DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12854] - The path for the font-matrix files is in unix format under windows

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE:

Arved Sandstrom wrote at 26 Sep 2002 19:50:01 -0300: > Tony Graham says that should be a Unicode character, or Char. As > in the actual real, encoded thing. Empirical evidence suggests that is the general understanding: grepping the XSL CR test suite shows everybody, FOP included, using litera

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13079] New: - PDFXObject made a very bad FOPImage.close() call

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re:

Tony, Thanks for responding. See below. Tony Graham wrote: > Arved Sandstrom wrote at 26 Sep 2002 19:50:01 -0300: > > Tony Graham says that should be a Unicode character, or Char. As > > in the actual real, encoded thing. > > Empirical evidence suggests that is the general understanding: >

fo wysiwig editor

Hi all. I wonder if I can get some help. I am currently using fo and fop to generate pdf documents for a large bank, and it works beautifully. We get the XML and apply a stylesheet to produce the document. However, we have a requirements that means our using should have the ability to edit the

Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

try http://www.xslfast.com Paul.Hussein@cha

RE : Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

Fop is free but for editing U pay ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : vendredi 27 septembre 2002 17:13 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Antwort: fo wysiwig editor try http://www.xslfast.com

RE: RE : Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

To the best of my knowledge, FOP is a Formatting Objects processor and renderer. There isn't a subproject in this group for a WYSIWIG FO editor. It would seem we're up to our gills in work working on FOP already. I'm certain that there's a desire out there for a free, open-source WYSIWIG FO

RE : Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

Big bank, I dont mind paying. "Gilles Crebassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 27/09/2002 16:29:56 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE : Antwort: fo wysiwig editor Fop is free but for editing U pay ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

I did. You have to save some sort of layout file. Whats that for ??? Al I want is an editor that that works with FO only. [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 27/09/2002 16:13:29 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor try http://www.xslfa

Re:

Peter B. West wrote: > Ok, so it's a character. How, then, is it represented? Is it also a > (of length one), or is it just a literal (length 1), or just an > NCName (length 1), or is it something else? Sorry for having sidetracked you with the NCName stuff, it is too restricted. For example

Re:

Peter B. West wrote at 28 Sep 2002 00:39:34 +1000: ... > Tony Graham wrote: ... > > Section 5.11, Property Datatypes, trumps the individual property > > definitions, since Section 5.11 defines "the syntax for specifying the > > datatypes usable in property values". It says "A single Unicode

RE: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

Paul Hussein wrote: > Al I want is an editor that that works with FO only. I don't know of anything out there right now that does what you are looking for. FO is not intended to be an editable format, but rather an intermediate format. The advantage to using FO is that it can be created pretty e

Re: convert tex to fop ?

Gilles Crebassa wrote: > I use now Latex (~1000 doc in tex) and I want using fop but : > You have a software for convert tex to fop ? If your software contains a nontrivial amount of mathmatical formulas and such stuff, just forget about converting to plain XSLFO. Converting to XSLFO with embedde

Re:

Out of the XML recomendation,section 2.2:         A character is an atomic unit of text as specified by ISO/IEC 10646 [ISO10646]. Legal characters are tab, carriage return, line feed, and the legal graphic characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646. or, more clearly:         Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #

Re:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 27 Sep 2002 16:44:32 -0300: > Out of the XML recomendation,section 2.2: > > A character is an atomic unit of text as specified by ISO/IEC > 10646 [ISO10646]. Legal characters are tab, > carriage return, line feed, and the legal graphic characters of Unicod

[Fwd: Re: Regarding your comment about on xsl-editors]

Original Message Subject: Re: Regarding your comment about on xsl-editors Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:00:53 -0500 From: Paul Grosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: xsl-editors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter, Unfortunatel