On 12.01.2003 11:40:57 Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
After having tried to understand how fop works by just reading the code for
a couple of hours now, FOrtress inevitably comes to my mind ;-)
(in the sense of: Not easy to get in, at least for a newbie)
:-) Unfortunately, Fortress is already
On 12.01.2003 04:59:36 Jeff Turner wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:43:37PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Jeff
I've applied your patches locally. Thanks. Everything's ok with the
first one, but with the second one I'm having problems (not your fault!):
- I had to add adjust the
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
I like it. First of all FOP is well-known among the whole xml
community for ages (what costs much) and secondly fop word has a
Yes, this is the primary consideration. The only reason why I mention it now
at all is that changing such things is always better done sooner
On Monday 13 January 2003 11:05, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.01.2003 11:40:57 Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
After having tried to understand how fop works by just reading the
code for a couple of hours now, FOrtress inevitably comes to my mind
;-) (in the sense of: Not easy to get in, at least
Victor Mote wrote:
It must be a cultural thing. The dictionary definition you gave should tell
the story well enough -- see the example felt contempt for the mincing
The word is a pejorative, but perhaps more so in my part of the world,
where calling someone a fop or a dandy might be
Peter B. West wrote:
Re my comment on this, I thought I should warn you that I am addicted to
ironical jokes, which can be a dangerous habit with email. I dislike
emoticons, probably because I am more of a snob than I like to admit,
but also because they seem to me to discourage any attempt
Victor Mote wrote:
We're OK. I caught your irony. My response was really entirely to Oleg's
question. However, I really was concerned about offending someone -- things
like names and logos carry a certain emotional weight.
In other words, I might worry about offending some on this list, but it
On Saturday 11 January 2003 20:13, Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
- Do we like our current logo? :-)
I hope I am not out of line to ask an even more fundamental question --
do we like our current name? I never have a problem writing it, but when
speaking it, I cannot make my
Hi Jeff
I've applied your patches locally. Thanks. Everything's ok with the
first one, but with the second one I'm having problems (not your fault!):
- I had to add adjust the inline DTD of skinconf.xml to include the role
attribute:
!ELEMENT credit (name, url, image, width?, height?)
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
- Do we like our current logo? :-)
That's a big question actually :) afair Keiron said the current logo
should be at least brighten to fit forrest-ed site design better or
suggested to make the logo contest. Should admit I spent a couple of
hours trying to implement my
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
- Do we like our current logo? :-)
Uh!
Should admit I spent a couple of
hours trying to implement my ideas about the logo (leading motifs were
medieval typographic dropcaps and a parrot as (imho) the most foppish
animal) but I'm too bad artist
J.Pietschmann wrote:
What about a TeX-parody?
+--- +--\
| | |
+-- /--\ +--/
| || |
| || |
||
\--/
Not bad, but what does it mean? (And does logo should mean anything?) :)
Colored as the current logo, or more in shades like the
Apache feather?
Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
- Do we like our current logo? :-)
I hope I am not out of line to ask an even more fundamental question -- do
we like our current name? I never have a problem writing it, but when
speaking it, I cannot make my mouth say fop, but invariably say
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:43:37PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Jeff
I've applied your patches locally. Thanks. Everything's ok with the
first one, but with the second one I'm having problems (not your fault!):
- I had to add adjust the inline DTD of skinconf.xml to include the role
Hi,
Running 'forrest validate' on CVS head, I get:
validate-xdocs:
/home/jeff/apache/xml/xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/design/alt.design/properties/enumerated-values.xml:211:63:
Element type code. must be declared.
15 matches
Mail list logo
