ne is not first in this
* LM and previous line end decision was not forced (LINEFEED),
* then set the SUPPRESS_LEADING_SPACE flag.
*/
Why are there those two exceptions to the suppression of leading space?
For example, in this fo fragment the leading space is not suppressed:
Some text.
Regards, Simon
--
Simon Pepping
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:38:20PM +0100, Finn Bock wrote:
> [J.Pietschmann]
>
> >>>Anybody dares to interpret how the followung is rendered?
> >>>
> >>> foo
> >>>>>>font-site="15pt">bar
> >>>I think this should generate two spaces between "foo" and "bar".
>
> [Andreas L. Delmelle]
>
[J.Pietschmann]
Anybody dares to interpret how the followung is rendered?
foo
bar
I think this should generate two spaces between "foo" and "bar".
[Andreas L. Delmelle]
One in 10pt, the other 15pt, or 2 spaces of 20pt?
[Simon Pepping]
I would think one space before foo according to the
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The space constraints probably (hopefully )only applies to
> space specifiers on the FOs itself, i.e if I had written
> ...
> Space characters ought to be another matter.
> Try:
>
> foo
> font-size
Simon Pepping wrote:
I see no space in the bar inline.
Dumb luck :-). Try:
foo
bar
J.Pietschmann
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 07:11:57PM +0100, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> > Anybody dares to interpret how the followung is rendered?
> >
> > foo
> > > font-site="15pt">bar
> > I think this should
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
I think this should generate two spaces between "foo" and "bar".
One in 10pt, the other 15pt, or 2 spaces of 20pt?
Yeah, I deliberately avoided this part of the answer...
So, it would depend on the space-specifiers, which are in this case
unspecified (no borders, no pad
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Anybody dares to interpret how the followung is rendered?
>
> foo
> font-site="15pt">bar
> I think this should generate two spaces between "foo" and "bar".
>
One in 10pt, the other 15pt, or 2 spaces
Finn Bock wrote:
I was taking a look at the issue where the text in a fo:block has a
leading space added. I thought that by default, the initial spaces and
LFs for such a block should be suppressed, but I can't quite find the
place in the spec where it is defined.
It is not explicitely spelled o
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In this case, there will never remain a single space as the result of the
> second step.
>
Which would, of course be a problem in case the space resulting from the
linefeed *does* need to be preserved...
(did
> -Original Message-
> From: Finn Bock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> , the text contains:
>
> 0x0a 0x20 0x20 0x20 0x20 0x20 0x20 0x20 0x20 0x54 0x68 0x69 0x73 ...
>
> the spaces surrounding the LF should be ignores:
>
> 0x0a 0x54 0x68 0x69 0x73 ...
>
> and the linefeed turned in
Hi,
I was taking a look at the issue where the text in a fo:block has a
leading space added. I thought that by default, the initial spaces and
LFs for such a block should be suppressed, but I can't quite find the
place in the spec where it is defined.
At least 3 properties comes into play:
wh
12 matches
Mail list logo
