Thanks,
it´s correct.
Paulo Benfatti
- Original Message -
From: "Rhett Aultman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: characters "<" and ">"
Isn't that < and > just lik
Isn't that < and > just like in HTML?
I think...
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulo Gustavo Benfatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: characters "<" and ">"
>
&g
Hi All,
How can i print the characters "<" and ">"
without FOP returns error.
Thanks,
Paulo Benfatti
Accenture - Brasil
- Message d'origine -
De : "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : 10 oct. 2002 20:40
> Patrick,
>
> I'm just trying to determine the limits. At the moment 1.3 is needed to
> compile, because of TrueType font support, although users may continue
> to run the results in their exis
Patrick,
I'm just trying to determine the limits. At the moment 1.3 is needed to
compile, because of TrueType font support, although users may continue
to run the results in their existing 1.2 environments. There has been
vigorous discussion for as long as I have subscribed to this list abou
- Message d'origine -
De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, you right about jdk1.3 - it remains to be seen, another alternatives
could
> be our own TR9 implementation (afaik renderx guys went this way last
summer,
> probably because they have to support jdk1.1 and ms jvm) or som
Peter B. West wrote:
> How is bidi support accessed in 1.3? Must you make your own
> determinations of directionality, or has the CDB BIDI data also been
> smuggled in?
Well, some bidi support was in swing packages a long time ago but it seems to
be intended entirely for system usage, e.g. ja
Patrick,
It remains to be seen how the 1.4 BIDI handling can be integrated with
FOP's layout, and how BIDI processing can be gracefully declined for
users not running 1.4. As Unicode and i18n are your strengths, I think
your input on this would be very valuable. Perhaps Oleg is already
cons
Oleg,
Thanks for this. I just had a look at java.text.Bidi, and was led
inexorably into java.awt.font, and from there back to bedrock -
java.lang.Character. It's Wonderland in there, and I haven't had time
to digest it, but it looks as though all of the attributes from the
Unicode character
- Message d'origine -
De : "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 17:27
Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
> patrick andries wrote:
> >>There are also various code points assigned
> >>to
patrick andries wrote:
>>There are also various code points assigned
>>to ligatures and presentation forms, for example U+FB01, which
>>could be used in the FO source (at the risk of confusing
>>hyphenation, spell checkers and others).
> Not a good idea, these code points are deprecated. Ligature
- Message d'origine -
De : "Victor Mote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 15:39
Objet : RE: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
> Patrick Andries wrote:
>
> > (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatur
- Message d'origine -
De : "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 15:30
Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
> patrick andries wrote:
> > (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (
Patrick Andries wrote:
> (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the
> substitution feature in Opentype) should be selected from fo ? I believe
> there is currently no such mechanism. Should we wait until another version
> of XSL-FO? Extensions ?
If I understand the OpenTyp
patrick andries wrote:
> (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the
> substitution feature in Opentype) should be selected from fo ? I believe
> there is currently no such mechanism. Should we wait until another version of
> XSL-FO? Extensions ?
IIRC the spec mentions i
- Message d'origine -
De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> patrick andries wrote:
> > Good, no need to help thus.
> I didn't say that! Volunteers are desperately needed, they are blood of
fop
> project, so if you are willing - you are welcome. Look at today's "New
> Developer Sug
patrick andries wrote:
> Good, no need to help thus.
I didn't say that! Volunteers are desperately needed, they are blood of fop
project, so if you are willing - you are welcome. Look at today's "New
Developer Suggestion" thread, for example.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Internat
Good, no need to help thus.
- Message d'origine -
De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 13:51
Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
> patrick andries wrote:
> > I'm willing to he
patrick andries wrote:
> I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support
> (contextualisation and bidi algorithms). Is someone else busy doing it ? Is
> the time ripe to do so ?
Implementation of bidi algorithm itself is not a problem as java has already
bidi support since jdk1.3 (it's
I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support
(contextualisation and bidi algorithms). Is someone else busy doing it ? Is
the time ripe to do so ?
> > - Message d'origine -
> > De : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> > (See attached file: example.fo)
> > (See attached file: fo
20 matches
Mail list logo
