On Jan 15, 2007, at 22:20, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
Not really sure what would be most efficient:
- a void method appending to a parameter StringBuffer
- a method returning a copy of the char[] from index to index...
Seen that every String ultimately has a backing char[](*) anyway,
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
On Jan 15, 2007, at 22:20, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
Not really sure what would be most efficient:
- a void method appending to a parameter StringBuffer
- a method returning a copy of the char[] from index to index...
Seen that every String ultimately
On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hadn't we agreed upon raising the minimum Java version to 1.4? Or at
least make a poll on fop-user to see if that would create any problem.
If that'd depend only on me, we would already be using all the Java
1.5
nice features ;-)
Vincent
On Jan 14, 2007, at 23:11, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
The SHY character will be presented to the hyphenator simply as a
character of the word it appears in. The hyphenator should then be
smart enough to recognize this as a special character, and do
something like:
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
BTW: I took a very quick look, and does anyone know if there is a good
reason why Hyphenation.word is a String?
The hyphenator interface goes through several wrapping layers,
probably due to the usual take working code and wrap it to fit
the caller method.
This which
On Jan 15, 2007, at 21:25, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
BTW: I took a very quick look, and does anyone know if there is a
good reason why Hyphenation.word is a String?
The hyphenator interface goes through several wrapping layers,
probably due to the usual take working
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
The SHY character will be presented to the
hyphenator simply as a character of the word it appears in. The
hyphenator should then be smart enough to recognize this as a special
character, and do something like: create a hyphenation point for the
SHY, ...
Just committed the initial support for the soft hyphen.
As we had two in favour of having the SHY always produce a break
opportunity and only one against that's the route I took.
I had no luck with giving the SHY a reduced penalty and have the Knuth
algorithm favour them before normal
On Jan 13, 2007, at 10:31, Manuel Mall wrote:
Hi Manuel,
Just committed the initial support for the soft hyphen.
Nice job, thanks!
As we had two in favour of having the SHY always produce a break
opportunity and only one against that's the route I took.
I had no luck with giving the SHY a
