Glen Mazza wrote:
Are you sure here? We had two versions of addALetterSpaceTo() --
the version in ILLM which takes a List (I didn't touch that one),
and a old (?) version from AbstractLayoutManager that takes a
KnuthElement. It is that latter version that I removed--it
wasn't being called
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm considering doing some work on the FOP viewer package.
The first patch has now been submitted.
The following improvements have been made:
1. Separated out the preview panels and control logic from the
buttons and dialog to make it easier to use elsewhere.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Victor,
I know you intended that. But use and further develop are two
different things. What I was getting at with the license grant thing is
the possibility to take your font code and put it FOP code repository
(or better XML Graphics Commons when it finally pops into existence,
still in the
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Just to be clear, these are the possibilities:
1. FOP uses FOray-Font (JAR file in lib directory), no
license grant necessary, no FOray sources in an ASF repository.
This is my preference.
2. FOP forks FOray-Font, license grants are necessary due to
ASF policy.
I
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Ideally, a font engine that is shared between two projects should be in
a more or less neutral place write-accessible by both parties but as
we've seen now there are personal dissonances.
I think Victor said he didn't want to collaborate anymore:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
To state my opinion on this matter:
I would like to see Vincent integrating FOray-Font into FOP.
There has been some work on fonts compared to the FOP
maintenance branch but Victor has invested more time in
FOray-Font. Victor's font subsystem is now technically more
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
To state my opinion on this matter:
I would like to see Vincent integrating FOray-Font into FOP.
There has been some work on fonts compared to the FOP
maintenance branch but Victor has invested more time in
FOray-Font. Victor's font subsystem is now technically more
Glen Mazza wrote:
I think Victor said he didn't want to collaborate anymore:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=111263144615399w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=111265443425492w=2
Even those on this list who are not native English speakers will be able to
easily understand
Glen Mazza wrote:
I think Victor said he didn't want to collaborate anymore:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=111263144615399w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=111265443425492w=2
Even those on this list who are not native English speakers will be able to
easily understand
Thanks, Glen, for your statement earlier. And I apologize for jumping to
early conclusions about your expected behaviour. I've been burnt a few
times so I get jumpy.
Victor, your offer for write access on FOray for qualified developers is
greatly appreciated and does away with some of my fears
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The logging problem is a minor one. There's a wrapper for JCL
that easily wraps an Avalon Logger [1]. But that's obviously
the exact opposite of what you need. On the other side,
creating an implementation of Avalon's Logger interface that
wraps a JCL logger should
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Ok, but this assumes that you work in concert with AWT's font
subsystem.
If we talk about the font subsystem for PDF and PS we have
all liberties we want. If we can give the FO processor a
directory and it makes all the fonts in this directory
available for FO
Thanks for the helping our project Richard! FOP/XSL is a fascinating
mathematical equation, and the clearer and rawer we can make that
equation, the more it will attract the best computer scientists and
mathematicians from around the world to help us work on determining it.
Reading your
On 14.06.2005 17:29:01 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The logging problem is a minor one. There's a wrapper for JCL
that easily wraps an Avalon Logger [1]. But that's obviously
the exact opposite of what you need. On the other side,
creating an implementation of Avalon's
On 14.06.2005 17:59:03 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Ok, but this assumes that you work in concert with AWT's font
subsystem.
If we talk about the font subsystem for PDF and PS we have
all liberties we want. If we can give the FO processor a
directory and it makes all
The receipt of Richard's ICLA has now been documented:
+notinavail:Richard Wheeldon:Richard Wheeldon:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Signed CLA
I'll review his patch tomorrow. I'll also take care of the german and
french translations.
On 14.06.2005 14:13:02 richardw wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Most people will want to point the auto-registration to
C:\WINDOWS\FONTS.
Mine has 581 files in it, each of which would have to be opened and
partially parsed. I actually use no more than 10-15 for FO work. I
think this might actually open up a bunch of
Lalitha Prasad wrote:
Hi Pietschmann,
font metrics-file=C:\Java\Tomcat-4.1\webapps\glaxo\arialuni.xml
This must be a proper URL, not a file name.
font-triplet name=ArialUnicodeMS style=normal weight=normal/
font-triplet name=ArialUnicodeMS
On 14.06.2005 23:27:44 J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Relying on static
variables in the case of logging is not necessarily bad.
*cough* This depends on whether a single logger for all threads
is not necessarily bad. I personally would probably prefer the
possibility to
Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Just to be clear, these are the possibilities:
1. FOP uses FOray-Font (JAR file in lib directory), no
license grant necessary, no FOray sources in an ASF repository.
This is my preference.
2. FOP forks FOray-Font, license grants are necessary
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 14.06.2005 17:59:03 Victor Mote wrote:
That whole idea deserves more thought and experimentation,
and I haven't had time to work on the font system since October.
Victor, I have been experiencing similar frustrations, and Jenni and I
are moving to the UK for 12
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Ok, but this assumes that you work in concert with AWT's font subsystem.
Well, AWT doesn't provide a way to get the file for a font, but
we can at least get an AWT Font from a TTF file.
And a Type1 file (Java 5). Java just keeps getting better.
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
I was starting to wonder what I could have done wrong so that things
turn out that way.
Just ignore the bickering for now. There seems to be a law that every
Open Source project (or any other reasonably open project for that
matter) sooner or
Let's not even start discussing the intellectual property implications that are
starting to surface...
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 6/14/2005 9:22 PM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Foray's font subsystem for Fop
25 matches
Mail list logo
