On Aug 31, 2006, at 17:44, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Would it be ok for everybody if I placed the newly-created FOP poster
under src/documentation/poster? I mean the sources, of course. We
could
also place a web-optimized PDF (i.e. without 1MB output profile) on
the
FOP website.
+1 from me
ote:
> > Would it be ok for everybody if I placed the newly-created FOP poster
> > under src/documentation/poster? I mean the sources, of course. We could
> > also place a web-optimized PDF (i.e. without 1MB output profile) on the
> > FOP website.
>
> In the repository, d
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Would it be ok for everybody if I placed the newly-created FOP poster
> under src/documentation/poster? I mean the sources, of course. We could
> also place a web-optimized PDF (i.e. without 1MB output profile) on the
>
Would it be ok for everybody if I placed the newly-created FOP poster
under src/documentation/poster? I mean the sources, of course. We could
also place a web-optimized PDF (i.e. without 1MB output profile) on the
FOP website.
Jeremias Maerki
Thanks for your suggestions!
On 29.08.2006 00:51:09 Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Hi Jeremias.
>
> Jeremias Maerki:
> > Thanks, Andreas, Manuel, Jay, Vincent, Glen, Simon, for all your
> > suggestions, corrections and nitpicking. I've incorporated almost all
> > points. The new version is now upload
Cameron McCormack:
> - In “Project History”, “was quickly adopted by many” sounds better
> than “quickly got adopted by many”. Also “prevented important
> features to be implemented” -> “prevent important features from
> being implemented”.
I meant to type “prevented important featu
Hi Jeremias.
Jeremias Maerki:
> Thanks, Andreas, Manuel, Jay, Vincent, Glen, Simon, for all your
> suggestions, corrections and nitpicking. I've incorporated almost all
> points. The new version is now uploaded at the same location as before.
Nice looking poster! I have some suggestions, too:
Thanks, Andreas, Manuel, Jay, Vincent, Glen, Simon, for all your
suggestions, corrections and nitpicking. I've incorporated almost all
points. The new version is now uploaded at the same location as before.
On 28.08.2006 00:39:55 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Gang,
>
> I've finally finished (more or l
Jeremias,
It is very nice. I like the way you have managed to get a complete
business card example on the poster.
A few remarks:
Tab 'Introduction'. I am a bit hesitant about this title. It is more a
title for a chapter. 'Introducing Apache FOP' or 'What is Apache
FOP?' may be better alternative
2006/8/28, Jeremias Maerki:
Gang,
I've finally finished (more or less anyway) the poster I plan to put up
at OpenExpo on 2006-09-20. I'd appreciate if someone could take a quick
peek and tell me if it's looking too ugly or if there are any spelling
mistakes. The logos may seem a bit dark on scre
e, though I think your poster will be
stronger if you don't.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 5:39 PM
Subject: FOP Poster
> Gang,
>
> I've finally fi
vices
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 5:39 PM
Subject: FOP Poster
> Gang,
>
> I've finally finished (more or less anyway) the poster I plan to put up
> at OpenExpo on 2006-09-20. I'd apprecia
On Monday 28 August 2006 06:39, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Gang,
>
> I've finally finished (more or less anyway) the poster I plan to put
> up at OpenExpo on 2006-09-20. I'd appreciate if someone could take a
> quick peek and tell me if it's looking too ugly or if there are any
> spelling mistakes. T
On Aug 28, 2006, at 00:39, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've finally finished (more or less anyway) the poster I plan to
put up
at OpenExpo on 2006-09-20. I'd appreciate if someone could take a
quick
peek and tell me if it's looking too ugly
Not at all, looks really good!
or if there are any s
Gang,
I've finally finished (more or less anyway) the poster I plan to put up
at OpenExpo on 2006-09-20. I'd appreciate if someone could take a quick
peek and tell me if it's looking too ugly or if there are any spelling
mistakes. The logos may seem a bit dark on screen, but they look fine in
prin
15 matches
Mail list logo
