Now that I got my memory back, I was actually the one starting the vote
to remove all this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=111079476222548&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111558789900011&r=1&w=2
I got tired of dealing with the licensing hell on hyphenation patterns.
I hated this so
Simon Pepping wrote:
In spring of this year it was proposed that all hyphenation patterns
be removed from fop and only be made available by OFFO.
I must have missed something: FOP is supposed to be distributed
without any hyphenation patterns at all?
I support augmentation by external projects
Damn. Right. Bloody details. Does anyone know where I can get a decent
brain upgrade or replacement? Anybody been lucky on ebay or something
like that? I hate forgetting stuff like that all the time.
On 14.08.2005 21:56:21 Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 07:43:36PM +0200, J.Pietschm
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 07:43:36PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >I think the hyphenation patterns were supposed to be in the fop-hyph.jar
> >which can be used or replaced by the one offered by OFFO. AFAIK, there's
> >no need for a fop.xconf to be compiled into the fop.jar
On 14.08.2005 19:43:36 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>1. IIRC Ant allows property definitions outside tasks
> > Just do it. :-)
>
> Well, there's still my antiquated ant-fu... I'd like to tap the
> collective wisdom, just in case I missed something important.
I'd have said if
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
1. IIRC Ant allows property definitions outside tasks
Just do it. :-)
Well, there's still my antiquated ant-fu... I'd like to tap the
collective wisdom, just in case I missed something important.
In particular with regard to the directory layout:
how stable should it
Not a bad idea, I think. Jörg?
On 14.08.2005 04:43:29 Manuel Mall wrote:
> One minor item to add. I have modified my local build.xml to include
> source="1.3" in the javac element. This means the bytecode my Java 5.0
> environment generates at least runs under 1.4 and 1.3. This mainly
> helps m
On 14.08.2005 00:27:20 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Hi devs,
> after some cleanup, there are still some things in build.xml
> which irritate me a bit. Mainly it's style. Unfortunately, my
> ant-fu hasn't been updated much since Ant 1.3 was the actual
> version.
> 1. IIRC Ant allows property definitions
One minor item to add. I have modified my local build.xml to include
source="1.3" in the javac element. This means the bytecode my Java 5.0
environment generates at least runs under 1.4 and 1.3. This mainly
helps me to switch between 5.0 and 1.4 without having to recompile. I
wonder if this cha
Hi devs,
after some cleanup, there are still some things in build.xml
which irritate me a bit. Mainly it's style. Unfortunately, my
ant-fu hasn't been updated much since Ant 1.3 was the actual
version.
1. IIRC Ant allows property definitions outside tasks sinc,
umm, 1.4 or so. None of the propert
10 matches
Mail list logo