Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 14.08.2005 00:27:20 J.Pietschmann wrote: Hi devs, after some cleanup, there are still some things in build.xml which irritate me a bit. Mainly it's style. Unfortunately, my ant-fu hasn't been updated much since Ant 1.3 was the actual version. 1. IIRC Ant allows property definitions

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Not a bad idea, I think. Jörg? On 14.08.2005 04:43:29 Manuel Mall wrote: One minor item to add. I have modified my local build.xml to include source=1.3 in the javac element. This means the bytecode my Java 5.0 environment generates at least runs under 1.4 and 1.3. This mainly helps me to

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: 1. IIRC Ant allows property definitions outside tasks Just do it. :-) Well, there's still my antiquated ant-fu... I'd like to tap the collective wisdom, just in case I missed something important. In particular with regard to the directory layout: how stable should it

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 14.08.2005 19:43:36 J.Pietschmann wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: 1. IIRC Ant allows property definitions outside tasks Just do it. :-) Well, there's still my antiquated ant-fu... I'd like to tap the collective wisdom, just in case I missed something important. I'd have said if I had

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread Simon Pepping
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 07:43:36PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I think the hyphenation patterns were supposed to be in the fop-hyph.jar which can be used or replaced by the one offered by OFFO. AFAIK, there's no need for a fop.xconf to be compiled into the fop.jar

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Damn. Right. Bloody details. Does anyone know where I can get a decent brain upgrade or replacement? Anybody been lucky on ebay or something like that? I hate forgetting stuff like that all the time. On 14.08.2005 21:56:21 Simon Pepping wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 07:43:36PM +0200,

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread J.Pietschmann
Simon Pepping wrote: In spring of this year it was proposed that all hyphenation patterns be removed from fop and only be made available by OFFO. I must have missed something: FOP is supposed to be distributed without any hyphenation patterns at all? I support augmentation by external

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Now that I got my memory back, I was actually the one starting the vote to remove all this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=111079476222548w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111558789900011r=1w=2 I got tired of dealing with the licensing hell on hyphenation patterns. I hated this so

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-13 Thread Manuel Mall
One minor item to add. I have modified my local build.xml to include source=1.3 in the javac element. This means the bytecode my Java 5.0 environment generates at least runs under 1.4 and 1.3. This mainly helps me to switch between 5.0 and 1.4 without having to recompile. I wonder if this