https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49835
--- Comment #3 from Jeremias Maerki 2010-09-07 03:02:34
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25995)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25995)
Reduced test case
I've reduced the test case to the minimum (attached). It
ok; but is there any reason not to commit the patch to permit those who find
maven useful to use it? there are many features in FOP that cater to
specific interests, why not permit that with the build process as well?
regards,
glenn
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Well,
Because I want to hear other opinions from the other committers first.
So far, none of the others responded. And I've stated in the past I
won't spend any more time on anything Maven-related, so I'm unlikely to
process the patch myself. I won't veto the addition but I certainly
won't spend any time
By the way, I live in a third world country (Philippines) with highly
variable connectivity and usually get no more than 20-30kB/s for downloads.
Furthermore, I don't have an IT infrastructure or servers, but am using an
isolated Macbook Pro for my work. Yet, with all that, I have not had any
parti
That's reasonable. I wasn't asking you to personally commit it. I would
commit it myself if I had the privileges, but am dependent on the good
graces of other committers at present. Perhaps someone will volunteer.
G.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Because I want to hear
On 7/09/2010 1:52 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Well, Ivy has one fundamental problem in common with Maven that many regard
as a great feature: the repository. Numerous times, I couldn't get a Maven
build to complete successfully because some artifact was temporarily or
permanently unavailable.
Fi
On 07.09.2010 09:56:00 Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 7/09/2010 1:52 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Well, Ivy has one fundamental problem in common with Maven that many regard
> > as a great feature: the repository. Numerous times, I couldn't get a Maven
> > build to complete successfully because some ar
Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn/Jeremias,
I've already implemented in my complex scripts work, so it will make it
into trunk in due time. However, I think I'll leave the default setting
as it is for the time being. Users can explicitly enable it via their
config. We can take up the issue of wheth
On 7/09/2010 4:40 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I guess we're in a "religious" dispute here, like PC vs. Mac. So we
can't expect to reach a consensus.
Well, certainly a discussion of preference. I know it gets religious for
some Java folks, but myself I don't mind too much so long as nobody
tri
Agreed. That is why I thought it best not to change that, while still adding
the ability for the user to configure it.
G.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Chris Bowditch
wrote:
> Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> Hi Glenn/Jeremias,
>
>
> I've already implemented in my complex scripts work, so it will make
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Due to its inflexibility, projects are
> almost forced to adopt it to keep everyone happy, just because Maven
> can't include a simple JAR that is not in a repository.
Perhaps this has changed, because while I was debugging a problem with
I want to inject one fact, and one collection of experience, but I'm still
not trying to talk anyone into anything.
Fact: the Apache Software Foundation maintains a comprehensive maven
infrastructure. There is a repository manager, there are standard parent
POMS. All projects that use Maven get th
On 7/09/2010 7:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I've never seen a message to one of the mailing lists
complaining that connectivity issues were making people miserable. Why? You
need connectivity to update from svn. Then you need connectivity to run a
build.
... and to get any libraries or other
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:44:37PM +0800, Glenn Adams wrote:
> That's reasonable. I wasn't asking you to personally commit it. I would
> commit it myself if I had the privileges, but am dependent on the good
> graces of other committers at present. Perhaps someone will volunteer.
> On Tue, Sep 7,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:47:16PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
> Meh. I'd like to see maven support in fop, but I'm not working with
> fop's code much at all so it's hardly something I can claim any say
> in. Maybe I should bash together an ant task to spit out Maven
> artifacts after a build, th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49885
Jeremias Maerki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Please, please, please do not create a new ant task from scratch :-).
Simon, I will have a look presently and see if I have any assistance to
offer.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:47:16PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> >
> > Meh. I'd like to see m
17 matches
Mail list logo
