Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-21 Thread Glenn Adams
t; It's likely though this will never result in it being close to either OTF >> or TTF levels of performance. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Robert >> >> > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:33:52 +0100 >> > From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-21 Thread Chris Bowditch
ther OTF or TTF levels of performance. Best Regards, Robert > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:33:52 +0100 > From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com > To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support > > Hi Rob, > > You've done a great job in developin

RE: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-21 Thread Robert Meyer
configuration. Regards, Robert Meyer > Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:26:23 +0100 > From: vhenneb...@gmail.com > To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support > > The code has certainly improved since last time. Now glyph names are > being used direct

Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-20 Thread Vincent Hennebert
The code has certainly improved since last time. Now glyph names are being used directly, without any round-trip to Unicode code point and back to character code. This is great as it simplifies the code quite a bit and makes it more robust. The PostScript parser hasn’t changed so my concerns abou

RE: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-20 Thread Simon Steiner
Hi, +1 Thanks From: Luis Bernardo [mailto:lmpmberna...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 May 2014 00:19 To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support +1 It would be desirable to add the six letter prefix to the font name so that Adobe Reader (and other

Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-17 Thread Luis Bernardo
+1 It would be desirable to add the six letter prefix to the font name so that Adobe Reader (and other viewers) flag the font as being subset. But I tested with new fonts and worked well. On 5/14/14, 10:22 AM, Robert Meyer wrote: Hi All, Following on from the last failed vote for adding Ty

Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-16 Thread Clay Leeds
t in it being close to either OTF or TTF levels > of performance. > > Best Regards, > > Robert > > > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:33:52 +0100 > > From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com > > To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset sup

RE: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-16 Thread Robert Meyer
result in it being close to either OTF or TTF levels of performance. Best Regards, Robert > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:33:52 +0100 > From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com > To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support > > Hi Rob, > > You

Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-16 Thread Chris Bowditch
Hi Rob, You've done a great job in developing this feature. Before voting though I'd like to understand why the default is not to subset Type 1 fonts. Most users will want the smallest output file size possible. Not enabling it by default is also inconsistent with True Type fonts, whose defau

Re: [VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-14 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hi, here is my +1 2014-05-14 11:22 GMT+02:00 Robert Meyer : > Hi All, > > Following on from the last failed vote for adding Type 1 subset support, I > have now put forward a modified patch and am ready to try this again. The > patch went up on Monday to address the issues and comments made by Vin

[VOTE] Add Type 1 subset support

2014-05-14 Thread Robert Meyer
Hi All, Following on from the last failed vote for adding Type 1 subset support, I have now put forward a modified patch and am ready to try this again. The patch went up on Monday to address the issues and comments made by Vincent and Luis. This vote will last 5 working days and will finish ne