Why used FOP instead of...

2002-02-01 Thread Patrick Andries
I would like to know why FOP enthousiast (I am one) are using FO rather than products such as Crystal Reports or other such software (anyone Jetfoms ?). Just for the fun of playing with new technology ? Thanks for any hints (in private since this is off-topic) Patrick Andries

Re: Why used FOP instead of...

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
FOP does almost all we need. What's missing can be added, since it's OpenSource, right? We're currently working on a project for an insurance company where Compuset is used and is to be replaced by an XML/XSLT/XSL:FO-based approach. One of the reasons for this decision was using freely available

Re: Why used FOP instead of...

2002-02-01 Thread Carlos Araya
When I started working with Docbook, Passivetex was a mistery to me and RenderX was not on the map yet. I've set up all my tool chains to work with Fop as the PDF/PS/PCL rederer so I don't see a reason to change. However there are still times when I'm about to shell out money and spend it on

Re: Why used FOP instead of...

2002-02-01 Thread Patrick Andries
Interesting, I also have experience in Compuset. Do you known Mr. Bulman ? Are you happy with FO's speed ? So do I understand that Jetform does not produce clean PS ? Isn't it easier to use as FO (I do nor really know Jetform) ? Is it expensive ? Thanks a lot (when you have some time).

Re: Why used FOP instead of...

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Interesting, I also have experience in Compuset. Do you known Mr. Bulman ? I personally don't have any experience with Compuset. Sorry. Are you happy with FO's speed ? No. But that doesn't matter so much at the moment, because we will start small and have designed our solution to be scalable

Re: Why used FOP instead of...

2002-02-01 Thread Cyril Rognon
FO offers a way to produce high quality documents way beyond Crystal Reports possibility. If your needs are entirely fullfiled by tools like Crystal Report, I suggest you stick to it or advise your customer/user to do so. On the other hand, If you have to deal with more sophisticated needs, or

XML, XSL a real problem

2002-02-01 Thread Zahigian, Mike
Has anybody managed to get a Java Servlet to accept xml, xsl stylesheet including fo and render to pdf? I've been struggling for days and am running out of time before I have to abandon FOP for this project. If possible, include your xml, xsl, and servlet code so I can work from there. Thanks in

Re: XML, XSL a real problem

2002-02-01 Thread Scott Moore
Yes, at least the XML part. The XSLT is on the server so the client doesn't send it, but I could get it exactly the same way I get the XML. What exactly are you having problems with? Writing the servlet code to retrieve an XML document from a POST? Scott - Original Message - From:

RE: XML, XSL a real problem

2002-02-01 Thread Zahigian, Mike
My problem seems to be in the transformation of the xml and xsl stylesheet (which includes fo elements). My servlet takes an fo document fine, but my problem is I need it to take xml (either in a stream or a file) and an xsl stylesheet that can format the xml very specifically for print. I get a

What do these errors mean?

2002-02-01 Thread Carlos
I'm working with fop 0.20.3rc using the Docbook XSL stylesheets version 1.48. I'm getting the following errors: [ERROR]: Error in column-width property value '33%': org.apache.fop.fo.expr.PropertyException: No conversion defined [ERROR]: At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be

Namespace not supported

2002-02-01 Thread Zahigian, Mike
When I try and perform an xml/xsl transformation with the FopServlet I get a FOPException: Namespace not supported. Rendering an fo file with the servlet works. Anyone know how to fix this issue? If we can solve this issue maybe we should include the improved example code in the distribution