RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Michiel Verhoef
$ -Original Message- $ From: Cox, Charlie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: donderdag 27 juni 2002 13:57 $ To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' $ Subject: RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop $ $ $ why can't you do multiple transformations? the first $ transformation will $ transform the

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Cox, Charlie
le to change the XML, but you can change what you do with it :) Charlie > -Original Message- > From: Michiel Verhoef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:43 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop > >

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Michiel Verhoef
a preprocessor using XSLT and transform the "xml" to a fo file and then feed this to fop. $ -Original Message- $ From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: donderdag 27 juni 2002 11:36 $ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Subject: Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop $ $ $ So, just

Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
which looks exactly like the tree we need when written to a file. Humm... need to thyink about that one for a while... $ -Original Message- $ From: Michiel Verhoef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: donderdag 27 juni 2002 8:02 $ To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' $ Subject: RE: Weird behaviou

Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
riting templates :-( Were we able to use Perl I'd have it done in a couple of lines days ago, but alas, we can't :-) Michiel $ -Original Message- $ From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2002 16:35 $ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Subject: Re: Wei

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Michiel Verhoef
om: Michiel Verhoef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: donderdag 27 juni 2002 8:10 $ To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' $ Subject: RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop $ $ $ Perhaps to stress unneccessary: the transformation as such does work. $ $ Guessing from the information so far it looks like we&#x

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Michiel Verhoef
for a while... $ -Original Message- $ From: Michiel Verhoef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: donderdag 27 juni 2002 8:02 $ To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' $ Subject: RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop $ $ $ I'm afraid a slight mistake has been made in WJ's answer: our $

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-27 Thread Michiel Verhoef
o, but alas, we can't :-) Michiel $ -Original Message- $ From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2002 16:35 $ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Subject: Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop $ $ $ Just curious - why are you processing input as string instead of tree? $ x

Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-26 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Just curious - why are you processing input as string instead of tree? xslt is not text processing language, it's intended for tree transformations. I believe this string processing example is a very convolute analogue of 3 simple xslt templates: Moreover, these t

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-26 Thread Willem-Jan van den Bichelaer
Hi, The problem is when we use our template to filter HTML style codes (e.g. ,,), FOP does not do what we want it to do. We use the following template to achieve this:

Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-25 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Michiel Verhoef wrote: Yesterday I removed the CDATA sections like Oleg advised and now I knew again why we added the CDATA sections: without the CDATA sections our html filter template did not work properly. We could generate PDF but the underlined, bold and italic texts were just plain text. What

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-25 Thread Michiel Verhoef
PROTECTED] $ Sent: maandag 24 juni 2002 21:46 $ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Subject: Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop $ $ $ Michiel Verhoef wrote: $ > Hi all, $ > $ > Currently we have a weird problem: when converting an XML $ file (or rather, $ > an XML-ified HML source) to a FO file an

Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-24 Thread J.Pietschmann
Michiel Verhoef wrote: Hi all, Currently we have a weird problem: when converting an XML file (or rather, an XML-ified HML source) to a FO file and converting this resulting FO file to a PDF all things are fine. However, when we try to convert the XML with the exact same XSL script into a PDF we

RE: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-24 Thread Michiel Verhoef
et the way you suggested and see what happens (although that's how I started out) Michiel $ -Original Message- $ From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Sent: maandag 24 juni 2002 17:12 $ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Subject: Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop $ $ $ Your xsl s

Re: Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-24 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Your xsl stylesheet is so bizarre... What are you using all these CDATA sections for? Why are you using instead of just ? Actually your xsl stylesheet works if and only if transformation result (fo document) is serialized and then reparsed again, because what are you creating by all these CDAT

Weird behaviour of Apache fop

2002-06-24 Thread Michiel Verhoef
Hi all, Currently we have a weird problem: when converting an XML file (or rather, an XML-ified HML source) to a FO file and converting this resulting FO file to a PDF all things are fine. However, when we try to convert the XML with the exact same XSL script into a PDF we get errors: [INFO]: F