Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The triplet associates the name, style and weight with a particular font.
You can associate multiple triplets with one font. So if you use
"Frutiger45Light"
in the triplet, you have to use "Frutiger45Light" in the FO, not "Frutiger 45
Light".
You could, for example, do t
Most probably, the problem you experience is simply to do the missing
spaces in the font-triplet. You specified "Frutiger45Light" in the
configuration, but "Frutiger 45 Light" in the FO.
More details below.
On 24.11.2007 17:03:15 Diana Walther wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've got trouble using custom
Hi there,
I've got trouble using customized fonts with FOP 0.94 on a Windows XP
machine. My java version is: 1.6.02.
I know the problem has been discussed before. However, none of the
suggestions given here or in other mailing lists or forums worked for
me.
My problem:
---
I get an erro
Chris Bowditch wrote:
I thought the command was basically the same for all fonts, except
where .ttc collections were involved. I was (and still am)
considering writing some magic code which autocreates the metrics when
a new font is discovered.
No need ;) such code already exists in FOP trun
Daniel Noll wrote:
Thomas Zastrow wrote:
I agree. I didn't thought of bundling FOP directly with the fonts.
Instead, they could be put on another webpage and the user can download
them optional. It was just an idea, as it was some labour to build the
metrics for my preferred fonts ;-)
I tho
Thomas Zastrow wrote:
I agree. I didn't thought of bundling FOP directly with the fonts.
Instead, they could be put on another webpage and the user can download
them optional. It was just an idea, as it was some labour to build the
metrics for my preferred fonts ;-)
I thought the command was b
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thomas Zastrow a écrit :
>
>
>> Sorry for that, but I'm not realy satisfied with the fonts which are
>> implemented in the FOP, so I converted some of my most beloved free /
>> OpenSource fonts. When the license of the font allows it, it would be
>> nic
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Zastrow a écrit :
> Sorry for that, but I'm not realy satisfied with the fonts which are
> implemented in the FOP, so I converted some of my most beloved free /
> OpenSource fonts. When the license of the font allows it, it would be
> nice to have something like an additional fo
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
>
>>> OK, I added . to the fop.xconf. But the result is
>>> the same ... btw., I'm not sure which directory is meant with "."?
>>>
>> Errm, if I'm correct then the "." is to be interpreted as relative to
>> the source document...
>>
>
> Actually it corres
Hi,
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
> On Apr 14, 2007, at 20:55, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
>
>> Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
>>> On Apr 14, 2007, at 17:41, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
>>>
The files LinLibertine.xml and LinLibertineU-Re-2.2.5.ttf are in the
root-directory of the FOP (version 0.93)
On Apr 14, 2007, at 23:12, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
In any case, now that you mention it, it does seem to lean towards
bad
practice to use a relative url as base-url for anything... :/
I solved the "problem": I used absolute paths, which is - in my
oppinion
- ju
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2007, at 20:55, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
>
>> Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
>>> On Apr 14, 2007, at 17:41, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
>>>
The files LinLibertine.xml and LinLibertineU-Re-2.2.5.ttf are in the
root-directory of the FOP (version 0.93). The bas
On Apr 14, 2007, at 20:55, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 14, 2007, at 17:41, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
The files LinLibertine.xml and LinLibertineU-Re-2.2.5.ttf are in the
root-directory of the FOP (version 0.93). The base-tag in the
config-file is untouched, it is still
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2007, at 17:41, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
>
>>
>> The files LinLibertine.xml and LinLibertineU-Re-2.2.5.ttf are in the
>> root-directory of the FOP (version 0.93). The base-tag in the
>> config-file is untouched, it is still .
>
> Keep in mind that they are inf
On Apr 14, 2007, at 17:41, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
The files LinLibertine.xml and LinLibertineU-Re-2.2.5.ttf are in the
root-directory of the FOP (version 0.93). The base-tag in the
config-file is untouched, it is still .
Keep in mind that they are influenced by . I /think/ both
of them. At
Hi there,
I try to use another TTF font with the FOP. As described here:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/fonts.html, I build the metric
file which seems to have worked without problems (LinLibertine.xml).
Now, I added the following to the font-section of conf/fop.xconf:
16 matches
Mail list logo
