cbowditch wrote:
>
> What version of FOP are you using? Can you attach a sample FO File that
> can be used to demonstrate the issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
I'm using FOP 0.95. I've attached a stripped down FO file that illustrates
the issue.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p27989770/test.fo tes
JoshC wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm using FOP to generate RTF output. The problem I'm having is that FOP
adds a space after each of the following three characters in RTF output: { }
\. In PDF output it does not add spaces after these characters. It seems to
only be on these characters, though I haven'
Hi Vincent,
great :-) But the Stylesheet for generating an OpenOffice- or better
OpenDocument has not finished at all. That's a pitty :-(
Have you tried to open an OpenDocument-file in Microsoft Word? Most users are
using word (a terrible application) and want to have a modifiable document
whic
Hi,
leeloo5e79-devel yahoo de a écrit :
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> you are correct: RTF is a terrible format. But seems to be the only way to
> get a modifiable document. There are also tools like which convert PDF to
> Word-Documents. But these tools also had the problem in correct converting
> PDF.
Hi Jeremias,
you are correct: RTF is a terrible format. But seems to be the only way to get
a modifiable document. There are also tools like which convert PDF to
Word-Documents. But these tools also had the problem in correct converting PDF.
In this case I'm using DocBook to create complex docu
Hi Adrian,
sorry for my late reply. Seems my email-provider are sorting out some messages.
I just find the list on nabbles.com.
I used Microsoft Word to display the generated RTF-Output. So I assumed
Microsoft Word would display the RTF in the correct way. But seems it didn't.
Because of your
Let me start by stating that RTF is a terrible format to begin with
(well, that's a personal opinion). Generally, it's not possible to map
every feature in XSL-FO into RTF. But then, RTF is probably also the
weakest output format in Apache FOP. I would only recommend RTF output
for relatively simpl
Hi Kerstin,
Sorry but could you be a little more descriptive of the problem you are
having? Providing some FO source examples would be of great help in
examining any problems you are experiencing with the RTF output.
Incidentally which RTF viewing application are you using to display/test
th
On Oct 25, 2005, at 00:20, Tony Morris wrote:
I don't have my test case with me, since I am at work at the moment.
Otherwise, what I recall is setting the size of an external-graphic
to the
exact number of pixels (I think if I didn't, the RTF renderer
wasn't happy),
the image appeared scale
> Tony Morris escribió:
>
>> Thanks, by explicitly setting a width and height, the problem
>> disappeared - it only occurred for the RTF renderer (though I only
>> tried the PDF one as well). The sizes themselves seem to be a tad
>> obscure though.
Tony, can you be a bit more precise as to what yo
On Oct 22, 2005, at 15:01, Glen Mazza wrote:
I wonder if setting the margins on the fo:region-body (instead of
the fo:external-graphic) would also have solved this. The example
you gave had an empty without dimensions, but
you may have been just abbreviating the sample by removing those
I wonder if setting the margins on the fo:region-body (instead of the
fo:external-graphic) would also have solved this. The example you gave
had an empty without dimensions, but you may have
been just abbreviating the sample by removing those dimensions.
Glen
Tony Morris escribió:
Thanks
Thanks, by explicitly setting a width and height, the problem
disappeared - it only occurred for the RTF renderer (though I only
tried the PDF one as well). The sizes themselves seem to be a tad
obscure though.
At 07:32 PM 22/10/2005, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Oct 22, 2005, at 11:12, Tony
On Oct 22, 2005, at 11:12, Tony Morris wrote:
Hi,
I attempt to generate RTF using the Ant task:
force="true"/>
I receive the following error:
[fop] 22/10/2005 19:04:42 org.apache.fop.fo.properties.EnumLength
getValue
[fop] SEVERE: getValue() called on AUTO length
[fop] 22/10/2005 19:04:42
14 matches
Mail list logo
