Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 12/6/17, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > If there was 1 "modern" view (i.e. with boxes) but with a 2-lines setup, > with the first line > for commit message in the "normal" font, and a second for the meta-data and > links in a > smaller font with a bit less visibility (to

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 12/5/17, Reimer Behrends wrote: > > Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Which is better? > >> > >>A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > >>B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > > > > I don't

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:27:28 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: Please keep a close eye on the Fossil website and report any usability issues. just a thought: could/should the boxes+checkin messages be indented, reflecting the horizontal position of the respective branch in the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 12/5/17, Reimer Behrends wrote: > Richard Hipp wrote: >> Which is better? >> >>A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline >>B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > > I don't see much of a difference, Thanks for looking. But the original question is old, and the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

I agree. Why does the [brief-hash] need to be a hyperlink and bracketed when the Timeline time stamp has the same link? On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Reimer Behrends wrote: > Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Which is better? >> >>A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline >>

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Richard Hipp wrote: Which is better? A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline I don't see much of a difference, to be honest (but that may be because I'm late to the party and the layouts have changed during the past days). The

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 2017-11-24 9:35, Richard Hipp wrote: Which is better? A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline They both use too much vertical screen space, IMO. Also: A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c B:

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Jungle Boogie on Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:08:58 -0800: > In which mode? I think this is only an issue in the compact mode, > right? Yes, after further experimentation, the problem only exists with the Compact mode. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005a1fa5b8

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Focusing on the Compact view: Is there any chance to limit the click action to just the ellipses? And to revert, click on the added content, Ex. "check-in:" or "user:". As others mentioned, it is annoying when selecting text from the comments to have the background action. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 11/29/17, Warren Young wrote: >> >>https://imgur.com/a/TEWjA > > I think we'd like the selection mechanism to somehow highlight the > entire row I don’t think it really helps, but this gets you

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > >> It can be fixed by adding href="#" into the elements > > Using "Inspect" on chrome, I found that adding: > > cursor: pointer; > > inside "element.style" fix the problem. That feels more heavy-handed to me. My

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Hi Andy, On 29/11/17 00:45, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Offray Vladimir Luna C?rdenas on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:20:44 -0500: > >> I agree with Warren's design and improved readability by adding space. >> Timeline now has more "air to breath" and is more pleasant to the eye. > If you're talking

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/29/17, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Still looks goofy in the Modern View, especially using Edge. Your >> help in fixing that problem will be much appreciated. > > It’s applying the style to the containing rather than to the that > most of the recent changes have been

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:10:28AM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > > There's a small display glitch, the mouse cursor over the > > Basic/Advanced button is set to "text selection" mode instead of the > > usual "hand with the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > [*] To be clear, that means the element ends up with two classes. Even more clear: ... td.timelineSelected { border-width: 2px; background-color: #ffc; box-shadow: 4px 4px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5); }

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The "selected entry" highlighting, such as seen here: > >https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=trunk > > Still looks goofy in the Modern View, especially using Edge. Your > help in fixing that problem will be

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > There's a small display glitch, the mouse cursor over the > Basic/Advanced button is set to "text selection" mode instead of the > usual "hand with the index finger up" for clickable links. It can be fixed by adding

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:26:57AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > The 4-view-modes timeline change is now on trunk and is the default on > these sites: > > https://sqlite.org/src/timeline > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline > http://mirror1.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

The 4-view-modes timeline change is now on trunk and is the default on these sites: https://sqlite.org/src/timeline https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline http://mirror1.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline https://androwish.org/index.html/timeline The "selected entry" highlighting, such as

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue 28 Nov 2017 10:36 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:41:55 -0500: > > > I have installed the new look (temporarily at least) on > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil so that we can live with it for a > > while to see how we like it. >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:33:04 -0500: > Maybe "Verbose" should be modified to include the hash up front This was one of the factors that actually lead to my #1 ranking for Verbose. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005a1e5143

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:08:38 -0500: > Please offer your opinions on: > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline I see that you've corrected one of the problems I mentioned previously which was the melding of different comments in the same branch by introducing

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue 28 Nov 2017 10:40 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:41:55 -0500: > > > The big down-side is that less information is visible on a single > > screen now, so you have to scroll more. But that seems to be the trend > > with websites these days >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 21:01:37 -0500: > As it was yesterday: >https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline Hard to stomach (as previously mentioned). > Warren Young's new approach: >https://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline Slightly better, but still has the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Offray Vladimir Luna C?rdenas on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:20:44 -0500: > I agree with Warren's design and improved readability by adding space. > Timeline now has more "air to breath" and is more pleasant to the eye. If you're talking about what is currently visible on

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:41:55 -0500: > The big down-side is that less information is visible on a single > screen now, so you have to scroll more. But that seems to be the trend > with websites these days There's another extremely annoying downside to this as

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:41:55 -0500: > I have installed the new look (temporarily at least) on > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil so that we can live with it for a > while to see how we like it. I tend to prefer having more information to less, but

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Richard Hipp wrote: > > "Verbose" mode now looks like legacy. > Thank you, much appreciated. -- Joe Mistachkin @ https://urn.to/r/mistachkin ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

A view of the dbpage branch of SQLite on the GitHub mirror: https://github.com/mackyle/sqlite/commits/dbpage The same information from the latest experimental Fossil: http://www.sqlite.org/srcxb/timeline?ss=n=34=dbpage=ci -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

I like it. Thanks On 29 Nov 2017, 10:17 AM +0800, Warren Young , wrote: > On Nov 27, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Steve Landers wrote: > > > > Note that I would retain the rounded corners on Warren’s backgrounds, they > > make the visuals “softer”. > > You

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/28/17, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Yeah, something like that would be cool. Also, having the "Leaf" indicator, > et al, up front as well (like before)? "Verbose" mode now looks like legacy. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/28/17, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Limitations: > (5) The selected-entry highlighting is messed up for MS-Edge. Ex: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline?ss=n=2017-07-07 - suggestions for how to fix this are welcomed. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Richard Hipp wrote: > > Maybe "Verbose" should be modified to include the hash up front > Yeah, something like that would be cool. Also, having the "Leaf" indicator, et al, up front as well (like before)? -- Joe Mistachkin @ https://urn.to/r/mistachkin

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/28/17, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> (1) You have a selection of styles: Normal, Compact, Verbose, >> Columnar. Each can be styled separately. >> > > Pretty please, can we have a "Legacy" style that gives the old look? > Maybe "Verbose" should

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Richard Hipp wrote: > > (1) You have a selection of styles: Normal, Compact, Verbose, > Columnar. Each can be styled separately. > Pretty please, can we have a "Legacy" style that gives the old look? I think not having the check-in at the front of the line is going to be a huge pain for me

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/28/17, Richard Hipp wrote: > Please offer your opinions on: > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline Other comparison repositories: http://mirror1.tcl.tk/tcl-b/timeline https://sqlite.org/b/timeline > > Changes: > > (1) You have a selection of styles:

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Please offer your opinions on: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline Changes: (1) You have a selection of styles: Normal, Compact, Verbose, Columnar. Each can be styled separately. (2) The style selection, the number of elements in the timeline, and whether the timeline shows just

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 28, 2017, at 3:12 AM, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > I think the one important thing is that all involved HTML elements have a > 'class' or 'id' tag. Yes. Several times in making my last custom Fossil skin, I’ve had to employ some rather clever CSS selector trickery to target

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 27, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Steve Landers wrote: > > Note that I would retain the rounded corners on Warren’s backgrounds, they > make the visuals “softer”. You can have that without the stroked borders: td.timelineTableCell { border-radius: 10px;

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/28/17, Johan Kuuse wrote: > I think it is impossible to get "one style fits all"... > Indeed. So my latest strategy is to provide a combobox in the submenu that lets the user selected between a small number of formats: "Compact", "Relaxed", "Detailed" (new name suggestions

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 25 November 2017 at 08:53, Richard Hipp wrote: > Send me your ideas of what you think timelines should look like.  Even > better: send me mock-ups. Since we’re at it, I’m going ahead with some other CSS suggestions. Here I’ve mostly focused on “calendar” demarcations which

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:07 AM, David Mason wrote: > I would like yesterdays with a bit of whitespace between commit comments. > > Also someone liked the original because the checkin tag was in a > predictable place. If you put the tag last in the extra information it >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

I would like yesterdays with a bit of whitespace between commit comments. Also someone liked the original because the checkin tag was in a predictable place. If you put the tag last in the extra information it would be predictably at the right margin. On 27 November 2017 at 21:01, Richard Hipp

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Note that I would retain the rounded corners on Warren’s backgrounds, they make the visuals “softer”. On 28 Nov 2017, 10:01 AM +0800, Richard Hipp , wrote: > On 11/27/17, Steve Landers wrote: > > Nice work. > > > > Have you considered dropping the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/27/17, Steve Landers wrote: > Nice work. > > Have you considered dropping the borders on the commits? They do add > definition to the commit, but at the expense of repetition and possibly > “noise” when the branch isn’t colored Here are comparison links: As it

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Nice work. Have you considered dropping the borders on the commits?  They do add definition to the commit, but at the expense of repetition and possibly “noise” when the branch isn’t colored Screenshot at https://www.dropbox.com/s/o4sa29q8i0dv7r3/timeline.png?dl=0 —Steve On 28 Nov 2017, 7:02

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 27/11/17 18:02, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>> The big down-side is that less >>> information is visible on a single screen now, so you have to scroll >>>

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> The big down-side is that less >> information is visible on a single screen now, so you have to scroll >> more. But that seems to be the trend with

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The big down-side is that less > information is visible on a single screen now, so you have to scroll > more. But that seems to be the trend with websites these days…. The design ideas I tapped into this were old when

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/27/17, Warren Young wrote: > > table.timelineTable { > border-collapse: separate; > } > td.timelineTableCell { > vertical-align: top; > text-align: left; > padding: 0.75em; > border: 1px #ccc solid; > border-radius: 1em; > } > span.timelineDetail { >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 27 November 2017 at 14:13, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 24, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> Which is better? >> >> A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline >> B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > > I prefer A because I don’t like

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 24, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Which is better? > > A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline I prefer A because I don’t like having to dig for details. Hiding details isn’t the answer to clutter. Drawing

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Jacob MacDonald on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:52:41 +: > Seems like I'm in the minority, but I prefer the A version. I tend to > like compact UIs and having all the relevant information close > together and the commit hash prominently displayed is nice. The only reason why I

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:12:14 -0500: > Now fixed. Verified. > Other changes on https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline since the > original comparison request: > > (1) The "details" section is shown on a separate line below the > check-in comment. I just

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Fri 24 Nov 2017 7:25 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > Wow, #5 is super clean and easy on the eyes! > And #12 is interesting if I can see it with Per-Item Time Format = (off)? > > Thanks for the changes! #5 is nice, and especially with the easy option to switch back to advanced. Perhaps the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Wow, #5 is super clean and easy on the eyes! And #12 is interesting if I can see it with Per-Item Time Format = (off)? Thanks for the changes! On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 11/24/17, Zakero wrote: > > > > tldr; This new change of

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/24/17, Zakero wrote: > > tldr; This new change of the timeline makes it harder to find useful links. > There is now a per-repository configuration option under Setup/Timeline that lets you choose which timeline format you prefer. https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/ is

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Looking at the commit message data, it has a 4 types of information: - The check-in link - The commit message - Leaf, Closed-Leaf - Detail (user, tags) For me, the most important piece of information is the check-in link. Now, l have to search for the link because it is no longer in a consistent

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:52:41PM +, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > Seems like I'm in the minority, but I prefer the A version. I tend to like > compact UIs and having all the relevant information close together and the > commit hash prominently displayed is nice. Same for me. With B

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Seems like I'm in the minority, but I prefer the A version. I tend to like compact UIs and having all the relevant information close together and the commit hash prominently displayed is nice. On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 12:32 PM David Mason wrote: > I like the B cases... in fact

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

I like the B cases... in fact I'd indent the details a bit so that the comments are easier to find visually. On 24 November 2017 at 11:53, wrote: > I understand the need for links, but do users really need truncated hashes > for every line? > Can the link be applied more

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

I understand the need for links, but do users really need truncated hashes for every line? Can the link be applied more subtly? Can there be a similar "quiet" setting for the Timeline like *Per-Item Time Format = (off) *to conserve space? My commits prepend a simple timestamp in the comment and

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/24/17, bch wrote: >> >> (1) The "details" section is shown on a separate line below the >> check-in comment. >> (2) The "details" are in the same font-color as the comment-text >> but have a slightly reduced font size. >> > > I don’t see that reflected on the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 8:12 AM Richard Hipp wrote: > On 11/24/17, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 11/24/17, Andy Bradford wrote: > >> I still miss the Leaf, which I do find useful. > > > > Ugh. I didn't intend to omit the "Leaf" and

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/24/17, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 11/24/17, Andy Bradford wrote: >> I still miss the Leaf, which I do find useful. > > Ugh. I didn't intend to omit the "Leaf" and "Closed-Leaf" marks, > though I did want to move them to the end, rather than before

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/24/17, Andy Bradford wrote: > I still miss the Leaf, which I do find useful. Ugh. I didn't intend to omit the "Leaf" and "Closed-Leaf" marks, though I did want to move them to the end, rather than before the check-in comment. The omission of that information is

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/24/17, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:35:55 -0500: > >> The change here is to emphasis the check-in comment and de-emphasize >> the links to the check-in details and other information. > > Hopefully this change is simply

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:13:22 -0500: > Alternative CSS that causes the "details" to appears on a separate > line from the comment: > > A: https://sqlite.org/src/timeline > B: https://sqlite.org/b/timeline I think it looks slightly cleaner with the ``details''

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:35:55 -0500: > The change here is to emphasis the check-in comment and de-emphasize > the links to the check-in details and other information. Hopefully this change is simply accomplished with some CSS. That way those who prefer their UI to

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:35:55 -0500: > Which is better? > > A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline I prefer A. I don't like muted colors for text. I prefer seeing text than to have to look for text that begins to

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Am 24.11.17 um 16:17 schrieb Richard Hipp: > If the entire check-in comment is a hyperlink, that would make it > difficult to have hyperlinks embedded within the check-in comment. I totally agree. So far I only use ticket IDs that are automatically linked but this is very important to me. If the

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/24/17, j. van den hoff wrote: > > personally, I rather like the tidiness of the timeline graph available in > mercurial via `hg serve' ... so one might think about doing something similar > (remove hash display and link the commit message itself to the 'chekin' >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 11/24/17, Richard Hipp wrote: > Which is better? > > A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > Alternative CSS that causes the "details" to appears on a separate line from the comment: A: https://sqlite.org/src/timeline

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:35:55 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: Which is better? A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline Also: A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c B:

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Hi, I'd like to object the default use of low-contrast type in professional software :) I use displays that are adjusted for low eye strain by reducing contrast and brightness. Having type and typography do the same thing again has the opposite effect and legibility starts to suffer. Regards,

[fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

Which is better? A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline Also: A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/finfo?name=src/search.c Surf about from any of the links above for additional views. The