Re: [fossil-users] Possible bug: Failure to acknowledge changes after failing to overwrite write-protected file

2014-11-13 Thread B Harder
On Nov 13, 2014 7:20 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:16 PM, to...@acm.org wrote: When opening a repo, if you select to overwrite all files, and a file to be updated happens to be read-only (R attrib set), the overwrite fails (it should) but if you then

Re: [fossil-users] Newbie question

2014-11-06 Thread B Harder
On 11/6/14, jose isaias cabrera jic...@cinops.xerox.com wrote: Greetings! First of all, I want to thank you whomever was the creator of this wonderful utility. Props to you. That'd be drh (Richard Hipp) and a collection of contributors. I have a setup on my Windows PC where I have many

Re: [fossil-users] SQLite pointer misuse in head?

2014-10-30 Thread B Harder
I got same error msg on first web request, and then hit reload and it worked fine. -bch On 10/30/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: I just updated my Fossil server from version [e061a675e6] 2014-09-26 21:02:03 to

Re: [fossil-users] Uncommit. Was: Fossil checksum

2014-10-28 Thread B Harder
properly is remarkably difficult. Are references backward, forward, or both ? What I mean is, roughly, is fossil a doubly linked list, or singly, and if single, what direction? -bch On 10/28/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:31 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com

Re: [fossil-users] Uncommit. Was: Fossil checksum

2014-10-28 Thread B Harder
a single card/obj could be deleted, and the dangling bits would be culled w/ a [f rebuild] ? 3) I can't think of anything else... -bch On 10/28/14, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:05 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Are references backward

Re: [fossil-users] Uncommit. Was: Fossil checksum

2014-10-28 Thread B Harder
(for the case of shun) is to re-rationalize dependencies down the chain -- which won't be necessary w/ working on a tip (?) -bch On 10/28/14, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:14 PM, B Harder brad.har

Re: [fossil-users] Uncommit. Was: Fossil checksum

2014-10-28 Thread B Harder
On 10/28/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe could be as simple as adding the relevant artifact IDs to the shun list and rebuilding. (Though that would be rather slow (which is not necessarily a bad thing for this

Re: [fossil-users] Uncommit. Was: Fossil checksum

2014-10-28 Thread B Harder
On 10/28/14, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Just be VERY CAREFUL that you don't add an artifact that is also used in some other check-out that you want to keep, because after you shun it will be gone forever.

[fossil-users] Anyway to diagnose a malformed disk image ?

2014-10-23 Thread B Harder
kamloops$ fossil open ../fossils/netbsd_src.fsl SQLITE_CORRUPT: database corruption at line 53640 of [e4ab094f8a] SQLITE_CORRUPT: database corruption at line 53679 of [e4ab094f8a] SQLITE_CORRUPT: statement aborts at 3: [SELECT 1 FROM event WHERE type='ci'] fossil: SQL error: database disk image is

Re: [fossil-users] Anyway to diagnose a malformed disk image ?

2014-10-23 Thread B Harder
/23/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:20 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: kamloops$ fossil open ../fossils/netbsd_src.fsl SQLITE_CORRUPT: database corruption at line 53640 of [e4ab094f8a] SQLITE_CORRUPT: database corruption at line 53679 of [e4ab094f8a

[fossil-users] vendor branches, patches, and ancestors

2014-10-16 Thread B Harder
I'm maintaining a large(ish) repo for production deployments of various software like Apache httpd, OpenSSL, etc. What I have is a [vendor] branch for the vanilla vendor software (ie: httpd-2.2.27.tar.gz), and feature branches for configuration/tweaks (ie: [redhat_build] for building for redhat

Re: [fossil-users] Is it possible to add empty folders to the repo?

2014-10-06 Thread B Harder
Arguably, if you need empty dirs in your project as part of a build process, it should be in the Makefile or equiv. -bch On 10/6/14, Gaurav M. Bhandarkar gaurav.a...@gmail.com wrote: maybe you could use : fossil settings empty-dirs A comma or newline-separated list of pathnames. On update

Re: [fossil-users] I have two trunks?

2014-10-02 Thread B Harder
Hi Dave. This is a fork (unintentional branch). It would happen (for example) if two different clones of a repository are updated independently of each other, and then sync'd. You can merge the errant trunk back to the good trunk without ill effect (minding you might have to do conflict

Re: [fossil-users] I have two trunks?

2014-10-02 Thread B Harder
On Oct 2, 2014 11:14 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 02 Oct 2014 19:31:12 +0200: The weird thing is, he's got two initial empty commits. i'm at a loss to explain that. Seems that one of them must have been created with an older fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Files marked as missing after addremove

2014-09-12 Thread B Harder
I haven't had time to dig in, but that sounds like the ticket I opened this week. If it sounds like that to you too, kindly add any more relevant info you have: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=94a1f83f9f On Sep 12, 2014 9:12 PM, Philip Bennefall phi...@blastbay.com wrote: Hi all,

Re: [fossil-users] Tags in comment document

2014-09-06 Thread B Harder
On Sep 6, 2014 11:11 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Philip Bennefall phi...@blastbay.com wrote: whether it should really say branch rather than tags. Is this a bug, or is it really meant to be branch rather than tags? It's probably just an

[fossil-users] github gets split diffs

2014-09-03 Thread B Harder
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8265249 Github gets split diffs, everybody rejoices. -bch ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread B Harder
On 8/6/14, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 7/26/2014 08:53, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: * Code review! Your talk of state machines suggests that you're instead envisioning a system where you can't get a checkin into

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil is now 7 years old

2014-07-26 Thread B Harder
Quotable: I must say that Fossil is the best thing to happen to my development workflow this year, as I am pretty sure that using Git has resulted in the premature death of too many of my brain cells. I'm glad to be able to replace Git in every place that I possibly can with Fossil. On Jul 25,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-07-26 Thread B Harder
I'm on mobile device - please excuse typos/brevity. I managed a team of about 10 local committers (in my office) and about 10 more remote (across the country). I had a FreeBSD production environment. I setup a FreeBSD dev/testing environment where everybody was isolated by jails, and had their

Re: [fossil-users] Curses! (foiled again?)

2014-07-22 Thread B Harder
My bindings for curses are pretty low-level, and I build functions to sort of act as macros where I want convenience, fwiw. I think it's important to honor the existing culture (ie: addressing in lines, columns versus more typical x,y) even though it's not how one might build it today. $0.02

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil: new script binding

2014-07-17 Thread B Harder
On 7/17/14, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/17/2014 3:22 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: in terms of memory use, it seems to be on par with lua, and lua is the lightest-memory interpreter i've yet run through valgrind. Most of them

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-10 Thread B Harder
It's clear people are split on what The Right Thing To Do is re: symliks. I'm personally not sure; I don't use them in the course of development. That said, I feel like they should *not* be in indirrected-through as a matter of treatment. It's understandable those that _would_ like them to be

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread B Harder
and receiving all SHUN records. You can disable this using fossil setting auto-shun off On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said B Harder on Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:40:58 -0700: myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread B Harder
Good catch: you're correct. -bch On 7/7/14, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:10 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Fossil insures that no remote user will ever be able to remove Shouldn't that be ensures? i always confuse the two

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-06 Thread B Harder
myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 439 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 425

[fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-05 Thread B Harder
What are the artifacts received below? Is these administrative, or is there something else at play? myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 442 bytes sent, 2308 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from

Re: [fossil-users] Sixteen-digit event IDs

2014-07-02 Thread B Harder
On Jun 30, 2014 2:20 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-27 23:40 GMT+02:00 Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com: How come events are always shown with (at least) sixteen digits on the timeline whereas other artifacts are given ten digits?

[fossil-users] no common ancestor

2014-06-18 Thread B Harder
If everything is (ultimately) spawned from the initial empty checkin, how can I be getting WARNING - no common ancestor: path when merging one branch into another ? -bch ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: interrupting a commit message

2014-06-17 Thread B Harder
On 6/17/14, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:49 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Remember that the buffer is only one level deep, though. A subsequent ^W, ^K , etc will clobber the previous contents. Almost: try 2x (NON-consecutively) ctrl-k

Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: interrupting a commit message

2014-06-17 Thread B Harder
On Jun 17, 2014 10:47 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:24 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Nice! As a BSD user though, I feel compelled to point out this looks like a readline[1] feature, and not an editline[2] feature. So it works with bash

Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: interrupting a commit message

2014-06-16 Thread B Harder
Remember that the buffer is only one level deep, though. A subsequent ^W, ^K , etc will clobber the previous contents. Along lines of Stephan Beals method, I use : preceding the fossil command. So: $ : fossil ci -m 'some msg' ($ is shell prompt). : is a command that consumes it's arguments and

Re: [fossil-users] Find in Files

2014-06-15 Thread B Harder
Cscope (+1) knows much more than just C. On Jun 15, 2014 2:17 PM, Sergei Gavrikov sergei.gavri...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Sean Woods wrote: Dear List, I am hacking on a large, complicated code base in my spare time for fun. I unzipped the tarball with many source files

Re: [fossil-users] Cannot determine user when using -A

2014-06-08 Thread B Harder
Fossil certainly will spawn external programs if you: 1) start a commit w/o a command-line commit message 2) run a did with an external diff-command configured. , maybe others. On Jun 7, 2014 12:00 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Stephan Beal

Re: [fossil-users] Index (was Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-07 Thread B Harder
Hey Nico -- Some thought-provoking comments. Thanks. -bch On 6/7/14, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com writes: I wouldn't, don't, and won't demand that anyone follow such a workflow for any codebase I don't own, and possibly not for codebases I own either

Re: [fossil-users] Index (was Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-05 Thread B Harder
drh Fossil allows you to commit a subset of files (by listing the files on the fossil commit command line) but there is no mechanism for committing a subset of lines within a single file. That, and there _are_ branches/tags which are encouraged to be used... my prev comment was for the case where

Re: [fossil-users] Outside contribution feature

2014-06-05 Thread B Harder
On Jun 5, 2014 10:55 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Warren Young on Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:25:39 -0600: A contribution from an untrusted outsider needs to be checked carefully before

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-04 Thread B Harder
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items. What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags, outside of new syntax ? -bch On 6/4/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Wed,

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-04 Thread B Harder
$UUID);'. -bch On 6/4/14, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:53 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items. What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags, outside of new syntax

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-04 Thread B Harder
sb fossil bk add xp experimental:2011-06-04 I can imagine this being useful at least occasionally. I'm still loathe to include it in core fossil, but it'd be a great task for a little tool. -bch On 6/4/14, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Because the internet can be a poor medium

Re: [fossil-users] Index (was Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-04 Thread B Harder
I've heard git allows this, and occasionally wished for it. As it stands currently, it's not possible with fossil. There is a degree of freedom in this regard using the fossil stash, though, which can be used with some file jigging to separate two (or more?) logical ideas that one wants committed

Re: [fossil-users] git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.

2014-06-03 Thread B Harder
Maybe convince the git developers to move their metadata into sqlite instead? Ha! Thanks for putting a smile on my face Stephan. -bch On 6/3/14, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: precision differences in 4

Re: [fossil-users] DRH's PGCon 2014 Keynote (with Fossil sighting!)

2014-06-01 Thread B Harder
I think drh unnecessarily missed an opportunity there. He seemed to work harder to obfuscate what fossil actually was than giving a single passing description and moving on with his talk about SQL and using fossil by name where it's used as an example. Otherwise, interesting talk! On Jun 1, 2014

Re: [fossil-users] working checkout does not match what would have ended up in the repository

2014-05-31 Thread B Harder
Stephan - i'm on mobile ATM so will be brief, but you and I did discussed this offline weeks ago whereby I thought we agreed that changing the text of the initial commit to something symbolic (.?) or inoffensive Latin (seed , origin) really would fit the bill without rejigging core fossil

[fossil-users] Git horror story post.

2014-05-31 Thread B Harder
http://mikegerwitz.com/papers/git-horror-story ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] working with open source code

2014-05-30 Thread B Harder
IIUC: you: fossil clone http://sqlite.org:8080 fossils/sqlite.fsl; cd project_dir; fossil open ~/project_dir/sqlite.fsl; fossil server Each of your our co-conspirators: fossil clone http://your.machine.address:8080 fossils/sqlite.fsl; cd project_dir; fossil open ~/fossils/sqlite.fsl You will:

Re: [fossil-users] Autosync retry?

2014-05-29 Thread B Harder
I was going to +1 sbeals idea, but the pull-only autosync note came up, and now I think I may not know all there is about autosync. Thanks for keeping it interesting, folks. On May 29, 2014 8:34 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 29 May 2014 22:10:24

Re: [fossil-users] Excluding [brackets] from a.../a links

2014-05-14 Thread B Harder
Andy, to be clear, are you suggesting: a) blah blah [a href=somethingcafebabe/a] blah blah blah b) blah blah a href=somethingcafebabe/a blah blah blah ? -bch On 5/14/14, Joseph Prostko joe.pros...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Excluding [brackets] from a.../a links

2014-05-14 Thread B Harder
...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:22 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Andy, to be clear, are you suggesting: a) blah blah [a href=somethingcafebabe/a] blah blah blah My comments assumed this interpretation. To my eyes that looks a tiny bit cleaner, but i won't argue strongly

Re: [fossil-users] RFC: primitive interactive add/rm/commit/diff

2014-05-09 Thread B Harder
The $EDITOR idea is the first thing I thought of when reading the Stephens initial post. Low barrier to entry, high effort/reward ratio. A curses interface would be sexy (for some definition), but I'd say a distant second as far as functional desirability. -bch On 5/7/14, Stephan Beal

Re: [fossil-users] Trouble when making new repository

2014-05-08 Thread B Harder
I restrained myself in the previous discussion that ended up being about the initial empty commit, but now I feel compelled: the rational, discussion, and decision to remove the initial empty commit were pretty poor, IMO. I don't want to belabor the point, so I'll leave it at that. Happy to

Re: [fossil-users] Merging two leaves not on the same graph?

2014-05-01 Thread B Harder
I think that initial empty commits went in at my request. Iirc, so I could have related (but not inheriting from trunk) vendor branches. Can we review/discuss before axing? On May 1, 2014 1:06 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-05-01 7:24 GMT+02:00 Gerald Gutierrez

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion about fossil commit

2014-04-14 Thread B Harder
That sounds like a bad idea to me. IMO, this is a case of good enough getting in the way of good as far as solutions to your annoyance. Off the top of my head, I can think of two workflow habits that may help you: 1) set up/turn on gpg signing, so you'll be required to sign commits before

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion about fossil commit

2014-04-14 Thread B Harder
On 4/14/14, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: Le 14 avr. 2014 11:48, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com a écrit : On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Tony Papadimitriou to...@acm.org wrote: But, in my defense, (and I just re-read it to be sure I didn't miss it) nowhere in the help

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion about fossil commit

2014-04-14 Thread B Harder
On 4/14/14, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote: On 4/14/14, 9:31 PM, B Harder wrote: [...] Our users shouldn't need CVS, SVN, etc experience to know this. I added documentation to clarify. It might also be useful to add: # (To abort the commit, leave this file unchanged) ...to the commit

Re: [fossil-users] TH1: support for octal and hexadecimal numbers in expressions

2014-04-04 Thread B Harder
I think th1 happens to basically be a subset of Tcl, but is not designed to strictly be a subset of Tcl, fwiw. On 4/4/14, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-04-04 10:54 GMT+02:00 Mark Janssen mpc.jans...@gmail.com: Why can't n-ary numbers have dots? 0b1.11 is a perfectly valid

Re: [fossil-users] Database locked, but which?

2014-01-14 Thread B Harder
On 1/14/14, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Hello, While attempting to pull the Fossil repository, I saw this error: $ fossil up Autosync: https://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET

Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.

2014-01-02 Thread B Harder
_WHY_ does --disable-internal-sqlite (and the unknown versions of SQLite that follow) have to be supported ? If package/OS maintainers insist on hacking in alien shared-lib SQLite, let them own their hacks and the repercussions. Call it a major version# bump, and remove that support. -bch On

Re: [fossil-users] Parent of the very first checkin?

2013-12-20 Thread B Harder
If I understand what you're looking for (first empty commit?), when I asked this question some time ago, somebody suggested I just tag it myself. Simple solution, Just Works. On Dec 20, 2013 8:54 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 20 Dec 2013

Re: [fossil-users] Breakthrough! [was Re: missing branch tag (?)]

2013-10-10 Thread B Harder
repo. On 10/10/13, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:31 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Breakthrough! I have a minimal(ish) example of a repo that is broken: Take the attached (broken.fsl, 62K) repo, co [vendor], and try to merge [trunk]. i end

Re: [fossil-users] Breakthrough! [was Re: missing branch tag (?)]

2013-10-10 Thread B Harder
closed/opened my more complex real-world problem repo and problem still exists. On 10/10/13, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: hrmmm... interesting. I was getting no common ancestor. I closed that repo to mail it. You did you testing (successfully). I re-opened the repo to replicate my

Re: [fossil-users] Breakthrough! [was Re: missing branch tag (?)]

2013-10-10 Thread B Harder
WARNING - no common ancestor: somefile WARNING - no common ancestor: someotherfile WARNING - no common ancestor: anotherfile ... On 10/10/13, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: closed/opened my more complex real-world problem repo and problem still exists. On 10/10/13, B Harder brad.har

[fossil-users] missing branch tag (?)

2013-10-09 Thread B Harder
It appears that somehow the branch tag was deleted on my [trunk]. Now, when I try to merge from trunk - feature_branch, I get something like: $ fossil merge trunk WARNING - no common ancestor: filea.c WARNING - no common ancestor: fileb.c WARNING - no common ancestor: filec.c ... ADDED

Re: [fossil-users] missing branch tag (?)

2013-10-09 Thread B Harder
checkin. Then I think you should be able to cancel the offending raw tag. On 9 Oct 2013 23:07, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: ...and now I see the edit where the trunk tag was cancelled -- question remains --- can I undo/reverse the effect? On 10/9/13, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [fossil-users] missing branch tag (?)

2013-10-09 Thread B Harder
a branch trunk in several nodes along the trunk timeline until one of them worked. Try it disconnected do as not to mess up the original db. On Oct 9, 2013 3:26 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: I know what you're talking about, but I'm not seeing the results I hope for. I've made

Re: [fossil-users] Anecdote regarding permissions tracking in Fossil

2013-09-19 Thread B Harder
On Sep 19, 2013 1:38 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, all, some people have bemoaned Fossil's lack of file permissions support over the years. Initially, Fossil did not track _any_ permissions, but the executable bit was eventually added because it is common practice to have

Re: [fossil-users] Autosync: Too bad git doesn't have it...

2013-09-12 Thread B Harder
I read this roughly (in fossil-speak) as: I had a bunch of email notes from folks requesting I merge their feature-branches into my main branch, but my machine crashed and my mail isn't accessible… I think auto-sync wouldn't have saved anything, but perhaps the something like fossils built-in

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread B Harder
fossil set tracker [on|off] ? On Sep 11, 2013 2:32 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands that modify the repository or a stash. i considered

Re: [fossil-users] database disk image is malformed?

2013-08-30 Thread B Harder
/ that, if it's an option. Cheers, -bch On 8/29/13, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:35 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know what the definition of recent is, but I think my password is same for months, wasn't working at time I sent last msg. I'll

Re: [fossil-users] database disk image is malformed?

2013-08-29 Thread B Harder
Did this nuke accounts/passwords ? On 8/29/13, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:50:19PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: The database corruption was caused by scenario 1.1 at

Re: [fossil-users] database disk image is malformed?

2013-08-29 Thread B Harder
I don't know what the definition of recent is, but I think my password is same for months, wasn't working at time I sent last msg. I'll work with you off-list if necessary. Thanks drh, -bch On Aug 29, 2013 8:12 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:59 PM, B

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of libfossil's name

2013-08-22 Thread B Harder
On Aug 22, 2013 7:58 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote: I'd say the name should just be set in stone as libfossil now, and a i tend

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of libfossil's name

2013-08-21 Thread B Harder
Agreed. Hyphens in libnames don't look pleasing to my eye (fwiw), libfossilscm (cc ... -lfossilscm ...) might be next best to disambiguate from potential collision w/ another libfossil, though it too is pretty ugly looking. Brief search yields https://github.com/paulfitz/libfossil as second hit

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-08-20 Thread B Harder
On Aug 20, 2013 8:25 PM, Donny Ward donnyjw...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Richard, I get the same problem every once in awhile. Many times actually. I consider myself a heavy fossil user. My most active repository has 1087 checkins all made by me. I once submitted a ticket about it here:

Re: [fossil-users] New user request

2013-08-11 Thread B Harder
Very glad you like it. On Aug 10, 2013 10:55 PM, Sam Sellars philosopher@gmail.com wrote: Thank you sir! This is exactly the type of thing I am looking for. I appreciate the time you put into this. — Hi Sam. Welcome aboard. I think Fossil is excellent, and I hope you will too.

Re: [fossil-users] New user request

2013-08-08 Thread B Harder
Hi Sam. Welcome aboard. I think Fossil is excellent, and I hope you will too. I'm typing on a mobile device ATM, so please excuse the brevity and spelling errors. I use fossil for all my personal projects, as well as professionally. For personal projects, I make a project-specific dir under my

Re: [fossil-users] few TODO items

2013-08-03 Thread B Harder
On Aug 3, 2013 7:09 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: a) Search feature seems to be addressed, right? Yes. b) uncomit - ability to simply uncommit last commit which I'd do while still staying in my local repo and

Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...

2013-07-31 Thread B Harder
I'm going to recycle a project name I've used before: urvogel (the first bird), and suggest for its logo: http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archie2.jpg On Jul 30, 2013 3:06 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, all, As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of

Re: [fossil-users] Q: What Unix / Linux _DISTRIBUTIONS_ Does The Fossil Project Care About?

2013-07-30 Thread B Harder
I'd suggest: fossil is happy to run wherever it can, and strives for portability wherever it can, whenever it makes sense. Any OS is welcome to modify/redistribute fossil in the terms described in the license. It sounds to me (correct me if I'm wrong) you are asking what (or how many?) operating

Re: [fossil-users] Any objections to renaming /stats_report...

2013-07-23 Thread B Harder
I personally have no objections, but as a matter of business and visibility, perhaps do final last call for objections/alternatives! on a business day. On Jul 23, 2013 12:59 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On

Re: [fossil-users] Scripting in Fossil v2

2013-07-23 Thread B Harder
I think these things support each other. Specifically, with respect to Tcl (and likely Guile, Lua), scripting support can come by embedding the Tcl interpreter inside the app (ie: the standalone fossil executable), by linking libtcl with fossil, and having fossil call into it appropriately.

Re: [fossil-users] fossil new bus error on Solaris 10 SPARC with gcc

2013-07-18 Thread B Harder
On 7/17/13, Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com wrote: Hello, Using a recent trunk version of fossil, built with gcc on Solaris 10 on an UltraSPARC system, I get a bus error from fossil new: $ ./fossil new t.fossil Bus Error (core dumped) $ ./fossil version -v This is fossil version 1.26

Re: [fossil-users] By week-of-year statistics

2013-07-17 Thread B Harder
On Jul 17, 2013 12:58 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:35 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Of top of head, reflexive position is that week numbers are running in wrong order, but if it's reversed, latest would be at bottom of page. i sorted

Re: [fossil-users] By week-of-year statistics

2013-07-16 Thread B Harder
Very cool, Stephan! On Jul 16, 2013 1:30 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: This looks cool. Will this data be available via the json interface? Being able to aggregate the stats over a lot of different

Re: [fossil-users] By week-of-year statistics

2013-07-16 Thread B Harder
Of top of head, reflexive position is that week numbers are running in wrong order, but if it's reversed, latest would be at bottom of page. That made me wonder though, what of vertical bars vs. horizontal? Just tossing ideas... On Jul 16, 2013 1:50 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:

[fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
Is there a: $ fossil co initial_ci Command/workalike available, or am I left to: $ fossil timel -n | tail [copy SHA1] $ fossil co [paste SHA1] ? -bch -- Brad Harder Method Logic Digital Consulting http://twitter.com/bcharder ___

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
On 7/15/13, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:21 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a: $ fossil co initial_ci Command/workalike available, or am I left to: $ fossil timel -n | tail [copy SHA1] $ fossil co [paste SHA1

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
** s/don't want to remain pure/want to remain pure/. On 7/15/13, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/15/13, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:21 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a: $ fossil co initial_ci Command/workalike

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
On 7/15/13, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: Le 15 juil. 2013 18:21, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com a écrit : Is there a: $ fossil co initial_ci Command/workalike available, or am I left to: $ fossil timel -n | tail [copy SHA1] $ fossil co [paste SHA1] ? You can tag

Re: [fossil-users] RFC: new config option

2013-06-21 Thread B Harder
On Jun 21, 2013 9:32 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hiho, In a repo of mine (not fossil) i just made a commit faux pas by not entering the _one_ filename i wanted on the command line, and instead committing several others i wasn't ready to commit. So now i want to add a fossil

Re: [fossil-users] RFC: new config option

2013-06-21 Thread B Harder
On Jun 21, 2013 11:02 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:35 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: I realize this check is early in the commit phase, but now I wonder: barring pushed/autosync'd content, can one pop or unwind the last commit of a local repo

[fossil-users] (no subject)

2013-04-29 Thread B Harder
Fossil trunk [748f975345] generates a binary that immediate segfaults. My env is: NetBSD kamloops 6.99.19 NetBSD 6.99.19 (GENERIC) #149: Mon Apr 29 11:57:00 PDT 2013 root@kamloops:/usr/obj/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64 I haven't had a change to triage this yet, and fossil's ticket system

Re: [fossil-users] (no subject)

2013-04-29 Thread B Harder
I reran ./configure, make clean, make and things look good on my end now too. Apologies for the noise. -bch On 4/29/13, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:55 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com