Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Laser, Mary
Cc: Stangel, Daniel; fossology@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem The scheduler is never starting because you have a corrupt License.bsam file (see below for path). Could you email it to me? Bob On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:13 PM, George A Pace wrote: 2009-10-27 14:04

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Bob Gobeille
The scheduler is never starting because you have a corrupt License.bsam file (see below for path). Could you email it to me? Bob On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:13 PM, George A Pace wrote: 2009-10-27 14:04:13 scheduler[3959] : FATAL: Scheduler error: Unable to access license cache '/var/lib/fossolo

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Bruno Cornec
George A Pace said on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:13:09PM -0400: > > Also, looking at the FOSSology install instruction at ( > http://fossology.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fossology/trunk/fossology/INSTALL > ) > I don't have a /usr/local/etc/fossology subdirectory (maybe the > instructions here are

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
ormat, see http://fossology.org/docs/scheduler#configuring_the_scheduler And in the log file - its pretty consistent . From: Bruno Cornec To: Bob Gobeille Cc: George A Pace , Daniel Stangel , fossology@fossology.org Date: 10/27/2009 01:59 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Bruno Cornec
Bob Gobeille said on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:57:19AM -0600: > /etc/init.d/fossology start > I don't know how to do this on red hat. Too easy. Exactly the same (LSB rules ;-) However to make it permanent on RH you need to pass: chkconfig fossology on (However should be done by the rpm) Bruno. -

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Bob Gobeille
Bruno Cornec Cc: fossology-boun...@fossology.org, "Stangel, Daniel" >, "fossology@fossology.org" Date: 10/27/2009 01:34 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Sent by:fossology-boun...@fossology.org Bruno, Just for kicks I rebooted

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
that should be turned on ? From: George A Pace To: Bruno Cornec Cc: fossology-boun...@fossology.org, "Stangel, Daniel" , "fossology@fossology.org" Date: 10/27/2009 01:34 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Sent by: fossology-boun...@fossology.org

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
To: Bruno Cornec Cc: "Stangel, Daniel" , "fossology@fossology.org" , fossology-boun...@fossology.org Date: 10/27/2009 01:16 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Bruno, Ok, I seem to have it all installed, I can get FOSSology up and running AND I am logged

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
From: Bruno Cornec To: George A Pace Cc: "Stangel, Daniel" , "fossology@fossology.org" , fossology-boun...@fossology.org Date: 10/27/2009 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem George A Pace said on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:48AM -0400: >

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Bruno Cornec
George A Pace said on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:48AM -0400: > Ok - was able to get YUM configured to run - I got most of the session - > Everything looks good until the end where the following error messages > come up > I ran the RPM for libextractor, but it seems I didn't run it for > libex

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Bruno Cornec
George A Pace said on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:54:43AM -0400: > rpm -i --test fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm You really should setup your yum repo to point to your local/remote instance of RHEL5 and use yum install instead. Now, some of the deps require an external repo, as mentioned on the wik

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
6 From: "Stangel, Daniel" To: Matt Taggart Cc: "fossology@fossology.org" Date: 10/26/2009 10:16 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Sent by: fossology-boun...@fossology.org On 2009-10-26 Matt Taggart wrote: >> Summarizing the issue you had,

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread Stangel, Daniel
a better download site, as this one is not responsive as of this morning) Dan > From: George A Pace To: "Stangel, > Daniel" > Cc: fossology-boun...@fossology.org, > "fossology@fossology.org" Date: 10/27/2009 > 08:08 AM Subject:

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
A Pace To: "Stangel, Daniel" , "fossology@fossology.org" , fossology-boun...@fossology.org Date: 10/27/2009 08:15 AM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Sent by: fossology-boun...@fossology.org My bad - was juggling to many things - Forget the link below -

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
) From: George A Pace To: "Stangel, Daniel" Cc: fossology-boun...@fossology.org, "fossology@fossology.org" Date: 10/27/2009 08:08 AM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Sent by: fossology-boun...@fossology.org Dan, I did a test on the remaining

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-27 Thread George A Pace
am running off to a meeting - so before I do any searches any ideas on if there is a larger package that contains all of these libraries ? From: "Stangel, Daniel" To: Matt Taggart Cc: "fossology@fossology.org" Date: 10/26/2009 10:16 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some p

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-26 Thread george . pace
AM GMT To: Matt Taggart Cc: "fossology@fossology.org" Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem On 2009-10-26 Matt Taggart wrote: >> Summarizing the issue you had, and CC'ing the FOSSology mailing list so >> we capture this knowledge for future generations:

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-26 Thread Stangel, Daniel
On 2009-10-26 Matt Taggart wrote: >> Summarizing the issue you had, and CC'ing the FOSSology mailing list so >> we capture this knowledge for future generations: You found that we >> were missing two RPMs from the list of FO dependencies: libtool-ltdl >> and perl-DateManip. > > Well they are depe

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-26 Thread Matt Taggart
> Summarizing the issue you had, and CC'ing the FOSSology mailing list so we > capture this knowledge for future generations: You found that we were > missing two RPMs from the list of FO dependencies: libtool-ltdl and > perl-DateManip. Well they are dependencies of our dependencies. If you were

Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem

2009-10-26 Thread Stangel, Daniel
George, Summarizing the issue you had, and CC'ing the FOSSology mailing list so we capture this knowledge for future generations: You found that we were missing two RPMs from the list of FO dependencies: libtool-ltdl and perl-DateManip. I checked, and both of these RPMs are provided by the RH