On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:37:19 -0800, Alec Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For this case such a thing is complete overkill, all we need to do is
rewrite the existing default portlets so that they don't depend on
(…)
Again, the portlets is not the thing I'm looking at here — let's use
Si
On 11/14/06, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:14:38 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is some portlets BBB stuff for people with main_template
> customisations that make globalize do slightly silly things. We could
> probably cut that out if w
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:14:38 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is some portlets BBB stuff for people with main_template
customisations that make globalize do slightly silly things. We could
probably cut that out if we don't mind breaking some customisations.
This seems to
Sorry for the fragmented responses, I really need to go to bed soon :)
On 11/14/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The contentmenu customisations will have broken with every Plone
version before, and it's a somewhat silly thing to have expected
customisations to such a complex and conv
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:14:38 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
python: [history[i] for i in (…) 0.8055s 10 0.08055s
What is this?
CMFEditions, the rendering of the inline history collapsible. I'm tempted
to move all this stuff to the History (Versioning) tab, so you c
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:53:06 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a bit reluctant to do that because I don't want to maintain two
things at once. Think plone_tableless.
The difference here is that it would be gone in Plone 3.5. No maintenance.
Deprecation, but in a way that
Hi guys,
On 11/14/06, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:14:38 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is some portlets BBB stuff for people with main_template
> customisations that make globalize do slightly silly things. We could
> probably cut tha
Some preliminary results of running a quick PTProfiler session on Plone
3.0 and trying to figure out what is slowing it down.
I was prompted to do this when I discovered that anonymous view of Plone
3.0 was about 30% slower than 2.5. Take these numbers as a general guide
only, it's still ea
One thing that might help is the work I'm putting in the Fate project.
The goal there is to cleanup the way Widgets are handled in Archetypes
to do the minimal amount of work possible and avoid calling the
'accessors' nedlessly. To do so, I'm adapting the Archetypes
Widget/Field combo into Zope 3
For completeness, I did the same test for the edit tab on the front page:
EDIT TAB: 10 loads of front page, in seconds
TemplateTotal Hits Per hit
===
ATContentTypes/atct_edit.cpt11.883 10 1.188
Alexander Limi wrote:
Some preliminary results of running a quick PTProfiler session on Plone
3.0 and trying to figure out what is slowing it down.
I was prompted to do this when I discovered that anonymous view of Plone
3.0 was about 30% slower than 2.5. Take these numbers as a general guid
On 11/14/06, Alec Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/14/06, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:14:38 -0800, Martin Aspeli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is some portlets BBB stuff for people with main_template
> > customisations that make globalize
Hi Alex,
I take it someone fixed PTProfiler for you?
On 11/14/06, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some preliminary results of running a quick PTProfiler session on Plone
3.0 and trying to figure out what is slowing it down.
I was prompted to do this when I discovered that anonymous v
13 matches
Mail list logo
