Great to hear of your progress, Amanda! Please say hi next time they
invite you back to Toronto!
Nicholas
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Amanda Christie
wrote:
> speaking of 16mm films having longer life than 35mm
>
> i had been hoping to finish my latest project, Spectres of Shortwave, on
ameWorks [mailto:frameworks-boun...@jonasmekasfilms.com] *On
> Behalf Of *40 Frames
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 20, 2014 6:44 PM
>
> *To:* Experimental Film Discussion List
> *Subject:* Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun
: Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:08 PM, John Woods
mailto:jawood...@yahoo.ca>> wrote:
Alain, while I'm primarily interested in experimental or artists films, I'd
open up to mainstream films too. I'm more broadly inter
> etc. I've often wondered what happened to all those prints. --Ed
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: 40 Frames
> Sent: Jul 20, 2014 5:44 PM
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
&
: Experimental Film Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:08 PM, John Woods wrote:>>> Alain, while I'm primarily interested in experimental or artists films,> I'd open up to mainstream films too. I'm
My film WATERSCAPE: ILLUSIONS, completed 2007, 52 minutes long, was shot and
finished on 16mm film.
The film is a meditation on myth and reality, a sort of experimental-hybrid
documentary/essay film that includes both gorgeous location footage, largely in
color, and watercolor illustrations
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:08 PM, John Woods wrote:
>
>
> Alain, while I'm primarily interested in experimental or artists films,
> I'd open up to mainstream films too. I'm more broadly interested in the
> state of 16mm film as an exhibition format and not necessarily
> experimental. If Spielberg d
Dusty Stacks is distributed on 16mm /// you can get one with a vocal track on
the print and another without vocals and Jodie serenades live, y'all.
> On Jul 20, 2014, at 3:08 PM, John Woods wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Alain, while I'm primarily interested in experimental or artists films, I'd
Alain, while I'm primarily interested in experimental or artists films, I'd
open up to mainstream films too. I'm more broadly interested in the
state of 16mm film as an exhibition format and not necessarily
experimental. If Spielberg decided to distribute his latest on 16mm,
then that wou
Lee Anne Schmitt's "California Company Town" (2008)
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the EE network.
Original Message
From: Beebe, Roger W.
Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2014 06:06
To: Experimental Film Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
Kevin Everson doesn’t finish to film, at least as far
Some of Kevin's films are finished on 16mm, but not all, and possibly not any
of the features.
Thom Andersen did indeed finish Get Out of the Car on 16mm.
Madison Brookshire's Color Series is a quite unique 16mm feature-length work.
Did anyone yet mention Els Van Riel's Gradual Speed or Matthew
Kevin Everson doesn’t finish to film, at least as far as I know. I saw a Q&A
with him after a screening of Erie (at Images, I think), and he said the reason
he doesn’t finish to film is that he “has so many films that [he] wants to
make.” I assumed he was talking about both the time and money
Yeah, Meek's is 35mm, shot 1.37 in super 35.
Alain
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Julian Antos <
jul...@northwestchicagofilmsociety.org> wrote:
> MEEK'S CUTOFF was shot and released on 35mm, through a fairly major studio
> (a personal favorite, and the prints looked great!). There have been
Hi John,
"Feature" is a somewhat broad term, and speaks more to run time than
form/content, but given your examples, I would assume you are asking about
experimental features??
The exact run time of a "feature" also seems to be dictated by
market/venue. Some say 40 minutes, some 60, and the indus
On Jul 18, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Amanda Christie
wrote:
> 4K would have been nice…
You shot film. You can always re-scan the selected takes if you don’t like 2K
on a big screen.
If they are real 2K scans (not HD) they probably will be ok from 35mm neg — a
dirty little secret is that a lot of g
well john... 2K was a budget decision... made in 2011 as i was about to start
shooting... and i was so scared and overwhelmed by this whole new area... i did
what i could afford
i also pulled back from frameworks a bit... and didn't ask for advice here...
feeling somehow like ... not a trai
Amanda, why did you choose a 2k scan, instead of a 4k? Strictly a cost savings?
Seems that TVs will be 4K before we know it. Even if you were lucky to afford a
DI and get a 35mm print, I've heard from several lab guys that 2K DIs were
always a little soft compared to a traditional contact print.
speaking of 16mm films having longer life than 35mm
i had been hoping to finish my latest project, Spectres of Shortwave, on
35mm... it's a 2 hour long landscape film of radio towers... but given that i
knew it would be at least 2 years in the filming process (as they were tearing
down the
Thanks for the many replies! I'm primarily interested in films produced in the
2010s. 45+ minutes in length, with an actual 16mm print struck.
With the end of 35mm distribution in the past year, I've been wondering about
how much longer 16mm prints will stick around. James Benning complained ab
MEEK'S CUTOFF was shot and released on 35mm, through a fairly major studio
(a personal favorite, and the prints looked great!). There have been
several independent and mainstream features shot on 16mm and super 16 in
the last couple years but these were all blown up to 35 (via 2K DIs).
On Fri, Ju
There have maybe been more than one thinks, particularly if we include
independent narrative films in addition to avant grade work. I believe Lukas
Moodysson's CONTAINER was exhibited on 16mm. I suppose Kelly Reichardt's MEEK'S
CUTOFF was released digitally even though it was shot on standard 16
Fotopoulus?
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
rg, both distributed on
>>>> 16mm:
>>>> Voluptuous Sleep 95 min.
>>>> A Darkness Swallowed 75min.
>>>>
>>>> Charlotte
>>>>
>>>> From: Adam Hyman
>>>> Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List
>
n
>>> Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List
>>>
>>> Date: Friday, July 18, 2014 9:58 AM
>>> To: "Patrick Friel , Experimental Film Discussion List"
>>> <"patrick.friel@att.netframeworks"@jonasmekasfilms.com>, Experimen
llowed75min.
>>
>> Charlotte
>>
>> From: Adam Hyman
>> Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List
>> Date: Friday, July 18, 2014 9:58 AM
>> To: "Patrick Friel , Experimental Film Discussion List"
>> <"patrick.friel@att
EARS AT SEA was shot in 16mm but released in 35mm.
>>
>> pf
>>
>>
>> On Friday, July 18, 2014 11:45 AM, Adam Hyman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
>> Didn’t one by
Film Discussion List"
<"patrick.friel@att.netframeworks"@jonasmekasfilms.com>, Experimental Film
Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
Thank you for the clarification. It
>
>
> Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
> Didn¹t one by Ben Rivers?
>
>
> On 7/18/14 6:46 AM, "Warren Cockerham" wrote:
>
>> Let Each One Go Where He May (2009) - Ben Russell
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1
Jem Cohen's Benjamin Smoke and Chain.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 9:53 AM, "Patrick Friel" wrote:
>
> Ben's TWO YEARS AT SEA was shot in 16mm but released in 35mm.
>
> pf
>
>
> On Friday, July 18, 2014 11:45 AM, Adam Hyman wrote:
>
>
> Didn’t one by Ben Rivers?
>
>
> On 7/1
Ben's TWO YEARS AT SEA was shot in 16mm but released in 35mm.
pf
On Friday, July 18, 2014 11:45 AM, Adam Hyman wrote:
Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, distributed on film
Didn’t one by Ben Rivers?
On 7/18/14 6:46 AM, "Warren Cockerham" wrote:
Let Each One Go Whe
g> | web:
www.ihousephilly.org<http://www.ihousephilly.org/>
From: FrameWorks [mailto:frameworks-boun...@jonasmekasfilms.com] On Behalf Of
Adam Hyman
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 12:40 PM
To: Experimental Film Discussion List; John Woods
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Modern 16mm features, di
Didn¹t one by Ben Rivers?
On 7/18/14 6:46 AM, "Warren Cockerham" wrote:
> Let Each One Go Where He May (2009) - Ben Russell
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:50 AM, John Woods wrote:
>> Differently, Molussia (2012) and Empty Quarter (2011) are the only feature
>> length films that I am aware o
Let Each One Go Where He May (2009) - Ben Russell
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:50 AM, John Woods wrote:
> Differently, Molussia (2012) and Empty Quarter (2011) are the only feature
> length films that I am aware of that were distributed on 16mm film in the
> past few years. Does anyone else know o
Differently, Molussia (2012) and Empty Quarter (2011) are the only feature
length films that I am aware of that were distributed on 16mm film in the past
few years. Does anyone else know of any others? Thank you!
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@j
35 matches
Mail list logo
