On Thu, 31 May 2001 16:31:21 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Seigo Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
Seigo for testing.
Seigo The patch is at
Seigo http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
WARNING: rebuild any modules that
Of course not. I never do that with pccards :-)
That's why I asked it :-) It shouldn't be necessary.
When I do that, as a work around, I find that I can pull the plug.
How hard is it to fix the way that the ethernet driver reads the MII
registers in the interrupt context?
Hard, but
Hi!
I get this about 20 seconds after boot completed (and fsck went into
background):
(I saw a similar message yesterday IIRC):
root@zerogravity ~dir $ gdb -k
/usr/obj/usr/home/alex/work/HEAD/src/sys/CICHLIDS/kernel.debug
vmcore.1
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB
I had this problem after I enabled the '4092-cylinder limit' jumper on my
Maxtor drive, because my BIOS (at that point) hung with a drive over 4092
cylinders. I flashed the BIOS afterwards, but forgot about the jumper,
because windows/linux both (somehow) saw the full geometry of the drive.
On Wed, 30 May 2001, David Taylor wrote:
When trying to profile ircd-hybrid-7 on -CURRENT (I tried using a pre-vm
madness version first, then tried a version cvsuped today), I reliably get
lots of:
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
messages on the console (one every 5-10
I wrote:
Trying to fix some make release problems, I've kept running into the
same freelist corruption problems that kris and dougb experienced
earlier this week. Main difference is that I notice when the box
(-CURRENT from 29 May, GENERIC kernel, UP) crashes. :-p
At dougb's urging, I
On 31-May-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, David Taylor wrote:
When trying to profile ircd-hybrid-7 on -CURRENT (I tried using a pre-vm
madness version first, then tried a version cvsuped today), I reliably get
lots of:
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
messages
On 31-May-01 Michael Harnois wrote:
I figured out how to get vmware2 to build, but not to run ;(
Argh. Do you have the source to host_lock_ppn()? If so can you get me a copy
of it that I can give you a patch for?
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key:
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Darian Lanx wrote:
I had this problem after I enabled the '4092-cylinder limit' jumper on my
Maxtor drive, because my BIOS (at that point) hung with a drive over 4092
cylinders. I flashed the BIOS afterwards, but forgot about the jumper,
because windows/linux both
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:31:21PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To
On 31-May-01 David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:31:21PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
I think
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
I think that's what he means by
On 31-May-01 David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
I
On 31-May-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
Once I saw that I had a real hostname, I hit ^D at the shell prompt, put
my fingers in position to hit Alt+F9, and
kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
Stopped at witness_destroy+0x237: cmpl%esi,0xc(%edx)
db trace
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you get any other messages, such as a faulting virtual address, etc.?
I had been using vty1; when the panic ocurred, I was (forcibly) switched
to vty0. There are no faulting virtual address-flavored messages
On 31-May-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you get any other messages, such as a faulting virtual address, etc.?
I had been using vty1; when the panic ocurred, I was (forcibly) switched
to vty0. There are no
I have been told that the OpenBSD code that is supposed to speed up some
types of file system access up to 60x, has been committed to -current on
4/30. I'm wondering if there's any idea when it will be committed to
-stable? Are their any stability issues with the code?
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring
each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is
not something that will scale as more and more archs are added.
It isn't that hard to put
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring
each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is
not something that will scale as more and more archs are added. If a
committer can get
Those of you who have been following the mailing lists will have
noticed (or participated in) a thread bemoaning the continued lack of
feedback from the core team. That thread is still very active, but
one suggestion (made by phk) was to send out a message asking for help
getting things done.
20 matches
Mail list logo
