Re: sftp and lastlog

2001-12-18 Thread Crist J . Clark
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:55:59PM +, David Hill wrote: Hello - Currently, if a user logs in using sftp, it does not log that user to the lastlog. In my opinion, I think it should log the connection. Is this how it is supposed to be? Yes. You only see an entry in last(1) when there

Re: current doesnt see ps2 port with acpi enabled on intel vc820

2001-12-18 Thread KT Sin
Hi all Glad to hear that it worked for you. Just wondering..is your affected motherboard using AMI for BIOS? Mine is AMI too. I'll try to submit a PR. Hopefully the fix will be accepted. kt On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 10:25:52AM -0500, Brian K. White wrote: - Original Message - From:

tx driver

2001-12-18 Thread Petr Holub
Hi all! I've encountered really awful behavior of my SMC card using tx driver in FreeBSD 4.3. On 100 Mbps network I get the throughput just about 200 kBps :-( Colleagues of mine running some PC based routers have very similar experiences with this driver (in both 4.3 and 4.4 Rel's) The same card

firewire driver

2001-12-18 Thread Petr Holub
Hi all! I'm struggling my FireWire OHCI based card in my notebook. I'm using driver from DVTS project (that's what I finally want to have up and running). I'm running FreeBSD 4.4 Release. dmesg of my machine is in the attachement (using boot -v). I've already added proper id for my card in both

minor nit, 4.4-release - -current

2001-12-18 Thread Faried Nawaz
make buildworld doesn't work because src/usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c has a __FBSDID(...) that's not wrapped around with an #ifdef __FBSDID. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: ACPI causes immediate reboot [Omnibook 6100] ?

2001-12-18 Thread Michael G. Petry
I've stumbled on the ACPI_DEBUG issue in the module load as well. The ACPI_DEBUG definition only propogates to the opt_acpi.h file in the base kernel. The acpi module build doesn't seem to carry forward the ACPI_DEBUG flag. As a workaround, I just wack the define into the opt_acpi.h file in

Object now: man(1) -m option is going away

2001-12-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! I'd like to drop the support for the man(1)'s -m option, which is almost undocumented and is of little interest. Unless I hear any valid objections, I am going to nuke it on Friday. Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: mountd(8) leaving filesystems exported

2001-12-18 Thread Ian Dowse
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Terry Lambert writes: One nasty bug is that the code for un-exporting filesystems checks to see if the filesystem is among a list of supported types, but the code for exporting doesn't. This list of supported filesystems does not include ext2fs or hpfs, so you

Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Soren! I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels. Index: fd.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/isa/fd.c,v retrieving revision 1.223 diff -u -p -r1.223 fd.c --- fd.c2001/12/16 05:37:22 1.223

Re: minor nit, 4.4-release - -current

2001-12-18 Thread Faried Nawaz
I've been informed that I should upgrade from -stable, not from -release. I'll keep that in mind the next time I try. Aside from that hitch, the upgrade to -current worked great: http://web.nilpotent.org/tmp/dmesg-old.txt http://web.nilpotent.org/tmp/dmesg-new.txt Faried. To Unsubscribe:

Re: minor nit, 4.4-release - -current

2001-12-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:16:24PM +0459, Faried Nawaz wrote: I've been informed that I should upgrade from -stable, not from -release. I'll keep that in mind the next time I try. Aside from that hitch, the upgrade to -current worked great: http://web.nilpotent.org/tmp/dmesg-old.txt

RE: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Dec-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Soren! I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels. Søren didn't commit this, adn there has already been a discussion on this list about it as it broke all non-i386 kernels. -- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:35:39AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: On 18-Dec-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Soren! I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels. S?ren didn't commit this, adn there has already been a discussion on this list about it as it broke all

Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:09:18PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: s/Soren/Joerg/ And yes, he knows about it. Wilko Soren! I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels. Index: fd.c === RCS file:

Re: current doesnt see ps2 port with acpi enabled on intel vc820

2001-12-18 Thread Mike Smith
Hi all Glad to hear that it worked for you. Just wondering..is your affected motherboard using AMI for BIOS? Mine is AMI too. I'll try to submit a PR. Hopefully the fix will be accepted. A PR that hardwires IRQ 12 probably won't be accepted. Can you look around the ACPI tables and

Re: ACPI causes immediate reboot [Omnibook 6100] ?

2001-12-18 Thread Mike Smith
You can define ACPI_DEBUG in the environment before building the kernel, or when manually building the module, or in /etc/make.conf. I've stumbled on the ACPI_DEBUG issue in the module load as well. The ACPI_DEBUG definition only propogates to the opt_acpi.h file in the base kernel. The

Re: tx driver

2001-12-18 Thread Christian Kratzer
Hi, On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Petr Holub wrote: Hi all! I've encountered really awful behavior of my SMC card using tx driver in FreeBSD 4.3. On 100 Mbps network I get the throughput just about 200 kBps :-( Colleagues of mine running some PC based routers have very similar experiences with

Hmm.... Adaptec SCB timeouts on -current, can reproduce at will

2001-12-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
I can reproduce this at will using the following test. Note that the machine does seem to recover from the error eventually. (This is with -current patches at: http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD/ However, I do not believe the patches are related to the SCSI bus

Buildworld broken on _FBSDID in xinstall.c ??

2001-12-18 Thread Michel Oosterhof
I might be doing something wrong here, this is my first try at -CURRENT. Anyway, buildworld fails right at the start after yacc: -8- cd /usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall; make obj; make depend; make all; make DESTDIR=/us r/obj/usr/src/i386 install

Re: Hmm.... Adaptec SCB timeouts on -current, can reproduce at will

2001-12-18 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
I can reproduce this at will using the following test. Note that the machine does seem to recover from the error eventually. According to the aic7xxx controller, the drive is not completing a disconnected command. This is very similar to some problems with some recent IBM firmware

Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops sorry, that was Joerg. It's fixed now, although i'm still not convinces that using __i386__ is the right thing. If our machine/param.h defines several constants for _MACHINE_ARCH, they should all be distint for the various machines. As it seems

vm_zeropage priority problems.

2001-12-18 Thread Luigi Rizzo
[Cc peter because he introduced this code] Hi, i was trying the following code in -current (basically copied from vm_zeropage.c), to implement device polling in the idle loop, and noticed that the process would take all of the CPU time. Being suspicious that something was wrong with priorities,

Is this a bug in the fork() code?

2001-12-18 Thread Julian Elischer
Near the end of fork1(): /* * If RFSTOPPED not requested, make child runnable and add to * run queue. */ microtime((p2-p_stats-p_start)); p2-p_acflag = AFORK; if ((flags RFSTOPPED) == 0) { mtx_lock_spin(sched_lock);

Re: Is this a bug in the fork() code?

2001-12-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011218 18:20] wrote: now, what is to say that the process has not exitted by this stage, and been reeped by init (on SMP) particularly since between the two is: /* * Preserve synchronization semantics of vfork. If waiting for

RE: Is this a bug in the fork() code?

2001-12-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Dec-01 Julian Elischer wrote: Near the end of fork1(): /* * If RFSTOPPED not requested, make child runnable and add to * run queue. */ microtime((p2-p_stats-p_start)); p2-p_acflag = AFORK; if ((flags RFSTOPPED) == 0) {

RE: Is this a bug in the fork() code?

2001-12-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Dec-01 John Baldwin wrote: It may be that due to some semantics of teh fork calls you cannot have P_PPWAIT and a process queued to run on the other processor while reparented to init(1) but I can't see it.. the result would be that the return value MIGHT be teh pid of a totally

Re: Is this a bug in the fork() code?

2001-12-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Dec-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011218 18:20] wrote: now, what is to say that the process has not exitted by this stage, and been reeped by init (on SMP) particularly since between the two is: /* * Preserve synchronization

Re: Is this a bug in the fork() code?

2001-12-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011218 18:41] wrote: Actually, it's a bit worse than that. The parent process will sleep on itself waiting to be woken up, but when the child exits, it will wake up init (p-p_pptr) not the waiting process, so if you do a rfork(..., RFNOWAIT | RFPPWAIT);

Re: Hmm.... Adaptec SCB timeouts on -current, can reproduce at will

2001-12-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :I can reproduce this at will using the following test. Note that the :machine does seem to recover from the error eventually. : :According to the aic7xxx controller, the drive is not completing a :disconnected command. This is very similar to some problems with :some recent IBM

Re: current doesnt see ps2 port with acpi enabled on intel vc820

2001-12-18 Thread KT Sin
Yes...you are absolutely correct. 8) For my case, all that is needed is adding the correct pnp id and let the pnp driver take care of the rest. Thanks kt On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: Hi all Glad to hear that it worked for you. Just wondering..is your

Re: Buildworld broken on _FBSDID in xinstall.c ??

2001-12-18 Thread Mike Barcroft
Michel Oosterhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I might be doing something wrong here, this is my first try at -CURRENT. Anyway, buildworld fails right at the start after yacc: It looks like Mark Murray broke xinstall.c in revision 1.45 by adding __FBSDID() to a build tool. FreeBSD localisms

Re: minor nit, 4.4-release - -current

2001-12-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Faried Nawaz writes: : make buildworld doesn't work because src/usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c : has a __FBSDID(...) that's not wrapped around with an #ifdef __FBSDID. You are the second person to mention it to me. I've just applied a fix. Anything else in the upgrade

Re: Buildworld broken on _FBSDID in xinstall.c ??

2001-12-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message 9voh4s$q07$[EMAIL PROTECTED] Michel Oosterhof writes: : I might be doing something wrong here, this is my first try at : -CURRENT. Anyway, buildworld fails right at the start after yacc: You are the third person to notice this. I just committed a fix. Warner To Unsubscribe: send

Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joerg Wunsch writes: : Cc goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: what is the politically correct way to : distinguish a PC-type architecture (in that case one that uses a : PC-style RTC memory to store configuration information) from another : architecture that uses IA32 CPUs

Re: Buildworld broken on _FBSDID in xinstall.c ??

2001-12-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Barcroft writes: : Any suggestions? : : I would recommend removing the __FBSD() line locally until this has : been resolved. cvsup might be better :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c vfs_vnops.c src/sys/sys vnode.h

2001-12-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
This is the problem: vfscache781251 49097K 73745K 85234K 24112590 0 64,128,256,2= 56K The VFS cache is running away. When it hits the 85MB kernel malloc limit the machine will lockup. The sbuf usage is also scary: sbuf1074836 33589K 33590K 85234K

Re: minor nit, 4.4-release - -current

2001-12-18 Thread Faried Nawaz
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You are the second person to mention it to me. I've just applied a fix. Anything else in the upgrade path? No -- there were no other problems. Thanks, Faried. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the