On 11/3/2014 9:50 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I simply do periodic(8) weekly runs of pkg version -vRl\ to catch any
port that has not been updated due to being locked. On option to only
report locked packages would simplify this and looks to me like it would be
pretty easy to add, but unless you
On 8/13/2014 9:21 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
It looks like mass storage was hidden in 4.0 and maybe removed after 4.2.
Try searching the android app store for usb mass storage.
Android supports MTP over USB 2.0 and 3.0. It also has backward
compatibility for PTP. Support for MTP is a bit rocky
On 7/29/2014 3:18 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Darren,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:36:06PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
D Never mistake silence for consent.
D
D The vast majority of people don't know pf is outdated and broken on
D FreeBSD because they don't know what they're missing and likely
On 7/18/2014 6:51 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote:
c) We never got the new syntax from OpenBSD 4.7's pf - at the time a long
discussion on the pf-mailing list flamed the new syntax saying it would cause
FreeBSD administrators too much headache. Today on the list it seems everyone
wants it - so
On 7/18/2014 4:06 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
K b) We are a major release away from OpenBSD (5.6 coming soon) - is
K following OpenBSD's pf the past? - should it be?
Following OpenBSD on features would be cool, but no bulk imports
would be made again. Bulk imports produce bad quality of port,
and
On 2/24/2014 6:56 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
One of the many problems with removing functionality is very well
illustrated by what happens now, when you upgrade an pre-10 system
running nameserver: you end up without it and eventually without your
nameserver database as well. Imagine, one day a
On 2/24/2014 6:56 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 24.02.14 13:47, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I don't believe BSD users use base system of itself to send and receive email.
They use ports (FreeBSD) or equivalent in other BSDs.
One of the beauties of the BSD 'base system' is that upon installation
On 2/23/2014 10:31 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
The main developer for systemd is very anti-portability and anti-!Linux. He
had actively rejected patches that made his projects work on non-Linux
systems. In order to port systemd to a non-Linux system, he wants you to
first implement every Linux
On 1/24/2014 11:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
I agree with the rest of this thread. This is just awful. I'm basically
forced to do source based updates when jumping major versions because
freebsd-update is a nightmare to use.
I've yet to go through a freebsd-update process that didn't require a
On 12/22/2013 6:00 AM, Frank Seltzer wrote:
Adrian Chadd said:
The point is that some people like an audit trail. The audit trail for
some people involves remote logging of syslog messages to a log host.
This would include when packages are installed.
There are two more:
1. When a port was
On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this information in
/var/log/messages
On 12/14/2013 12:12 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Opened up an old VM from a month or so ago (r257910) and dhclient won’t start.
Specifically, dhclient complains (when run by root):
“can’t limit bpf descriptor: Bad address”
and then immediately exits.
Are you running a custom kernel without the
At the risk of facetiousness, the nice thing about FreeBSD is that you
have to deal with this problem only a few times per year. ;)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe,
On 10/11/2013 7:14 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:10:26PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
Whatever happened to /usr/bin/nslookup in FreeBSD-current, and
what is one supposed to use in its place?
Use host.
nslookup was part of BIND, and has been deprecated for
On 7/16/2013 2:12 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
... The Haswell line of CPUs is widely reported to
support DIMMs twice as large, and it's due in September. That would
make the systems of late 2013 hold up to 1536GB of memory.
I'd point you at stuff like the Supermicro X8BQ6 series of mainboards.
QP
One of the really cool things Constantine didn't mention is the entire
site is just the nginx config! It's done with what some might consider
slight abuses of rewrite rules, but it does mean the whole thing is
completely memory resident. The full config on github is definitely
worth a read.
M. Warner Losh wrote:
It would be very convenient to have this particular thing in the
base, and we shouldn't be too dogmatic about never having any new 3rd
party things in the base.
Please no, don't add optional servers to the base. I already don't like
sendmail, bind, ntpd and inetd in
On 2003.11.16 09:46:47 -0500, Robert M.Zigweid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 16, 2003, at 12:10 AM, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
I just committed a patch to change /bin and /sbin from statically to
dynamically linked. If you don't like the idea of using a
dynamically linked /bin and /sbin,
On 2003.09.13 01:16:16 -0700, John-Mark Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darren Pilgrim wrote this message on Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 17:55 -0700:
In my workstation, running 5.1-R, I have two disks, one containing
FreeBSD, the other Windows. Since the Windows disk isn't used at
all when
In my workstation, running 5.1-R, I have two disks, one containing
FreeBSD, the other Windows. Since the Windows disk isn't used at all
when in FreeBSD, I would like to put it into standby or sleep mode
(whichever is necessary) to make it spin down, reducing heat and noise
production--both of
On 2003.09.08 14:54:37 -0700, Jason Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You have hit one of the main issues still to be resolved in GEOM. (I
don't know that phk thinks it's a problem to be resolved or a
feature to be documented.)
In any case, since GEOM was added you can no longer slice or
On 2003-08-11, at 00:41:57, Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 2003-08-10, at 15:29:32, Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I'm trying to get 5.1-R installed, but I've run into a problem I don't
On 2003-08-10, at 15:29:32, Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I'm trying to get 5.1-R installed, but I've run into a problem I don't
understand. The disk layout I want should look like this:
s1: 20gb, FreeBSD
s2: 10gb, Windows
s3: ~83gb
I'm trying to get 5.1-R installed, but I've run into a problem I don't
understand. The disk layout I want should look like this:
s1: 20gb, FreeBSD
s2: 10gb, Windows
s3: ~83gb (the rest of the disk), data
The partition, label, and install process all seems to work fine. However, when
I reboot,
Just now, my 120GB western digital, immediately upon the mounting of all
filesystems during startup, made a faint click, then my screen filled with
errors of the form:
ad6: hard error reading fsbn -# of -#--# error=10
That's not an exact quote, of course, since the messages scrolled by so fast I
When I add a new slice or partition to a disk, the device files don't
automatically appear in /dev. If I reboot, it shows up, but having to
reboot twice just to add a filesystem to a running disk is absurd. How
do I make /dev automatically add these devices upon creation? Failing
that, how do I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Darren Pilgrim writes:
When I add a new slice or partition to a disk, the device files don't
automatically appear in /dev. If I reboot, it shows up, but having to
reboot twice just to add a filesystem to a running disk is absurd. How
do I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Darren Pilgrim writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Darren Pilgrim writes:
When I add a new slice or partition to a disk, the device files don't
automatically appear in /dev. If I reboot, it shows up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joerg Wunsch writes:
Darren Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The above practices have worked fine for a long time in 4.x and still do
even in 4.7p4, which is on this same machine.
Get Matthew N. Dodd's patch at:
ftp://ftp.jurai.net
I've been trying to move the installed OSes around on my hard disk, but
am having a huge amount of trouble doing so.
The task involves dd'ing the slices off the disk for safe-keeping,
modifying the on-disk slice table, then dd'ing the slices back onto the
disk in their new locations. However,
I have a Toshiba Satellite 1805-S207 laptop. When I boot the generic 5.0-R
kernel from a fresh install (fresh as in initial reboot), it will show the
device lines for agp0 then hang indefinitely, requiring that I turn off the
machine via the power button. This is a repeating event, and occurs
Ray Kohler wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:05:37PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
How do tell make to use /5/usr/obj instead of /usr/obj? Will
MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/5/usr/obj do this?
I have more questons:
Can I force make to ignore /etc/make.conf and
/etc/defaults/make.conf and read another
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The first question is a bit tougher.
Not at all. Just prepare the slice so that it contains at least an
'a' partition (so you can boot from it), mount the fresh partitions in
the correct places in relation to eachother
I'd like to try out -current, however I'm not willing to clobber by working
4.7 install. How do build -current on 4.7p3 away from my RELENG_4_7 source,
then install to a seperate, pre-partitioned slice?
Is it ok to create the filesystems with 4.7p3's newfs?
Also, how do I cvsup a developer
Matt Dillon wrote:
Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and
flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share
my views on how to deal with other people.
I hereby give maintainership of all my code to Warner, or, whoever wants
it, for that
35 matches
Mail list logo
