On Fri 21 Jun 15:23, Shawn Webb wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> With the recent changes to ncurses in base, I'm getting a bunch of
> messages (snippet below) on every single new PTY. Every time I open a
> new window in tmux or login via ssh, I'm getting spammed with a flood
> of messages like below.
>
> ==
Hey all,
With the recent changes to ncurses in base, I'm getting a bunch of
messages (snippet below) on every single new PTY. Every time I open a
new window in tmux or login via ssh, I'm getting spammed with a flood
of messages like below.
BEGIN LOG
Name collision 'tvi950-b' between
21 1:34 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote:
I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via
this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your
phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth.
Has anyone
On 2021-05-26 22:50:57 (+0800), Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote:
I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently
sent via
this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula;
Your
phone has a virus
from Kurt Jaeger:
> Hi!
> > > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote:
> > > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via
> > > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your
> > > phone has
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
> > > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote:
> > > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via
> > > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your
> > > phone has a virus,
Hi!
> > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote:
> > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via
> > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your
> > phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so fo
> On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote:
>
> I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via
> this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your
> phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth.
> Has anyone else
I got one this morning
Blackmail stuff - just delete it.
> On May 25, 2021, at 4:52 PM, jake h wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via
> this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your
> phon
Hi everyone,
I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via
this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your
phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth.
Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me?
Thanks,
Jake
Hello,
From: Alan Somers
Subject: How to delete comment spam from bugzilla?
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:31:01 -0600
> Somebody, or more likely some bot, is posting comment spam in our
> bugzilla. How can we delete spammy comments ?
I faced same situation before and was told to send m
Somebody, or more likely some bot, is posting comment spam in our
bugzilla. How can we delete spammy comments ?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 7:05 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Am Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:58:47 -0400
> Michael Butler schrieb:
>
> > This started a few days ago .. no apparent ill effect but still annoying
> ..
> >
> > *** Creating the temporary root env
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:58:47 -0400
Michael Butler schrieb:
> This started a few days ago .. no apparent ill effect but still annoying ..
>
> *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot
> *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use
>
This started a few days ago .. no apparent ill effect but still annoying ..
*** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot
*** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use
*** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot
make[4]: "/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.dirs.mk" line 29:
Hello.
After https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=336593
any make action starting spam errors (svn not work on NFS mounted
partitions)
svn: E155016: The working copy database at '/usr/src' is corrupt.
svn: E155016: The working copy database at '/usr/src&
On 30 Jun 2018, at 04:03, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> I'm running Exim, with DNSSEC enabled, and my zone (lerctr.org) is
> DNSSEC signed, but my dyn.lerctr.org subdomain is NOT DNSSEC signed due
> to HE.net don't support DNSSEC.
>
> I get a ton of:
> Jun 29 20:12:53 thebighonker exim[37649]: getho
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 07:33:02PM -0700, Michael Mitchell wrote:
> /etc/syslog.conf maybe
>
> mdm - from a phone
>
That won't help, as I don't want to suppress ALL of the nastygrams.
I'm looking for more selectivity from this in libc.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.o
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 08:29:48PM -0700, Michael Mitchell wrote:
> pick the right options for the daemon and info level?
Nope, it's just this message which is annoying.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
pick the right options for the daemon and info level?
mdm - from a phone
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018, 8:00 PM Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 07:33:02PM -0700, Michael Mitchell wrote:
> > /etc/syslog.conf maybe
> >
> > mdm - from a phone
> >
> That won't help, as I don't want to suppre
/etc/syslog.conf maybe
mdm - from a phone
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018, 7:27 PM Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I'm running Exim, with DNSSEC enabled, and my zone (lerctr.org) is
> DNSSEC signed, but my dyn.lerctr.org subdomain is NOT DNSSEC signed due
> to HE.net don't support DNSSEC.
>
> I get a ton of:
> Ju
I'm running Exim, with DNSSEC enabled, and my zone (lerctr.org) is
DNSSEC signed, but my dyn.lerctr.org subdomain is NOT DNSSEC signed due
to HE.net don't support DNSSEC.
I get a ton of:
Jun 29 20:12:53 thebighonker exim[37649]: gethostby*.gethostanswer: asked for
"borg.lerctr.org IN ", got
On Thu., 22 Dec. 2016 at 12:45 am, Gleb Smirnoff
wrote:
> That was my failure and already fixed.
>
Thanks for the fix!
For those of us playing along at home, I believe the fix can in r310032.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=310032
Regards,
Ben
___
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:03:14AM +0100, Eivind Nicolay Evensen wrote:
E>
E> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:48:59AM -0600, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
E> > On 12/13/2016 09:24, Michael Butler wrote:
E> > > Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like
below. Is
E> > > there a sysctl
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:48:59AM -0600, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 09:24, Michael Butler wrote:
> > Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like below.
> > Is
> > there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
> >
> > Dec 13 10:00:01 archive kernel: Limiting icmp
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:07:19AM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
M> >> Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like
below. Is
M> >> there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
M> >>
M> >> Dec 13 10:00:01 archive kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 1 to
200
M> >> packe
On 2016-12-13 10:24, Michael Butler wrote:
> Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like
> below. Is there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
>
> Dec 13 10:00:01 archive kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 1 to
> 200 packets/sec
> Dec 13 10:00:21 archive last mess
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:19:18AM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 12/13/16 11:15, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:43:27AM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> >> On 12/13/16 10:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >>
> >>> Somebody is most likely port scanning your machines. I see this all t
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:07:19AM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
M> On 12/13/16 10:48, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
M> > On 12/13/2016 09:24, Michael Butler wrote:
M> >> Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like
below. Is
M> >> there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
M> >>
M>
On 12/13/16 11:15, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:43:27AM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
On 12/13/16 10:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Somebody is most likely port scanning your machines. I see this all the
time on boxes connected to the internet.
As are mine. I wouldn't mind so muc
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:43:27AM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 12/13/16 10:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> > Somebody is most likely port scanning your machines. I see this all the
> > time on boxes connected to the internet.
>
> As are mine. I wouldn't mind so much if the message contained
On 12/13/16 10:48, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 12/13/2016 09:24, Michael Butler wrote:
Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like below. Is
there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
Dec 13 10:00:01 archive kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 1 to 200
packets/sec
D
On 2016/12/13 15:43, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 12/13/16 10:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
>> Somebody is most likely port scanning your machines. I see this all the
>> time on boxes connected to the internet.
>
> As are mine. I wouldn't mind so much if the message contained sufficient
> useful inf
On 12/13/2016 09:24, Michael Butler wrote:
> Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like below. Is
> there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
>
> Dec 13 10:00:01 archive kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 1 to 200
> packets/sec
> Dec 13 10:00:21 archive last mess
On 12/13/16 10:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Somebody is most likely port scanning your machines. I see this all the
time on boxes connected to the internet.
As are mine. I wouldn't mind so much if the message contained sufficient
useful information that could be acted on, e.g. originating IP ad
On 13 Dec 2016, at 16:24, Michael Butler wrote:
>
> Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like below.
Somebody is most likely port scanning your machines. I see this all the
time on boxes connected to the internet.
> Is there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
>
>
Any hints as to why all of my -current equipment is complaining like
below. Is there a sysctl to moderate/turn this off?
Dec 13 10:00:01 archive kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 1 to
200 packets/sec
Dec 13 10:00:21 archive last message repeated 13 times
Dec 13 10:02:21 archive last
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 22:27 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:08:54PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 21:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:08:54PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 21:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
> > >
> > > I assume that there
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 21:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
> >
> > I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> > as every one
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
>
> I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> as every one of my machines is spamming my consoles on startup with this
> new messag
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 11:45 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Sep 16, 2014, at 11:40, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >
> > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
> >
> > I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> > as every one of my machin
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 11:40, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
>
> I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> as every one of my machines is spamming my consoles on startup with this
> new message.
unam
HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
as every one of my machines is spamming my consoles on startup with this
new message.
sean
___
freebsd-curr
Please check the headers and then ask me. This is for those who may assume
that I do such things.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-uns
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06:34AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
> > > wrote:
> > > >Because of that deinstall lo
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
> > wrote:
> > >Because of that deinstall log. When you use `pkg install` to upgrade a
> > >port, you get somethi
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
> wrote:
> >Because of that deinstall log. When you use `pkg install` to upgrade a
> >port, you get something like this:
> >
> >Jul 10 23:06:40 chombo pkg-static: ca_root_nss-3.15.1 ins
On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
wrote:
>Because of that deinstall log. When you use `pkg install` to upgrade a
>port, you get something like this:
>
>Jul 10 23:06:40 chombo pkg-static: ca_root_nss-3.15.1 installed
>Nov 29 15:04:52 chombo pkg: ca_root_nss reinstalled: 3.15.2_1
>
>T
On 12/22/2013 6:00 AM, Frank Seltzer wrote:
Adrian Chadd said:
The point is that some people like an audit trail. The audit trail for
some people involves remote logging of syslog messages to a log host.
This would include when packages are installed.
There are two more:
1. When a port was de
figuration file
Glen Barber replied:
echo 'SYSLOG: no' >> /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
And Shane Ambler:
now we can turn it off which I don't think we could before.
All of this is mostly off-topic. I haven't had any opposition to logging.
Instead, I originally thought that th
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:48:49 +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:14:03PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: S> It did
> not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have S> this stupidity
> stopped by default. The spewing of this S> information in
> /var/log/messages pr
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 09:00:42AM -0500, Frank Seltzer wrote:
/root # man pkg.conf
No manual entry for pkg.conf
pkg.conf man pages comes with pkg itself, just bootstrap it and you will get the
manpage :)
regards,
Bapt
OK, my bad, I did this
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 15:25 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > >> this has been done and activated for reason, first
On 22/12/2013 16:08, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 22/12/2013 14:55, olli hauer wrote:
>> What I agree is having it would be nice to have dedicated syslog
>> (like yum.log) instead /var/log/messages since this is already
>> spammed by most every process.
>
> Add something like this to /etc/syslog.con
On 22/12/2013 14:55, olli hauer wrote:
> What I agree is having it would be nice to have dedicated syslog
> (like yum.log) instead /var/log/messages since this is already
> spammed by most every process.
Add something like this to /etc/syslog.conf:
!pkg
*.* /var/log/pkg.log
C
dure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
>>>
>>> pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
>>> configuration file
>>
>> Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being
>> spewed to /var/log/messaage, e.g.,
t;> big portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
> >>
> >> pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
> >> configuration file
> >
> > Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being
> > sp
ed. Please create a repository
configuration file
Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being
spewed to /var/log/messaage, e.g.,
Dec 21 10:27:28 laptop-kargl pkg-static: libwpg-0.2.2 installed
Dec 21 10:31:15 laptop-kargl pkg-static: libcdr-0.0.14 installed
Dec 21 10:32:35 laptop
Steve,
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:14:03PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
S> It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have
S> this stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this
S> information in /var/log/messages provides NOTHING. Please
S> turn it off by default.
I am really sup
The point is that some people like an audit trail. The audit trail for
some people involves remote logging of syslog messages to a log host.
This would include when packages are installed.
-adrian
On 21 December 2013 15:49, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Glen Ba
On 22/12/2013 09:34, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
>
> companies can turn it on it they want it.
Generally the more secure option is default, you can turn off
I was surprised initially, but haven't thought about it much since.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/PACKAGESITE-spam-tp5870583p5870666.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabbl
In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
Steve Kargl writes:
>Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>that 'pkg info' doesn't!
A record of when packages were installed and removed.
-GAWollman
___
free
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:49:26PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> /var/log/message never gets corrupted?
>
If a machine is compromised, I can review log from remote syslog server.
It is impossible to trust the package information, relying on the local
database alone.
Glen
pgpklyEF3RMKl.pgp
Descr
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > Steve Kargl writes:
> >
> > >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > > Steve Kargl writes:
> > >
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > Steve Kargl writes:
> >
> > >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> Steve Kargl writes:
>
> >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
> >that 'pkg info' doesn't!
>
> A record of when packages were installed
On 22/12/13 00:04, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>
> Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
> that 'pkg info' doesn't! Please turn of this feature by default.
>
No please don't, it's a very useful feature, y
On 12/22/2013 12:25 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
co
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
> > companies can turn it on it they wan
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
companies can turn it on it they want it.
And if you want to save the few extra kB, you can turn it off...
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
companies can turn it on it they want it.
> secondly I receive tons of request to actiavte on by default while
> you are the first to request it off by
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:39:59PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:24:55PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >>
> > >
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:24:55PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>
> >>> It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
> >>>
On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this information in
/var/log/messages pr
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
> > stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this information in
> > /var/log/messages provides NOTHING. Please turn
rforming a
big portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a
repository configuration file
Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being spewed to
/var/log/messaage, e.g.,
Dec 21 10:27:28 laptop
performing a big
portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
configuration file
Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being
spewed to /var/log/messaage, e.g.,
Dec 21 10:27:28 laptop
> > > portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
> > >
> > > pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
> > > configuration file
> >
> > Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being
&
> >
> > pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
> > configuration file
>
> Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being
> spewed to /var/log/messaage, e.g.,
>
> Dec 21 10:27:28 laptop-kargl pkg-static: libwpg-0.2.2 i
itory
> configuration file
Yeah, I noticed that spam along with the spam that is being
spewed to /var/log/messaage, e.g.,
Dec 21 10:27:28 laptop-kargl pkg-static: libwpg-0.2.2 installed
Dec 21 10:31:15 laptop-kargl pkg-static: libcdr-0.0.14 installed
Dec 21 10:32:35 laptop-kargl pkg-static: o
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
configuration file
___
freebsd-current@fr
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 22:24 +0200, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
> W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
> > Hello, Marek.
> > You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
> >
> >>> atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
> > MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
> >
W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
Hello, Marek.
You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
MS> Do you have any solution?
In my case it was local patch for exotic embedded c
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:56:11 -0800
Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 12/4/11 12:30 PM, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 22:25:19 +0200
> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> >> Try to set sysctl security.bsd.map_at_zero to 1.
> > I didn't even think of that. It helped, thanks :)
> >
> do you
on. Is there a good way to quiesce this
> > > spam?
> >
> > Ask on acpi@ list.
> > Kidding :-) or not.
> > Try hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate=0.
>
> Adding the following line in /boot/loader.conf will disable
> acpi_thermal(4) completely:
>
> de
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:40 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following:
> > I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty
> > bad ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce this
> > spam?
>
> Ask on a
on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following:
> I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty bad
> ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce this spam?
Ask on acpi@ list.
Kidding :-) or not.
Try hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate=0.
> The console fill
I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty bad
ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce this spam?
The console fills up with repeated warnings that never cease.
FreeBSD testbox 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r228164S: Wed Nov
30 16:19:16 PST 2011
sbruno
Hi all,
On 12/28/10 07:37, Colin Percival wrote:
> The '(CTRL-C to abort)' which gets printed while dumping is irritating me
> because EC2's console has a very limited buffer and having this spammed
> makes it impossible to see any printfs immediately prior.
Never mind, I've had pointed out to me
Hi all,
The '(CTRL-C to abort)' which gets printed while dumping is irritating me
because EC2's console has a very limited buffer and having this spammed
makes it impossible to see any printfs immediately prior. (Turning off
dumping solves the problem, but creates a worse problem, namely a lack o
--Best Regards,Littlecho
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content and is
believed to be clean.
> Original Message
>From: freebsd-current-requ...@freebsd.org
>To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>Sent: Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 20:01 PM
>Subject: [SPAM]
Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 14:02, Bartosz Stec wrote:
On 2010-09-23 13:36, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 13:21, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 04:29, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded my FreeBSD 8.1 installation to FreeBSD 9
current via
buildwo
On 2010-09-23 14:02, Bartosz Stec wrote:
On 2010-09-23 13:36, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 13:21, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 04:29, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded my FreeBSD 8.1 installation to FreeBSD 9
current via
buildworld and buildkernel. I
On 2010-09-23 13:36, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 13:21, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 04:29, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded my FreeBSD 8.1 installation to FreeBSD 9
current via
buildworld and buildkernel. I was able to one general ports, src
and
On 2010-09-23 13:21, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2010-09-23 04:29, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded my FreeBSD 8.1 installation to FreeBSD 9 current via
buildworld and buildkernel. I was able to one general ports, src and doc
update by cvsup but now I am getting the fo
On 2010-08-20 11:10, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
If you have profiling libraries installed, you can build a profiling
version of grep (or any program) like so:
% cd /usr/src/usr.bin/grep
% make clean
% make DEBUG_FLAGS="-pg -g" -DNO_SHARED
Do *not" make install, because the result will be dog s
From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:03, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses,
etc.
> >
> > I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of
them
> > FreeBSD related) so I was wonder
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
