Re: PPP modem dial is completely broken

2001-06-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:45:58 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 11-Jun-2001 Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > With new PPP I can't dial to my provider anymore. Two variants: > > > > 1) PPP says "Clearing choked output queue" and connection stuck forever > > with carrier on. Nothing else hap

Re: msdosfs can't mount Extended partition. Any ideas?

2001-06-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 15:25:27 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > I just found that msdosfs can't mount legal Extended partition because > > required info is few blocks later in that case, not immediately as for > > Primary partition. Is it known pro

Re: msdosfs can't mount Extended partition. Any ideas?

2001-06-12 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello Ache, On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:08:22PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 15:25:27 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > > > I just found that msdosfs can't mount legal Extended partition because > > > required info is fe

Re: msdosfs can't mount Extended partition. Any ideas?

2001-06-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:47:43 +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > In your situation I would try ad0s5 and onwards. If you do not have the > device node under /dev, so create it:-) (No worries I have also forgotten > how to do such mounts on occasion before:-) Thanks, it works. I was confused b

Re: msdosfs can't mount Extended partition. Any ideas?

2001-06-12 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:01:02PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:47:43 +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > > > In your situation I would try ad0s5 and onwards. If you do not have the > > device node under /dev, so create it:-) (No worries I have also forgotten > > ho

Re: What's happened to the generation of CTM?

2001-06-12 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2001-Jun-11 21:46:55 -0500, Steve Hocking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w rote: > >I see that cvs-cur stuff hasn't been generated since the beginning of May - > > cvs-cur _is_ being generated[1], it just not being mirrored on > ftp.freebsd.org at present. When I asked Jordan

Re: HEADS UP: locale names reorganization

2001-06-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:32:57 +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > I thought of two components, like ru_RU, en_US, or de_DE. AFAICT, > that's the common practice i've seen in the other Unices. Lets swith to i18n list, I Cc: here first time to notice -current readers. > > But then we need to rewrite

HEADS UP: hints implementation repairs in -current!

2001-06-12 Thread Peter Wemm
The potential for breakage is there, but I've tested just about everything I can think of for now. Ideally there should not be any user visible differences. In a nutshell: - several poorly thought out API's for doing some stuff that cam etc needed has been removed with extreme prejudice (resourc

Re: msdosfs can't mount Extended partition. Any ideas?

2001-06-12 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 15:25:27 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > > > I just found that msdosfs can't mount legal Extended partition because > > > required info is few blocks later in that case, not

handle_written_filepage: active pagedep

2001-06-12 Thread Jun Kuriyama
I updated my notebook today and I got some messages on my console. handle_written_filepage: active pagedep handle_written_filepage: active pagedep handle_written_filepage: active pagedep ... Can I ignore these messages? Or something wrong in sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c? -- Jun Kuriyama <[EMA

Re: handle_written_filepage: active pagedep

2001-06-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 19:07:44 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > I updated my notebook today and I got some messages on my console. > > handle_written_filepage: active pagedep > handle_written_filepage: active pagedep > handle_written_filepage: active pagedep > ... I can confirm that I saw them

Re: handle_written_filepage: active pagedep

2001-06-12 Thread Jun Kuriyama
I got panic with recently updated box. Brief trackback is here: panic() deallocate_dependencies() softdep_setup_freeblocks() ffs_truncate() handle_workitem_remove() softdep_setup_remove() ufs_dirremove() ufs_rmdir() ufs_vnoperate() rmdir() syscall() syscall_with_err_pushed() -- Jun Kuriyama

Re: PCCARD and -current

2001-06-12 Thread Samuel Tardieu
> "Warner" == Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Warner> In summary: Warner> o Use the same config file you used before. Warner> o Update pccardd Warner> o Add "-I -i 9" to pccardd_flags (if your pcic's irq is 9). Warner> o rebuild and reinstall the kernel. Warner> o reboot. Send your p

Patch to restore WARNS feature

2001-06-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! The attached patch enables us to restore the -Werror bit of the WARNS feature by fixing relevant headers and adding one new header, complex.h, aligned with the POSIX.1-200x draft. I did not fix the CSRG's libm (-DWANT_CSRG_LIBM) because it does not compile with the current sources for the re

Re: PPP modem dial is completely broken

2001-06-12 Thread Brian Somers
> With new PPP I can't dial to my provider anymore. Two variants: > > 1) PPP says "Clearing choked output queue" and connection stuck forever > with carrier on. Nothing else happens. > > 2) PPP says "Too many IPCP NAKs sent - abandoning negotiation" and drop > carrier forever without further red

Re: PCCARD and -current

2001-06-12 Thread Samuel Tardieu
> "Sam" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sam> I just did that. I got a panic, which I could not save (I cannot Sam> panic From ddb, it just doesn't work). ddb reports the faulty Sam> process as being ddb, and it relates to "trap 12 being called Sam> ..." (I don't remember the exa

Re: Unrecognised CBCP packet [strange problems with ppp(8)]

2001-06-12 Thread Mark Valentine
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Somers) > Date: Fri 8 Jun, 2001 > Subject: Re: Unrecognised CBCP packet [strange problems with ppp(8)] > To be honest, I have no idea what's going on here. It doesn't even > look as if you sent any data. I think you may have to ask your ISP > why they're closi

PAM causes segfault in login(1)

2001-06-12 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, I've noticed that new PAM segfaults when I'm typing non-existing login at console login prompt. Please fix. -Maxim FreeBSD/i386 (big_brother) (ttyv0) login: max1 pid 372 (login), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) FreeBSD/i386 (big_brother) (ttyv0) login: max Password: Welcome t

Re: Patch to restore WARNS feature

2001-06-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 03:53:18PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I did not fix the CSRG's libm (-DWANT_CSRG_LIBM) because it > does not compile with the current sources for the reason of > missing library functions. > CSRG's libm should be deleted before 5.0 is tagged. I sent in PR misc/1784

Patch to restore WARNS feature

2001-06-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > + qsort((void *)sp->fts_array, nitems, sizeof(FTSENT *), > + (int (*) __P((const void *, const void *)))sp->fts_compar); This is wrong. The declaration of the comparison function should be fixed, rather than papering over the mistake here. (This is arguably a deficiency i

RE: Couple "Giant not locked" at vm_object.c:261 panics I had to

2001-06-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 09-Jun-01 Richard Todd wrote: > Backtraces posted here in hopes they might enlighten someone. > This is with kernel source from June 6 (specifically, > "Sticky Date: 2001.06.06.22.16.24" according to cvs status). The machine > is a dual PII/400; dmesg follows the backtraces from the two pani

Can a program ignore all signals?

2001-06-12 Thread Riccardo Torrini
I'm trying to obtain a dump of a (working) cd disk on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #17: Sat Apr 28 03:30:53 CEST 2001 I also have a 4.3-STABLE machine but I cannot test on it because it has no cd... The machine is all ide/ata, one hd, one cd and a writer. ---[ short-dmesg ]--- atapci0: port ... ata0: at

lock recursion in uipc_mbuf.c

2001-06-12 Thread Michael Harnois
This is from today's current. Can you spot the problem from this or do you need a backtrace? recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) mbuf free list lock @ ../../kern/uipc_mbuf.c:573 -- Michael D. Harnois[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redeemer Lutheran Church

Re: lock recursion in uipc_mbuf.c

2001-06-12 Thread Bosko Milekic
Although I'm ripping all this out and replacing it with new code within [hopefully] the next week, a backtrace would be nice nonetheless. On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:00:34PM -0500, Michael Harnois wrote: > This is from today's current. Can you spot the problem from this or do > you need a backtra

Re: Couple "Giant not locked" at vm_object.c:261 panics I had to

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Todd
In fbsd-current John Baldwin writes: >On 09-Jun-01 Richard Todd wrote: >> Note that the first panic is somewhat muddled by the fact that, while >> syncing disks from the vm_object.c panic, it apparently paniced again with >> "Giant locked" at i386/trap.c:1153. That probably confuses the issue >

New SMP Mbuf Allocator (PATCH and TESTING request)

2001-06-12 Thread Bosko Milekic
Hi -current && -alpha, If you run -CURRENT on multiprocessor alpha, please please please read this! :-) The final version (or next to final, depending on how this final testing stage goes) of the new mbuf allocator which I have been working on for the past 1.5 months and which I

Re: New SMP Mbuf Allocator (PATCH and TESTING request)

2001-06-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week tho? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: New SMP Mbuf Allocator (PATCH and TESTING request)

2001-06-12 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:13:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week > tho? Your prompt reply is extremely encouraging. Thanks! :- The reason I said "in the next week" is actually because on Sat. June 23rd (not th

Re: msdosfs can't mount Extended partition. Any ideas?

2001-06-12 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szilveszter Adam writes: : > Thanks, it works. I was confused by 'devfs' this time which not show ad0s5 : > slice under /dev until it is actualy mounted. : : Yes, devfs really takes some getting used to in the beginning, at least it : has for me:-) I'm not sure I l

Re: handle_written_filepage: active pagedep

2001-06-12 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jun Kuriyama writes: : Can I ignore these messages? Or something wrong in : sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c? SOFTUPDATES are not safe in current. Maybe I should write an UPDATING entry. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-c

Re: PCCARD and -current

2001-06-12 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Samuel Tardieu writes: : I just did that. I got a panic, which I could not save (I cannot panic : From=20ddb, it just doesn't work). ddb reports the faulty process as : being ddb, and it relates to "trap 12 being called ..." (I don't : remember the exact message unfo

Re: PCCARD and -current

2001-06-12 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Samuel Tardieu writes: : fine by adding "-I -i 9". It seems to be only my Psion Dacom Gold Card : that has a problem. OK. This is the second report of a modem failing (but mine worked, grump) so I'll look into this some more. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [

Re: New SMP Mbuf Allocator (PATCH and TESTING request)

2001-06-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:13:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week > > tho? > > Your prompt reply is extremely encouraging. Thanks! :- > > The reason I said "

Re: PAM causes segfault in login(1)

2001-06-12 Thread Mark Murray
> I've noticed that new PAM segfaults when I'm typing non-existing login > at console login prompt. Please fix. This current, right? I'll sort it out. Thanks for the debug-sleuthing! M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc

Using sync(1) while background-fscking

2001-06-12 Thread Samuel Tardieu
If I run sync(1) while background fsck is in progress, sync(1) is blocked and fsck stops. Using -CURRENT from yesterday, and SOFTUPDATES (I don't know if it's related). Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP signature

-current pproblems (FS and psm)

2001-06-12 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, with -current as of yesterday evening I got: /usr: mount pending error: blocks 76 files 9 /usr has (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) Is this critical? Furthermore psm stopped working. During boot I got: psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 atkbd1: irq 1 on a

Re: PAM causes segfault in login(1)

2001-06-12 Thread Maxim Sobolev
> > > I've noticed that new PAM segfaults when I'm typing non-existing login > > at console login prompt. Please fix. > > This current, right? Did I complain? > I'll sort it out. Thanks for the debug-sleuthing! Yes, please do it. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "u