Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
the following message seems to suggest that the compiler
(the way it is invoked) packs structures differently
when building the kernel and userland.
The stize of the structure in question is computed
by both kernel and userland app using sizeof(),
so there is no
Hi, I was scratching around the geocrawler archives yesterday, looking for
information on using SCSI emulation in FBSD. I found some, but was dumb
enough (yet again) not to bookmark it.
I've synced my source with -CURRENT, and looked through all the options I
could find, even a home-made LINT,
Anybody have any idea what I need and where I can find it?
http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/
Jan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Just a note for those following these things...
Not of great importance, as we know that -current
performance will go up and down,
but I just noticed we lost 1.5% since the 9th
on the worldstone test. (real time numbers. several runs)
July 14 kernel
3441.946u 1492.986s 1:32:01.33 89.3%
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Hi all,
I reworked my patch as from PR bin/29175 and the PR
misc/27816.
http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/patches/rpcgen.diff
Some comments about the patch.
- TI-RPC is now the default again for code generation. Unbreaks
ports/mail/drac for CURRENT.
- As before, inetd support support is
Hello everybody,
I have recently finished to upgrade my system to today morning's
-CURRENT, with sources just *before* the commit of rev 1.154 to
src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c by Julian.
I have an UP IA32 machine, I am not using any additional kernel modules,
and now, upon rebooting with the new
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 07:49:57PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have recently finished to upgrade my system to today morning's
-CURRENT, with sources just *before* the commit of rev 1.154 to
src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c by Julian.
I have an UP IA32 machine, I am not
I'm still upset that we don't have tirpc99, when do you plan on porting
that over?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 05:29:01PM -0600, Eric Anholt wrote:
well if you give me details, i could try
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/dri login
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/dri -z3 co -P xc
details snipped/
ok i'll try :-) I am not a kernel hacker, so MMMV (my
Anybody have any idea what I need and where I can find it?
http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/
Just as a datapoint, I recently applied the ATAPI/CAM patches to a -STABLE
from July 10th).
They applied flawlessly, compile was clean.
My newly-acquired TEAC DW-28E CDR/CDRW/DVD
Just to follow up, I went back to -STABLE after discovering I don't need
-current to do this (*slight sigh of reliefe*)
Thanks Jan and Thomas, it works perfectly with both my BTC 36x ATAPI
CD-ROM and the HP CD-Writer+ 9110.
Thomas, ever consider asking for it to be committed into FreeBSD
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:50:00PM +0200, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
Hi,
I installed FreeBSD 5.0-current on my notebook, because in FreeBSD4.6
the sounddriver let the kernel hang on boot.
I know, that acpi is under developement, but here are my results testing
acpi on this hardware.
About a year ago I pushed for this to be integrated and
at that time there were lots of comments about
not being done correctly and it will be done corectly soon.
well another year or so ha spassed and people are STILL
having to apply the patches manually.
Can I suggest that the code be applied
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 08:06:49PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 07:49:57PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have recently finished to upgrade my system to today morning's
-CURRENT, with sources just *before* the commit of rev 1.154 to
On Sun, 2002/07/14 at 01:18:10 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
the following message seems to suggest that the compiler
(the way it is invoked) packs structures differently
when building the kernel and userland.
The stize of the structure in question is computed
by both kernel and userland
[i am deliberately not trimming the email in case someone wants to
look at the context]
i am a bit dubious about your explaination -- it also does not
explain why the person reporting this problem fixed that
by swapping timestamp and next_rule in the structure
cheers
luigi
On
On Sun, 2002/07/14 at 13:43:37 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
[i am deliberately not trimming the email in case someone wants to
look at the context]
i am a bit dubious about your explaination -- it also does not
explain why the person reporting this problem fixed that
by swapping timestamp and
Hi!
I'm getting strange dead-locks/complete lookups when I use the system
ssh with port forwarding. Using something like:
ssh -L8080:remote:8080 account@remote
to forward a remote apache to my local box. When I access
http://localhost:8080/ not later than the third click on link (or
pressing
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:08:07PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
I'm getting strange dead-locks/complete lookups when I use the system
ssh with port forwarding. Using something like:
ssh -L8080:remote:8080 account@remote
to forward a remote apache to my local box. When I access
you can use addr2line to get info, but
at a pinch you can just use nm -n to figure out what function each address
is in.
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have recently finished to upgrade my system to today morning's
-CURRENT, with sources just *before* the
No, the problem is because the kernel has grown too large to
fit on the md(4) filesystem prepared for it.
src/release/ARCH/dokern.sh needs to be adapted to omit
new drivers added to GENERIC.
Cheers,
Jerry Hicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday, July 13, 2002, at 12:21 PM, Donny Lee wrote:
Ooh... yuh, i didn't read into detail of the log.
--
// Donny
W Gerald Hicks wrote:
No, the problem is because the kernel has grown too large to
fit on the md(4) filesystem prepared for it.
src/release/ARCH/dokern.sh needs to be adapted to omit
new drivers added to GENERIC.
it looks
W Gerald Hicks wrote:
With the current hack^Wmethod used by make release we are
required to add elements to a shell script which deletes items
from the GENERIC configuration to create BOOTMFS.
If my proposition holds water we can do away with the linkage
to GENERIC in favor of a statically
I've been having inexplicable crashes for a while and finally got around
to getting a debug kernel and checking out what's going on, so here
goes (apologies for the ^M's and all, I scripted a gdb session and that's
what I got...):
panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy
panic messages:
---
Fatal
25 matches
Mail list logo
