Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/wpifw.ko
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:246
246 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:246
#1 0xc05f668f in boot (howto=260)
at /usr/local/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:416
#2 0xc05f6972 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I've made a post to -arch regarding my plans for BIND in the base, along
with some information about getting ready for DNSSEC, including the
upcoming signing of the root zone. You can find the message at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-
On 2/16/2010 6:30 PM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> Mmm - the port (without thread and without XML) works fine:
I'm glad to here that you got something that works. Unfortunately when
you start talking about threads on ARM you've pole vaulted outside of my
competency area. If the folks on the -arm list can
On 2/16/2010 10:56 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
>> Wow, that was fast. :) It sure looks like that's the problem. Can you
>> try compiling ports/dns/bind96 without threads and see if that works for
>> you? If it does then it would be good to follow up on
>> freebsd-...@freebsd.org and see if the problem
On 2/16/2010 10:39 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# gdb /usr/sbin/named named.core
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute
On 2/15/2010 1:39 PM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> [62]# uname -a
> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r203927: Mon Feb 15 19:12:36 CET
> 2010
> ti...@cicely14.cicely.de:/data/builder/arm-current/head/sys/arm/compile/FBOX
> arm
> [64]# /etc/rc.d/named start
> Starting named.
> /etc/rc.d/n
On 2/15/2010 10:33 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> On 16.02.2010 4:51, Bernd Walter wrote:
>>> I don't know how difficult it is to fix, but for many of us mpd is
>>> important to have network connection.
>>
>> You can try this patch. I don't know why Alexander did't commit
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> All,
>
> We are badly overflowing the disc1 release ISO with packages, and need
> to trim it down. One package that could easily get axed is the
> linux-netscape-communicator package.
I concur with that. For those of us who use linux netscape for whatever
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to
> > happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled
> > through the ports
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Well, actually it is directly related. Part of the plan to
> transition to libpthread is making ports PTHREAD_LIBS compliant.
> As stated in that thread, if a libpthread exists on the system,
> autoconf/configure will pick it up and the port will also
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Harald Schmalzbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are
> >
> > Maybe I missed the re
We discuss rc on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feel free to send any ideas
to that list.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send a
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : That functionality is being ported back to the vendor, if it hasn't been
> : already. If we want really cool whizbang features tha
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Yes. that has been the plan for some time now. However, dhclient is
> really lame in a lot of ways. Martin Blapp has made it a lot better
> of lates. In geral, I tend to believe that I shouldn't fix bugs in
> dhclient with devd things. However, a m
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:59:11PM +0200, Philipp Grau wrote:
> >Next problem is that /etc/rc.d/ntpd is evaluated before /etc/rc.d/devfs (see
> >the output of "rcorder /etc/rc.d*) So the start of ntpd fails because it is
> >requires the devfs link. Ntpd li
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > @ ${CP} ${WRKSRC}/configure ${WRKSRC}/configure.Patched
> > @ ${SED} -e 's#-lpthread#${PTHREAD_LIBS}#g' \
>
> How about: ${SED} -Ee 's#-l?pt
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> For which versions of FreeBSD? I just tried using ${PTHREAD_LIBS}, but
> the loader could not find any of the pthread routines. I assume it
> should be defined in one of the .mk files, but it does not seem to be
> on either a current (yesterday) or an old
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Khairil Yusof wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 16:07, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Any occurences of -lc_r should be changed to ${PTHREAD_LIBS} too.
>
> Seems that -lc_r is set by default in bsd.port.mk for ${PTHREAD_LIBS}.
The reason we use the variable
Argh. I got this working again by putting the
hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range back into my /boot/loader.conf.local
file. I had it in there originally thinking it would help with my acpi
problems, but when the new .aml file fixed the acpi issues, I took it
out.
I attached two files, one is the re
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2003 06:23, leafy wrote:
> > IMO this deprecation deserves a place in UPDATING. And what are the
> > plans to Do The Right Thing? QT currently does not compile on -current
> > with the -pthread deprecated.
Probably be nice t
With a kernel updated last night, I get the following every time I try
to put in a wireless card, in either slot:
pccard0: can't alloc memory to read attributes
pccard0: CARD ERROR!
cbb0: PC Card card activation failed
pccard1: can't alloc memory to read attributes
pccard1: CARD ERROR!
cbb1: PC Ca
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquière wrote:
> Doug,
>
> We have already posted some info about the N610c here in the mailing
> list. I've got a acpi code uploadable from the bootloader to bios
> available:
>
> http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl
>
> This code can be co
The Compaq Evo N610c that I'm having all these acpi problems with will
be at bsdcon, if anyone wants to take a look.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
FYI,
Doug
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 06:03:15 -0700
From: Rodney Joffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: UltraDNS Corp
Subject: Important changes to the .org tld today.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
During the root zone (.) update later toda
I compiled the latest -current, and now it doesn't even boot. :( My
first cd drive (a CD-ROM) is probed, but it falls back to PIO4. The
kernel boot freezes after that point, and my CD-RW is never detected.
This time the trick of putting a CD into the second drive doesn't help.
I've added back the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen this problem on my compaq evo n610c as well, but didn't
realize it was affecting other hardware as well. I tried to stir up
interest in getting the acpi problem fixed, but wasn't successful.
Mark, ok with you if I nuke the sysctl -a line in
oug
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Doug Barton wrote:
> dougb 2003/09/04 03:07:01 PDT
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sbin/savecoresavecore.8 savecore.c
> Log:
> Add a flag that reports the existence of a dump, and does nothing else.
>
You should really file a PR about this.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Nicole wrote:
> Sorry I didn't mean to be so "testy" I guess would discribe it. It's
> an old issue for me.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but I've seen numerous posts from
you, on several topics, all of them berating people for not giving you
what you want, when you want
I'm sure there's lots of errors, so be gentle. :) It does work though,
so that's a plus.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protectionIndex: savecore.8
===
RCS file: /usr/local/ncvs/src/sbin/savecore/savecore.8,v
retrie
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Nicole wrote:
> It just drives me crazy when important things get broken and people
> act like.. What the big deal. I don't need it why should you?
You're certainly free to draw that conclusion, however you'd be
mistaken. There are times when adding new features means that t
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes:
> >On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, that was an unfortunate side effect.
> >
> >Heh, well, stuff happens. I think your idea of op
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> I still think that the real problem is in running swapon before
> savecore. In 99% of the cases out there, RAM scales with storage,
> so I really can't imaging fsck needing to swap, and certainly not
> in it's 'preen-before-background' mode.
I agree, but t
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:58:40AM -0600 I heard the voice of
> Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > I still think that the real problem is in running swapon before
> > savecore. In 99% of the cases out there, RAM scales with storage,
> > so I
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Hmm, that was an unfortunate side effect.
Heh, well, stuff happens. I think your idea of opening swap exclusive is
probably a good one, but it will require some gymnastics to accomodate
it. One thing that'd really help is an option to savecore that t
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> Device flags are not specified in the kernel config anymore unless you
> try really, really hard. /etc/device.hints is the correct place to
> adjust this flag.
Yeah, I was looking at the kernel config on the wrong box. This flag did
used to be in GENERIC,
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Ian Freislich wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any idea why '-C' is hard coded for bsd.lib.mk and bsd.own.mk? I
> thought that the make.conf variable was there to allow or disallow
> this. The following comes from bsd.lib.mk:
I'd also like to see this option be a knob, preferably defaulting
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > > I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion... I tried that one, but got the same error
> > about not enough memory to load the overr
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> :
> : > My tool is initially just a 'delete these files' tool, but now that I
&
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > I posted one approach to this today... touch a file right before you
> > start installworld, then consider anything not newer than that file a
> > candidate for disposal. There is currently something weird going on in
> > /usr/lib though... a lot of th
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> My tool is initially just a 'delete these files' tool, but now that I
> think about it, it wouldn't be hard to say also 'create these
> symlinks'. The hard part here is generating the 'obsolete' lists.
I posted one approach to this today... touch a fil
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquière wrote:
> I don't seem to have these problems. I use xbattbar without problem.
Argh. How recent is your -current? I compile regularly, and I was up to
date as of this afternoon.
> I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsd
I got interested in this recently because I inherited one of these
laptops from work.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote:
> Which version of the N610C BIOS are you using? (F.14 is the latest on
> the hp.com website.) I know that the _OSI("Windows 2001") bug will be
> fixed in
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Martin Jessa wrote:
> Sources fetched an hour ago.
> Running make in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL :
Remove device pcic from your kernel config. My understanding is that
it's broken anyway, so you're not losing anything by removing it.
HTH,
Doug
--
This .signatur
There was a discussion of this recently, and the conclusion was more or
less that doing this in an automated fashion is frought with danger,
since you don't know for sure what else besides system components the
user has put in the various directories.
I've been using the following combination of a
I've cvsup'ed and built world/kernel from the latest sources to this
point, and on my desktop I have the problem that's been previously
discussed about not being able to boot without a disc in the CD-RW
that's on ata1-master. I've included an annotated verbose dmsesg below.
I have the following in
I found my problem, when I got this new laptop two weeks ago I
UN-commented the pcic cardbus bridge "just in case." This worked fine up
till 8/27, my last build on that machine. Starting last night, with that
device in my kernel config, kernel build fails with the error below.
Commenting it again a
With latest sources:
cc -c -O -fno-ident -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/local/src/sys
-I/usr/local/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpic
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes:
> >Poul-Henning,
> >
> >Please don't forget to update src/share/examples/etc/make.conf
> >accordingly.
>
> Hmm, so this stuff is documented both in m
Poul-Henning,
Please don't forget to update src/share/examples/etc/make.conf
accordingly.
All,
As a sometime-contributor to the "let's give people more options to
leave stuff out" cause, I fully support adding more knobs like this.
There is no harm to adding more knobs that work the same way as
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Okay, you philosophize while the rest of us follow the advice of the
> folks who have a good understanding of gcc's optimizer. :-)
Not to be disagreeable, but the gcc developers seem to think that -O2
should "always" produce better code, and "never" pro
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> I think some people are already tracking this down related to the recent
> update of the ata drivers.
It would be nice if those people would post regarding their progress. A
lot of people depend on atapicam.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized fo
Folks,
One of the topics at the recent ICANN conference was the issue of
functionality for the new generic top level domains (gTLD's). Seven new
gTLD's were adopted by ICANN in November of 2000, but many users with
domains in those TLD's are still having problems using them.
One of the areas that
I'll take a look at this, thanks.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 08:21:14PM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> > > > mergemaster -dv
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > cd /usr/src/etc/sendmail; make distribution
> > > install -o root -g wheel -m 644 /usr/src/e
Ok, good news and bad news. The good news is that your patch fixed the
problem with acpi errors rolling through the logs. The bad news is that
now that I can actually boot the thing repeatedly, my disappearing xl
device is disappearing again. :-/ I booted it repeatedly, and saved the
verbose dmesg
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> This message is due to a bug in ACPICA. Patch looks like this:
Thanks John! I look forward to trying this when I get home tonight.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
[EMAIL PROTEC
This set of commits seems to have fixed a perennial problem I've had with
my laptop and acpi. Previously, about every 3rd or 4th reboot the pci bus
would fail to initialize, the major symptom of which was that the xl card
wouldn't set up, and I'd have to reboot again. Disabling acpi eliminated
the
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote:
> This is a rather different statement than you previously gave.
I've been extremely consistent in saying that I'm talking about the right
thing to do _now_. I purposely tried to avoid confusing the issue with
detailed plans for the future, however no
Wow you've so completely missed the point that I hesitate to respond
to this, but I suppose I should try.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 3:01 AM -0700 2003/06/06, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Regardless of whether I agree with the points you make here or not,
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
> I seem to remember that part of the issue is that FreeBSD pulls in the
> resolver libraries from BIND.
Only indirectly. The resolver code actually hasn't been updated in a
while, unfortunately.
> I actually would like to see BIND completely
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Paul Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:01:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > FreeBSD development model requires that what we import in -current, for
> > the most part, be what we plan to eventually MFC. That factor alone
> > eliminates the
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 12:09 AM -0700 2003/06/06, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please
> > see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.html
>
> I might be able to buy your
[ Please respect followups to -arch, thanks. ]
As most of you are probably already aware, there have been two recent
releases of BIND 8. Version 8.3.5 is the "bugfix, and new minor features"
release on the 8.3.x branch that we've currently got in the tree already.
8.4.0 is (more or less) the "all
Personally I think it would make more sense for gdbe init to pull the
sectorsize from the fs for the user. But, I'm not volunteering to write
the code. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
htt
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Mark Murray wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > KerberosIV support was recently dropped from HEAD, but Mark
> > forgot to remove some vestiges. I've sent him a patch on
> > March 14, but he seems off-line for a moment.
>
> I'm on-line, just busy with other things. Please do N
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:07:53PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:43:19PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:11:12AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:28:34AM -0800, Cri
Are you guys precisely following the instructions in src/UPDATING?
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Scott Sipe wrote:
> I second that problem. Tried doing an upgrade yesterday, and it didn't
> work--missing libc.so.4 error given during make installworld.
>
> Scott
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "R
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote:
> FreeBSD is a free software. You have no right to make any claims
> or force developers to do something to fit your needs (did you
> read BSD license?). If it's used to work fine but currently broken,
> it will be fixed. Also you're always welcom
Update your sources, and make sure that you have 1.202 of
sys/netinet/tcp_input.c. I had a 100% reproducable panic very similar to
yours, and hsu fixed it.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Damian Gerow wrote:
> I've managed to write down the actual panic twice (no panic to screen if
> you're in X),
You pro
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tobias Reifenberger wrote:
> Am Di, 2003-03-11 um 17.43 schrieb KT Sin:
>
> > Another panic in tcp_input while exiting gtk-gnutella.
Update your sources, and make sure that you have 1.202 of
sys/netinet/tcp_input.c. I had a 100% reproducable panic very similar to
yours, and h
You should send this information to the gcc folks. My understanding is
that they are interested in solving problems like this.
Doug
On Mon, 11 Mar 2003, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> Since my issues are related to 5.0, I though I'd rather ask here. I've
> noticed an interesting problem: I
You didn't say when your most recent upgrade was. If you're using
5.0-Release, you should upgrade to 5-current, where this problem should be
fixed already.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current
FYI, -bugs is not a discussion list.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/49079; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Martin Machacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: kern/49079: panic: b
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > That way, both named and ndc "see" the same picture of the system, in and
> > out of the chroot tree.
>
> Speaking of ndc, I think that's a BIND8-ism.
Not _exactly_ true, but yes, ndc is what you use to manage BIND 8. All
comparisons to tools that you m
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Philip Paeps wrote:
> Is it actually possible for one to build a custom release without the
> ``unnecessary'' BIND bits? I haven't grepped the source, forgive me,
> but what does 'NO_BIND=true' actually do? If I were to make a release
> like that, would that end me up without
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, The Anarcat wrote:
> Juste jumping in... Couldn't you just:
>
> sed -i.orig -e Makefile
No, because sed -i is evil, and will cause you to have hairy palms.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscrib
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Adrian Steinmann wrote:
>
> I use this command in my build script to force apache13+modssl to use
> the openssl in base.
>
> # Use base openssl (OpenSSL 0.9.7a as of Feb 19 2003)
> cd /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl
> cp Makefile Makefile-
> sed -ie 's/^\.include.*Makefile\.ssl.
D'oh, I forgot the other half of my response (I KNOW you're disappointed
by this). :)
A big part of the reason that perl was cut is that bmake'ing the build was
a NIGHTMARE. By contrast, the BIND bmake glue is not terribly difficult to
maintain. The other contributing factors were the license (not
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Subscriber wrote:
> Would the powers that be please consider removing sendmail,
> bind and openssl from the base system, as was done for perl
> with 5.0?
This topic has been discussed ad nauseum, and the consensus has always
been that those three things (and openssh) should st
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > The code is still useful as a simple implementation, much more
> > > easily understood by the student than the current TCP/IP stack,
> > > for c
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> If you want to make it about "failure to attract a maintainer", then
> do that.
Actually several people have made this argument, along with the corollary
"failure to attract a userbase."
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
To Unsubsc
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The code is still useful as a simple implementation, much more
> easily understood by the student than the current TCP/IP stack,
> for certain.
And it will still be available. It'll just be available in the Attic. The
fact that it will get more broken in
I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists
for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and
those not interested would not need to filter them out.
Is anyone else interested in doing it that way? Or is this a solution
looking for a problem?
D
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in
> some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset
> to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to reproduce this is to build
> Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries, w
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /etc/rc.d/named is quite bogus, especially when it comes to running bind
> chrooted.
Correct. I'm working on an improved method of dealing with this.
> E.g. /dev/null isn't needed by bind8 at all
Incorrect. /dev/null is needed for bind 8. /dev/null
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Coercitas Temet'Nosce wrote:
> Pardon my poor knowledge about IPFW 2 but if I remember well, IPFW
> wasn't a SPI Firewall, which is what I need. Btw, previous Kernel allows
> us to fine tune its building for IPF and now, it simply gone...was
> really wondering where those featu
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
> I'm always compiling -current on alpha and i386 with -O2 since months.
> I havn't noticed any compiler related problems lately.
How do you know?
--
"The last time France wanted more evidence, it rolled right
through Paris with a German fla
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > Forgive me for being dense, but can you expand on your concerns?
>
> My concern is setting various mac labels to various files in /etc, and
> having these files keep the labels after a mergemaster.
That&#x
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Yes, *I* can do it but I don't work at every place they do
> simulation!
Well the code is still going to be available in cvs. It's not like we're
going to magically make it disappear. :)
> If in the extreme you are suggesting that a
> portable application
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> So far, this is final variant for 0 problem fixing ready for committing.
> Any objections?
Several people, including myself have asked for A) Enough discussion to
reach a consensus, and B) Thorough testing of the agreed upon solution.
You have allowe
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 13:26:21 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > Workaround I find so far is something like that
> >
> > #define MASK 123459876
>
> I found nothing better. Here is fix for 0 problem I plan to commit:
I think it's worthwhile to w
Folks,
Please send this info to SOREN, not to the list.
Thanks,
Doug
--
If it's moving, encrypt it. If it's not moving, encrypt
it till it moves, then encrypt it some more.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Forgive me for being dense, but can you expand on your concerns?
Doug
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> I'm starting to have a bad feeling about mergemaster and /etc's full of
> acl and mac labels...
>
> Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> > I have local patches submitted by Chris Faulhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
> I'm trying to get X up and going after upgrading 4.7 -> 5.0. I have
> portupgraded XFree86-4 and wrapper. Here is the output from
> /var/log/XFree86.0.log:
>
>
> Symbol from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> unresolved!
>
> Fatal s
This is good stuff Geoffrey we may just "borrow" it. :) I know
you'ved saved me some work personally, as playing with gdbe is high on my
list of things to do.
Doug
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Geoffrey T. Falk wrote:
> For encrypting swap, try this:
>
>
> --- etc/rc.d/Makefile 22 Dec 2002 22:25:
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> It looks like sys/filedesc.h needs to be included in nv-freebsd.h
This got me up and running again on -current compiled 12/31. Thanks Scott!
Now that I'm used to the better performance of the nvidia drivers, it's
really noticable when it's not there.
Doug
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> Suspend works ok on my Thinkpad R32. Which version do you have?
A21e
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> The main reason I decided to try 5.0-RC1 on my brand new Dell Inspiron
> 4150 is a minor problem with suspending the machine under 4.7: After
> wakeup, the fan runs full speed and will not settle until I reboot.
>
> However, with 5.0-RC1 the machin
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> I don't understand what you are saying. Why would we have routing run after
> local filesystems are mounted but before the network is up?
What if /usr/local is an nfs-mounted partition (like it is on my systems,
both at home and work)?
> > btw, someone
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I'd like to think about really sitting down and overhauling the rc.d
> system after 5.0 is branched. I think that it's reasonable to say we
> should not try to be compatible with NetBSD except for keeping a common
> rc.subr and major initialization catag
501 - 600 of 887 matches
Mail list logo
