current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread Kenneth Culver
Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to install -CURRENT on one of my machines. Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to install -CURRENT on one of my machines. Because it's the only reliable current snapshot building

Re: current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread Kenneth Culver
Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks Ken On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Will Andrews wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese

Re: current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kenneth Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site : and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks Not really. No differences that are important. (eg, different machine names, snapjp

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-08 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to know where to go

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:32:55PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Are the ftp paths equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work? ENOCLUE. But does it matter? Either today or w/the CNAME sysinstall is referenced. The delay in waiting

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-08 Thread David O'Brien
, sorry for inconveniences at this time. Sounds like actually doing one suggestion Kris had that JKH veto'ed would be a good idea. That is having the old current.freebsd.org and releng4.freebsd.org machines mirror snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org. This would reduce the admin load needed to keep {current

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-08 Thread Chuck Robey
again. They never stopped, `make release' has been broken. Just like current.freebsd.org there are holes in snapshots. :-P current.freebsd.org works again now (it's been pointed at the Japanese site, which has up-to-date snaps available

current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread Chuck Robey
is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to know where to go for a snap of current. Anyone got one?

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to know where to go for a snap

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread Chuck Robey
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new one, easiest fix is just to

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread Garrett Rooney
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:48:47PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to re-install (having booting problems

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: is that machine dead? It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by someone else would help. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread Chuck Robey
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David O'Brien wrote: On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: is that machine dead? It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by someone else would help.

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread Makoto Matsushita
chuckr Ohhhkay. The .jp site I found stopped making snaps on 6/21. Mainly because kern.flp was flood. Any tiny breakages refuse to make a distribution. chuckr Manfred Antar told me about ftp.kddlabs.co.jp, which is the chuckr good site. It mirrors snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org daily, if my log

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Wemm
equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

current.freebsd.org

2002-06-04 Thread Mike
I have been trying for several days now to access current.freebsd.org so I can get the latest -CURRENT snapshot instead of my usual DP1 - cvsup - buildworld, but I am unable to get in.. Is this not a public server? saturn# ftp current.freebsd.org Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-06-04 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:39:41AM -0400, Mike wrote: Hi, I have been trying for several days now to access current.freebsd.org so I can get the latest -CURRENT snapshot instead of my usual DP1 - cvsup - buildworld, but I am unable to get in.. Is this not a public server? There seems

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-11 Thread Jordan Hubbard
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? Hmm... galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp 331 Guest login

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-11 Thread Chris Faulhaber
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: Hi, =20 I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with=20 current.freebsd.org

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-11 Thread Will Andrews
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to load -CURRENT

current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-11 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hi, I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to load -CURRENT on my laptop. Any idea? Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-11 Thread Makoto Matsushita
to reboot it or take it off-line at any time and without notice during that period until the service is transitioned. Thanks for your patience. But this doesn't mention about current.FreeBSD.org, and today is Feb/07/2002. I'm anxious about something goes wrong (machine troubles, jkh is still

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-11 Thread Makoto Matsushita
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? Hmm... galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp 331 Guest login ok

current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-07 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hi, I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to load -CURRENT on my laptop. Any idea? Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-07 Thread Chris Faulhaber
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: Hi, I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to load

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-07 Thread Will Andrews
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to load -CURRENT

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-07 Thread Makoto Matsushita
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? Hmm... galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp 331 Guest login ok

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-07 Thread Makoto Matsushita
to reboot it or take it off-line at any time and without notice during that period until the service is transitioned. Thanks for your patience. But this doesn't mention about current.FreeBSD.org, and today is Feb/07/2002. I'm anxious about something goes wrong (machine troubles, jkh is still

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2002-02-07 Thread Jordan Hubbard
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with current.freebsd.org at the moment? Hmm... galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp 331 Guest login

What happened to current.freebsd.org again?

2001-11-30 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
Hello, since some time again I can't get to ftp://current.freebsd.org to download current snapshots and packages. Is the machine broken again? -- Regards, Georg. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: What happened to current.freebsd.org again?

2001-11-30 Thread Anders Andersson
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:01:08PM +0100, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: Hello, since some time again I can't get to ftp://current.freebsd.org to download current snapshots and packages. Is the machine broken again? In the meantime you could use ftp://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/ -- Anders

current.freebsd.org successfully building snapshots again

2001-10-11 Thread Jordan Hubbard
drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Oct 11 22:17 5.0-20011011-CURRENT Come 'n get it. No warrantees stated or implied as to how far these bits get you after you transfer them, of course. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of

Re: current.freebsd.org is broken?

2001-10-02 Thread $B>.Ln42@8(B
I did not look at current.FreeBSD.ORG, but at current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG, the build on the 1st and 2nd October seem to have succeeded. I tried to install 5.0-CURRENT-20011002-JPSNAP from current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG, then sysinstall says mknod of /dev/rad0s1b returned failure status! and stops

current.freebsd.org is broken?

2001-09-26 Thread Alexander N. Kabaev
ftp -a fails to login to the current.freebsd.org with the following error message: --- Begin - Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Thu Jul 6 03:57:36 CDT 2000) ready. 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. 530 Can't

Re: current.freebsd.org is broken?

2001-09-26 Thread Robert Watson
to the current.freebsd.org with the following error message: --- Begin - Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Thu Jul 6 03:57:36 CDT 2000) ready. 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. 530 Can't set guest privileges

Re: current.freebsd.org is broken?

2001-09-26 Thread Peter S. Housel
At Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:54:52 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson wrote: current.jp.freebsd.org apparently carries snapshots, although I haven't tried it recently. It's been unable to build a release for the past two weeks since the release kernel overflows its floppy. The last successful build was on

current.freebsd.org

2001-09-07 Thread Alexey Zelkin
hi, Is there any reason why 5.0-RELEASE snapshots are not building/uploading to current.freebsd.org for about 3 months ? Latest i386 snapshot is 20010618. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: current.freebsd.org

2001-09-07 Thread Jordan Hubbard
First we had hardware problems, then NFS was broken on the cluster for awhile, preventing current.freebsd.org from getting at the CVS repository. It's fixed now and I see that a snapshot is building as we speak. - Jordan From: Alexey Zelkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: current.freebsd.org Date

Re: no new snapshotonftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-20 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
wosch Sorry, my fault. Never mind :-) wosch Nevertheless, current sucks. No successfully builds since 9 days ;-{{ I've checked the original CVS code. It seems that URL:http://ccvs.cvshome.org/source/browse/ccvs/src/client.c.diff?r1=1.302r2=1.303 will fix our problem (sorry I don't test it).

Re: no new snapshot onftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-19 Thread John Hay
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp 27 Aug 10 17:19 5-LATEST - 5.0-CURRENT-20010810-JPSNAP The last successfully finished release should be Aug/10/2001. Right. Current 5-current release is broken, since KerberosIV-enabled src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs is broken as follows: Nevertheless, current

Re: no new snapshot onftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-18 Thread Wolfram Schneider
Hi Makoto, the 5.0-current snapshots on current.jp.freebsd.org are not updated since 3-Aug-2001. What happens? -Wolfram wosch What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a wosch snapshot anymore? current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.freebsd.org is back again

Re: no new snapshotonftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-18 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
wosch the 5.0-current snapshots on current.jp.freebsd.org are not updated wosch since 3-Aug-2001. What happens? Really? lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp 27 Aug 10 17:19 5-LATEST - 5.0-CURRENT-20010810-JPSNAP The last successfully finished release should be Aug/10/2001. Current 5-current release is

Re: no new snapshot onftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-18 Thread Wolfram Schneider
On 2001-08-19 00:48:19 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote: wosch the 5.0-current snapshots on current.jp.freebsd.org are not updated wosch since 3-Aug-2001. What happens? Really? Sorry, my fault. lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp 27 Aug 10 17:19 5-LATEST - 5.0-CURRENT-20010810-JPSNAP The last

Re: no new snapshot on ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-05 Thread Wolfram Schneider
On 2001-08-03 10:27:26 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote: wosch What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a wosch snapshot anymore? current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.freebsd.org is back again; it's not a *mirror*, but has almost same features. Great! I

Re: no new snapshot onftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-03 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
wosch What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a wosch snapshot anymore? current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.freebsd.org is back again; it's not a *mirror*, but has almost same features. -- - Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

no new snapshot on ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-03 Thread Wolfram Schneider
Hi, the last -current snapshot is 6 weeks old. ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20010618-CURRENT/, What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a snapshot anymore? -Wolfram -- Wolfram Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wolfram.schneider.org

Re: no new snapshot onftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-03 Thread Jordan Hubbard
No, the machine is dead and we haven't managed to get a replacement going yet. Hopefully in late August, as soon as everyone involved is back from vacation. - Jordan From: Wolfram Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: no new snapshot on ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ Date

is current.freebsd.org still down?

2001-06-29 Thread Adam
connection refused or timeout To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

current.freebsd.org down?

2001-06-25 Thread John Doe
is current.freebsd.org down? __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

[david@catwhisker.org: Re: current.freebsd.org down?] (fwd)

2001-06-25 Thread Mark M. Lutgen
-4770 Qwest Internet Solutions | Voice.(612) 664-3332 -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:44:13 -0500 From: Pete McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Lutgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: current.freebsd.org down?] FYI Pete

Re: current.freebsd.org down?

2001-06-25 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Yes, it is. I'm trying to get it back online but it needs a hard reset since it's wedged beyond the point where I can do anything useful from the serial console. - Jordan From: John Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: current.freebsd.org down? Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:33:52 -0700 (PDT

Re: [david@catwhisker.org: Re: current.freebsd.org down?] (fwd)

2001-06-25 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Thanks, this is my fault too given that I tried to fix it myself and didn't raise it with you earlier. :( From: Mark M. Lutgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: current.freebsd.org down?] (fwd) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:20:55 -0500 (CDT) I was just told about this and should

current.FreeBSD.org: package building?

2001-05-17 Thread Robert Watson
The last package build on current.FreeBSD.org seems to be from March 26th. Is there any chance we could get an updated package build for -CURRENT? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe

Re: current.FreeBSD.org: package building?

2001-05-17 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Robert Watson wrote: The last package build on current.FreeBSD.org seems to be from March 26th. Is there any chance we could get an updated package build for -CURRENT? AFAIK there are some problems with bento's hardware. Contact Satoshi for more details. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail

current.freebsd.org

2000-12-01 Thread Sean O'Connell
Hi All- Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but current.freebsd.org does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both current.freebsd.org and usw2.freebsd.org (its alterego) fail. I did find that ftp7.de.freebsd.org has the 27 November 2000 snapshot of current

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-12-01 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but current.freebsd.org does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both current.freebsd.org and usw2.freebsd.org (its alterego) fail. I did find that ftp7.de.freebsd.or g has the 27 November 2000 snapshot of current

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-12-01 Thread Brett Rabe
Jordan: I can probably help you out. 612.664.3078. Brett On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:56:32 PST, "Jordan Hubbard" wrote: Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but current.freebsd.org does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both current.freebsd.org and usw2.f

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-21 Thread John Hay
jhay For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me. Would you please explain "an older kernel" ? I'm using a kernel as of Sep/30/2000 and it panics. *** Note that this (Sep/30/2000) kernel doesn't panic until Oct/13/2000. Between Oct/14/2000 and Oct/17/2000, "make

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-21 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
jhay It looks like I spoke too soon. My 2000-10-05 kernel that previously jhay worked also now panics. It must be somewhere when the floppies are jhay made. Maybe there is a problem in newfs(8). peter 2000/10/16 17:41:37 PDT Modified files: sbin/newfs mkfs.c Log:

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-21 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
matusita When I backout this change, the problem seems disappeared... This is sample shell script to reproduce recent kernel hungup: #!/bin/sh dd of=/tmp/image if=/dev/zero count=1440 bs=1k awk 'BEGIN {printf "%c%c", 85, 170}' | \ dd of=/tmp/image obs=1 seek=510 conv=notrunc vnconfig -s

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-20 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
jkh I'll look into this tomorrow morning, thanks. I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in these two days, when making a boot floppy (the hungup was occured *exactly* the same point). -- - Makoto

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-20 Thread Masanori Kanaoka
From: Makoto MATSUSHITA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org problems? Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:30:30 +0900 $ I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make $ release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in $ these two days, w

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-20 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
jhay For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me. Would you please explain "an older kernel" ? I'm using a kernel as of Sep/30/2000 and it panics. *** Note that this (Sep/30/2000) kernel doesn't panic until Oct/13/2000. Between Oct/14/2000 and Oct/17/2000, "make release" was

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-20 Thread Masanori Kanaoka
From: John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org problems? Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:07:14 +0200 (SAT) $ For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me. How older is your kernel? My kernel build 2000-09-21 JST. It panic when "make release". --- Masano

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-20 Thread John Hay
$ For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me. How older is your kernel? My kernel build 2000-09-21 JST. It panic when "make release". Not that old. 2000-10-05. The machine is a dual 266MHz PII. I have no problem building releases using "NODOC=YES WORLD_FLAGS=-j4" when

current.freebsd.org back up

2000-10-20 Thread Jordan Hubbard
snapshots are still broken, but you can at least get the previous ones via ftp now. - jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-19 Thread Bill G
I have been trying to download a current snapshot from current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success. The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect' - I am doing a standard anonymous ftp, as always. Just wanted to make sure someone was aware of the problem, if not already. Thanks

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bill G [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have been trying to download a current snapshot from current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success. The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect' - I am doing a standard anonymous ftp, as always. Just wanted to make sure someone was aware

Re: current.freebsd.org problems?

2000-10-19 Thread Jordan Hubbard
I'll look into this tomorrow morning, thanks. Bill G [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have been trying to download a current snapshot from current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success. The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect' - I am doing a standard anonymous ftp

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-09 Thread Nik Clayton
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 10:32:53PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: We've also been forced by the silicon valley personnel crunch to hire a new system administrator who's a little strange (he refers to himself as "Elvis Preston" and makes odd little hip-thrusts at the system rack when he thinks

current.freebsd.org FTP wedged

2000-10-08 Thread Forrest Aldrich
FYI, you get the FTP login prompt, but it hangs thereafter. Looks like something is wedged. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Bill Woods mail
whats up with current.freebsd.org, its not allowing anon ftp To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 8:18 PM Subject: current.freebsd.org whats up with current.freebsd.org, its not allowing anon ftp To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Bill Woods mail
on hardware these days. Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Bill Woods mail" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 8:18 PM Subject: current.freebsd.org whats up with current.freebsd.org, its not allowin

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:13:56PM -0700, Bill Woods mail wrote: Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by BSDI The clue boat left the docks and you were standing on the pier. Might I suggest a long walk... -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH /

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Mike Smith
another hardware problem again? Seems FreeBSD is a bit tough on hardware these days. Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Bill Woods mail" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 8:18 PM Subject: current.f

RE: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Tony Johnson
I was downloading 1007 this weekend and getting 7-8k a second from current.freebsd.org. What they are saying is not totally inaccurate. Please stop dis-respecting other peoples comments just because you do not agree with them! What is your comment to this... Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
a second from current.freebsd.org. What they are saying is not totally inaccurate. Please stop dis-respecting other peoples comments just because you do not agree with them! What is your comment to this... [snip] My comment would be: "you just don't get it" People are not

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Jordan Hubbard
.S. Unbelievers also claim that both releng4.freebsd.org and current.freebsd.org are actually at USWest and totally outside the realm of BSDi's control, but you can't put too much trust in what they say. Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by BSDI.

RE: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Tony Johnson
Current, Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org Please get mailer that doesn't quote the messages you're replying to in such a brain dead manner. * Mike Smith wrote: Uh, folks, releng4 is hosted at (and donated by) Yahoo, and BSDi have exactly *nothing* to do with its availability or otherwise.

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Well deal with it and get releng4 back up. That reminds me of a joke: Q. "What do engineers use for birth control?" A. "Their personalities." We now return you to our regularly scheduled content-free discussion. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

RE: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Tony Johnson
]]On Behalf Of Jordan Hubbard Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:33 AM To: Bill Woods mail Cc: Thomas T. Veldhouse; FreeBSD-Current, Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org I'm sorry, but BSDi's dead-alien based UPS (as described in that fine documentary film "repo man") has been unrelia

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Tony Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001008 22:36] wrote: Wow. Is it just me or does FreeBSD like to point fingers at everything that is not the issue. I do not believe that my mailer has anything to do with this. If you cannot roll with the punches, then that is your problem. I don't even

Re: Is current.freebsd.org running Linux?

2000-04-05 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
It is down right now. It will be back soon. Thanks for asking so loudly. Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges and why won't ANYBODY answer the question? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Is current.freebsd.org running Linux?

2000-04-05 Thread Visigoth
current.jp.freebsd.org is another stable/current build machine. /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa Thanks Hidetoshi, but I think my meager 3 years of nihongo in highschool are not going to be enough to run a Japanese snapshot just yet... Damieon Stark Sr. Unix Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is current.freebsd.org running Linux?

2000-04-05 Thread Hidetoshi Shimokawa
From: Visigoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is current.freebsd.org running Linux? Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:32:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] visigoth visigoth current.jp.freebsd.org is another stable/current build machine. visigoth visigoth /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa visigoth

Is current.freebsd.org running Linux?

2000-04-04 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges and why won't ANYBODY answer the question? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Is current.freebsd.org running Linux?

2000-04-04 Thread Mike Smith
Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges and why won't ANYBODY answer the question? Because it's been answered about a dozen times already; it's down with hardware problems, and the people responsible are trying to do something about it. -- \\ Give a man

Re: Is current.freebsd.org running Linux?

2000-04-04 Thread Hidetoshi Shimokawa
current.jp.freebsd.org is another stable/current build machine. /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP public key: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: current.freebsd.org ftp misconfig ?

2000-03-29 Thread James FitzGibbon
situation, or is current down for maintainance ? [central-01:james] ~ (2) ftp -a current.freebsd.org Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 25 00:05:38 CST 2000) ready. 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password.

current.freebsd.org ftp misconfig ?

2000-03-28 Thread James FitzGibbon
Is this a transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ? [central-01:james] ~ (2) ftp -a current.freebsd.org Connected to usw2.freebsd.org. 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 25 00:05:38 CST 2000) ready. 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail

Re: current.freebsd.org ftp misconfig ?

2000-03-28 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
Good luck getting an answer. Nobody seems willing to answer this question. :( Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, James FitzGibbon wrote: Is this a transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ? [central-01:james] ~ (2) ftp -a current.freebsd.org Connected

current.freebsd.org again?

2000-03-27 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
What is going on with that server? It seems to be denying requests more than accepting them these days. [9:08am] 5 [~/FreeBSD]:cascade% ncftp3 current.freebsd.org NcFTP 3.0.0 (March 20, 2000) by Mike Gleason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Copyright (c) 1992-1999 by Mike Gleason. All rights reserved

Re: current.freebsd.org snapshots and broken X11

2000-03-15 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Robert Watson wrote: Sounds good to me, as long as it runs :-). BTW, ran into another nit from the 02/13 snapshot. I installed the X-kern-developer distribution, discovered X11 didn't work, so went back into sysinstall to install X11 stuff. I selected some combination of X11

current.freebsd.org snapshots and broken X11

2000-03-14 Thread Robert Watson
It looks like the X11 associated with the snapshots on current.freebsd.org is still broken: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Share object "libXThrStub.so.6" not found Installing -current boxes for testing and development would be a lot easier if this worked. :-) Especially leading up t

Re: current.freebsd.org snapshots and broken X11

2000-03-14 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in time to make a difference. - Jordan It looks like the X11 associated with the snapshots on current.freebsd.org is still broken: /usr/libexec/ld

Re: current.freebsd.org snapshots and broken X11

2000-03-14 Thread Robert Watson
have a definitive XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in time to make a difference. - Jordan It looks like the X11 associated with the snapshots on current.freebsd.org is still broken: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Share object "libXThrStub

Re: current.freebsd.org snapshots and broken X11

2000-03-14 Thread Doug Barton
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in time to make a difference. Not to mention that 4.0 has "issues" with some

Re: current.freebsd.org snapshots and broken X11

2000-03-14 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I was actually talking about FreeBSD 4.0, not XFree86 4.0. :) On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in time to make a difference.

  1   2   >