On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:54:53PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
Yelling at people won't solve the problem, nor will trying to hold the
project to ransom. These are things that you need to take into
consideration.
You can take over Gcc and Binutils maintenance at any time. I doubt you or
any
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010713 07:00] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:49:25 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
Alfred Certain operations, such as:
Alfred kq = (struct kqueue *)fp-f_data;
Alfred should not really require that the file be locked, it's implicitly frozen
Alfred
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does not cover the solution of
BSD/OS, so it needs updating.
Here's some more commentary and a pointer to some work done.
This is
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 04:25:04 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Alfred This is just about completely file locking related,
Alfred however I do have a question about PGRP locking, in
Alfred a certain part you may have to lock two pgrps, how do you
Alfred deal with deadlock?
Lock
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:49:25 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
Alfred Certain operations, such as:
Alfred kq = (struct kqueue *)fp-f_data;
Alfred should not really require that the file be locked, it's implicitly frozen
Alfred at creation time (i think)
Seigo Yes.
Only one exception beats
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010712 01:45] wrote:
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010712 01:42] wrote:
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 01:44:44 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Alfred * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010712 01:42] wrote:
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does not cover the solution of
BSD/OS, so it needs updating.
Right now I'm only reviewing the file part and
I'm only up to
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does not cover the solution of
BSD/OS, so it needs updating.
I'm just reviewing the file stuff, I have a number of updates mainly
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010712 01:42] wrote:
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does not cover the solution of
BSD/OS, so it needs updating.
I'm
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:44:21 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Alfred I'm also quite sure that you can't call the ktrace functions with
Alfred any mutexes held so the code is doing to need some help, basically
Alfred the trick in trapsig() and postsig() is to generate the ktrace
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 01:39] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:44:21 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Alfred I'm also quite sure that you can't call the ktrace functions with
Alfred any mutexes held so the code is doing to need some help, basically
Alfred
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 03:20:44 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
wait for me to finish, but it seems like no one has stepped forward
to review this. I'd like to see it committed, so either go ahead
or wait for
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010710 03:46] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 03:20:44 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
wait for me to finish, but it seems like no one has stepped forward
to review this.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 03:53:47 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Alfred * Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010710 03:46] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 03:20:44 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010707 16:43] wrote:
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010702 03:13] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:04:31 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
Seigo The results of build test with the latest patch are now at:
Seigo
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 04:42:49PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
wait for me to finish, but it seems like no one has stepped forward
to review this. I'd like to see it committed, so either go ahead
or wait for my review if
* David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010707 18:06] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 04:42:49PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
wait for me to finish, but it seems like no one has stepped forward
to review this. I'd like to see
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 08:13:57PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I'm not interested in wasting time tracking down bugs for your
arch.
*My* arch?? _OUR_ arches.
Anyhow, the simple fact is that if you're unable to cope with some
instability for a short amount of time you shouldn't be
Finally, if you're so damn concerned about your precious alpha I
expect you or at least ANYONE WHO CARES ABOUT ALPHA TO ASSIST IN
TESTING THESE DIFFS.
HOW THE FSCK AM I TO TEST THEM WHEN I CANNOT EVEN GET TO SINGLE USER??
By testing them before they're committed, obviously.
David -
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:04:31 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
Seigo The results of build test with the latest patch are now at:
Seigo http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/pg_fd/
Seigo As it is likely to take quite a while to fix alpha, I am going to
Seigo update the patch every few days.
On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 16:48:30 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
David It would also be nice to get a timeline on the commit schedule for this.
Test of 2 weeks should be enough, followed by commit in 15 June.
David I request that this be on hold until we actually get -current Alphas
David
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:52:23 -0700,
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
David On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:28:57PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
David It would also be nice to get a timeline on the commit schedule for this.
Test of 2 weeks should be enough, followed by commit in 15 June.
David
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 04:48:30PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Test of 2 weeks should be enough, followed by commit in 15 June.
David I request that this be on hold until we actually get -current Alphas
David usable again.
OK, then we can test on pc98 and ia64 to wait for that.
Now
On Thu, 31 May 2001 16:31:21 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
Seigo Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
Seigo for testing.
Although the patch is still under test, a new task proposal comes to
my mind.
A new task: lock underlying objects of struct file
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:28:57PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
David It would also be nice to get a timeline on the commit schedule for this.
Test of 2 weeks should be enough, followed by commit in 15 June.
I request that this be on hold until we actually get -current Alphas
usable again.
On Thu, 31 May 2001 13:01:56 -0700,
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
David On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:28:57PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
David Committers do not need Alpha users to verify that a patch compiles,
David Beast.freebsd.org can be used for that. Testing on a running system is
David of course a different matter.
I will test building a GENERIC kernel
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 05:44:17 -0700,
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
David Committers do not need Alpha users to verify that a patch compiles,
David Beast.freebsd.org can be used for that. Testing on a running system is
David of course a different matter.
I will test building a
On Thu, 31 May 2001 16:31:21 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Seigo Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
Seigo for testing.
Seigo The patch is at
Seigo http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
WARNING: rebuild any modules
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:31:21PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED
On 31-May-01 David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:31:21PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
I think
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
I think that's what he means
On 31-May-01 David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
I
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring
each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is
not something that will scale as more and more archs are added.
It isn't that hard to put
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring
each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is
not something that will scale as more and more archs are added. If a
committer can get
36 matches
Mail list logo
