Re: Still no XFree86-4

2002-07-22 Thread John Angelmo
Eric Anholt wrote: > On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 03:14, John Angelmo wrote: > >>Well here's my latest XFree86-4 build errors, I made a clean build >>uninstalled XFree-4, perl and so on but still I get these errors >> > > [...] > > >>===> Extracting for XFree86-4.2.0_1,1 >> No MD5 checksum file

Re: Still no XFree86-4

2002-07-22 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/07/21 21:08), Eric Anholt wrote: > You don't have XFree86-4 uninstalled, or don't have it uninstalled > successfully. Just removing the XFree86-4 metaport doesn't remove the > miniports that contain the actual files. If you are going to build > without using portupgrade, you should sta

Re: Still no XFree86-4

2002-07-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 03:14, John Angelmo wrote: > Well here's my latest XFree86-4 build errors, I made a clean build > uninstalled XFree-4, perl and so on but still I get these errors > [...] > ===> Extracting for XFree86-4.2.0_1,1 > >> No MD5 checksum file. > ===> XFree86-4.2.0_1,1 depends

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-17 Thread Will Andrews
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:39:41PM -0600, Eric Anholt wrote: > > I thought the whole point of Wraphelp.c was that the person who > > runs the machine (whatever machine X is being installed on) has > > to obtain that file, so they would have to explicitly verify that > > they -- personally -- have

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 19:38, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 7:27 PM -0600 7/16/02, Eric Anholt wrote: > >It notably doesn't include md5summing of Wraphelp.c. If I can > >find what's the 'best' Wraphelp.c (and most legal? What's the > >status of wraphelp importing/exporting?), I'll switch it. Is

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 7:27 PM -0600 7/16/02, Eric Anholt wrote: >It notably doesn't include md5summing of Wraphelp.c. If I can >find what's the 'best' Wraphelp.c (and most legal? What's the >status of wraphelp importing/exporting?), I'll switch it. Is >there any circumstance when someone wouldn't have access to >

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:25, Eric Anholt wrote: > As far as the Wraphelp.c issues, I'm working on cleaning that mess up > right now (testing the patch on a full XFree86-4 build on clean > -current). I've put the patch up at http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/files/x420diff2-1 It does the following

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 04:04, John Angelmo wrote: > Hello > > I erased my /usr/ports just to be sure that all the diffrent patches > out, then cvsuped to get the latest version, to my disepointment > XFree86-4 Still dosn't build under Current, I still got the same perl > error in fonts, the per

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 12:04 PM +0200 7/16/02, John Angelmo wrote: >Hello > >I erased my /usr/ports just to be sure that all the different >patches out, then cvsuped to get the latest version, to my >disappointment XFree86-4 Still dosn't build under Current, I >still got the same perl error in fonts, the perl port is

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread John Angelmo
Andrew Kolchoogin wrote: > John, > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:04:53PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote: > > >>I erased my /usr/ports just to be sure that all the diffrent patches >>out, then cvsuped to get the latest version, to my disepointment >>XFree86-4 Still dosn't build under Current, I stil

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread John Angelmo
Wasn't this added in this commit? http://freshports.org/commit.php?[EMAIL PROTECTED] /John Arnold Cavazos Jr. wrote: > This was posted on 11 July: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/files/x420diff-1 > > I did have to manually copy Wraphelp.c somewhere in the font-server > port, but thing

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread Arnold Cavazos Jr.
This was posted on 11 July: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/files/x420diff-1 I did have to manually copy Wraphelp.c somewhere in the font-server port, but things built fine after that. -- abcjr On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:04:53PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote: > Hello > > I erased my /usr/ports

Re: Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread Andrew Kolchoogin
John, On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:04:53PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote: > I erased my /usr/ports just to be sure that all the diffrent patches > out, then cvsuped to get the latest version, to my disepointment > XFree86-4 Still dosn't build under Current, I still got the same perl > error in font

Still no XFree86-4?

2002-07-16 Thread John Angelmo
Hello I erased my /usr/ports just to be sure that all the diffrent patches out, then cvsuped to get the latest version, to my disepointment XFree86-4 Still dosn't build under Current, I still got the same perl error in fonts, the perl port is installed. Does anyone have a working patch? /Joh