zfs/vm panic: vm_object_page_collect_flush failed

2010-11-20 Thread Bruce Cran
Hi, I've been building KDE on a new -CURRENT system with ZFS and hit a panic - vm_object_page_collect_flush failed (more info is at http://www.cran.org.uk/~brucec/freebsd/zfs_vm_panic.txt). #9 0x802a6190 in panic (fmt=Variable fmt is not available. ) at

Re: zfs/vm panic: vm_object_page_collect_flush failed

2010-11-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:48:15PM +, Bruce Cran wrote: Hi, I've been building KDE on a new -CURRENT system with ZFS and hit a panic - vm_object_page_collect_flush failed (more info is at http://www.cran.org.uk/~brucec/freebsd/zfs_vm_panic.txt). #9 0x802a6190 in panic

vm panic

2003-01-22 Thread David Xu
panic: lockmgr: locking against myself Debugger(panic) Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 dbtrace Debugger(c0381630,c03e4ee0,c037fd14,da447c28,1) at Debugger+0x54 panic(c037fd14,0,c037fc88,eb,1fb) at panic+0xab lockmgr(c138e85c,2,0,c3c150e0,c3c1514) at lockmgr+0x512

Re: vm panic

2003-01-22 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:45:13AM +0800, David Xu said words to the effect of; panic: lockmgr: locking against myself Debugger(panic) Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 dbtrace Debugger(c0381630,c03e4ee0,c037fd14,da447c28,1) at Debugger+0x54

Re: VM panic

2002-08-21 Thread Mark Murray
What kind of value do you use for N? It looks like lately the makefiles are too aggressive when using -j, so you end up with N * N * 2 processes running simultaneously. On my -current box with 128M RAM, I used -j13 for a long time, but that runs out of swap nowadays, so I'm using -j4 which

Re: VM panic

2002-08-19 Thread Jason
Matthew N. Dodd wrote: On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote: If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running. Anyone else

Re: VM panic

2002-08-19 Thread Chris Hedley
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jason wrote: Wierd, I have it running just peachy on a dual P3 900 box It runs mostly okay on my dual P3/600, although for the last couple of months it has a tendency to panic with a bdwrite: buffer is not busy on average 2-3 times a day (per approx 15 hour run) Such is

Re: VM panic

2002-08-19 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jason wrote: Wierd, I have it running just peachy on a dual P3 900 box Just so nobody else replies to this with something similar we're talking about PENTIUMS. Not the P3, P2, Alpha or anything else. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E |

Re: VM panic

2002-08-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthew N. Dodd wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jason wrote: Wierd, I have it running just peachy on a dual P3 900 box Just so nobody else replies to this with something similar we're talking about PENTIUMS. Not the P3, P2, Alpha or anything else. Yes. My ASUS Dual P90 machine has the

Re: VM panic

2002-08-19 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Yes. My ASUS Dual P90 machine has the same problem. I just thought it was the MP Spec compliance level of the BIOS, and gave up running -current. I guess it's not just me. 8-(. Its likely that we've got the same motherboard. Mine is a

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote: If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running. Anyone else getting this? I'm amazed

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote: If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and the panic always happens in

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread Yuri Victorovich
I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all. both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C and dual P55C). I am running SMP CURRENT kernel on 4-Alpha processors . No problems for a lot of months. Yuri. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 18), David Wolfskill said: From: Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all. I'm not. both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C and dual P55C). freebeast(5.0-C)[2] uname -a CPU:

VM panic

2002-08-17 Thread Mark Murray
Hi all If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running. Anyone else getting this? M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_Warning: this

Re: VM panic

2002-08-17 Thread John Hay
If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running. Anyone else getting this? What kind of value do you use for N? It looks like

woo hoo! vm panic!

2001-02-23 Thread Matthew Jacob
panic: vm_page_insert: already inserted syncing disks... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-27 Thread Mark Murray
It looks like you guys got it! What is currently checked in (by Assar) is working fine! :-) M :--=-=-= : :Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Well, yes... that's essentially what I suggested. You didn't say : anything about removing the externalized inlines, which is what you

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-27 Thread Matt Dillon
: :It looks like you guys got it! What is currently checked in (by Assar) :is working fine! :-) : :M Excellent news! -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Mark Murray
Hi Matt I'm getting a reliable panic on CURRENT (2000/12/26) with INVARIANTS set. I suppose I could "fix" this by taking out INVARIANTS, but it seems to make more sense to try to get it fixed. The panic() is "freeing free entry", and the traceback (minus most of the numbers) is: panic zerror

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Dillon
:Hi Matt : :I'm getting a reliable panic on CURRENT (2000/12/26) with INVARIANTS :set. I suppose I could "fix" this by taking out INVARIANTS, but it :seems to make more sense to try to get it fixed. : :The panic() is "freeing free entry", and the traceback (minus most :of the numbers) is: :

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: I'm getting a reliable panic on CURRENT (2000/12/26) with INVARIANTS set. I suppose I could "fix" this by taking out INVARIANTS, but it seems to make more sense to try to get it fixed. Do you have NFS compiled in to the kernel?

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Dillon
:Do you have NFS compiled in to the kernel? I've had trouble using :INVARIANTS in the kernel and NFS as a module many times - it always :panics in the zone allocation stuff. : :(Either you always need to compile modules with the same INVARIENTS :options as the kernel, or we need to fix INVARIENTS

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Assar Westerlund
Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think the only real solution is to rip out the externally visible zalloc/zfree inlines and replace them with real routines. I will happily do this, those inlines have always been an eyesore to me and the performance benefit is minimal

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Dillon
: :Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I think the only real solution is to rip out the externally visible : zalloc/zfree inlines and replace them with real routines. I will happily : do this, those inlines have always been an eyesore to me and the : performance benefit is

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Assar Westerlund
Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We can't just go do an end-run around the established API as a hack around the problem. I fail too se how my suggestion would change the API at all, but in case I was unclear, diffs are below. /assar Index: vm_zone.c

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Dillon
:Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : We can't just go do an end-run around the established API as a : hack around the problem. : :I fail too se how my suggestion would change the API at all, but in :case I was unclear, diffs are below. : :/assar : Well, yes... that's essentially

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Assar Westerlund
Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, yes... that's essentially what I suggested. You didn't say anything about removing the externalized inlines, which is what you do in your patch. Looks like a fine patch to me. Except it didn't work. Now here's a patch that survived

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Dillon
:--=-=-= : :Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Well, yes... that's essentially what I suggested. You didn't say : anything about removing the externalized inlines, which is what you : do in your patch. Looks like a fine patch to me. : :Except it didn't work. Now here's a

Re: NFS/VM panic in current with INVARIANTS

2000-12-26 Thread Mark Murray
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: I'm getting a reliable panic on CURRENT (2000/12/26) with INVARIANTS set. I suppose I could "fix" this by taking out INVARIANTS, but it seems to make more sense to try to get it fixed. Do you have NFS compiled in to the