Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
for testing.
The patch is at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Below is the brief description of locking.
1. struct filedesc and struct file
- fd_mtx protects struct filedesc.
- f_mtx protects stru
On Thu, 31 May 2001 16:31:21 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Seigo> Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
Seigo> for testing.
Seigo> The patch is at
Seigo> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
WARNING: rebuild any modules t
> Of course not. I never do that with pccards :-)
That's why I asked it :-) It shouldn't be necessary.
> When I do that, as a work around, I find that I can pull the plug.
>
> How hard is it to fix the way that the ethernet driver reads the MII
> registers in the interrupt context?
Hard, but p
Hi!
I get this about 20 seconds after boot completed (and fsck went into
background):
(I saw a similar message yesterday IIRC):
root@zerogravity ~dir $ gdb -k
/usr/obj/usr/home/alex/work/HEAD/src/sys/CICHLIDS/kernel.debug
vmcore.1
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB
> I had this problem after I enabled the '4092-cylinder limit' jumper on my
> Maxtor drive, because my BIOS (at that point) hung with a drive over 4092
> cylinders. I flashed the BIOS afterwards, but forgot about the jumper,
> because windows/linux both (somehow) saw the full geometry of the dri
On Wed, 30 May 2001, David Taylor wrote:
> When trying to profile ircd-hybrid-7 on -CURRENT (I tried using a pre-vm
> madness version first, then tried a version cvsuped today), I reliably get
> lots of:
>
> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
>
> messages on the console (one every 5-
Title: URGENT MESSAGE!
PRIORITY
EXPRESS MAIL
I wrote:
> Trying to fix some make release problems, I've kept running into the
> same freelist corruption problems that kris and dougb experienced
> earlier this week. Main difference is that I notice when the box
> (-CURRENT from 29 May, GENERIC kernel, UP) crashes. :-p
At dougb's urging, I
On 31-May-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, David Taylor wrote:
>
>> When trying to profile ircd-hybrid-7 on -CURRENT (I tried using a pre-vm
>> madness version first, then tried a version cvsuped today), I reliably get
>> lots of:
>>
>> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
>
On 31-May-01 Michael Harnois wrote:
> I figured out how to get vmware2 to build, but not to run ;(
Argh. Do you have the source to host_lock_ppn()? If so can you get me a copy
of it that I can give you a patch for?
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key:
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Darian Lanx wrote:
>
> > I had this problem after I enabled the '4092-cylinder limit' jumper on my
> > Maxtor drive, because my BIOS (at that point) hung with a drive over 4092
> > cylinders. I flashed the BIOS afterwards, but forgot about the jumper,
> > because windows/lin
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:31:21PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
> for testing.
>
> The patch is at
>
> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
Compiled on Alpha?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Uns
On 31-May-01 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:31:21PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
>> Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
>> for testing.
>>
>> The patch is at
>>
>> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
>
> Compiled on Alp
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
> >> for testing.
> >>
> >> The patch is at
> >>
> >> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
> >
> > Compiled on Alpha?
>
> I think that's
CVSup was finished shortly before 04:00 (AM) PDT. Noted ru's change
to xinstall.c to permit -C & -d together, so I re-uncommented the line
in /etc/make.conf, and the resulting buildworld/kernel/installworld/
mergemaster completed uneventfully (within an X environment) -- that was
running on yeste
On 31-May-01 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
>> >> for testing.
>> >>
>> >> The patch is at
>> >>
>> >> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/fd_pgrp.diff.gz
>> >
On 31-May-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
> Once I saw that I had a real hostname, I hit ^D at the shell prompt, put
> my fingers in position to hit Alt+F9, and
>
> kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
> Stopped at witness_destroy+0x237: cmpl%esi,0xc(%edx)
> db> trace
> witness_destroy(ce7e211c,ce7e
>Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Did you get any other messages, such as a faulting virtual address, etc.?
I had been using vty1; when the panic ocurred, I was (forcibly) switched
to vty0. There are no faulting virtual address-flavored messag
On 31-May-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
>>Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
>>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>Did you get any other messages, such as a faulting virtual address, etc.?
>
> I had been using vty1; when the panic ocurred, I was (forcibly) switched
> to vty0. There
I have been told that the OpenBSD code that is supposed to speed up some
types of file system access up to 60x, has been committed to -current on
4/30. I'm wondering if there's any idea when it will be committed to
-stable? Are their any stability issues with the code?
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring
> each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is
> not something that will scale as more and more archs are added.
It isn't that hard to p
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring
> each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is
> not something that will scale as more and more archs are added. If a
> committer can get
Those of you who have been following the mailing lists will have
noticed (or participated in) a thread bemoaning the continued lack of
feedback from the core team. That thread is still very active, but
one suggestion (made by phk) was to send out a message asking for help
getting things done. It
23 matches
Mail list logo
