> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:27:04AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > This is the single most flagrant lack of cooperation I have experienced
> > > while working with the FreeBSD Project. I'm truly dumbfounded.
> >
> > It's not a lack of co-operation.. it's a lack of communication. I didn't
>
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:27:04AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > This is the single most flagrant lack of cooperation I have experienced
> > while working with the FreeBSD Project. I'm truly dumbfounded.
>
> It's not a lack of co-operation.. it's a lack of communication. I didn't
> see an an
Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> On 2001-Jan-27 00:33:23 -0800, Root Dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I've broken the proc structure into 4 structures.
>
> Leaving aside the issue of whether or your efforts were a waste of time,
> I have some comments on the ordering of fields. Since the fields are
>
On 2001-Jan-27 00:33:23 -0800, Root Dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've broken the proc structure into 4 structures.
Leaving aside the issue of whether or your efforts were a waste of time,
I have some comments on the ordering of fields. Since the fields are
being re-arranged anyway, I'd like
BTW Mark, your mail server is somehow incompatible with my ISP..
error message follows:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at syncopation-01.iinet.net.au.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn'
Mark Murray wrote:
>
> > > This is the single most flagrant lack of cooperation I have experienced
> > > while working with the FreeBSD Project. I'm truly dumbfounded.
> >
> > It's not a lack of co-operation.. it's a lack of communication. I didn't
> > see an any lists that anyone was doing this
> > This is the single most flagrant lack of cooperation I have experienced
> > while working with the FreeBSD Project. I'm truly dumbfounded.
>
> It's not a lack of co-operation.. it's a lack of communication. I didn't
> see an any lists that anyone was doing this yet and thought I'd get
> the
Jason Evans wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:33:23AM -0800, Root Dude wrote:
> >
> > Here's a first step.
>
> This is very disappointing, Julian. You've duplicated work that I've
> already done, and if you've been paying attention at all, you know that it
> was already done. Even if you h
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Root Dude writes:
> >
> >Here's a first step.
> >
> >I've broken the proc structure into 4 structures. [...]
>
> Uhm Julian,
>
> You are aware that other people are working on this stuff too ?
well considering that I was int he disc
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:33:23AM -0800, Root Dude wrote:
>
> Here's a first step.
This is very disappointing, Julian. You've duplicated work that I've
already done, and if you've been paying attention at all, you know that it
was already done. Even if you haven't been paying attention, I fin
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Root Dude writes:
>
>Here's a first step.
>
>I've broken the proc structure into 4 structures. [...]
Uhm Julian,
You are aware that other people are working on this stuff too ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TC
11 matches
Mail list logo
