[PATCH] automated make -j value

2006-12-13 Thread David O'Brien
With multi-socket systems becoming more prevalent, and the continued increase in cores per processors, I thought it would be nice for 'make -j' to gain some automation. Attached is a patch that makes -j- be the same as -j `sysctl -n kern.smp.cpus` and -j= be twice that. I've also thought that

Anything weird about size or layout of 'struct thread'?

2007-09-18 Thread David O'Brien
For a reason I haven't tracked down, this patch results in a panic on 6-STABLE when taking the GENERIC kernel and adding WITNESS, INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT, MUTEX_DEBUG, KDB, KDB_TRACE, DDB. Index: sys/proc.h === RCS file:

Re: Useful tools missing from /rescue

2007-10-03 Thread David O'Brien
Yar Tikhiy wrote: I've had to use /rescue recently and felt lack of a few basic tools in it, namely pgrep(1), head(1), tail(1), tee(1), and a text filter, e.g., sed(1). Well, in fact most functionality of pgrep(1), head(1), tail(1), and even tee(1) can be emulated if one has

Re: Useful tools missing from /rescue

2007-10-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:01:39AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:23:44PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: I also don't see the need for pgrep - I think needing that says your system is running multiuser pretty well. First of all, I'd like to point out that /rescue doesn't

Re: Useful tools missing from /rescue

2007-11-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:04:21AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:38:26AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: I guess I'm not creative enough in the ways I've screwed up my systems and needed tools from /rescue. 8-) Just try to installworld FreeBSD/amd64 over a running FreeBSD

Re: tcpdump(1) additions.

1999-06-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 06:54:06PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: Unless there is strong feelings against it, I'd like to commit the smb patches (as seen on www.samba.org) Cool! I've been meaning to do this for quite some time. HOWEVER, please reference this PGP signed email (I'll send you the

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/ftp Makefile fetch.c ftp.1 ftp.c ftp_var.h main.c util.c

1999-07-02 Thread David O'Brien
... compared to the sources as of today. This gives minimal semantic difference from the way it worked before the change (which was that if FTP_PASSIVE_MODE existed, ftp used passive mode). I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosense

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/ftp Makefile fetch.c ftp.1 ftp.c ftp_var.h main.c util.c

1999-07-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 05:15:14PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosense values since that is all that was required before. Now what are these poor souls to do when they upgrade to 3.3-R and their

Re: Reading CIS from kernel?

1999-07-13 Thread David O'Brien
The Xircom ethernet driver needs to read/write PCCARD attribute memory from its probe routine, in order to identify the type of card and to beat ... then making crdread() and crdwrite() (in /sys/pccard/pccard.c) non-static and calling them directly from the driver code would be an easy

Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ??

1999-07-21 Thread David O'Brien
So is FreeBSD *EVER* going to see native IPv6 ?? I attended a talk by a group of Intrusion Detection researchers. They were basing their research on FreeBSD because they needed divert sockets and found FreeBSD worked perfectly for this in this respect. However, once they needed IPv6 and IPsec

Re: newsyslog owner.group - owner:group

1999-07-27 Thread David O'Brien
This one raised a number of eyebrows and a few people asked you to hold on to legacy support for a single release. It's a reasonable request, given the obscure error message one gets for providing the previously supported syntax: newsyslog: error in config file; bad permissions:

Re: newsyslog owner.group - owner:group

1999-07-27 Thread David O'Brien
COMPATIBILITY Previous versions of the chown utility used the dot (``.'') character to distinguish the group name. Begining with FreeBSD 4.0, this has been changed to be a colon (``:'') character so that user and group names may contain the dot character. Hum... I think

Re: newsyslog owner.group - owner:group

1999-07-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 05:25:23PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: Hi Brian, To paraphase Bill Paul: G that's part of my last name. -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the

Re: newsyslog owner.group - owner:group

1999-07-27 Thread David O'Brien
A better patch would check to see if the text to the right of the '.' is a valid group... However, the above will still parse fred.jones:fred.jones in the most desirable way, so I suppose the validity checking is overkill. This is what I plan to commit (w/in minutes): -

Re: replacing grep(1)

1999-07-27 Thread David O'Brien
$ uname -a $ grep foo NONEXIST Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb /usr/bin/grep grep.core ... (no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `grep'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libz.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.

Re: file(1) Magdir candidate: wintendo

1999-07-27 Thread David O'Brien
I've had some interesting comments from David Bushong, motivating for inclusion of his Magdir candidate on PR 12554. He makes a strong case for a bloated file(1) Magdir. The only thing we're battling with is a filename for his submission. My advice would be to submit his PR to Chris

Re: Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ??

1999-07-27 Thread David O'Brien
various researchers and early-adopters, all of which can go to the KAME site and grab the patches to 3.2-stable if they want to play now, today. If we haven't done a good enough job of making that clear and are suffering from defections to other *BSDs because of this, then we just need to

Re: file(1) Magdir candidate: wintendo

1999-07-28 Thread David O'Brien
My advice would be to submit his PR to Chris Demtrito(sp?), file's You may want to verify this. I'm pretty sure that Christos Zoulas (another NetBSD guy) maintains file(1): [EMAIL PROTECTED] My major Duh!! If Christos sees this thread, my apologies. There is no excuse for me not

Re: file(1) Magdir candidate: wintendo

1999-07-29 Thread David O'Brien
My major Duh!! If Christos sees this thread, my apologies. David, I was trying to be helpful; sorry if my msg came across wrong. ^ Not in the least. I was being stupid and that's all. I'm certainly not mad about

Initio INI-* SCSI card support

1999-08-02 Thread David O'Brien
Has anybody taken a look at the FreeBSD driver source at http://www.initio.com/source.zip for the INI-* cards? Is this something we should import into -CURRENT? -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: Please review: rc file changes

1999-08-30 Thread David O'Brien
I've had a week-end away from a keyboard to think about this. The only reason we have to use case statements for case-insensitive variable testing is because sh(1) doesn't offer any upper/lower case handling Also so that common settings can be added. Besides "yes" and "no" there could be

Re: Fetch/wget/ftp: How to do a recursive ftp-get?

1999-10-04 Thread David O'Brien
But which tool can do a command-line, recursive ftp-get? NcFTP versions 2 3 can. There are also purely command-line versions, called ncftpget ncftpput in the `ncftp3' port. -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: Developer assessment (was Re: A bike shed ...)

1999-10-04 Thread David O'Brien
Let me give you some advice on FreeBSD list etiquette. You quoted *_114_* lines just to add FIVE?? Are you so busy you can't figure out how to delete lines in your editor? It is replies like this that have run many of the knowledgeable people from this list. To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: Which egcs port should I use?

1999-11-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 03:06:26AM +0100, Bjoern Fischer wrote: Which egcs would you recommend, if I want to minimize the hassle to switch from that egcs to the FreeBSD4.x native egcs? /usr/ports/lang/egcs. It is the one that is released code. ``gcc-devel'' is equivent to our -CURRENT and can

Re: Proposal for the kill-list (userland nfs)

1999-11-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 03:49:31PM -0700, Alec Wolman wrote: Digital Unix, aka Compaq Tru64 Unix, formerly know as DEC OSF/1 supports this syntax. In fact, this is the only syntax it supports, IIRC, so FreeBSD is not the only OS to use it. Ultrix was the one that only suported this

Re: Human readable df

1999-11-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 11:57:48PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: Note, this uses the "traditional computer science SI extention" units. Where M == 1 20, G == 1 30, etc. Disk drive manufacturers use the real SI units where M == 10 ^ 6, G == 10 ^ 9, Some implimentations of ``df -h'' use "-h"

Re: Human readable df

1999-11-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:37:08PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Here's a patch to add -h flag to df to produce human readable output. This makes it easier to read if the disk is big. You should submit this as a PR so it doesn't fall through the cracks (although it looks like Chris might

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_fbsd Makefile

2000-01-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 07:18:12AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: Use _open internally within libc and libpthread. Have one "open" entry point that is the cancellation version of open. This is what it appears Solaris 7 does. -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to

desire for ftp.internat.freebsd.org mirror

2000-04-06 Thread David O'Brien
Access to ftp.internat.freebsd.org from the USA (and presumably elsewhere) is an abomination. Isn't there *anyone* with an permanate FTP server that could officially mirror the crypto bits from ftp.internat.freebsd.org? -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: kerneld for -current

2000-05-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:17:22AM -0400, Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO wrote: is there any interest in ``kerneld'' (a-la Linux) for FreeBSD? i've got some working prototype Could you summerize what it offers and does? -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Disclaimer: Not speaking for

Re: fixing flex definitions?

2001-03-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:55:22PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: I'm guessing YY_PROTO is like __P() so it can be "compilable with a KR Old Testament compiler." Yes. And in this case, the output of lex *must* be portable to KR. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix /

doFS.sh newfs parameters for install floppy

2001-03-08 Thread David O'Brien
Does anyone know of *any* problems with committing this diff? It changes the % free space from the 8% default to 0. Index: doFS.sh === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/release/scripts/doFS.sh,v retrieving revision 1.24.2.3 diff -u

Re: if_fxp - the real point

2001-03-09 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 06:13:07PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote: However, there *ARE* some of us who aren't intimate with your fxp problems. The problem does exist. I have a board that the `fxp' driver splits this out for: fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 17, addr = 2 fxp1:

Re: if_fxp - the real point

2001-03-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 10:30:08AM -0600, Peter Seebach wrote: For that matter, is the fxp still the most-recommended driver on Alpha? It *never* has been the recommended driver on FreeBSD/Alpha. The fxp driver has had issues on Alpha for a long time. Andrew will fix something with it, then

Re: Solution: Sendmail 8.11.3 on FreeBSD 4.2

2001-03-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:26:29PM +0300, Zaitsev Serg wrote: I have upgrade the Sendmail 8.11.3 on FreeBSD 4.2. But on FreeBSD 4.2 I got trouble with /usr/libexec/mail.local . Filling up /var/spool/mqueue a lot of files. /var/mail/user was empty. Mail stopped. chmod u+s

Re: optimizing apache with php and nfs mounts

2001-03-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:34:32PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote: CC="gcc -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer" OPTIM="-O2 -DBUFFERED_LOGS" could some c guru tell me if this would be bad to use to an apache optimization? I need to compile apache on my own not

Re: optimizing apache with php and nfs mounts

2001-03-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:08:00AM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote: Actually, we did. Of course, our production stuff is still compiled with gcc 2.7.2.1. I think. Whatever the standard system compiler for FreeBSD-3.2 is. And that was at a time when the world was still compiled with -O2, wasn't it?

Re: Solution: Sendmail 8.11.3 on FreeBSD 4.2

2001-03-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:57:51AM +1000, Greg Black wrote: $ uname -rs FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE $ cat /usr/src/UPDATING cat: /usr/src/UPDATING: No such file or directory Perhaps the documentation should be installed more thoroughly. If one is building and installing a new

Re: Solution: Sendmail 8.11.3 on FreeBSD 4.2

2001-03-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:27:02PM +1000, Greg Black wrote: This is the point where we disagree. The information in this file is in fact of interest to somebody who does a fresh install from CD as the simple way to upgrade from an earlier release. Huh??? If you do a fresh install from CD,

Re: optimizing apache with php and nfs mounts

2001-03-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:19:31AM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote: However, even the pgcc web page describes -O2 as safe. I won't even to there... Yes, scanning thru the ML leads me to believe some of these optimizations are pretty much untested. Which is kinda funny, since the ia32 bits are

Re: if_fxp - the real point

2001-03-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:37:34AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: ALL the time. Microsoft has given the UC-Davis security and formal verification lab a multi-year grant to look at this problem. (the approach being researched is "model checking") How does one get the forms for these sort

Re: if_fxp - the real point

2001-03-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:41:53PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: With 2000 and above, your system will check for non-digitally signed dll's and etc. Being signed has nothing to do with correctly working. The project I was speaking about wanted to be able to do something about you buying that

Re: if_fxp - the real point

2001-03-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Dennis wrote: Why would they need to do that? Every time you load a program it updates the libraries, breaking older programs. Its a philosophical problem. You dont need a grant to figure it out. You JUST DON'T GET IT [academic research]. And any

Re: optimizing apache with php and nfs mounts

2001-03-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:12:41PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote: Not untested -- but you should go grab a graduate text on compiler optimizations and familiarize yourself with the complexity of the problem. Care to recommend any starting places. You've piqued my interest.

Re: /bin/ps thing

2001-03-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:04:43AM +, Jordan DeLong wrote: It seemed that send-pr was just for reporting issues, not for fixing them also Nope. At the bottom of the send-pr form, is a "How to fix" section. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX

Re: GCC Upgrade?

2001-03-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:46:42AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: GCC 2.95.3 was just released. I did notice that there are some bug fixes ... in the optimizer, and some various other fixes etc. Considering the recent discussion about incorrect code generation due to -O2 and above, I

Re: GCC Upgrade?

2001-03-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 02:54:52PM +0100, Titus von Boxberg wrote: Since at least aug. 2000 (according to the mailing list archives) the exception handling in base system g++ is broken (at least for multithreaded programs) I am not aware of exception handling being broken (more so than in

Re: gcc and exceptions and frame.c

2001-03-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: It there any particular reason why you are using gcc295 from ports instead of FreeBSD stock compiler? I would assume because he has a 3.4 box: $ g++295 -v specs from

Re: GCC Upgrade?

2001-03-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:12:18PM -0500, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: The fix has been posted on the gcc-devel mailing list and Berndt Schmidt even included it into some of GCC 2.95.3-testXX release. And that time I decided that my job is done, but apparently Berndt managed to revert (most

Re: GCC Upgrade?

2001-03-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:31:06PM -0500, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: I certainly do not see that happening in FreeBSD 4-STABLE any time soon. It never will. FreeBSD-CURRENT might switch to DWARF2 some day, David O'Brien is the right person to ask about that. It will happen right after I

Re: 4.3-BETA world crashing 4.2-RELEASE kernel ?

2001-03-21 Thread David O'Brien
First let me say to anyone reading the email I am replying to: _ _ ___ __ _ _ _ | _ \ ___| \ | |/ _ \_ _|__| | ___ | |_| |__ (_)___ | | | |/ _ \ | \| | | | || | / _` |/ _ \ | __| '_ \| / __| | |_| | (_) | | |\ | |_| || |

Re: 4.3-BETA world crashing 4.2-RELEASE kernel ?

2001-03-22 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:51:00PM -0700, Matt Simerson wrote: Actually, they aren't backwards. You've gone and snipped the parts of my original message that show that the commands are being executed at the same time. I read you message twice and came away with the same idea. You should

Re: GCC Upgrade?

2001-03-23 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 01:35:30PM -0500, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: This patch will work. According to Berndt Schimidt, there are some problems with it on HP/UX and that was the main reason why it was backed out. I never saw any ill effects on i386 with this patch though, while good efects

Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2.

2001-03-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 06:31:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: 2) even if you have hardware with an "fxp" on board, adding a second supported card is cheap and easy -- nothing like having to put in a second video card; Many, many U1-form-factor systems have two fxp on-board NICs. No room

Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2.

2001-03-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Dennis wrote: Most drivers are written without full docs. Feh. *EVERY* wpaul written Ethernet driver was written _with_ having the full docs. wpaul will not write a driver otherwise. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux

Re: problems with: /usr/src/lib/libc

2001-03-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Jochen Kaiser wrote: why are all my .o files in /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc and not in /usr/src/lib/libc ? Because that is how our make framework works w/in /usr/src See the readme in /usr/share/mk/ I changed syscalls.master, created new syscall, made

Re: Vinum stripe size (was: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server)

2001-03-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 05:16:53PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: No, there's no requirement for it to be a prime number. The only problem is that with 32 MB cylinder groups and a power of two stripe size and subdisk count, you end up with all the superblocks on one subdisk, The change I made to

Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL

2001-03-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:26:56AM +0200, Arjan Knepper wrote: What is preffered the build-in STL (/usr/include/g++) or STLport? The one bundled with (and matches) G++ of course. Unless you find your code just will not work with it. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send

Re: # of bpf devices

2001-03-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:49:53PM -0500, Dennis wrote: It seems that only 256 bpf devices are supported. How painful would it be to increase that number...I assume its an 8bit varable somewhere? Are there other caveats? It's pretty trivial. Send a patch when you are done. I was

Re: # of bpf devices

2001-03-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:56:21PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: Anyway, I just had a quick look, and I think that your basic problem is that MAKEDEV uses the wrong encoding for devices above 255. This is fixed in -CURRENT, and if you bring back the unit2minor changes from there to -STABLE you

Re: if_fxp - the real point

2001-03-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:40:05PM -0500, Dennis wrote: 3com never has, Uh, how do you think Bill Paul wrote the xl driver? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2.

2001-03-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:49:55PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote: Its not a "proprietary tree". I dont have time to clean it up and submit patches. But you do seem to have time to keep arguing with people??? I'm sure you'll have time to bitch again if 4.4 doesn't meet your needs because you

Re: Security problems with access(2)?

2001-04-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:55:23AM +1000, Greg Black wrote: Many years ago I implemented a new interface that I called eaccess() which replicated the work of access, but tested against the effective uid and gid. I'd like to see that introduced more widely. That still isn't suffient (and

Re: Security problems with access(2)?

2001-04-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:02:11PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: eaccess_file(2) - Using effective credentials, check to see if the requested access is permitted on the file or directory identified by the provided pathname. Why not stick to existing naming practices? eaccess()

Re: Idea about modules build

2001-04-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:51:20AM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: I have idea about modules build/install process: Warner (imp) was to commit this fuctionality to 5-current (and back port to releng_4 after 4.3-RELEASE). -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium

2001-04-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:57:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to see this too, however I think you have to sign NDA's and the like to be a part of the AMD effort to develop for it. Understandable I guess. Yes. I now have a copy of the Virtutech Simics x86-64 simulator.

Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium

2001-04-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:06:56PM -0700, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: I'm talking about FreeBSD using the gcc x86-64 compiler to port FreeBSD to x86-64. What other compiler would we use?? I have access to the SuSE x96-64 compiler effort. I'm talking about a FreeBSD project to port to x86-64.

Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium

2001-04-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:51:17PM -0700, Doug White wrote: (Yes I know the emulator is ass-slow and a gigantic beast, but it does work, right?) The public simulator took 12 hours to get to the twirler of our boot loader. I guess it would have booted the i386 kernel I was feeding it in just

Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium

2001-04-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:32:32AM -0700, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: You're taking me out of context my friend. I was responding to this: ... I was saying that gcc can be used by anyone without signing any NDAs. Ah. Sorry for the misudertanding. You are of course correct. -- -- David ([EMAIL

Re: UFS block size vs. write speed

2001-04-21 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 07:52:03AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Soft updates isn't an "async" or "sync" thing. It combines synchronous and asynchronous transfers. If I'm not mistaken, all metadata is synchronously written, and all data is asynchronously written. You're mistaken, what

Re: gcc -O bug

2001-04-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:44:36AM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote: Er, isn't this the kind of problem the GCC folks are more likly to be able to fix? In general yes. But it doesn't hurt to double check here to make sure you your ducks in row before going to the GCC lists. I see later in this

Re: pax(1) gzip functionality

2001-04-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created. Sigh. They could have generalized this just a little and supported Bzip2 at the same time. Please let me know

Re: pax(1) gzip functionality

2001-04-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created. Sigh. They could have generalized this

Re: BSDI and Marketing 101

2001-04-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:00:35PM -0400, Dennis wrote: At 08:12 PM 04/26/2001, David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 07:03:47PM -0400, Dennis wrote: I saw BSDIs retail product of FreeBSD in a local bookstore the other day, and it became sadly clear why LINUX, although highly

Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium

2001-04-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:59:06PM -0500, Michael C . Wu wrote: IIRC, KA-64 does not even have an emulator yet. Are you making a distinction between emulator and simulator? Such that SimNow! and VirtuHammer don't fall into what you are speaking of? -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To

Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium

2001-04-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:08:48PM -0700, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: What's KA-64 ? AMD internal name for the x86-64. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: BSDI and Marketing 101

2001-04-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:50:01PM -0400, Dennis wrote: I guess you missed the POINT, which was that mandrake was selling the same I guess you missed the POINT. I see you are conveniently totally ignoring the fact that the channel wants $129 items. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Trouble with 4.3-RELEASE compiler

2001-04-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 07:40:22PM -0300, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: I was installing a squid server with 4.3-RELEASE, and found that FreeBSD has now a bug in the compiler that affects squid. The default compilation of squid is with CFLAGS=-g -O2 -Wall, and this setup triggers the

Re: fd driver hacking to recover data

2001-05-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:07:53AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: i think you can try dd from the raw device (/dev/rfd) using the iseek Uh, the raw device is /dev/fd. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: subscribe

2001-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:01:13PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: Argh! I'm sorry folks, I almost always remember to delete the cc line when I send somebody that particular form letter so as not to spam the list myself, but this time I forgot to do that before typing the send command. Bad

wint_t

2001-05-14 Thread David O'Brien
What is the proper definition of wint_t? curses.h has it as a long int, however NetBSD (and GCC's libstdc++) has it as an int. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: gcc (cpp) include search path problem

2001-05-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:55:38AM -0400, Brent Verner wrote: IMO, the search path for cpp should include /usr/local/include, especially since we install ports there. That would be wrong. We install ports where ever you tell the system to. That could be /usr/reall-cool-FreeBSD-treats/ or

Re: general speed differences between 4.1.1-RELEASE and 4.3-RELEASE

2001-05-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:21:06PM -0700, Ed Hudson wrote: enclosed is a .jpeg of an xgraph of the following interactive test: Are you setup such that you could do the same test on a stock Red Hat 6.2, 7.0, and 7.1 box? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: Preliminary Tuning man page (was Re: Benchmarking FreeBSD (w

2001-05-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:33:19PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: Nice! One thing to note in the filesystem tuning is that newfs can turn on softupdates at newfs time now with -U, at least in -current. Stable too. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: What changed in ld?

2001-06-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:42:34AM -0500, G. Adam Stanislav wrote: I have recently upgraded from FreeBSD 3.1 to 4.3-20010525-STABLE. And thus upgraded your assembler and linker from GNU Binutils 2.9.1 to 2.10.1. When you upgrade to 4.4-FreeBSD you will get GNU Binutils 2.11. That tells me

Re: Fixing documented bug in env(1)

2001-06-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:29:38PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: Although this is a documented shortcoming, it's quite unnecessary given how easy it is to fix it. Any objections to allowing '--' to mean end of env. variable assignments? The orthoginal way (with grep, mv, et. al.) would be to

Re: Fixing documented bug in env(1)

2001-06-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:49:43AM +1000, Greg Black wrote: | For whatever it's worth, it seems more reasonable to me | to use '--' instead of '=='. Since '--' has NO equals | sign in it, it clearly can't be the setting of an | environment variable. If we're voting on this, I'm very

Re: Fixing documented bug in env(1)

2001-06-03 Thread David O'Brien
Mark you've given the justification and logic behind `==' much, much better than I did. Thanks! :-) -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) P.S. typically I don't quote a whole message like this, but I think it is important that at least read this one and honestly consider it. On Sat, Jun 02, 2001

Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality?

2001-06-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:46:18PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: Is there any reason not to MFC the new md(4) functionality Zero reason not to. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality?

2001-06-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:10:56AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:46:18PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: mdconfig(8) and mdioctl.h aren't in -stable so those can be brought over verbatim, Dumb question: Can we just add a RELENG_4 tag to the files in such a

Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality?

2001-06-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 06:33:17PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Others see it differently, it would seriously break a lot of people who are using -stable in embedded applications. Can you expand on this? I assume you know we are not talking about disabling vn(4). To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: need help: gdb -k 4.16/7

2001-06-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:32:39AM -0700, Dorr H. Clark wrote: Interestingly, the 4.16 distribution archived at ftp://www.gnu.org does not exactly match the version in the FreeBSD 2.2.x release, and doesn't build cleanly either. Not sure why you find this so surprising. Install the 2.2.x

Re: Re: import NetBSD rc system [summary]

2001-06-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:48:49AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: I think that since we use CVS around here, we should simply import the Some time tonight I will be vendor importing the NetBSD rc system. (no it will not be functional at that time). I am doing this to help the various efforts

Re: Re: import NetBSD rc system [summary]

2001-06-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:08:48PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Some time tonight I will be vendor importing the NetBSD rc system. (no it will not be functional at that time). Erm.. Sheldon Hearn has expressed a desire to discuss things with Luke Mewburn in the hope of coming to some

Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?

2001-06-16 Thread David O'Brien
Doesn't any one remember Netiquette these days and trim what they are replying to?? [ thread left below to see how bad this is getting.. ] On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 02:42:35PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: This is a good reference, but sadly it only really refers to the sockets paradigm as first

Re: import NetBSD rc system

2001-06-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:58:06AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I'll submit the patches I have for this that make it work in both FreeBSD and NetBSD. BTW, why do we use libutil.h and they use util.h? Just the way things are. I like Matt's idea (I think it was Matt) to have a new_rc switch.

Re: import NetBSD rc system

2001-06-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 08:04:42AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I also had an idea to break out the network init into several different pieces falling under 2 headings LINK (ether, atm) and NETWORK (ipx, ipv4, ipv6, atalk). I've started work on breaking everything out and was wondering if I

Re: Changes to the /etc/rc* boot system

2001-06-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:32:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I think that we're closer to agreement here than it may appear. Last I heard from obrien he was overloaded, and wasn't looking to head this up himself unless no one else was going to do it. At this point I view myself as more

Re: whois(1) patch for review

2001-06-22 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:37:17AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Arg.. I wish you had contacted me before doing this work. From looking at your patch, your using an old copy of my work. The newest one is available at:

Re: whois(1) patch for review

2001-06-22 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:08:21PM +0300, Alexey Zelkin wrote: For example you can have following string in your whoisservers configuration file (system wide -- /usr/share/misc/whoiservers or personal ~/.whoisservers): System wide configuration files should be in /etc, not /usr/share/misc.

  1   2   3   4   >