Le 31/05/2013 16:01, Chris Rees a écrit :
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
expression I passed took a very long time, and suspected the usual
backtracking loop, so I started trimming
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
expression I passed took a very long time, and suspected the usual
On 2 June 2013 11:41, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
expression I
Le 02/06/2013 14:16, Chris Rees a écrit :
On 2 June 2013 11:41, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
by the length of a regex passed to it.
On 2 June 2013 18:15, Florent Peterschmitt flor...@peterschmitt.fr wrote:
Le 02/06/2013 14:16, Chris Rees a écrit :
On 2 June 2013 11:41, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange
... so run it inside hwpmc and see what the resulting CPU users are?
adrian
On 31 May 2013 07:01, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
expression I
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
expression I passed took a very long time, and suspected the usual
backtracking loop, so I started trimming it... and discovered this:
[crees@pegasus]~%
El día Wednesday, August 06, 2008 a las 07:29:31PM +0200, Oliver Fromme
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
I'm just
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:54:53AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Wednesday, August 06, 2008 a las 07:29:31PM +0200, Oliver Fromme
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem
rebelion kernel: da0: VBTM Store'n'go 6.51 Removable Direct
Access SCSI-0 device
Aug 6 10:06:12 rebelion kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
Aug 6 10:06:12 rebelion kernel: da0: Attempt to query device size failed: UNIT
ATTENTION, Medium not present
seems to be this one:
http://luhdc.berlios.de
Hello,
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
what makes me worry is that the problem was raised in 5.4-RC3 in 2005
and still exists in 7.0R
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
I'm just wondering what happens if you enforce a rescan
on the (virtual
On (06/08/2008 19:29), Oliver Fromme wrote:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
Situation here is somewhat
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything exotic then you will probably be safe.
the really safe way of course it to make a 6.0 chroot on your machine and
compile your app there.
For raw UNIX applications,
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything exotic then you will probably be safe.
For raw UNIX applications, this rule of thumb
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything exotic then you will probably be safe.
For raw
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both previous and subsequent minor releases of the same major release?
In
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both previous and subsequent minor releases of the
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both
Daniel Eischen wrote:
Binaries compiled on a certain version of FreeBSD will continue to run
on later versions, but are not guaranteed to run on earlier versions
(and in fact *will* not run depending on the binary). This is because
over time the system libraries and kernel grow new features
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both previous and subsequent
Julian Elischer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the
Kris Julian
Thank you for clarifiying the compatibility situation. This
information was exactly what I was looking for.
I have a follow-up question based on this remark...
On 5/5/08, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we don't attempt to keep this form of ABI compatibility
Carl Shapiro wrote:
If my binary only executes system calls indirectly through libc
interfaces, as far as libc and libm are concerned, are new symbols the
only thing I need to worry about?
I think so, yes.
Kris
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Carl Shapiro wrote:
Kris Julian
Thank you for clarifiying the compatibility situation. This
information was exactly what I was looking for.
I have a follow-up question based on this remark...
On 5/5/08, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we don't attempt to keep this form
Carl Shapiro wrote:
Kris Julian
Thank you for clarifiying the compatibility situation. This
information was exactly what I was looking for.
I have a follow-up question based on this remark...
On 5/5/08, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we don't attempt to keep this form of
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
As a datapoint, I have been using cistron-radiusd for
Hi ,
I am a Masters student at Carnegie Mellon Uni, working on xen/freebsd
opensource project. I have been working on pci-passtrhough support for
freebsd domU.
I am testing pcifront on freebsd domU using following sound card
[ Cirrus Logic CS 4614/22/24 [CrystalClear SoundFusion Audio
Hi All,
I am a Masters student at Carnegie Mellon Uni, working on xen/freebsd
opensource project. I have been working on pci-passtrhough support for
freebsd domU.
I am testing pcifront on freebsd domU using following sound card
[ Cirrus Logic CS 4614/22/24 [CrystalClear SoundFusion Audio
The makefile has the following lines:
PHPBBDIR= ${WWWDOCROOT}/${PHPBBURL}
PKGOPTS=${FILESDIR}/pkg-opts
EXCEPTFILES=${PREFIX}/${PHPBBDIR}/install/install.php \
${PREFIX}/${PHPBBDIR}/install/upgrade.php \
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Vizion wrote:
The makefile has the following lines:
PHPBBDIR= ${WWWDOCROOT}/${PHPBBURL}
PKGOPTS= ${FILESDIR}/pkg-opts
EXCEPTFILES= ${PREFIX}/${PHPBBDIR}/install/install.php \
${PREFIX}/${PHPBBDIR}/install/upgrade.php \
On Thursday 08 September 2005 17:05, the author Vizion contributed to the
dialogue on-
/usr/ports/www/phpbb --? Makefile query:
The makefile has the following lines:
PHPBBDIR= ${WWWDOCROOT}/${PHPBBURL}
PKGOPTS= ${FILESDIR}/pkg-opts
EXCEPTFILES= ${PREFIX}/${PHPBBDIR}/install
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: /usr/ports/www/phpbb --? Makefile query
Date: Thursday 08 September 2005 17:34
From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
Johann Visagie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 08 September 2005
: /usr/ports/www/phpbb --? Makefile query:
On Thursday 08 September 2005 17:23, you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Vizion wrote:
The makefile has the following lines:
PHPBBDIR= ${WWWDOCROOT}/${PHPBBURL}
PKGOPTS=${FILESDIR}/pkg-opts
EXCEPTFILES=${PREFIX}/${PHPBBDIR
Ok, this a good one for experts.
How to I ask the CD burner if it's tray is open or closed? I am creating
a automagical shell script to do semi-unattended backups and need to
figure out how to make sure there is a cd in the tray before I start
burning. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
* Ed Stover [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041217 13:12]:
Ok, this a good one for experts.
How to I ask the CD burner if it's tray is open or closed? I am creating
a automagical shell script to do semi-unattended backups and need to
figure out how to make sure there is a cd in the tray before I start
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:11:52PM -0700, Ed Stover wrote:
How to I ask the CD burner if it's tray is open or closed? I am creating
a automagical shell script to do semi-unattended backups and need to
figure out how to make sure there is a cd in the tray before I start
burning. Any help
Hi there,
* Neil Fenemor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
I currently have an issue of how open the whole WiFi tends to be, so,
as all good people should do, I've started implementing a IPSec
encryption system rather than the rather disappointing WEP.
I'm encrypting all data to and
Hi all,
I currently have an issue of how open the whole WiFi tends to be, so,
as all good people should do, I've started implementing a IPSec
encryption system rather than the rather disappointing WEP.
I'm encrypting all data to and from the gateway, which isn't a problem.
This was documented
Hi, I have query related gdb and gdbserver communication.
Query Section Offset(qOffset)
This request sent by the gdb to determine what relocation, if any, the
target applies to applications and data during the download process.
Target responds with the offsets it applies to the application`s
Is there a way to specify a function in a shared library as the main
entry point for my C++ application instead of usual main function?
-Vinoth
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Hi,
This might be a lame query...but ...
I am trying to create a file from kernel space given
the vnode of the parent directory using VOP_CREATE.
The code is as below.
int make_file(struct vnode *dvp, struct vnode **vpp, struct proc *p, char
*name)
{
struct componentname cnp
Where can i find a hardware compatibility list for
the x86 platform?
Kostas Chortarias
On 03.07.2001 22:39:15 +, kostas wrote:
[doesn't this belong on -questions?]
Where can i find a hardware compatibility list for the x86 platform?
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.3-RELEASE/HARDWARE.TXT
/Michael
--
Michael Lyngbøl -- michael at lyngbol dot dk
TDC Tele
In a message dated 06/28/2001 12:23:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally I don't care much about BSD vs. GPL and am
annoyed by Microsoft's hypocricy (sp?). The fact that
they're using open source software is great.
That was the point I was trying to
anyone seen this yet or am I slow as usual?
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/dotnet/2001/06/27/dotnet.html
Ak
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
Wes Peters said on Jun 23, 2001 at 23:28:42:
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
Wes Peters said on Jun 23, 2001 at 23:28:42:
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only for legacy Unix stuff.
Can you substantiate your claim there is
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
Wes Peters said on Jun 23, 2001 at 23:28:42:
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only for legacy Unix stuff.
Can you substantiate your claim there is plenty of GNU stuff in
Interix, or are you just talking out your ass as usual?
Substantiate? Look at the component list:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/features.asp
Why should I substantiate it? Do it yourself if it bothers you.
To
Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/interixinc.asp
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only for legacy Unix stuff.
Can you substantiate your claim there is plenty of GNU stuff in
Interix, or are
Mark Valentine wrote:
No. The core SpiderTCP protocol implementation is _not_ derived
from BSD. Some of the utilities which were added as the product
was developed came from Net/1 or Net/2 (hence the FTP.EXE copyright
string), but others such as route and netstat were written from
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wes Peters writes:
Mark Valentine wrote:
No. The core SpiderTCP protocol implementation is _not_ derived
from BSD. [...]
(NOTE: this was never sockets over TLI like the stuff some UNIX
vendors bought from a Spider competitor!)
*Cough*Lachman*cough*.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/interixinc.asp
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only for legacy Unix stuff.
Can you substantiate your claim there is plenty of GNU stuff in
Interix, or are you just talking out
In mailinglist.freebsd.hackers, you wrote:
This is a good reference, but sadly it only really refers to the
sockets paradigm as first popularized by BSD, which means they could
have followed the API without touching a single line of BSD code.
To reiterate: What I'm looking for is some true,
Wes Peters said on Jun 23, 2001 at 23:28:42:
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only for legacy Unix stuff.
Can you substantiate your claim there is plenty of GNU stuff in
Interix, or are you just talking out your ass as
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
Wes Peters said on Jun 23, 2001 at 23:28:42:
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only for legacy Unix stuff.
Can you substantiate your claim there is plenty of GNU stuff in
Dear Jordan,
Bill Gates has jumped in to clarify OS vs. GPL surprisingly quickly after
the publication in WSJ. Lee is my hero.
Sort of the other way around. We were the several FreeBSD
volunteers referenced in the article. Lee's my press contact at the
WSJ and he's done a number of
Koster, K.J. said on Jun 21, 2001 at 10:24:24:
Perhaps Lee can consider tracking down how much GLP lisenced software is
used in companies in close proximity to Microsoft. While Microsoft is not
going to be caught dead using it,
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/interixinc.asp
OOPs ;)
check
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-06-20-018-20-NW-MS-SW
Ak
Koster, K.J. said on Jun 21, 2001 at 10:24:24:
Perhaps Lee can consider tracking down how much GLP lisenced software is
used in companies in close proximity to Microsoft. While
Microsoft is not
going
Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-06-20-018-20-NW-MS-SW
Doesn't this mean software developed with Microsoft's SDK is viral?
And doesn't *that* mean you're not allowed to develop it with
Microsoft's SDK? And doesn't this sound a bit circular?
DES
--
On 21 Jun 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-06-20-018-20-NW-MS-SW
Doesn't this mean software developed with Microsoft's SDK is viral?
And doesn't *that* mean you're not allowed to develop it with
Microsoft's SDK?
Rahul Siddharthan [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/interixinc.asp
Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
Of course, they say it's all meant only for legacy Unix stuff.
Legacy being industry jargon for working.
mike
--
Mike
Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:16:20 +0200
It all sounds really odd to me but alas a cat does stupid things when it
gets cornered...
I
* Dave McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010620 15:26] wrote:
Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:16:20 +0200
It all sounds really odd to me but alas
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6322264.html?tag=tp_pr
Gates talks about GPL and being against it. ---Quote:
In an interview Tuesday with CNET News.com at the TechEd 2001 conference,
Gates observed that Microsoft routinely shares the source code for its Windows
operating system with its
Peter wrote:
However, Gates said, there are problems for commercial users relative to the
(GNU General Public License), and we are just making sure people understand the
GPL.
end Quote.
But the issue is that wasn't the end of the quotation. Later on, Bubba says,
And so people
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GPL is great for simple things, that don't create any standard, but
work upon one. But as even RMS [I think it was RMS] agreed, BSD
license is much better for 'standards'. -- ie the oog format was BSD
licensed and the GPL people endorsed it because this would
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:55:06PM -0400, Sergey Babkin wrote:
Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:16:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is BSDI's stack so superior to any of the other BSDs that MS would pay BSDI
for it, particularly at a time when BSDI was trying to
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
I've had several marketing types approach me recently for details as
to whether or not Microsoft was using the BSD TCP/IP stack and/or user
utilities, and though it's always been common knowledge in the
community that they were, when I set about to prove it I found it
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 15), Jordan Hubbard said:
Thanks, that represents the first hard hit I've seen yet:
root@winston- strings FTP.EXE |grep University of California
@(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
But this probably just
An article over on www.Kuro5hin.org by a someone who claims
to be a former MS employee describes the stack used in NT back
in the early 90's as code which was liscensed from a company
called 'Spider'. In the comp.unix.admin archives I found a post
which references Spider QNIX as a *nix variant so
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam)
Date: Tue 19 Jun, 2001
Subject: Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
An article over on www.Kuro5hin.org by a someone who claims
to be a former MS employee describes the stack used in NT back
in the early 90's as code which
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:16:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is BSDI's stack so superior to any of the other BSDs that MS would pay BSDI
for it, particularly at a time when BSDI was trying to compete with MS in the
server market? Seems like something that a bunch of BSD fanatics
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:16:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is BSDI's stack so superior to any of the other BSDs that MS
would pay BSDI
for it, particularly at a time when BSDI
jeez, forgot the link to WSJ
http://public.wsj.com/news/hmc/sb992819157437237260.htm
If this is what started this forgive me for being
so unobservent, we're a bit slow here in the UK
sometimes (well I am that is!)
Ak
Hmm, anyone seen this then in the Wall Street J ??
Or is this what
In a message dated 06/17/2001 2:27:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. We're not bashing Microsoft here. We're just trying to figure
out if their recently published comments that Open Source is bad
and inimical to our interests is really just marketspeak which
I'm not sure if this will help or not but Winsock.h, Winsock2.h, and Ws2spi.h
which are shipped with visual studio 6 include the following in the header:
* This file includes parts which are Copyright (c) 1982-1986 Regents
* of the University of California. All rights reserved. The
*
a help with this article. If nothing
else, it finally got Microsoft to publically admit that we're STILL at
Hotmail rather than saying, as they have in the past, that FreeBSD
was completely removed and replaced with Windows. :-)
- Jordan
From: Andy [Tecc Nops] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Query
+ Adam wrote:
| I'm not sure if this will help or not but Winsock.h, Winsock2.h, and Ws2spi.h
| which are shipped with visual studio 6 include the following in the header:
|
| * This file includes parts which are Copyright (c) 1982-1986 Regents
| * of the University of California. All
Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:16:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is BSDI's stack so superior to any of the other BSDs that MS would pay BSDI
for it, particularly at a time when BSDI was trying to compete with MS in the
server market? Seems like something that a
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had several marketing types approach me recently for details as
to whether or not Microsoft was using the BSD TCP/IP stack and/or user
utilities, and though it's always been common knowledge in the
community that they were, when I set about to
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 01:16:20PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had several marketing types approach me recently for details as
to whether or not Microsoft was using the BSD TCP/IP stack and/or user
utilities, and though it's always been common
From: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:16:20 +0200
It all sounds really odd to me but alas a cat does stupid things when it
gets cornered...
I sincerely hope that you BSD guysgals stay far far
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It all sounds really odd to me but alas a cat does stupid things
when it gets cornered...
I sincerely hope that you BSD guysgals stay far far away from the
microsoft is evil, we can't win it easily so let's
microsoft is evil, we can't win it easily so let's bash it to
microsoft /is/ evil. point in fact they're one of the most unethical
capitalist organizations you could find as far as their business practices
are concerned. unfortunately, the masses are also too stupid to protect
themselves.
Sergey Babkin wrote:
| Brian Wolter wrote:
|
|microsoft is evil, we can't win it easily so let's bash it to
|
| microsoft /is/ evil. point in fact they're one of the most unethical
| ^^^
| capitalist organizations you
name names, but suffice it to say that it will be a small (and very
visible) coup for us if we can help them prove this. Thanks.
- Jordan
From: Joseph A. Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:06:23 -0400
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't any one remember Netiquette these days and trim what they are
replying to??
No. Every month is September.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Hi,
I agree with Serger Babkin - strings(1) wouldn't help.
Main keywords are: ndis.vxd , vip.386 , vtcp.386 .
Any DLL's has nothing common with TCP/IP stack - at least on md 9x.
Sergey Babkin wrote:
I know one way but it's a hard one: disassemble and manually decomiple
the code and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jordan Hubbard)
Date: Fri 15 Jun, 2001
Subject: Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
root@winston- strings FTP.EXE |grep University of California
@(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
You can't tell much from
is BSDI's stack so superior to any of the other BSDs that MS would pay BSDI
for it, particularly at a time when BSDI was trying to compete with MS in the
server market? Seems like something that a bunch of BSD fanatics conjured up
after a few beers.
Bryan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
In the previous episode, Jordan Hubbard said:
Not really, I don't have any contacts there. Sigh. I didn't think
proving this would be quite so hard. :(
If you issue the following command on hub:
% grep microsoft.com freebsd-* 2/dev/null
you may be able to find some contacts there.
I've had several marketing types approach me recently for details as
to whether or not Microsoft was using the BSD TCP/IP stack and/or user
utilities, and though it's always been common knowledge in the
community that they were, when I set about to prove it I found it to
be less easy than I'd
What I read awhile back was MS licensed from BSDi their TCP/IP stack for use
in W2K.
Steve B.
- Original Message -
From: Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:57 PM
Subject: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
I've
Do you have a pointer to what you read? I really need HARD evidence
here, not just anecdotal stuff. Thanks!
- Jordan
From: Steve B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:59:51 -0700
What I read awhile back was MS
Do you happen to have any of their Winsock propoganda handy (specifically
developer materials or winsock.h header file)? I know for a fact that they
have said repetedly that some of it was taken directly from Berkely. I'm
just not sure where... I'm going to start digging through my stuff to see
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
