Hi,
I have a bunch of netbooted machines, one set in a cluster is older (HP
DL80 G9, 2x8C, Intel I350 -igb- NICs), the other set is newer (HP XL225n
G10, AMD EPYC2x16C, BCM57412 -bnxt- NICs).
All of these boot from the network, which is basically:
- get IP and options with DHCP with the help of
Hi,
Never heard of it, thanks!
On 04/19/12 11:32, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
Hi,
Use IP_RECVIF option.
For IP_SENDIF look at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2007-March/013510.html
I used the patch on my embedded FreeBSD 9.0 boxes and it works fine. I
modificated it slightly to
Hi,
I want to solve the classic problem of a DHCP server: listening for
broadcast UDP packets and figuring out what interface a packet has
come in.
The Linux solution is SO_BINDTODEVICE, which according to socket(7):
SO_BINDTODEVICE
Bind this socket to a particular
Hi,
On a recently built stable/9 I have these lines in rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0_name=admin
vlans_admin=pub
create_args_pub=vlan 20
ifconfig_admin=inet 192.168.2.20 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_pub=inet 1.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
ifconfig_pub_ipv6=inet6 accept_rtadv
ifconfig_carp0=vhid 1 pass
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 9-STABLE on a four core machine with bce to run
multi-threaded unbound with libev (using kqueue).
Here's the first message (not a long thread so far) about the problem:
http://unbound.net/pipermail/unbound-users/2012-February/002237.html
To summarize:
whether I run
Hi,
Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
we can assume it's stable now.
But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people
hacking with rc.local or various scripts in
Здравствуйте
On 01/20/12 08:15, Коньков Евгений wrote:
Здравствуйте, Attila.
Вы писали 20 января 2012 г., 8:52:47:
AN Hi,
AN Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
AN capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
AN we can assume
Hi,
On 02/07/11 01:22, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:54:49PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:01:47 +0100, Ronald Klop
ronald-freeb...@klop.yi.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:38:04 +0100,sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
So, does anyone have an idea why the IP
Barney Cordoba wrote:
Any one knows if there is any near plan to develop drivers
for
network cards based on broadcom NetXtereme II 57710
10 GbE controller?
---
best regards
Hooman Fazaeli
Ok, I'll bite. What is so special about this particular part that you
simply
Barney Cordoba wrote:
A possible cause -at least for me- is that HP switched from
the Gigabit Broadcoms for these 10GE versions. So newer
machines (for example the HP BL460c G6) come with Broadcom
57711 instead of the 57xx ones (supported by bge and bce).
I wouldn't use a new server that
Hello,
What I'm trying to accomplish is the following:
- there are two machines, connected over the internet (let's call them A
and B)
- when A tries to connect to B:port, or B to A:port (via TCP, port is
just a TCP port, in this case, 3306) the connection should be redirected
to a local
Stephen Clark wrote:
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
What I'm trying to accomplish is the following:
- there are two machines, connected over the internet (let's call
them A and B)
- when A tries to connect to B:port, or B to A:port (via TCP, port is
just a TCP port, in this case, 3306
Hello,
Somewhere between 5th May and yesterday there was a (routing related?)
change, which causes this machine crash at boot:
http://picasaweb.google.com/nagy.attila/20090517Fbsd8Crash#5336859077575768514
http://picasaweb.google.com/nagy.attila/20090517Fbsd8Crash#5336859069031814370
The
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Somewhere between 5th May and yesterday there was a (routing related?)
change, which causes this machine crash at boot:
http://picasaweb.google.com/nagy.attila/20090517Fbsd8Crash#5336859077575768514
http://picasaweb.google.com/nagy.attila/20090517Fbsd8Crash
Hello,
OpenBSD's relayd has grown a very useful transparent relay support,
which means you can run a HTTP(S) reverse proxy transparently
(maintaining the source IP, while you have a different TCP stream open
from the proxy to the backend, even by terminating the SSL part and
speaking clear
of the load
balancer, but it would be better if the previous behaviour (as in
6-STABLE) could be restored.
Could anybody help to resolve this?
Thanks,
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630 306 6758
On 03/06/08 13:17, Max Laier wrote:
Am Do, 6.03.2008, 09:36, schrieb Attila Nagy:
Hello,
I've just upgraded some of our 6-STABLE servers to 7-STABLE to notice
that pf reply-to for directly connected IPs seems to be broken.
I have the following relevant rule in pf.conf:
pass in on $ext_if
On 08/15/06 14:25, Brian Candler wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:43:28PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose.
They aren't cheap, but they work very well.
I don't like blackboxes with nice GUIs. :)
They have a command-line interface too :) Seriously
On 08/15/06 16:47, Brian Candler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
I can solve this problem with Linux
How?
With a shared filesystem of course.
Specifically, which one? If there is a good filesystem for this application
perhaps it could be ported.
Any
side, Solaris has the capability of doing NFS client
failover (reported to have some problems, but for now I would have only
FreeBSD clients), and AMD has multiple server support, but I don't know
how does that work with FreeBSD diskless boots yet. (root FS on NFS)
Thanks,
--
Attila Nagy
networking +
AMD running, and mount everything else via NFS. Another
Yes, I've also thought of that, but that has drawbacks too.
Thanks for the ideas.
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630 306 6758
http
On 2006. 08. 14. 20:43, Attila Nagy wrote:
that a little bit hackish. I can solve this problem with Linux, but I
would like to do it with FreeBSD, that's why I'm asking. Maybe somebody
has a clever idea, which can make it possible on FreeBSD, without the
above hassles.
BTW, is there a feature
machines, if that counts...
... yes, that counts. Without pf it works OK, but when I load a simple
pass only ruleset, it breaks.
The strange thing is that FreeBSD-FreeBSD works with pf loaded, but
FreeBSD with Windows or Linux doesn't.
Any ideas?
--
Attila Nagy e
filter on loopback
interfaces. Last time I tried, I could not filter on TCP or UDP ports,
filtering from and to IP and protocol worked.
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adopt a directory on our free software phone @work: +361 371 3536
server! http
:
don't serve big files with thttpd, use something else
Great.
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194
will connect the machine to an other switch, maybe tomorrow to test
whether the VLAN trunking works or not.
Thanks a lot!
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU
]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Hello,
Intel 8255x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet Controller Family
Open Source Software Developer Manual
Revision 1.0
Any news about the PRO/100 S cards, or the PRO/1000 series?
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy
://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
modules/netgraph/fec/load for defining the fec interface.
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194
=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
the source and not the docs?
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell
Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send
-OpenSSH_2.3.0
Isn't that OpenSSH vulnerable to multiple root exploits? ;)
[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194
driver. Which works with the em one,
so either me, or the driver is buggy :)
[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194
-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
this is about Linux UDP NFS clients, in particular.
Nope, both the server and the client side is FreeBSD stable.
[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU
wouldn't help me...
[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell
!
[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758
on that front.
Thanks a lot.
[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194
Hello,
oops. I meant to write eladtam .. bad fingers.. and Dalma says that I
should have said megadtam
Oh, I see now.
Thanks.. with his email address I could find the orignal mail :-)
Good luck! :)
[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]---
Attila Nagy
be glad to test this :)
--
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Budapest Polytechnic (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
H-1084 Budapest, Tavaszmezo u. 15-17. cell
Hello,
it is being donated by a french fellow. He is just polishing it. I
will try commit it in the next few days.
Great, thanks!
--
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Budapest
.
Is it possible to do VLAN trunking on a FEC interface?
Thanks,
--
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Budapest Polytechnic (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
H-1084 Budapest
--
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Budapest Polytechnic (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
H-1084 Budapest, Tavaszmezo u. 15-17. cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
46 matches
Mail list logo
