Re: FreeBSD Port: php72-7.2.0 : trouble with lang/php72 & libargon2

Aloha, 1. In the worst case (when built on remote poudriere) php72 crashes when using the PASSWORD_ARGON2I algo for password_hash. pkg check --dependencies reports problem. 2. On a separate machine. When building from local ports, password_hash(...PASSWORD_ARGON2I) works but pkg check

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

Aloha Stefan, On 05.12.2017 08:35, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 05.12.17 um 00:43 schrieb Tatsuki Makino: By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor? I am using portmaster. I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter

PHP 7.2 - RC5 - Review

Aloha, i prepared the current PHP 7.2 RC5 for a commit. I'm already using it quite a while and got some feedback from other tester. So i decided to get it a review for public interest: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12980 Feel free to test and review. If anything is fine i'm going to commit it

Re: New pkg audit FNs

Aloha, Why not teach pkg-audit(8) to query NVD based on CPE annotations in *binary* packages? Doing so would also provide a workaround for VuXML entries cancelled to reduce bloat. I agree, pkg-audit needs to be taught to do that. Along those lines, we could create a port for cvechecker:

Re: FreshPorts API

On 21.09.2017 14:31, Dan Langille wrote: FreshPorts contains more than just ports. It contains all commits to the FreeBSD repository. This is all stored in a database. It can be queried. We just need an API. The goal is to start gradually, based on the ideas started at

Re: Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk

On 21.08.2017 16:48, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 20/08/2017 à 23:16, Derek Schrock a écrit : On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:28:01PM EDT, L.Bartoletti wrote: Hello, I would suggest to add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk Since, I think I am not competent to propose a patch, I ask for help. I have

Re: Committer needed

On 10.08.2017 07:34, Andreas Andersson wrote: Can someone please take a look at these two?: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215524 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221313 I will take care of them. Greetings, Torsten -- Support me at:

Re: Maintainer timeout on PR

On 08.08.2017 16:35, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 06.08.2017 10:00, Jonathan Chen wrote: Hi, Could a kind committer please take a look, and possibly commit: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220782 The port maintainer has not responded in more than 2 weeks. I will take

Re: Maintainer timeout on PR

On 06.08.2017 10:00, Jonathan Chen wrote: Hi, Could a kind committer please take a look, and possibly commit: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220782 The port maintainer has not responded in more than 2 weeks. I will take care of it. Greetings, Torsten -- Support me at:

Re: php56 and oniguruma

On 14.07.2017 11:25, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Aloha Tomas, on some machines I am using php56-mbstring, which requires vulnerable oniguruma5. Is there any chance to get it working with oniguruma6? There was a patch for all PHP versions: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: libidn2 drags in ruby and friends

There is an even better approach of the patch currently reviewed: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11823 Also there is an PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221178 So if nothing happen, there will be a maintainer timeout which implicit approves the commit. Also the maintainer is

Re: libidn2 drags in ruby and friends

I'm waiting for approval by sunpoet (maintainer). On 29.07.2017 04:29, Randy Bush wrote: repo head is 446595, which does not have this patch. i plead for someone to commit? pretty please? :) thanks randy Attached an updated patch. I will also send it to sunpoet (maintainer) and will ask

Re: PR needs care

On 27.07.2017 11:30, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 26.07.2017 18:44, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: Hi, Can a committer have a look at this?: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220951 I will take care of it. Committed, thanks! Greetings, Torsten -- Support me at: https

Re: php71-pdo_sqlite won't build with poudriere

On 21.07.2017 04:24, Jim Trigg wrote: On 7/19/2017 3:44 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 19.07.2017 06:23, Jim Trigg wrote: I'm trying to set up a poudriere repository, and php71-pdo_sqlite refuses to build. [00:01:37] >> [02][00:00:18] Finished build of databases/php71-pdo_

Re: PR needs care

On 26.07.2017 18:44, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: Hi, Can a committer have a look at this?: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220951 I will take care of it. Greetings, Torsten -- Support me at: https://www.patreon.com/TorstenZuehlsdorff

Re: libidn2 drags in ruby and friends

Aloha, it just wanted an upgrade of libidn2, but decided to install ruby and all her friends ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Upgrade libidn2-2.0.2 to libidn2-2.0.3 Install textproc/rubygem-ronn Install devel/ruby-gems

Re: libidn2 drags in ruby and friends

On 26.07.2017 09:11, Randy Bush wrote: it just wanted an upgrade of libidn2, but decided to install ruby and all her friends ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Upgrade libidn2-2.0.2 to libidn2-2.0.3 Install textproc/rubygem-ronn

Re: php71-pdo_sqlite won't build with poudriere

On 19.07.2017 06:23, Jim Trigg wrote: I'm trying to set up a poudriere repository, and php71-pdo_sqlite refuses to build. [00:01:37] >> [02][00:00:18] Finished build of databases/php71-pdo_sqlite: Failed: build-depends But php71-pdo_sqlite properly depends (runtime) on php71-pdo. Why

Re: committer needed for new ports: Search Guard for Kibana and Elasticsearch

Aloha, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219739 I take this one! Greetings, Torsten -- Support me at: https://www.patreon.com/TorstenZuehlsdorff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: php56 and oniguruma

Aloha Tomas, on some machines I am using php56-mbstring, which requires vulnerable oniguruma5. Is there any chance to get it working with oniguruma6? There was a patch for all PHP versions: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220598 Since i'm not the maintainer of PHP 5.6 i did

Re: Update failure E000022 after upgrade to subversion 1.9.6

On 11.07.2017 17:17, duglas wrote: Hi, After upgrading to subversion 1.9.6 My latest svn update attempts result in the following. svn update /usr/ports Updating 'ports': svn: E22: Error converting entry in directory '/usr/ports' to UTF-8 svn: E22: Can't convert string from native

Re: PostgreSQL related NEW PORTS need committers

On 30.06.2017 05:40, Jov wrote: ​​ Hi hackers, I ported some PostgreSQL related tools/extensions to FreeBSD several weeks ago，the PR links are as follows. All of them passed portlint and tested by poudriere testport. Review, comment，test or commit all are welcome，I really hope some of them can

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On 27.06.2017 15:24, scratch65...@att.net wrote: [Default] On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:33:50 +, Grzegorz Junka wrote: we could start small with a just a handful of ports in a stable LTS (Long Term Support) branch. Develop processes around maintaining them, get some feedback

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On 26.06.2017 21:33, Grzegorz Junka wrote: On 26/06/2017 07:24, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Aloha David, I think the current process of having rolling-releases packages makes unpredictable upgrades as we have to manually check if the upgrade will be fine or not. When a user installs FreeBSD

Re: Should a package restart on upgrade itself

On 27.06.2017 18:29, Matthias Fechner wrote: Dear all, it is always a pain if pkg upgrade a lot of packages to restart all services to make sure update/security fixes are applied to all running services. Is there an option in pkg that it restart services automatically or is it OK if I would

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

Aloha David, I think the current process of having rolling-releases packages makes unpredictable upgrades as we have to manually check if the upgrade will be fine or not. When a user installs FreeBSD 11.0 on its system, it probably expects that everything will work fine until a next major

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On 22.06.2017 21:56, Baho Utot wrote: On 6/22/2017 11:30 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 22.06.2017 21:26, Baho Utot wrote: On 6/22/2017 10:03 AM, scratch65...@att.net wrote: [Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:18:56 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: As

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On 22.06.2017 21:26, Baho Utot wrote: On 6/22/2017 10:03 AM, scratch65...@att.net wrote: [Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:18:56 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: As usual with such proposal, where do you find the manpower to handle the number of branches required (the

PHP-Ports: Help improving QA

Hello, as PHP-maintainer i first want to thank all for the great feedback and patches send on various ways. You keep my live interesting :) In the last months i learned a lot about various configurations, settings and bugs. Also - sadly - there are always PRs, patches and emails left,

Re: PostgreSQL Updates in 2017Q2?

Aloha, I noticed that ports head has had security updates for PostgreSQL 9.2 to 9.6 since 11 May, but these haven't been merged into the 2017Q2 branch.The last batch of updates in February arrived into 2017Q2 the same day as the official release, but it's been nearly 2 weeks since this last

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

On 02.06.2017 16:29, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le jeu. 1 juin 17 à 15:45:43 +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailingli...@toco-domains.de> écrivait : Just as a short note: there is a complete rewrite of portmaster ongoing. Since its a beast and everything else is very hard there is no

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

On 02.06.2017 12:24, Jim Ohlstein wrote: On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 06:10 -0400, Stari Karp wrote: Looks like the new portmaster is coming but what is about Synth? I am the user of Synth and I like to know what the FreeBSD leaders decided, please. The "FreeBSD leaders," in their infinite wisdom,

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

On 01.06.2017 18:20, Matthieu Volat wrote: On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:45:43 +0200 Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailingli...@toco-domains.de> wrote: [...] Just as a short note: there is a complete rewrite of portmaster ongoing. Since its a beast and everything else is very hard there is no public ev

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

On 31.05.2017 20:31, Adam Weinberger wrote: On 31 May, 2017, at 11:28, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: On 2017-05-31 02:10, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon > wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2017 at

Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/php71-extensions - missing php71-mssql

On 15.05.2017 16:46, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote on 2017/05/15 15:00: I search the internet and didn't found any problem reports for this. PHP manual still shows this http://php.net/manual/en/mssql.requirements.php If you read the manual this section is very important

Re: The future of portmaster

On 30.05.2017 16:00, Adam Weinberger wrote: On 30 May, 2017, at 7:51, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: when portmaster have gone away? What? WHAT? portmaster going away??? I hope not Anton The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in the

Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/php71-extensions - missing php71-mssql

Aloha Franco, We are using php56-mssql for connecting to some MSSQL servers and we are planning to upgrade to PHP 7.1 now but unfortunately I cannot find php71-mssql port. Why is it missing? Are there any problems to build this extension for PHP 7.1? PHP 7 does not have mysql anymore, only

Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/php71-extensions - missing php71-mssql

Hello Miroslav, On 15.05.2017 14:53, Miroslav Lachman wrote: We are using php56-mssql for connecting to some MSSQL servers and we are planning to upgrade to PHP 7.1 now but unfortunately I cannot find php71-mssql port. Why is it missing? Are there any problems to build this extension for PHP

Re: Update of devel/rubygem-google-api-client broke www/rubygem-rest-client (blocks security related update)

On 11.04.2017 12:17, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Aloha, the upgrade of devel/rubygem-google-api-client broke www/rubygem-rest-client. I'm already fixing this issue! It is fixed now! :) Also i did an update of www/gitlab to fix the security issue. Greetings, Torsten

Re: Update of devel/rubygem-google-api-client broke www/rubygem-rest-client (blocks security related update)

Aloha, the upgrade of devel/rubygem-google-api-client broke www/rubygem-rest-client. I'm already fixing this issue! The new devel/rubygem-google-api-client points to a dependency that is to new for www/rubygem-rest-client. The update of rubygem-rest-client 2.0.1 fixes that:

Re: net/rubygem-signet causing poudriere to be unhappy

On 20.03.2017 19:00, Adam Weinberger wrote: On 20 Mar, 2017, at 11:53, Shawn Webb wrote: Hey All, It looks like the new net/rubygem-signet port is causing issues with poudriere: Error: Duplicated origin for rubygem-signet-0.7.3: security/rubygem-signet AND

Re: php 7.0

Aloha, I can compile lang/php70 but not www/mod_php7 . What gives? What gives the error-log? Good question ;) It works just fine on all my servers and test-instances? Greetings, Torsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: opendmarc - Massive dependancy list going from 1.3.1 to 1.3.1_4?

Aloha, I have two 10.3 systems - I installed opendmarc on the first, a while ago - 'make all-depends-list' shows a small list of dependencies: /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg /usr/ports/mail/libspf2 On the other machine after portsnap fetch/extract it looks like I'm going to get '1.3.1_4' - but a

Re: Recent update to lang/php70 and lang/php71

On 02.02.2017 18:21, Adam Weinberger wrote: On 2 Feb, 2017, at 7:39, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: On 02.02.2017 15:37, Jim Ohlstein wrote: Hello, On 02/02/2017 04:35 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Hello Jim, Could not this semantic change have waited for a new v

Re: Recent update to lang/php70 and lang/php71

On 02.02.2017 15:37, Jim Ohlstein wrote: Hello, On 02/02/2017 04:35 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Hello Jim, Could not this semantic change have waited for a new version? It forced a rebuild of ALL PHP extensions for no reason. They all had a dependency on devel/pcre via the main port

Re: Recent update to lang/php70 and lang/php71

Hello Jim, Could not this semantic change have waited for a new version? It forced a rebuild of ALL PHP extensions for no reason. They all had a dependency on devel/pcre via the main port as it was. Did you use poudriere? It wasn't meant to force a rebuild. There was no PORTREVISION bump nor

Re: WIP: lang/php71

On 24.01.2017 05:41, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote: On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailingli...@toco-domains.de <mailto:mailingli...@toco-domains.de>> wrote: Aloha, yesterday PHP 7.1 was released. I upgraded my dev-repo for interested users. What i

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 21.12.2016 12:32, John Marino wrote: On 12/21/2016 01:23, Jim Trigg wrote: Therefore my first assumption was that the problem was the new tool I had just started using. Note: while my phrasing may have been poor, I was not meaning to imply that the tool (poudriere) was necessarily broken,

Re: poudriere: problems setting options/build failure ZTS related stuff

Aloha Oliver, first, please CC me, I'm not actively subscribing this list. Since a couple of weeks now I face a nasty problem with building ports using poudriere. For our department's infrastructure and my home office's jails, I provide packages build with poudriere. Having a threaded

Re: what is the purpose of the quarterly ports branches?

On 16.12.2016 11:38, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 16-12-2016 11:10, Julian Elischer wrote: On 16/12/2016 4:01 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, at 23:14, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I heard that ports' SVN is mirrored to Github. Isn't it enough to just create a branch or tag for

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On 16.12.2016 08:24, David Demelier wrote: 2016-12-15 17:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Seaman : On 2016/12/15 16:01, Olivier Duchateau wrote: The problem is that there are no tests in FreeBSD ports. All source based systems I've tested: pkgsrc, FreeBSD ports, OpenBSD, Gentoo;

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 18:43, Miroslav Lachman wrote: John Marino wrote on 2016/12/15 17:46: [1] I've got it on my todo list to provide a new method that would eliminate the "my builder just rebuilt 150 packages, but pkg(8) only upgraded 2 packages" issue that some users don't want to see. It's a lot

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 17:46, John Marino wrote: On 12/15/2016 10:31, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote: It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well. No, it isn't. Lets check the history. This is just a general statement. portmaster was added 2006

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote: On 12/15/2016 09:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice situation. People have been trying to get portmaster deprecated and removed from the

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On 15.12.2016 14:16, David Demelier wrote: 2016-11-16 13:17 GMT+01:00 Vlad K. : The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and security fixes. That is the theory and intent behind

Re: WIP: lang/php71

Aloha, yesterday PHP 7.1 was released. I upgraded my dev-repo for interested users. You can get a full ports-tree with all new ports from GitHub: $ git clone https://github.com/t-zuehlsdorff/freebsd-ports $ git checkout php71 Also i created a diff for an review:

Re: Piwik 2.17.1

On 20.11.2016 17:48, Matthias Fechner wrote: It was already assigned to and processed by me. And a second ago committed. :) sry, was maybe to fast here :) Yes. ;) Can you please elaborate on this? I couldn't find any hints for a security issue. Or do you mean critical in sense of "fix

Re: Piwik 2.17.1

Aloha Matthias, could a commit please look on: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214508 It was already assigned to and processed by me. And a second ago committed. :) As I see it, it is a critical update. Can you please elaborate on this? I couldn't find any hints for a

Re: WIP: lang/php71

Aloha, more work was done and i want to thank Martin Waschbüsch for his greatly appreciated help. PHP 7.1 was updated to Release Candidate 6 and - as far as i can see - all modules are added. Here a short list of all new ports: archivers/php71-bz2 archivers/php71-phar archivers/php71-zip

WIP: lang/php71

Aloha, PHP 7.1 RC5 was released and it will hopefully not too far until the full release. Therefore i started some work on the new port. Sadly i haven't had much time in the last, so its not too much. Currently i just added lang/php71, pet portlint a little and test a little of the basics.

Re: misc/jive deleted

On 24.10.2016 09:16, Greg Byshenk wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:05:52AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Mark Linimon wrote: It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less infested with USA style prissy

Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg

On 16.10.2016 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Has anyone actually looked/asked how other OS's solve this problem? Yes, for various linux distributions. This provided me with so many reasons to stay and work with the ports-tree. I too found "xxx-dev" vs "xxx-lib" annoying until I realized

Re: www/magento port outdated

On 14.10.2016 12:15, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 14.10.2016 11:13, Alexander Liebau wrote: hello, i would like to ask if it is possible to update the port www/magento to its current version. it is currently on version 1.8.1 which is more than 2 years old. the most recent version would

Re: www/magento port outdated

On 14.10.2016 11:13, Alexander Liebau wrote: hello, i would like to ask if it is possible to update the port www/magento to its current version. it is currently on version 1.8.1 which is more than 2 years old. the most recent version would be 2.1.2 or 2.0.10 according to

Re: Staging failure for freshly-built www/firefox-49.0_8,1

On 10.10.2016 21:25, David Wolfskill wrote: After copying eacho those, firefox starts, then errors out: On the other hand, with those in place, firefox-49.0_8,1 builds, stages, and installs OK... though it doesn't stay up for very long. :-( OK; I fired up my poudriere

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On 29.09.2016 21:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Christian Weisgerber wrote on 09/29/2016 18:57: Mathieu Arnold: If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about 30 seconds to click the automatic migration to github thing, and it is usually done within the hour,) since

Re: LICENSE documentation

On 14.09.2016 23:05, Dave Horsfall wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Kurt Jaeger wrote: This interpretation is based on the hypothesis that the user is located in a country that has this kind of legal rule. This is not the case in every country, so your conclusion is not always valid. What

Re: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6

On 26.08.2016 21:38, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! About resetting the maintainer, I'll ask around. The rules are pretty clear: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html It's more about: Who's willing to do it ? As talked in private: i could/will do, since

Re: Open Transactions

04.08.2016 18:30, Kurt Jaeger wrote: I think there should be ports of the Open Transactions packages for FreeBSD and Windows. For people to create there own cryptocurrencies. What do you guys and gals think? http://opentransactions.org/ No new releases since 2014 on github ? What's going

Re: math/open-axiom gone?

Hello, after updating my ports tree, I've found out that math/open-axiom has been deleted! After math/fricas unusable with sbcl-1.3.x for many months and now gone too, I'm left with NO alternatives for that kind of software here. Fortunately, I still have a working package of open-axiom on my

Re: portmaster --check-port-dbdir is broken for me

Hello, As it wants to literally remove all of the installed OPTIONS (xxx does not seem to be installed). What could have happened here? It went bad between 7-19 July. The system in question was offline. There was a patch included on 16 July. I could not figure out why it wants to remove

Re: Wxlua / Zbstudio

akeLists.txt # wxlua/pkg-descr # wxlua/Makefile~ # echo c - wxlua mkdir -p wxlua > /dev/null 2>&1 echo x - wxlua/Makefile sed 's/^X//' >wxlua/Makefile << 'ff53da160e1e10480c09e3cd273490a1' X# Created by: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <t...@freebsd.org> X# $FreeBSD$ X XPORTNAME=

Re: committer for multimedia/zoneminder

Hello, can anybody commit https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210939 ? It status was changed, but assignee is not, I suspect no one is aware about this particular PR. I will have a look at it. Greetings, Torsten ___

Re: Best way to exterminate a port

On 12.07.2016 07:33, Freddie Cash wrote: On Jul 11, 2016 10:22 PM, "Kurt Jaeger" wrote: Hi! Is there an easy way to "rip out by the roots" a botched port install and start over, including re-doing all the configuration dialogs of the port and its dependencies? For one

Re: A few problems with Gitlab

Hello Vlad, This is the first time I'm trying to install Gitlab and first time I have to do anything with a Ruby application. So I'm not sure if these problems are due to my misconfiguration, or a few bug reports to be filed: First: how did you installed GitLab? Did you use the port

Re: Wxlua / Zbstudio

Hello Raymond, I'm a developer of Lua/torch. Currently, I use Ubuntu to write my codes. However, Ubuntu has frequent updates and make my environment unstable. I tried to install Ghost BSD and compile wxlua and zbstudio but both failed. Do you have any plan to port these two to FreeBSD? I

Re: Wxlua / Zbstudio

Hello Raymond, OpenBlas (make config; # with OpenMP option), OpenMP, Lapack & ++, GotoBlas are installed. Header files of OpenBlas is also included to $CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH. However, I still got the same error message, missing lapack. There are various variables to set to specify where to look

Re: Piwik 2.16.1 critical security release since April

Hello Peter, Just checking if anyone is working on updating Piwik in ports to 2.16.1, since according to www.piwik.org it is a critical security release. I see that the latest change to Piwik came after a maintainer timeout. The maintainer approved my patch and i committed it a minute ago.

Re: Piwik 2.16.1 critical security release since April

Aloha Peter, Just checking if anyone is working on updating Piwik in ports to 2.16.1, since according to www.piwik.org it is a critical security release. I've created a patch for you: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210458 Greetings, Torsten

Re: Wxlua / Zbstudio

Hello Raymond, I call run zbstudio 32bit binary on FreeBSD 11 Alpha 4. I will try to build wxlua later. Another question about lua / torch is lapack. I tried to make and install via the OpenBlas port with the flags (add USE_THREAD=1 NUM_THREAD=8 in order to make) suggested by the link below:

Re: Feedback needed: www/redmine Update

On 06.06.2016 22:22, Steve Wills wrote: Hi, On 06/ 6/16 12:23 PM, Steve Wills wrote: Hi, On 06/ 6/16 08:10 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Aloha, The patch can be found here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209938 I updated the PR with a new patch. With that, it works

Re: Wxlua / Zbstudio

Hello Raymond, Thanks for your prompt reply. I got the error like this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32777201/compiling-c-opengl-in-freebsd Gl.h no found, even I installed wxgtk28 and wxgtk30. I have limited knowledge on C, C++, wx Widgets and OpenGL. I just found this discussion today.

Re: Download all source before compiling the port

On 09.06.2016 01:19, David Wolfskill wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:15:04PM -0300, Rafael Rodrigues Nakano wrote: Hello, Is there a way to download everything required by a port before starting to build it and its dependencies (so I can let it to build later without an internet connection).

Re: gem, pip et al vs. pkg

On 08.06.2016 02:53, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! The ports tree has thousands of entries, which are simply thin wrappers around Ruby's gem or Perl's and/or Python's pip. Thanks again for asking the right questions. Please add go to that list 8-} Why do we need them? Obviously, it is primarily

Re: Feedback needed: www/redmine Update

Aloha, i wrote an update for www/redmine. It would be very nice if some more people can test it, That's awesome, I'm glad to hear that, thanks for the work! I have an install of redmine that I could use for testing. Where is the patch? The patch can be found here:

Feedback needed: www/redmine Update

Hello, i wrote an update for www/redmine. It would be very nice if some more people can test it, since its skipping multiple major versions. The patch brings the port from 2.6.9 to 3.2.2. Also i notices some more ports related to www/redmine. Namley: $ cd /usr/ports/ && find . -name

Feedback needed: www/redmine Update

Hello, i wrote an update for www/redmine. It would be very nice if some more people can test it, since its skipping multiple major versions. The patch brings the port from 2.6.9 to 3.2.2. Also i notices some more ports related to www/redmine. Namley: $ cd /usr/ports/ && find . -name

Re: Zimbra Port

On 02.06.2016 07:41, Bradley T. Hughes wrote: On 01 Jun 2016, at 16:08, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailingli...@toco-domains.de> wrote: * The Zimbra source is huge, a git clone is about 13 GigaBytes. I am not sure on how source that big is handled correctly in ports. (e.g. is it OK that

Re: Zimbra Port

On 01.06.2016 16:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote: rs wrote on 06/01/2016 15:47: Hello List, I am trying to create a port of the zimbra collaboration suite. I am in contact with upstream and they are actively helping in making a port happen. It would be my first FreeBSD port (although I have a

Re: Zimbra Port

Hello Ray, I am trying to create a port of the zimbra collaboration suite. I am in contact with upstream and they are actively helping in making a port happen. That is really create. I wanted to start a Zimbra port myself, but was stuck with GitLab (and a bunch of others...) :D I have a

Re: old ports/packages

On 31.05.2016 15:59, Vincent Hoffman-Kazlauskas wrote: What you cannot do is create old-style packages from a new ports tree. This is because the ports infrastructure has been changing since pkg_install was deprecated, and pkg_install simply will not work with the current ports tree (and, as I

Re: old ports/packages

On 04.05.2016 19:17, Grzegorz Junka wrote: Please excuse my late answer. I was right into vacation and need to handle some work right afterwards. What you cannot do is create old-style packages from a new ports tree. This is because the ports infrastructure has been changing since

Re: Using the subversion switch command to keep up with quarterly branches

On 18.05.2016 12:47, Thomas Mueller wrote: Excerpt from Melissa Pilgrim: I wasn't aware there was a lightweight git client in base. I wasn't aware either, still can't find it, looked in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin as well as online Porters' Handbook and FreeBSD Handbook. Where is the

Re: Using the subversion switch command to keep up with quarterly branches

Hello Mel, I track the quarterly ports branches so that I can build ports from the same tree as binary packages so that I don't, for example, have to build all 2783 packages on my dev VM, just the 13 where I need non-default options. Yes I know, "That is not the intended use, ma'am," blah blah

Re: old ports/packages

On 04.05.2016 09:03, Greg Byshenk wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:44:29PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 3/05/2016 2:31 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 3 mai 2016 12:02:13 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote: | On 2/05/2016 8:39 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> There is a

Re: 'porting' AMD compiler suite

On 11.04.2016 03:32, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: On 04/10/16 20:22, Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: Or set the (g)make variable 'MAKE' to gmake & let it propogate What you are doing is, in effect, creating a port. If you create a real port,

Re: gentoo's package.provided equivalent?

On 03.04.2016 03:54, anat...@kazanfieldhockey.ru wrote: Sometimes i need to build specific version of some library from source, not from ports. How can I tell port system about it. There was no problem with old pkg_, because I was able just to put dummy directory into /var/db/pkg and port system

Re: synth just deleted 290 ports on my machine on second try ;)

On 02.04.2016 08:17, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff < mailingli...@toco-domains.de> wrote: On 31.03.2016 20:20, Mathias Picker wrote: What can I do now, other than using portmaster to rebuild all ports? You can use poudriere to rebui

Re: synth just deleted 290 ports on my machine on second try ;)

On 31.03.2016 20:20, Mathias Picker wrote: What can I do now, other than using portmaster to rebuild all ports? You can use poudriere to rebuild all the ports and use its local repository for pkg. Greetings, Torsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

  1   2   >