Re: question on virtusertable - sendmail

2006-11-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-24 15:04, David Banning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> @domain.com bounce >> >> You can define "bounce" in /etc/mail/aliases, or just leave it undefined >> (since it will probably bounce anyway). > > I am looking at my /etc/mail/aliases > > how would I define bounce? > > I k

Re: sources version file?

2006-11-23 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-23 09:46, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ive searched the archives over the past 2 weeks or so unsuccessfully for this > tidbit, which i have seen mentioned here before. so, i re-ask: > > what is the path/filename of the sources file that says what version of the > cvs s

Re: Sendmail Smarthost Auth

2006-11-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-11 21:42, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well Giorgos, > For starters the advice in that section is wrong for 2 reasons: Noted. Thank you Ted, for the helpful comments :) > pwcheck_method: passwd does not work on sasl2 and FreeBSD 6.X > You don't want to use sasl1 fo

Re: Sendmail Smarthost Auth

2006-11-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-09 09:13, Tom Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just got a new Internet connection through Verizon and need > to be able to use a smarthost to send mail. All servers that I > can use required SMTP auth and I need to figure out a way to > have Sendmail authenticate with the smarthost.

Re: core dumps

2006-11-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-10 12:40, Jim Pazarena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is there any way to have NO core dumps? ..aside from never causing one :) > > I mean, can you compile something into the kernel to prevent core dumps? > I've never found it necessary to examine one in many years, and cannot > foresee e

Re: pf working but no log

2006-11-07 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-07 08:53, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> No, that should be ok. Can you see pflogd running when you run: >> >># pgrep pflogd | xargs ps -xau -p > > No, and now when I think about i

Re: pf working but no log

2006-11-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-07 07:57, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Juha Saarinen wrote: >> That file should be a pcap file: > > Maybe that's the problem then - that I created it using touch? No, that should be ok. Can you see pflogd running when you run: # pgrep pflogd | x

Re: pf working but no log

2006-11-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-06 22:57, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> I think there's a slight misunderstanding here. PF is *not* >> ipfilter, so unless you've done something special it doesn't log to >> ipf

Re: pf working but no log

2006-11-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-06 19:40, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I configured the pf utility on FBSD 6.1 stable. > > I put in a very simple rule to test: > > block in log on $ext_if proto tcp from 218.83.108.230 to any port 25 > > Now, my conf file specifies that logging should be done

Re: REPOST: Howto use a *local* groff font?

2006-11-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-06 09:07, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > This roff script is in a directory with ye-olden-English font, > BlackChancery. Last Sept, I ran a simple groff script against > this: > > \f[HR] > This is a test line using Helvetica Roman > .br > \f[BlackCh

Re: tools for network traffic accounting

2006-11-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-06 15:51, Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, also to all others who answered this question. > I found out that setting 'set loginterface ' in pf.conf makes it > possible to get transfer statistics from pfctl -si. Maybe it is of > interest for other beginners like me. There is a

Re: digression: There is no "ye"

2006-11-04 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-04 20:53, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is no word "ye", and there never was. > > Word origins is a hobby of mine, and I found it pretty difficult to > figure out where "ye" came from, because it never existed. > > What _did_ exist, was a letter in old English called a

Re: ISO files...

2006-11-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-02 22:05, Denise and Raul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have ISO files saved on cd's. > 1) 6.1-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso > 2) 6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > 3) 6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso if you have saved these ISO images as "files" on a CD-ROM, there is something wrong here.

Re: snd_hda driver for 6.1 now working

2006-11-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-02 23:22, Sergio Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all > > after trying to set up the sound on the 6.1 RELEASE on a acer aspire > 3100 notebook, I realise that the driver for the sound chip was the > HDA (high definition audio) > > That notebook use a realtek version of the sound

Re: About "how the GUI should look like after installation!"

2006-11-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-11-01 17:18, Evans Durandisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am brand new to unix. I m a beginner student in computer > engineering. I wanted to install freeBSD since there's such a fuss > about it. I got the iso images and mounted them on a CD with Alcohol > 120. I don't know what "Alcoh

Re: subversion on boot

2006-10-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-31 14:49, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > what is the best way to launch subversion (svnserve) on boot? > > So far I did not find out something that can be put in /etc/rc.conf. You can write your own rc.d script and save it in `/usr/local/etc/rc.d'. We hav

Re: replacing ^M with emacs

2006-10-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-30 10:03, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-10-28 04:18, Tsampros Leonidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think there is something similar in emacs by using the > > set-buffer-file-coding-system (binded at C-x RET f in default > >

Re: replacing ^M with emacs

2006-10-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-27 16:30, Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Peter, > > where is the logic here? What is control-q for and what is control-j > for? I am trying to figure out how I could have figured that out. > > also is there a better page than the one I am using below to figure all > th

Re: replacing ^M with emacs

2006-10-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-28 04:18, Tsampros Leonidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think there is something similar in emacs by using the > set-buffer-file-coding-system (binded at C-x RET f in default > configurations). > > So to "cure" and succesfully "convert" DOS files into unix format, i > use C-x RET f u

Re: replacing ^M with emacs

2006-10-27 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-27 12:26, Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > It appears that a text editor placed a bunch on ^M throughout a text > file I am working with. I assure this is equivalent to eh keystroke > control-M. Open the file in Emacs with: M-x find-file-literally RET filename RE

Re: tao.thought.org is back.....

2006-10-20 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-20 11:26, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /* > * several lines of mail being rejected yesterday afternoon > */ > > 3929:Oct 19 13:08:56 sage sm-mta[8263]: k9JK8Jfs008260: makeconnection > (tao.thought.org. [10.0.0.247]) failed: Connection refused by > tao.thou > ght.org. > 39

Re: cvs

2006-10-20 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-20 13:27, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I do not want to start any discussion - it just occurred to me that it > seems like cvsup/csup binds FreeBSD to cvs (comparing to svn), or am I > wrong? You're wrong. It's the other way around: We are *forced

Re: tao.thought.org is back.....

2006-10-20 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-19 22:10, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:47:25AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-10-19 12:38, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 05:22:44PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-19 15:30, Martin McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Zbyslaw writes: > > set prompt="hello%{^G%}there " > > > > where ^G is a single control char, not two chars. > > Thanks. It works perfectly. I am reading the man for > tcsh again to attempt to figure out what I missed

Re: tao.thought.org is back.....

2006-10-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-19 12:38, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 05:22:44PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> You can override MX prioritization by using a mailertable. >> >> But you will need to list IP addresses in square brackets to disable >> MX lookups and force other MX host

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-19 11:48, Martin McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RW writes: > > There is an alternative uid 0 user called toor which you can use if you > > want > > to use bash as root. OTOH hand there is a school of thought that you > > shouldn't be too comfortable as root. > > My thanks

Re: tao.thought.org is back.....

2006-10-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-18 17:14, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 12:57:08AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2006-10-18 14:12, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This is only for sendmail *wizards* out there. It t

Re: tao.thought.org is back.....

2006-10-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-18 14:12, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is only for sendmail *wizards* out there. It took me two > hours of messing round with the /etc/mail/* files on ns1|sage > before I just gave up. After I rebooted both servers to get mail > to default to tao. > > After my fi

Re: ipfw vs. ipf on a freebsd router

2006-10-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-18 15:10, John Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm putting together a freebsd router to sit between my LAN and a T1. > The current router (still running BSD/OS) uses BSDI's ipfw, but that > died when BSDI did. It's about as simple a routing job as one could > ask, a T1 with a static

Re: File system full

2006-10-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-18 14:34, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > The file `alias.log' is not rotated by `newsyslog.conf', so maybe we > > should add it there? Then we can let `newsyslog' signal `natd' by: > > >

Re: File system full

2006-10-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-18 07:13, Paul Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-10-18 07:53, "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> My firewall server was running out of space on / parti

Re: File system full

2006-10-17 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-18 07:53, "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear All, > My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I > have try to reboot/fsck and delete all unneccessary files > inside / but I still get 12 MB of free space with total 495 MB > worth of that partit

Re: What's so compelling about FreeBSD?

2006-10-17 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-18 08:37, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 10/17/06, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Linux supports more devices than FreeBSD, especially new devices. >> >> This is probably true. > > yes it's true linux has sup

Re: python-mode in emacs

2006-10-17 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-17 00:21, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > >Emacs doesn't seem to load files in /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp > >installed by ports. [...] > > In emacs do "ESC-x describe-variable load-path" which tells you where > emacs is looking. Mine is >

Re: What's so compelling about FreeBSD?

2006-10-17 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-16 10:45, Simon Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a few FreeBSD machine from 4.x to 5.x. I have asked people how to > upgrade them to latest version 6.x cleanly. > > All I was told is that I need to wipe them out and reinstall. However, > this is not the case with Gentoo Linux. Wit

Re: python-mode in emacs

2006-10-17 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-17 02:20, Svein Halvor Halvorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >cpghost wrote: >> Well, it doesn't cause any harm to add to your ~/.emacs >> >> ;; Add python-mode >> (autoload 'python-mode "python-mode" "Python editing mode." t) >> (setq auto-mode-alist >> (cons '("\\.py$" . python-mode)

Re: "canary mismatch on efree()"

2006-10-16 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-14 18:27, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm running Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) and PHP/4.4.4 with Suhosin-Patch. All of > a sudden I get this in my log: > > [Sat Oct 14 19:54:32 2006] [error] ALERT - canary mismatch on efree() - > heap overflow or double efree detected (att

Re: Problems with ipfw and ssh

2006-10-11 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-12 01:31, Spiros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 12/10/06, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> , >> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/giorgos$ su - >> | Password: &

Re: Problems with ipfw and ssh

2006-10-11 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-12 00:53, Spiros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I started yesterday playing with it / testing it, but since i > want to do most of the work remotely, i stuck on this rule and > feel like keep looking until i find the solution. I paste the > whole script here just in case somet

Re: Problems with ipfw and ssh

2006-10-11 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
I removed freebsd-ipfw from the recipient list. Please keep `general' questions in freebsd-questions. The freebsd-ipfw list is, as far as I know, used for *development* of IPFW; not questions. On 2006-10-11 22:53, Spiros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to configure

Re: Getting started with FreeBSD

2006-10-11 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-11 08:45, cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Tore Lund ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > I wondered about the same thing some time ago. I was told by one of the > > gurus to try packages-6-stable, which would most likely work with > > 6.1-RELEASE. So I tried to fetch the late

Re: Getting started with FreeBSD

2006-10-11 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-11 01:20, cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Garrett Cooper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I find it interesting that a former Slackware user would be > > complaining about compiling stuff, but you probably used > > slapt-get to update your packages. > > Well, I am probably coming

Re: 'File too large' mail delivery error

2006-09-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-30 22:02, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 30 September 2006 23:27, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > What does postconf have to say about mailbox size limit? > > > > # postconf mailbox_size_limit > > mailbox_size_limit = 5120

Re: 'File too large' mail delivery error

2006-09-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-30 11:46, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What could cause Postfix/Dovecot to suddenly start failing to deliver > mail and issue this error message in the /var/log/maillog: > > Sep 30 09:45:24 scorpio postfix/local[1439]: 80E65C613: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > st.seibercom.net>,

Re: Best way to "renice" a process by name?

2006-09-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-26 09:32, Brett Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working with a machine that's operating as a NAT router and > recursive DNS resolver and is also running the Squid disk cache. > Squid, in turn, spawns the "diskd" daemon, which does disk accesses on > behalf of Squid. When Squid spa

Re: freebsd compilation of handbooks

2006-09-21 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-21 15:21, "Bob M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Came across this earlier today, and figured it was a good resource: > > http://elibrary.fultus.com/technical/index.jsp?topic=/com.fultus.freebsd.books/books/arch-handbook/index.html > FWIW, most of the FreeBSD stuff mentioned there is a

Re: Newbie Experience (As promised)

2006-09-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-17 12:22, Joel Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Very Helpful and Informative FreeBSD List, > > I installed FreeBSD on Friday Night and tried very hard to get > it all working. My initial X problem actually fixed itself > (you can imagine my surprise), however, even with that, o

Re: Crippled FreeBSD! Need help!

2006-09-18 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-16 20:15, Viswas Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have managed to scr** up my FBSD 6.1 installation. This is what > happened: > > I had an installation of BSD with which I was experimenting and > managed to get it to work to my taste. Call this installation A. This > installation had

Re: cvs question

2006-09-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-15 20:05, Michael Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/15/06, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The CVS server seems to be using some sort of CVS access control, i.e. > >by a CVSROOT/readers or CVSROOT/writers file or something similar. >

Re: cvs question

2006-09-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-15 17:58, Michael Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [#786] ls -l CVS > total 6 > -rw-r--r-- 1 mgrant 1001 197 Oct 16 2005 Entries > -rw-r--r-- 1 mgrant 10018 May 30 2005 Repository > -rw-r--r-- 1 mgrant 1001 55 May 30 2005 Root > [#787] cat CVS/Root > :pserver:xgrant:[EM

Re: cvs question

2006-09-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-15 13:56, Michael Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 9/15/06, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On 2006-09-14 19:11, Michael Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs... >>> >>> I hav

Re: cvs question

2006-09-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-14 19:11, Michael Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs... > > I have 3 boxes, one is acting as a cvs server. The "cvs clients" (for > lack of a better term) are running 6.1 and should be configured the > same. Yet, one machine lets me do a cvs login, th

Re: Top not showing cpu usage even remotely accurately

2006-09-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-14 00:48, "Tamouh H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think TOP and load averages are no longer accurate on FBSD 5.x and > 6.x with SMP kernel. As far as I've seen. Load averages hit sometimes > 8.0 without a noticable degradation in performance. > > This is one TOP that freaked me out, n

Re: CLI text editor recommendation

2006-09-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-13 17:49, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Andy Greenwood wrote: >> I need a CLI text editor I can use over ssh, which does NOT append >> newlines to the end of files as I save them. I am using this to edit >> PHP files, and my PHP doesn't like newlines outside the last ?>. ee >>

Re: sendmail and hosts_access(5)

2006-09-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-13 17:56, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hosts.allow triggers special behaviour with sendmail. Unlike other > services which just close the connection immediately, with sendmail > what happens is that it will accept the connection, let the sender > attempt to send e-mail, b

Re: sendmail and hosts_access(5)

2006-09-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-13 19:37, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-09-13 11:14, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I am attempting to block an SMTP server with /etc/hosts.allow: > > > > --

Re: CLI text editor recommendation

2006-09-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-13 12:25, Andy Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need a CLI text editor I can use over ssh, which does NOT append > newlines to the end of files as I save them. I am using this to edit > PHP files, and my PHP doesn't like newlines outside the last ?>. ee > and vi both do so, I tri

Re: sendmail and hosts_access(5)

2006-09-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-13 11:14, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am attempting to block an SMTP server with /etc/hosts.allow: > > -- > Received: from 241net251.net.zeork.com.pl (241net251.net.zeork.com.pl > [194.117.241.251] (

Re: Top behavior differences

2006-09-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-10 18:04, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote: > > > Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor > > > status display is different on FreeBSD, than it is o

Re: solaris

2006-09-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-05 22:50, Bill-Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If just a "relatively" small handful of dedicated FreeBSD coders can > produce an OS that will install on damm near "ANYTHING" I always found > it troubling that SUN Microsystems, with all it's resources, could > not, at the least,

Re: solaris

2006-09-04 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-04 15:52, backyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would recommend the second drive option. Me too. Not for the same reasons though. > I have attempted installing Solaris 10 on multiple computers and all > if ever seems to do is corrupt the drive on me. Once I got it to boot > up and g

Re: solaris

2006-09-04 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-04 08:41, Bill-S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At Mon, 4 Sep 2006 it looks like Matthew Seaman composed: >> Back in the Solaris 8 days, the trick was to use fdisk to create a primary >> partition and mark it as type 'Linux Swap' after which Solaris would happily >> recognise it as a locati

Re: solaris

2006-09-04 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-04 16:57, dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 03 Sep Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > > I am not sure about installing Solaris into an existing partition. > > I remember one of the FBSD's (a RC, but still) destroying my partition > table. That's the reason I ask. I kn

Re: Why sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-02 13:25, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Saturday 02 September 2006 11:31, Atom Powers wrote: >[...] >> By making the Postfix port /not/ disable Sendmail it gives you the >> ability to, more easily, run Sendmail *and* Postfix on the same >> machine. ie it doesn't break you

Re: Oh, no....

2006-09-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-02 11:01, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 100% consistent. tHe strange thing is that when I set the > boot-order in the BIOS to "CDROM" it's ignored. (Maybe I > don't have the boot CD? that occured when I was crawling > out of bed!) I have all 4 f the 5.3 boxed set. So the

Re: Is the new version going to be easier to get working?

2006-09-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-02 14:33, "NoIP (exemail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Two mornings ago I was feeling pretty good. I had downloaded > and burnt to disc freebsd, pcbsd and also desktopbsd. But not > now > > Having 21 computers here I figured I would finally be rid of > MSwindows, and have a comp

Re: Oh, no....

2006-09-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-09-01 20:30, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, gang, for about the only time in ten or eleven years, my FreeBSD > has kernel crashed. The kernel err is 18 I believe a int divide by > zero. I backup most stuff regularly but still have several megs of > data files. Can I fix

Re: CVS

2006-08-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-30 16:32, Martin Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Which ports does I need for a cvs system (client and server)? I searched > against "cvs" in ports but it gets a lot of links. Any hints are welcome. You don't need any ports. CVS is part of the base system, and it can

Re: ipfilter on 6.1

2006-08-27 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 20:31, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 07:59 PM 8/26/2006, you wrote: > >I'd go for the simpler syntax of: > > > >MYADDR: > > ! /sbin/ipf -y > > well that didnt work either. what a pain. :( > > tun0: Warning: /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup: ! /sbin/ipf -y: Invalid comman

Re: ipfilter on 6.1

2006-08-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 19:46, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok guys...now that I have ipfilter working...I need to run a few > commands in /etc/ppp/ppp;linkup and cant figure out the syntax... > > % cat /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup > > # It is no longer necessary to re-add the default route here as our

Re: ipfilter on 6.1

2006-08-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 18:52, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 06:37 PM 8/26/2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >Cool! If this is indeed the fix, let us know :) > > > >If you also feel like it and you are not limited by contract or > >other things, I

Re: ipfilter on 6.1

2006-08-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 17:48, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 05:19 PM 8/26/2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> You are implicitly blocking all traffic on the lo0 interface (by the >> modified default policy to "block" all traffic, and missing

Re: ipfilter on 6.1

2006-08-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 17:10, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 05:07 PM 8/26/2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >Weird. This doesn't seem ot include *ANY* block rules at all. > > > >Is this a standard 6.1 installation, or do you have local IP Filt

Re: ipfilter on 6.1

2006-08-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 16:05, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 03:40 PM 8/26/2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > >Don't show us the ipf.conf file you are using, but the output of: > > > >% ipfstat -hni > >% ipfstat -hno > > &g

Re: ipfilter on 6.1

2006-08-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 15:02, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got a full load of 6.1p4 installed and all built. I have > pppoe and ipfilter running almost perfect. > > Clients can use the machine (as a router) and get out > perfectly! No issues with network performance at all. I am > very ple

Re: Commercial Software

2006-08-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-26 13:00, shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I quote you from your page: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing/index.html > "Commercial entities engaged in FreeBSD-related enterprises are also > encouraged to contact us. " > > I am a software writer

Re: Has Anyone Else Tried mha-mhedit?

2006-08-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-25 16:03, Martin McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use nmh and recently wanted to not have to manually > clean up all the garbage that gets in to the quoted text if you > quote a HTML message or one that has a lot of 8-bit junk like > Microsoft OUtlook messages do. > >

Re: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

2006-08-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-25 19:46, Kyrre Nyg?rd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:50 25.08.2006, David J Brooks wrote: > > Back in the Jurassic era, when typewriters still roamed the earth, > > it was a convention to leave a double-space following a period so > > that the reader could more easily distinguish th

Re: sendmail

2006-08-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-25 18:40, eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 25 Aug 2006, at 18:35, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-08-25 16:00, eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hello >>> Im using sylpheed for my mail (its work mail). Having some issues >>

Re: sendmail

2006-08-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-25 16:00, eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > Im using sylpheed for my mail (its work mail). Having some issues > sending from their smtp server to non-work accounts. > > I have sendmail installed but I have never used it before and am > wondering if I can use this through my loc

Re: Code beautifiers, anyone?

2006-08-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-25 15:24, Kyrre Nyg?rd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 21:09 24.08.2006, Matti J. Karki wrote: > > >Well, my scripts aren't magic. They are pretty simple. Here's few (not > >scripts, these are valid Vim regexps): > > Those are great regexps, Matti, thank you so much. > > They have bee

Re: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

2006-08-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-25 05:50, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Friday 25 August 2006 04:19, Kyrre Nyg?rd wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I am just wondering why it says: >> >> "The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved." >> >> when I log in locally, but: >> >> "The Reg

Re: Rebuilding Kernel

2006-08-22 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-22 08:43, beno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Don't edit GENERIC. It's very rarely a good idea. If you spend >> some time to fine tune GENERIC to your own particular setup, >> matching your own preferences, you may be sur

Re: Rebuilding Kernel

2006-08-22 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-22 18:00, Mikhail Goriachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-08-21 16:28, beno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> make buildkernel >>> make installkernel >>> sh /etc/rc.shutdown >>> pkill sendmail &

Re: Rebuilding Kernel

2006-08-22 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-21 16:28, beno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi; > I just barely finished upgrading from 5.3 to 6.1 and all is well, > however, now I realize I have to rebuild my kernel again to accommodate > PF. I've edited the correct GENERIC file (I'm on an i386 box). Don't edit GENERIC. It's very r

Re: Ouch! "write failed, file system is full"

2006-08-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-19 18:55, "W. D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I get out of this mess? > > gzip: stdout: No space left on device > Broken pipe > > df > Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/da0s1a 9918398644-7395 108%/ First of all, start by tryi

Re: How to prevent users from receiving email

2006-08-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-19 19:21, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apparently my memory is useless and I've lost the ability to use > google as well. > > I just added a user account to a mail server, but I don't want that > user to receive mail on that server. It's running Postfix. > > I seem to re

Re: Stupid question about mountpoints and fstab

2006-08-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-15 19:08, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-08-15 18:41, Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello people, > > > > I have never figured out something like this can be done, but today I > > see it. We h

Re: Stupid question about mountpoints and fstab

2006-08-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-15 18:41, Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello people, > > I have never figured out something like this can be done, but today I > see it. We have purchased s co-lo server. They have installed it and > given me access to "do whatever you want with the box", but their

Re: FreeBSD & STREAMS

2006-08-14 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-14 22:08, Aaron Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 8/14/06, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On 2006-08-14 18:23, Aaron Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> All, >>> Just curious, does FreeBSD (or any of the BSDs)

Re: FreeBSD & STREAMS

2006-08-14 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-14 18:23, Aaron Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > Just curious, does FreeBSD (or any of the BSDs) have a STREAMS > implementation? Not really. At least not in the official source tree. > Or does anyone know of a 3rd party implementation? I'm not sure about this. What d

Re: quick way fall back to the original kernel

2006-08-14 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-14 11:20, dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13 Aug Atom Powers wrote: > > And, although I've never tried it, you sholud be able to `cp > > /boot/kernel.old /boot/kernel` to restore the previous kernel.> > > I did. A few times. I just renamed the directories to "kernel" and

Re: working with dbsd-tools

2006-08-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-13 18:30, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i almost have desktopbsd tools working perfectly... except that > i cannot mount usb drives without opening a terminal as root, > and chmoding /dev/da* to 660. > > how can i cause new devices (such as da*) to be created with > proper

Re: OT: new documents notification and approval

2006-08-12 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-12 18:26, Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello. > > I apologize for the OT, but I really wouldn't know where to ask and, > afterall, server side will be FreeBSD. > > A customer of mine has the need to notify all users when a certain type > of new document is written and as

Re: Top not showing cpu usage even remotely accurately

2006-08-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-10 00:45, "Tamouh H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But since running 5.x (5.5-STABLE since 1st Aug) top can show > > 0.0% idle but the cpu usages shown don't add up to much of a > > fraction of 100%. In recent 6.X versions, you can use 'S' to show system threads too. For an even mor

Re: Port Not Available

2006-08-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-08 14:59, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have not been able to get printing working on this PC. By accident. I > noticed that the ::1 port does not seem to be available. I tried this > command: > > ~ $ telnet localhost 25 > Trying ::1... > telnet: connect to address ::1:

Re: Midnight Commander in base distribution set

2006-08-07 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-04 08:38, Scott Oertel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bryan Bonifacio wrote: > >The ports and packages are also available from the CD-ROMs (either the > >first or the second). > > I use midnight commander on a daily basis, can anyone recommend a > better, more lightweight tool then mc?

Re: perl problem

2006-08-07 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-08-03 10:50, RJ45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello using imapsync to make a transition from imapuw to a > cyrus server make the imapsync perl process to die on FreeBSD > 6.1 because it uses more than 512MB of memory. > > this does not happen using imapsync with the same transfer > operat

Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ?

2006-07-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-07-26 18:59, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Darrin Chandler wrote: >> Do you see that if support in 4.x had been based on open specs from >> Adaptec that this issue would not exist? Adaptec is controlling your >> ability to use their product, and that's the real problem. It's >>

Re: [OT] gcc: maximum length of an array?

2006-07-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-07-27 17:02, "P.U.Kruppa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-07-24 20:49, "P.U.Kruppa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> sorry for posting an [OT], but usually people on this

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >