Re: FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE

--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE > To: "Masoom Shaikh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Friday,

Re: FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE

is an arbitrary name and there's no way to know the timestamp it was built from in CVS, then replacing BETA2 with the timestamp used for the CVS checkout makes sense. Of course CVS is good down to the second, so it would have to be MMDDHHMMSS...and at that point 7.1-PRERELEASE-200810200710

Re: FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE

Masoom Shaikh skrev: Hi folks, y'day I csuped the src and built installed the kernel from RELENG_7 I was expecting FreeBSD-BETA2 in output of `uname -a` it is still -PRERELEASE, is it by decision or I have to change something ? I greped /usr/src for PRERELEASE but cud not locate it. I guess re

Re: FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:07:32PM +0530, Masoom Shaikh wrote: > Hi folks, > y'day I csuped the src and built installed the kernel from RELENG_7 > I was expecting FreeBSD-BETA2 in output of `uname -a` > it is still -PRERELEASE, is it by decision or I have to change something ? > > I greped /usr/src

RE: FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE

>Onderwerp: FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE >Hi folks, >y'day I csuped the src and built installed the kernel from RELENG_7 >I was expecting FreeBSD-BETA2 in output of `uname -a` >it is still -PRERELEASE, is it by decision or I have to change something ? >I greped /usr

FreeBSD-7.1, BETA2 or PRERELEASE

Hi folks, y'day I csuped the src and built installed the kernel from RELENG_7 I was expecting FreeBSD-BETA2 in output of `uname -a` it is still -PRERELEASE, is it by decision or I have to change something ? I greped /usr/src for PRERELEASE but cud not locate it. I guess release engineering team do

Re: Upgrading 7.1-PRERELEASE

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 07:52:11AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > Jeremy Chadwick skrev: >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:41:05AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: >>> Jeremy Chadwick skrev: >>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:24:56AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: >>&

Re: Upgrading 7.1-PRERELEASE

Jeremy Chadwick skrev: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:41:05AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: Jeremy Chadwick skrev: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:24:56AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE. Yesterday I csup'ed and upgraded as I've done several times in order to in

Re: Upgrading 7.1-PRERELEASE

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:41:05AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick skrev: >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:24:56AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: >>> I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE. Yesterday I csup'ed and upgraded as I've >>> done several times in o

Re: Upgrading 7.1-PRERELEASE

Jeremy Chadwick skrev: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:24:56AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE. Yesterday I csup'ed and upgraded as I've done several times in order to install 7.1-BETA2. Everything went as it should, but my system still says 7.1-PRERELEAS

Re: Upgrading 7.1-PRERELEASE

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:24:56AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE. Yesterday I csup'ed and upgraded as I've > done several times in order to install 7.1-BETA2. Everything went as it > should, but my system still says 7.1-PRERELEASE. In my s

Upgrading 7.1-PRERELEASE

I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE. Yesterday I csup'ed and upgraded as I've done several times in order to install 7.1-BETA2. Everything went as it should, but my system still says 7.1-PRERELEASE. In my stable-supfile I have "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7". Can anyone

Re: [SOLVED] Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > >> Firstly, I see a periodic(8) job that DOES use find -sx, which means >> your attempt to track it down was faulty, and your syntax should have >> been "find -sx /" not "find / -sx". See here: >> >> /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetui

Re: [SOLVED] Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

Firstly, I see a periodic(8) job that DOES use find -sx, which means your attempt to track it down was faulty, and your syntax should have been "find -sx /" not "find / -sx". See here: /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid: find -sx $MP /dev/null -type f \ Thanks for clearing that out. :-)

Re: [SOLVED] Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:43:39AM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: # sysctl -a | grep dirhash >>> shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash >>> vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0 >>> vfs.uf

Re: [SOLVED] Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

Thank you very much! Probably you are right. Our users use shared IMAP folders and sometimes they keep ten thousands of messages in one folder. I have increased dirhash_maxmem to 64MB and see what happens. Unfortunately, I cannot play with the hardware because it is in a server park, and

[SOLVED] Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: # sysctl -a | grep dirhash shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0 vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: 2095818 vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152 vfs.ufs.dirhash_minsize: 2560 Ma

RE: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

>Johan Hendriks írta: >> If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of >> >vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: >> >> # sysctl -a | grep dirhash >> >shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash >vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0 >vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: 2095818 >vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152 >vfs.uf

Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:13:00AM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > Johan Hendriks írta: >> If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of >> vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: >> >> # sysctl -a | grep dirhash >> > shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash > vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0 > vfs.ufs

Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

Johan Hendriks írta: If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: # sysctl -a | grep dirhash shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0 vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: 2095818 vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152 vfs.ufs.dirhash_minsize: 25

Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #3: Mon Oct 6 07:50:31 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PR

RE: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: # sysctl -a | grep dirhash Make sure vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: is not close to vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: Regards, Johan Hendriks Double -L Automatisering No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by A

Re: 7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:40:01AM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > Hi, > > A computer hangs every day in the morning at a specific time, between 8 > AM and 9 AM. We can ping it. Apparently the console works, also gdm > works on it, but we are not able to login at all. ssh accepts > connections,

7.1 hangs, shutdown terminated

the problem? I can't believe that dovecot could freeze the whole system. #4. Hardware error. I don't think this is the case since the computer freezes at the same time, every day, so it is more likely a software problem. Any thoughts what is causing this? uname -a: FreeBSD shop

'Atheros L2 - 10/100 controller (wired)' shows up in pc-bsd7, but not freebsd 7.1-stable

I'm not surprised, just curious if there's actually a tweak, or if the pcbsd guys haven't moved the patch upstream. I find kde so annoying that I put 7-stable back on the machine, and my onboard lan disappeared again... Best, Steve ___ freebsd-questions

Re: 7.1-PRELEASE sporadically panicking with fatal trap 12

John L. Templer wrote: I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE, with /usr/src and /usr/ports last csup-ed just a few days ago. After being up for about a day or so the system will panic because of a page fault. I'm not completely sure, but it seems that the system is more stable when gdm and

7.1-PRELEASE sporadically panicking with fatal trap 12

I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE, with /usr/src and /usr/ports last csup-ed just a few days ago. After being up for about a day or so the system will panic because of a page fault. I'm not completely sure, but it seems that the system is more stable when gdm and gnome are disabled in rc

Re: freebsd 7.1 - Report Hardware

Thanks to FreeBSD support FreeBSD 7.1 still cannot detect ethernet gigabit sis 191 report my hardware on laptop localhost# pciconf -lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0:class=0x06 card=0x50501019 chip=0x06711039 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS)'

Re: freebsd 7.1 - Good luck

Fian Dracestar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When FreeBSD support ethernet type Gigabit ? FreeBSD supports gigabit ethernet for quite a lot of years already. It even supports several 10-gigabit ethernet interfaces. > and chipset sis (new) I've recently updated a SiS chipset based machine (not

freebsd 7.1 - Good luck

When FreeBSD support ethernet type Gigabit ? and chipset sis (new) / all new hardware Thanks Good Luck your project FreeBSD 7.1 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To

Re: buildworld error with 7.1 BETA

Nash Nipples skrev: just try to run make one more time. not cleaning anything just type the same make command after fail without extra activity. if it fails again check if you have filled your disks up and you might want to `ls /usr/src/usr.sbin/zzz/zzz.8` to see if its really there It fa

Re: buildworld error with 7.1 BETA

2008/9/19 Leslie Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > make -j 4 buildworld > > gives after a while the following > > gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/zic/zdump/../zdump.8 > zdump.8.gz > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DTM_GMTOFF=tm_gmtoff -DTM_ZONE=tm_zone > -DSTD_INSPIRED -DPCTS -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE -DTZDIR=

Re: buildworld error with 7.1 BETA

> > just try to run make one more time. not cleaning > anything just type the same make command after fail without > extra activity. > > > > if it fails again check if you have filled your disks > up and you might want to `ls /usr/src/usr.sbin/zzz/zzz.8` to > see if its really there > > > > It

Re: buildworld error with 7.1 BETA

Nash Nipples skrev: make -j 4 buildworld gives after a while the following gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/zic/zdump/../zdump.8 > zdump.8.gz cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DTM_GMTOFF=tm_gmtoff -DTM_ZONE=tm_zone -DSTD_INSPIRED -DPCTS -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE -DTZDIR=\"/usr/share/zoneinfo\" -Demkdi

Re: buildworld error with 7.1 BETA

> make -j 4 buildworld > > gives after a while the following > > gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/zic/zdump/../zdump.8 > > zdump.8.gz > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DTM_GMTOFF=tm_gmtoff > -DTM_ZONE=tm_zone -DSTD_INSPIRED -DPCTS -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE > -DTZDIR=\"/usr/share/zoneinfo\" > -Demkdir=mk

buildworld error with 7.1 BETA

make -j 4 buildworld gives after a while the following gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/zic/zdump/../zdump.8 > zdump.8.gz cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DTM_GMTOFF=tm_gmtoff -DTM_ZONE=tm_zone -DSTD_INSPIRED -DPCTS -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE -DTZDIR=\"/usr/share/zoneinfo\" -Demkdir=mkdir -I/usr/src/usr

Re: NTP on 7.1 BETA amd64 odd behaviour

Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2008 16:44:40 Nash Nipples wrote: > > thanks for the new /etc/rc.d/ntpd > > ... > > > > > rc_flags="-c ${ntpd_config} ${ntpd_flags}" > > > > ... > > what we can learn

Re: NTP on 7.1 BETA amd64 odd behaviour

On Thursday 18 September 2008 16:44:40 Nash Nipples wrote: > thanks for the new /etc/rc.d/ntpd > ... > > > rc_flags="-c ${ntpd_config} ${ntpd_flags}" > > ... > what we can learn from it is that on 7.1 BETA your rc.conf.local file > should look like

Re: NTP on 7.1 BETA amd64 odd behaviour

thanks for the new /etc/rc.d/ntpd ... > rc_flags="-c ${ntpd_config} ${ntpd_flags}" ... what we can learn from it is that on 7.1 BETA your rc.conf.local file should look like this ntpd_config="/etc/ntpd.conf" ntpd_flags="-p /var/run/ntpd.p

Re: NTP on 7.1 BETA amd64 odd behaviour

> - > > If I comment out the > > ntpd_flags="-c /etc/ntp.conf -p > /var/run/ntpd.pid" > > line. > > ntp starts without any error. > > Should I accept this or is something wrong? > > Thanks > /Leslie Looks like it wants only one parameter as

NTP on 7.1 BETA amd64 odd behaviour

sp.se driftfile /etc/ntp/ntp.drift on my second machine 7.1-BETA amd64, the same configuration produces this error -- :/etc/rc.d/ntpd start Starting ntpd. ERROR: only one configfile option allowed ntpd - NTP daemon program - Ver.

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 BETA and update to RELEASE

On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:29:55 -0400 Michael Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the Beta installs and runs successfully you won't have any problem > updating the system when 7.1-Release makes it out the door. It should be very straightforward if you later upgrade to RELENG_7

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 BETA and update to RELEASE

Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to install FreeBSD 7.0 on my computer but my NIC was not > supported, so finally I didn't install it. > Yesterday I tried 7.1 Beta bootinst and the network card was > recognized during the installation. I was planning to

FreeBSD 7.1 BETA and update to RELEASE

Hi all, I tried to install FreeBSD 7.0 on my computer but my NIC was not supported, so finally I didn't install it. Yesterday I tried 7.1 Beta bootinst and the network card was recognized during the installation. I was planning to install 7.1 Beta now, but I have some questions: -

LDAP and ssh not working anymore since upgrade to FreeBSD 7.1

I recently updated several boxes up to FreeBSD 7.1-PRE having had a working OpenLDAP binding. After this update, I can't log in on those boxes connected to an LDAP server via ssh! The boxes also run lighttpd as a webserver with remote LDAP authentication for several user spaces and this

Re: KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

..just made an #portsnap update and there is the kde 4.1. Must have been come in recently. Cheers herbs -- *** Herbert Langhans, Warschau *** Sprachtraining Langhans *** http://www.langhans.com.pl *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** NIP 526-229-61-51 *** Regon 014911759 ***

Re: KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:11:07PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Dave Feustel wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:46:04PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> >>> FuLLBLaSTstorm wrote: >>> >>>> Just in case anybody k

Re: KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

> What is the procedure for updating from kde 4.0.5 to 4.1? > I've tried yum update but yum reports there are no updates to apply. > FreeBSD does not use Yum, it uses a ports tree, the closest thing that Linux has is Gentoo portage Sam Fourman Jr. ___ f

Re: KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

Dave Feustel wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:46:04PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: FuLLBLaSTstorm wrote: Just in case anybody knows: will be KDE-4.1 included in 7.1-RELEASE? ___ You mean as in "precompiled package on CD"? I can

Re: KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

Dave Feustel wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:46:04PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: FuLLBLaSTstorm wrote: Just in case anybody knows: will be KDE-4.1 included in 7.1-RELEASE? ___ You mean as in "precompiled package on CD

Re: KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:46:04PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > FuLLBLaSTstorm wrote: >> Just in case anybody knows: will be KDE-4.1 included in 7.1-RELEASE? >> ___ >> > You mean as in "precompiled package on CD"

Re: KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

FuLLBLaSTstorm wrote: Just in case anybody knows: will be KDE-4.1 included in 7.1-RELEASE? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT

KDE-4.1 in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE

Just in case anybody knows: will be KDE-4.1 included in 7.1-RELEASE? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Mounting a RHLinux 7.1 partition

Isaac Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Once I had FreeBSD 5.4 set up, I put the RHLinux drive in the FreeBSD > machine as primary slave. Manually mounting the drive didn't seem to > work since I could find which /dev/ entry the RHLinux drive ended up > on, and of course fdisk wouldn't help fo

Re: Mounting a RHLinux 7.1 partition

Isaac Grover wrote: Good morning everyone, Due to a hardware failure on my RHLinux 7.1 gateway, I have chosen to install FreeBSD 5.4 as my new gateway's operating system. The hard drive didn't die fortunately, as I did test it on another system to make sure it booted, and aside

Mounting a RHLinux 7.1 partition

Good morning everyone, Due to a hardware failure on my RHLinux 7.1 gateway, I have chosen to install FreeBSD 5.4 as my new gateway's operating system. The hard drive didn't die fortunately, as I did test it on another system to make sure it booted, and aside from kudzu complaining abou

netscape 7.1 profile error

Netscape 7.1 from FreeBSD Ports FBSD V5.2 I get the following error when trying to open Netscape. I know it sounds like a locking issue but I can't find the file that stores the profile or the lock file for it. Anyone run into this and have a solution? I can create a new profile, but onl

Re: Java and Netscape 7.1?

This link might be useful. http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/09/05/FreeBSD_Basics.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Java and Netscape 7.1?

Hi, I've installed both netscape7-7.1 (a Linux browser) and linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2 via ports on FreeBSD-4.8. Both are working fine, but I can't work out how to enable Java support from within netscape7english. I've searched the questions mailing list with no luck. All the Netsc

linux-sun-JDK13 stopped working with netscape 7.1

Hello I had linux-sun-JDK13 working perfectly with netscape 7.02 and now I installed netscape 7.1 using the port and the java plugin doesn't work any more, it gives me this error: LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.3.1/jre/plugin/i386/

Trying to build Amaya 7.1

Hi: Apparently this has been encountered before but never corrected in the Amaya distribution, but I'm either having a shell quoting problem or sed issue. I've tried the obvious things - swapping gsed for regular sed and rebuilding, also using bash instead of /bin/sh for the configure script. Nei

Re: installing python2 on linux_base-7.1

> +[ Esto dijo paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > | > | Fernan Aguero wrote: > | > | >Can I safely ignore these and force python2 to install? > | > > | > | any reason why you can't just use the ports version? > > You mean /usr/ports/lang/python20 or python21? No ... I need > the linux one. > > I

Re: installing python2 on linux_base-7.1

+[ Esto dijo paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | | Fernan Aguero wrote: | | >Can I safely ignore these and force python2 to install? | > | | any reason why you can't just use the ports version? You mean /usr/ports/lang/python20 or python21? No ... I need the linux one. I have a linux software pack

Re: installing python2 on linux_base-7.1

Fernan Aguero wrote: Can I safely ignore these and force python2 to install? any reason why you can't just use the ports version? -- Paul Beard / 8040 27th Ave NE / Seattle WA 98115 / paulbeard [at] mac [ dot] com / 206 529 8400 weblog @ The fact

installing python2 on linux_base-7.1

recently updated linux_base-7.1 (linux_base-6 -> lihux_base-7). I am invoking rpm with the following command line options: pi# rpm --allfiles --ignoreos --root /compat/linux --dbpath /var/lib/rpm --replacepkgs -i python2-2.2.1-2.i386.rh7.3.rpm I get several failed dependencies, they are mos

<    2   3   4   5   6   7