Addition?

2013-08-19 Thread Jenny Frost
Hi there, Cheeky me!? I came across your page with grammar exercises at http://web008.pavilion.net/fr/gallery/npgallery.html and wondered if you might be interested in mentioning my grammar checker? It's located here: http://www.grammarcheck.net/ It's totally free, checks for grammar and

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-09 Thread Chad Perrin
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:56:49PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... Not all BSD Unix systems are servers. This email was composed in Mutt+Vim on FreeBSD 7.2 on a ThinkPad R52. -- Chad

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 9 May 2010, Chad Perrin wrote: On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:56:49PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... Not all BSD Unix systems are servers. True, but, then again, few desktops users

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-07 Thread Chip Camden
I like that idea. On May 07 2010 09:37, Fbsd1 wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. Maybe

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-07 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... On Fri, 7 May 2010, Chip Camden wrote: I like that idea. On May 07 2010 09:37, Fbsd1 wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: The problem with not

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-07 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I was just thinking about it, and one point that I don't know if I've ever made (or haven't made in awhile) is that BSDStats looks at who is *using* a *BSD variant, not who *was* ... it relies on being run *at least* once a month for a server to be counted ... if you run it once and never run

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-07 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Actually: Contributor to BSDStats sounds better / easier to understand On Fri, 7 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... On Fri, 7 May 2010, Chip Camden wrote: I like that idea. On May 07

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-06 Thread Chris Whitehouse
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Randi Harper wrote: I wouldn't want to add an option to sysinstall for this unless bsdstats was part of base. nobody would appreciate (and outcry would be heavy) if someone were to add an 'opt-out phone home script' that they didn't consciously

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-06 Thread Robert Huff
Chris Whitehouse writes: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. What about a monthly (3 monthly, whatever) reminder saying what bsdstats is about and the

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: Chris Whitehouse writes: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. What about a monthly (3 monthly, whatever) reminder saying

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-06 Thread Fbsd1
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. Maybe it could go in the monthly subscription list

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Chris Whitehouse
Marc G. Fournier wrote: can you tell me two things: nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) so for a very long time I haven't installed it.

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Chris Hill
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Tue, 4 May 2010, Gary Kline wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:12:21PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time. Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ... i

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: can you tell me two things: nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) so

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Hill wrote: Since we're on the topic, and in light of Fbsd1's recent adventure... Panama seems awfully high in the country stats. I understand what you said upthread about haproxy being in Panama, but it's a small country to be always at the top; maybe there's some

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) There has been talk about adding it as an option to sysinstall, but, unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge of

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Randi Harper
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) There has been talk about adding it as an option to sysinstall, but, unfortunately, I don't have

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread mikel king
On May 5, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Randi Harper wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) There has been talk about adding it as an

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Randi Harper wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) There has been talk about adding it as an option to

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Randi Harper
mikel king wrote: On May 5, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Randi Harper wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) There has been talk about

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-05 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Randi Harper ra...@freebsd.org wrote: This idea was mentioned a few years as a way to improve advocacy statistics. Something short and sweet, with a one or two line explanation encouraging people to install the BSDStats system. If it were a yes/no option

Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Steve Bertrand
Marc, et-al, I wasn't originally going to post this to the list, but I thought that it would be useful to do so in order to try to solicit feedback. There's a suggestion that I have for the server-side of bsdstats. I would find it very useful if the server could track the % of the reporting

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Fbsd1
Steve Bertrand wrote: Marc, et-al, I wasn't originally going to post this to the list, but I thought that it would be useful to do so in order to try to solicit feedback. There's a suggestion that I have for the server-side of bsdstats. I would find it very useful if the server could track the

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
The backend to bsdstats.org is load balanced behind an haproxy backend, with only the IP of haproxy being passed back into it ... one of the key issues that was brought up from day one was security and anonymity(sp?) of those submitting, and we've taken that *very* seriously ... other then

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time. Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ... I am a retired American who is now living in the Philippines. All during RELEASE 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, and now 8.0 I have been running the bsdstats port on my single

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: Most odd ... what is in your /var/db/bsdstats file ... ? I've had no reports of problems in many months now ... Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with trying to masquarade behind

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Gary Kline
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:12:21PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time. Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ... i see a golden opportunity here, marc. why not post the basic onlist now?

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Gary Kline wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:12:21PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time. Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ... i see a golden opportunity here, marc. why

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Fbsd1
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with trying to masquarade behind haproxy, so it looked like all systems were coming in from Panama if they were running the newest code ... which means alot of

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Brian Callahan
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with trying to masquarade behind haproxy, so it looked like all systems were coming in

Re: Addition to BSDstats

2010-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
can you tell me two things: nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats the results should have showed up instantly on the web site ... but, just checking the database, I do find a connection from PH today at 2010-05-05 03:30:12.196478 ... and the country stats does show

OOo3.1 binary addition makes firefox,evolution unlaunchable from desktop

2009-11-26 Thread dhaneshk k
fellow FreeBSDians, I am facinggnome2 issues in freebsd7.2 I installed freebsd7.2 in an IBMT60 lenova notebook,( coreduoe 2.16 Ghz, IGB ram, ATI graphics) I done pkg_add -r xorg, fine created xorg.conf and tested with -retro option, then got mouse detected with blank

Re: OOo3.1 binary addition makes firefox,evolution unlaunchable from desktop

2009-11-26 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:07:15 +, dhaneshk k dhanes...@hotmail.com wrote: I deinstalled gnutls jpeg ports and installed again them. after this OOo got installed and working fine. But after I rebooted the machinebut issues 1) firefox browser can't launch , what I

Now problems with mouse and sound (Re: In addition to - 7.2 panic during installation : AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed !)

2009-06-19 Thread manish jain
Hi, After 6-7 reboots, I managed to get the 7.2-RELEASE installation media to boot and install properly. 2 issues still remain however. 1) No sound : My Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H board has onboard Realtek High Definition Audio. Since I couldn't figure out which driver would work with this, I put

In addition to - 7.2 panic during installation : AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed !

2009-06-17 Thread Manish Jain
I forgot to mention that Windows installs and runs very smoothly on the system. Windows system information reports : System Manufacturer Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. System ModelGA-MA78GM-US2H System Type X86-based PC Processor x86 Family 16 Model 2 Stepping 3

RE: In addition to - 7.2 panic during installation : AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed !

2009-06-17 Thread Gary Gatten
Hmmm, seems to me the easy solution then is to run Wind0ze j/k... -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Manish Jain Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:21 PM To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: In addition

Re: In addition to - 7.2 panic during installation : AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed !

2009-06-17 Thread Manish Jain
Subject: In addition to - 7.2 panic during installation : AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed ! I forgot to mention that Windows installs and runs very smoothly on the system. Windows system information reports : System Manufacturer Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. System ModelGA-MA78GM-US2H System

Re: In addition to - 7.2 panic during installation : AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed !

2009-06-17 Thread Wojciech Puchar
The only thing that strikes me as odd is that right-clicking on My Computer reports the amount of RAM as 768 MB, while the diagnostics above states 1024 MB. For the brief period of time the FreeBSD installer runs, it reports the amount of RAM as 768 MB too. Don't you have shared-memory

Re: In addition to - 7.2 panic during installation : AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed !

2009-06-17 Thread Chris Whitehouse
Manish Jain wrote: I forgot to mention that Windows installs and runs very smoothly on the system. Windows system information reports : System ManufacturerGigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. System ModelGA-MA78GM-US2H snip The only thing that strikes me as odd is that

Re: temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-05 Thread Erik Norgaard
Noah wrote: Erik Norgaard wrote: Noah wrote: the servers and clients are not on the same LAN segment. capturing MAC has nothing to do with this scenario. You haven't exactly told a lot about the network you want to setup. The logic thing is to authenticate against the firewall connected to

Re: temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-04 Thread Erik Norgaard
Noah wrote: Does anybody have a recommendation for a program out there that would allow somebody to enter an account and password on my website, their IP address is cached, and the cached IP address is added temporarily to the firewall ruleset to be allowed. I am not aware of anything that

Re: temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-04 Thread Noah
Erik Norgaard wrote: Noah wrote: Does anybody have a recommendation for a program out there that would allow somebody to enter an account and password on my website, their IP address is cached, and the cached IP address is added temporarily to the firewall ruleset to be allowed. I am not

Re: temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-04 Thread J65nko
On 2/4/07, Noah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody have a recommendation for a program out there that would allow somebody to enter an account and password on my website, their IP address is cached, and the cached IP address is added temporarily to the firewall ruleset to be allowed. Have

Re: temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-04 Thread Erik Norgaard
Noah wrote: the servers and clients are not on the same LAN segment. capturing MAC has nothing to do with this scenario. You haven't exactly told a lot about the network you want to setup. The logic thing is to authenticate against the firewall connected to the same subnet - and that will

Re: temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-04 Thread Erik Osterholm
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:51:58PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote: Noah wrote: the servers and clients are not on the same LAN segment. capturing MAC has nothing to do with this scenario. You haven't exactly told a lot about the network you want to setup. The logic thing is to authenticate

Re: temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-04 Thread Noah
Erik Norgaard wrote: Noah wrote: the servers and clients are not on the same LAN segment. capturing MAC has nothing to do with this scenario. You haven't exactly told a lot about the network you want to setup. The logic thing is to authenticate against the firewall connected to the same

temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-03 Thread Noah
Hi, Does anybody have a recommendation for a program out there that would allow somebody to enter an account and password on my website, their IP address is cached, and the cached IP address is added temporarily to the firewall ruleset to be allowed. cheers, Noah

temporary IP addition to firewall rules

2007-02-03 Thread Noah
Hi, Does anybody have a recommendation for a program out there that would allow somebody to enter an account and password on my website, their IP address is cached, and the cached IP address is added temporarily to the firewall ruleset to be allowed. cheers, Noah

rcng, addition to rc.subr

2006-03-31 Thread Frans Haarman
I am changing /etc/rc.subr. I can now use rc.env.d directories. Each file in the directory becomes a variable. somewhat like daemontools envdir. It seemed nice to include it to rcng. So with this we can do: echo 'yes' rc.env.d/sshd/sshd_enable Am concidering adding the $_command' name to the

Broken apache after upgrade and addition of php4.

2006-03-18 Thread Graham North
I am running FBSD 4.11 with Apache 1.3.33-ssl, now upgraded to 1.3.34-ssl after doing a cvsup plus portupgrade. All continued to work well, with the new 1.3.34 (but not sure if I had done a reboot to put new program into play). I then added php4 via the mod-php4 port. After rebooting,

Re: contributing: addition of package

2004-06-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 05:43:23PM +, vishal kochhar wrote: Hi, This question is related to addition of a package (not related to OS or kernel) to freebsd. I read from the contribution page about 'value-added' packages. Is it related only to OS related packages or other s/w's like

contributing: addition of package

2004-06-11 Thread vishal kochhar
Hi, This question is related to addition of a package (not related to OS or kernel) to freebsd. I read from the contribution page about 'value-added' packages. Is it related only to OS related packages or other s/w's like compilers etc too? I am wondering if this small piece of utility

Re: Addition of user

2004-02-26 Thread doug
You can also set the shell to passwd. On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Peter Risdon wrote: Jeffrey Allan D. Java wrote: Hi, Is it possible to add an email account in a mail server without a shell account? Yes, by using some additional software to manage the virtual user.

Re: Addition of user

2004-02-26 Thread Peter Risdon
doug wrote: You can also set the shell to passwd. That's a good point, based on a closer reading of the OP than my own. The difference being that it requires the addition of a user for each mail account whereas something like vpopmail does not. I've googled but can't see anything about

Re: Addition of user

2004-02-26 Thread doug
. The difference being that it requires the addition of a user for each mail account whereas something like vpopmail does not. I've googled but can't see anything about this so for my information, I generally use /nonexistent as the shell in situations like this, and add /nonexistent to /etc

Addition of user

2004-02-25 Thread Jeffrey Allan D. Java
Hi, Is it possible to add an email account in a mail server without a shell account? Regards, Jeff ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Addition of user

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Risdon
Jeffrey Allan D. Java wrote: Hi, Is it possible to add an email account in a mail server without a shell account? Yes, by using some additional software to manage the virtual user. /usr/ports/mail/vpopmail is one such, but there are others. PWR.

Re: Suggestion to display date/time of port addition or modification

2003-11-21 Thread Jacek Pelka
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:36:09PM -0800, Peter Leftwich wrote: [2] I do not understand the usefulness nor see the beauty of the current method of installing ports. Why must a user download elementary instructions for programs A, B, C, D, through Z when all he or she may want are programs P

Suggestion to display date/time of port addition or modification

2003-11-18 Thread Peter Leftwich
RE: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=gimpstype=all [1] Two quick questions/suggestions if I may? Has the ports team ever considered including the date/time of when the port was added or modified? This could be displayed as a time code, such as 20031118 (today's date) and appear on the

Addition

2003-01-16 Thread Doron Shmaryahu
Hi, sorry the error from ps: ps ax ps: proc size mismatch (61248 total, 1060 chunks) and this is the last line of dmesg link_elf: symbol fw_one_pass undefined Thanks again Doron Shmaryahu To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the

Re: Addition

2003-01-16 Thread Andrew Y Ng
can you give us `uname -a` outputs? try recompiling your kernel. config the kernel, and do a make depend and make install. that's the old school way of doing it. I think now you can cd into /usr/src and do `make kernel`, it will build and install a new kernel for you. /ayn On 0, Doron

Re: Addition

2003-01-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:33:12AM +0200, Doron Shmaryahu wrote: Hi, sorry the error from ps: ps ax ps: proc size mismatch (61248 total, 1060 chunks) and this is the last line of dmesg link_elf: symbol fw_one_pass undefined Looks like your kernel and userland are out of sync.