Chris Hill wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do
I have to do devious things to eventually find it?
# cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc42
# make install clean
Or install FreeBSD 7.0 and do nothing else.
# g++ -v
Usin
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do
I have to do devious things to eventually find it?
# cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc42
# make install clean
--
Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** [ Busy Ex
What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do I have
to do devious things to eventually find it?
Are you Catholic and single? Click Here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3oGxtfMGTyKQeDjl1IylH
At 12:29 AM 3/17/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 15, 2008, at 05:59, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 09:49 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiti
On Mar 15, 2008, at 05:59, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 09:49 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar
At 12:02 PM 3/15/2008, Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Ragona wrote:
> At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
>> why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Ragona wrote:
> At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
>> why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped
>> through using the gdb n command. Here is t
At 09:49 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
why c.rmonths was always zero
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped
through using the gdb n command. Here is the output:
(gdb)
215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped
through using the gdb n command. Here is the output:
(gdb)
215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / toMONTHS;
(gdb)
223
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:19:28 -0500
"Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rod Person wrote:
> > /usr/bin/ld cannot find -lgcc_s
> ls /lib/gcc*
>
> You should have:
> ls libgcc*
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 43K Nov 4 01:23:20 2007 libg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:31:39 -0800
"Josh Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> >
> > I googled for awhile and found the suggestion to reinstall libtool,
>
Josh Carroll wrote:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
I googled for awhile and found the suggestion to reinstall libtool, but
that also fails with the same error.
Can you paste the config.log from the port's work source directory
(where configure is located)?
> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
>
> I googled for awhile and found the suggestion to reinstall libtool, but
> that also fails with the same error.
Can you paste the config.log from the port's work source directory
(where configure is located)?
Can you
Rod Person wrote:
> I seem to have really hosed up my system somehow and I'm not sure what
> I did. I'm running FreeBSD 7 Beta 1 i386.
>
> I was going to upgrade to Beta 2, but when ever I compile anything it
> fails and the last line is always:
>
> configure:
> >
> > I was going to upgrade to Beta 2, but when ever I compile anything
> > it fails and the last line is always:
> >
> > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> >
> > I googled for awhile and found the suggestion to reinstall li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I seem to have really hosed up my system somehow and I'm not sure what
I did. I'm running FreeBSD 7 Beta 1 i386.
I was going to upgrade to Beta 2, but when ever I compile anything it
fails and the last line is always:
configure: error:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:08:30 +0200
Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My preference for doing things is;
>
> 1) Can it be done with a shell-script? (esp. one-time hacks)
> 2) Else use Perl, Octave, Ruby, but
> 3) If speed is key, use C. :-)
Yup, exactly. In Python, that's what extension mo
preference for doing things is;
1) Can it be done with a shell-script? (esp. one-time hacks)
2) Else use Perl, Octave, Ruby, but
3) If speed is key, use C. :-)
> > > Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
> > > there are for FreeBSD that would al
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:08:58AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>i complete my software engineering degree.
> >
> >PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
>
> for me it's just funny thing that needs several megs of RAM to display the
> current date ;)
>
> but as
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:07:59AM +, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> > PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
> > system that happens to be able to use extensions that can provide C
> > style linkage. That said, I laude you for your desire to learn a real
> > programming
oo -- though probably long after Ruby or Perl.
If you specifically want to learn C++, though, and skip the middle man:
more power to ya, and good luck.
>
> > Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
> > there are for FreeBSD that would allow me to compi
.
Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
there are for FreeBSD that would allow me to compile and execute some
of the examples i will practise from the book.
Also if anyone wants to recommend any other books on C++ feel free. We
are learning VB at college at the
a lot of pitfalls and gotchas that you won't experience
elsewhere (not so much with C itself, but with C++). And
that's why it's good to start with C
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-quest
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:53:00 +0100
"James Jeffery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also if anyone wants to recommend any other books on C++ feel free.
For beginners, I'd highly recommend "C++ Primer" / Fourth Ed.
by Stanley B. Lippman et. al.
But if you're starting to learn programming from scratch,
i complete my software engineering degree.
PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
for me it's just funny thing that needs several megs of RAM to display the
current date ;)
but as being treated as "technology" instead of just tool, it's used
everythere withou
> PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
> system that happens to be able to use extensions that can provide C
> style linkage. That said, I laude you for your desire to learn a real
> programming language, and agree with the recommendation that you start
> with somet
On 2007-10-06, James Jeffery top-posted.
[ please don't do that, it makes it very difficult to format responses
correctly and makes it just about as hard to read and understand them ]
> Hi all, thanks for the fast replys, much appreciated.
>
> Manolis: Yep, its the book by Jesse, i never believe th
ge of any lower level languages, so i do need to be spoon fed
> the basics.
>
> Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
> there are for FreeBSD that would allow me to compile and execute some
> of the examples i will practise from the book.
The base syste
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books pointless and stupid, but i have no knowledge
of any lower level languages, so i do need to be spoon fed the basics.
so you should start from lower level first - learn C first :)
C is easy. it's a
;d say that C++ isn't the easiest way to learn programming. I'd suggest
> starting with Perl, Ruby or Python.
>
> > Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
> > there are for FreeBSD that would allow me to compile and execute some
> > of
any lower level languages, so i do need to be spoon fed the basics.
I'd say that C++ isn't the easiest way to learn programming. I'd suggest
starting with Perl, Ruby or Python.
> Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
> there are for FreeBSD that w
e spoon fed the basics.
>
> Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
> there are for FreeBSD that would allow me to compile and execute some
> of the examples i will practise from the book.
>
> Also if anyone wants to recommend any other books on C++ f
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:53:00 +0100
"James Jeffery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
> there are for FreeBSD that would allow me to compile and execute some
> of the examples i will practise from the book.
g
Evening to you all (or morning in some parts of the world).
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books pointless and stupid, but i have no knowledge
of any lower level languages, so i do need to be spoon fed the basics.
Im using Borland C
- Original Message
From: Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>That rebuilds the python C library interface stuff I believe, but
>doesn't have anything at all to do with the system C compiler. There
>is nothing wrong with your system C compiler.
Well, that's a
install-make instance dance, which is a
> no-brainer. TIA,
> Rachel
>
>
That rebuilds the python C library interface stuff I believe, but
doesn't have anything at all to do with the system C compiler. There
is nothing wrong with your system C compiler.
If you look at the Zope po
81- Original Message
From: Jan Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>When you have a chance, it'd be nice to get a detailed error report
>(including the command you were running to clean up the libraries).
I get this error when I try to runzope:
ImportError: No module named cPersistence
I yaho
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Rachel Florentine wrote:
From: Jan Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>I don't think it makes much sense, no. Zope is python-based and unless
>>you're building products that rely on native libraries, what you
>>describe doesn't sound like an accurate diagnosis. It's more likely
>>(
76
- Original Message
From: Jan Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I don't think it makes much sense, no. Zope is python-based and unless
>you're building products that rely on native libraries, what you
>describe doesn't sound like an accurate diagnosis. It's more likely
>(this is a stab in
had up-to-date backups) and it appears to have
> corrupted gcc...my C compiler. I deduce this because when I go to build
> Zope (as an example) from source I have to run a script afterwards that
> repairs the broken C files. (This, strangely, is not the case if I build
> Zope from
- Original Message
From: Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>It's not immediately clear to me what you mean by repairing broken C
>files. The port uses the Zope source and the system compiler,
>presumably the same source and compiler you are using to build it by
>hand. Are you sure y
it appears to have
corrupted gcc...my C compiler. I deduce this because when I go to
build Zope (as an example) from source I have to run a script
afterwards that repairs the broken C files. (This, strangely, is not
the case if I build Zope from port.) So, my questions for you
programmers more
(thank goodness I had up-to-date backups) and it
> appears to have corrupted gcc...my C compiler. I deduce this
> because when I go to build Zope (as an example) from source I have
> to run a script afterwards that repairs the broken C files. (This,
> strangely, is not the case if I
106Hi;
I entered the following stupid command:
cp -R /* /ad2
thinking that would copy the contents of my working HD to my new 1/2 teraflop
HD (ad2). What it did was manage to wipe out some very important files (thank
goodness I had up-to-date backups) and it appears to have corrupted gcc...my C
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0600, Josh Hansen wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I?ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs
Quoting Josh Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compil
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0600, Josh Hansen wrote:
> Bill Moran wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I?ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
> >>programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
> >>FreeBSD pro
On Oct 4, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Josh Hansen wrote:
[ ...5.2.1 being slower than Linux... ]
I really don't think the problem is that simple. How about either
giving him a real answer or none at all?
Sigh. The malloc debugging options in 5.2.1 really will slow down
userland programs which heavily uti
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
to linux. I checked several compile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
> programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
> FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
> to linux. I checked several compile opti
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
to linux. I checked several compile options, but it did
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
to linux. I checked several compile options, but it did not have good results.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:21:41AM +0300, B.Bonev wrote:
> How can I use Intel C Compiler as default compiler?
You cannot, yet. Some work is being done to allow this in 5.x.
> Is there any dificulties compiling ports?
Yes, depending on the port.
Kris
pgpFRlLhBBdZf.pgp
Descriptio
How can I use Intel C Compiler as default compiler?
Is there any dificulties compiling ports?
Thanks to all FreeBSD Supporters
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm looking for some quick help with the 5.2.1 C compiler. In FBSD 4.x
> I could write multi-line printf() statements with embedded new-lines
> such as:
>
> printf("
> hello,
>
I'm looking for some quick help with the 5.2.1 C compiler. In FBSD 4.x
I could write multi-line printf() statements with embedded new-lines
such as:
printf("
hello,
this
is
a
test");
60 matches
Mail list logo
