Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-03 Thread Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
From: Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 4:13 PM Subject: Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled. Could you rate-limit the system to 'n' submissions from a given email address in a given unit of time? That won't stop someone from

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-03 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-03T14:58:22Z, Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How 'bout cookieing them... How 'bout requiring GPG signatures on the bug report? Or giving the user a block of text to sign and paste into a textbox? -- Kirk Strauser In Googlis non est, ergo non est.

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-03 Thread Bill Moran
Kirk Strauser wrote: At 2003-03-03T14:58:22Z, Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How 'bout cookieing them... How 'bout requiring GPG signatures on the bug report? Or giving the user a block of text to sign and paste into a textbox? While I understand the reason for this, keep

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-03 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-03T15:48:17Z, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While I understand the reason for this, keep in mind that if you make this too complicated, you'll never get any bug reports. I might note that zero bug reports are currently being submitted via the web interface. Allowing report

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-03 Thread IAccounts
Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from abusing it. Why not have a pr-moderator for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc), who approves each incoming PR. Basically this person would act as a front-line defense against

RE: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread charles pelletier
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Mock Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:00 AM To: Pedro F. Giffuni Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled. On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 08:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: Hi guys; Any chance that http

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- Jim Mock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 08:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: Hi guys; Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback?? No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Bill Moran
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers interested in my ports (math/cad stuff) anyway. I guess I'll just keep'em for myself for some more time. Or you could consider helping find a way to

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers interested in my ports (math/cad stuff) anyway. I guess I'll just keep'em for

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-03-02 05:47, Pedro F. Giffuni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback?? Not really. Not without making large changes to the way gnats works. I'm not against enabling it again, but it'll take a bit of work

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Matthew Emmerton
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers interested in my ports (math/cad stuff) anyway. I guess I'll just keep'em

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:58:58PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Daxbert
Quoting Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers interested in my ports

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Bill Moran
Ceri Davies wrote: Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from abusing it. Why not have a pr-moderator for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc), who approves each incoming PR. Basically this person would act as a front-line defense

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:17:21PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Ceri Davies wrote: Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from abusing it. Why not have a pr-moderator for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc), who approves each

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from abusing it. Well, If heard for years several committers criticising the whole PR system. Time for bugzilla?? ... You could

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-03-02 17:22, Pedro F. Giffuni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So? Set your EDITOR environment variable to whatever you prefer and you won't have to deal with vi. I tried that with pico some years ago, but the result was not nice. That's a problem of pico then. Pico does stupid things

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-03-02 12:15, Daxbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've never submitted a pr, but I've written scripts for bulk web submissions (GET and POST for load testing web apps). Did the previous web pr-interface have any sort of verification process?

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Jens Rehsack
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: --- Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from abusing it. Well, If heard for years several committers criticising the whole PR system. Time for bugzilla?? ...

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
I just sent my ports to Jens... thanks!! Also thank you to everyone that made jokes in private...I'm still laughing :-P. Pedro. __ Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Alexey V. Litvinov
Thanks! I'll do this when I find more time to hunt the problem. What's weird (for me) is that I don't have their DNS IP address: since Windows doesn't need it, the ISP doesn't provide it. hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of ISP's dns-server? It is getting it through ppp.

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- Alexey V. Litvinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of ISP's dns-server? It is getting it through ppp. Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to write it down. FreeBSD's chap doesn't seem to get it, but I still have to find

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-03-03 03:16, Pedro F. Giffuni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Alexey V. Litvinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of ISP's dns-server? It is getting it through ppp. Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to write it down.

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Alexey V. Litvinov
Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to write it down. FreeBSD's chap doesn't seem to get it, but I still have to find out why :(. freeBSD also ;) I for example getting it automaticaly from ISP and written in resolv.conf To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Alexey V. Litvinov
8. Ask your ISP to authenticate your nameserver address(es) with the line enable dns hi said in prevous posts that : Anyway, it's not even an option since I've been unable to set up ppp properly. It connects fine but it doesn't resolv any address, and I

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Sure it does. The manpage of ppp(8) includes: 8. Ask your ISP to authenticate your nameserver address(es) with the line enable dns I did this, and I'm not running named. Thanks to Alexey's hints I found the values I needed though. thanks,

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Mock
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Daxbert wrote: Quoting Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find

ppp (was Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.)

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
This definitely worked! It's too slow, maybe cause I left enable dns, I'll get it working fine. Thanks Alexey! Pedro. --- Alexey V. Litvinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: What version of mustdie you use? if 95/98 try to run WINIPCFG.EXE while in connect to ISP... as i can remember

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:47:03AM +0100, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: Hi guys; Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback?? It was disabled because it was being abused by a juvenile who was spamming the GNATS DB with bogus PRs. Talk to the

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-01 Thread Jim Mock
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 08:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: Hi guys; Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback?? No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. I've been waiting for this to get fixed to submit two