On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:44:14 Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by
Hi,
The missing switch is the -R parameter of portupdate.
I.e. portupgrade -vnyNbR
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
dan mesli...@yahoo.fr
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
08.07.2009 14:05
Please respond to
mesli...@yahoo.fr
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
Prior
to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are
upgraded.
If this
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
Prior
to the installation a new port/package, all
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to /etc/make.conf.
Or use the --batch command line option to
On Tue, 7 April 2009 16:17:40 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for
config questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, new_guy wrote:
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions? I'd like to leave my laptop
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:24:10PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
What do we do about packages that fail to update?
This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about
the ones where there is a configure error or uknown build error or
install error
FYI -- I followed
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked
fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power
on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box.
What
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portupgrade question
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:25 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over
again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart
the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off.
Otherwise,
Thanks Glen:
So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portupgrade question
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Glen:
So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs?
Please stop top-posting.
Continue with the command you had already used.
--
Glen Barber
___
Glen Barber writes:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
start over again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the
portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off.
Not according to my understanding of portupgrade.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Glen Barber writes:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
start over again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the
portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:13:19 -0800 (PST)
gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it
worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly
i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1
box.
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:35:03 +1000
From: Fraser Tweedale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:02PM +, AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:15 -0500, AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If
* AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-13-2008]:
How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this?
Look for references to MAKE_ARGS in $PREFIX/etc/pkgtools.conf.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
Nikola Lecic wrote:
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to
be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to
Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:56:52 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:18:11 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get
the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt
dependencies.
Please don't forget to try switching to portupgrade-devel in that
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing here.
One of the ports that was updated was vim, which had originally
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:40:30AM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' = 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 17:12 +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
Make sense. I've been using these
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:29 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a
central
repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used
across most/all of them).
in situations where new packages are built from
On Saturday October 21, 2006 at 08:29:05 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Hi people,
I just did the portupgrade -rf pkg-config\* to upgrade the apps, but i
think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probably is
On 7/20/06, Nagy László [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
*
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:29:10PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Different defaults.
Thanks a lot.
np.
Kris
pgpbQ76wJJ4Xj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:10 -0400
Subject: Re: portupgrade question (solved)
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget
works just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for some
Thanks, I will definitely try it out.
On 6/7/06, Andrey Slusar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well.
What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :)
Kris
pgpQqWxSTgnVY.pgp
At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400,
Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for
I had them set, but in lower case - $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy. wget
doesn't have a problem with that.
More precisely (applogies for not specifying in the first place) the
problem was retrieving files from FTP hosts. HTTP sites were fine.
On 6/7/06, Toni Schmidbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Michael S wrote:
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. This
On Monday 29 March 2004 12:03 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following
error and exchange came up:
server# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 - openssl-0.9.7d
(security/openssl):
49 matches
Mail list logo
