On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Harald Weis ha...@free.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:04:00PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I will tell Adobe to provide a FreeBSD-native release, though it would be
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:04:00PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I will tell Adobe to provide a FreeBSD-native release, though it would be
nice to know I won't be the only one. I'm actually going right now
As much as I am now a no-user of Flash, allow me the
following comments.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:49:56 -0600, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
Almost all Internet video
has moved to flash as well (such as all the sermons on sermons.net
which my church uses).
That's
Quoting Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
As much as I am now a no-user of Flash, allow me the
following comments.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:49:56 -0600, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
Almost all Internet video
has moved to flash as well (such as all the sermons on
Programmer in Training wrote:
Quoting Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:49:56 -0600, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
Almost all Internet video
has moved to flash as well (such as all the sermons on sermons.net
which my church uses).
That's all
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:51:40 -0600
Programmer in Training p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
Quoting Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
That's all within transition. Currently, big video portals are
moving to HTML5, often including the wish to also use free and
open standards for their videos so
RW wrote:
[snip]
As I understand it, originally Ogg Theora was going to be the standard,
but it's now been left open instead due to uncertainty about Theora
infringing patents. Some sites are using Theora, but most seem to be
going with h.264. I presume that this is due to IE support for
Quoting RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:51:40 -0600
Programmer in Training p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
Quoting Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
That's all within transition. Currently, big video portals are
moving to HTML5, often including the wish to also use free
Quoting Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com:
Programmer in Training wrote:
Quoting Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:49:56 -0600, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
snip
That's a no-go, I have it on good authority that h.264 was chosen
over
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:32:21 +0200
Samuel Martín Moro faus...@gmail.com articulated:
Their last Linux release only exists for x86.
Two ArchLinux mailinglists are advising users about uninstalling
Flash from our systems.
Flash is hardly working on BSD. And often bug on Linux.
I spent one
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I will tell Adobe to provide a FreeBSD-native release, though it would be
nice to know I won't be the only one. I'm actually going right now to do so.
Good luck with that. Adobe doesn't care about FreeBSD.
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:04:00 +0200
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I will tell Adobe to provide a FreeBSD-native release, though it
would be nice to know I won't be the only one. I'm actually
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:53 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:04:00 +0200
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Programmer in Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I will tell Adobe to provide a FreeBSD-native release,
hi there,
why is flash still causing such problems under freebsd? i've been
having the same issues for years nows:
- browser tabs freeze completely
- `ps` reports a lot of nspluginwrapper/npviewer.bin processes
- nspluginwrapper/npviewer.bin coredumps
i read that the cause for this is a buggy
On Jun 15 2010 22:55, Alexander Best wrote:
hi there,
why is flash still causing such problems under freebsd? i've been
having the same issues for years nows:
- browser tabs freeze completely
- `ps` reports a lot of nspluginwrapper/npviewer.bin processes
- nspluginwrapper/npviewer.bin
Quoting Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com:
snip
My alias for killflash is Don't install it.
Flash is buggy software on any platform.
snip
While that may be, try telling that to your 4 yr old nephew who likes
to play those flash based games on PBS Kids. Almost all Internet video
has
On Jun 15, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Programmer in Training wrote:
[ ... ]
While that may be, try telling that to your 4 yr old nephew who likes to play
those flash based games on PBS Kids. Almost all Internet video has moved to
flash as well (such as all the sermons on sermons.net which my church
Quoting Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Programmer in Training wrote:
[ ... ]
While that may be, try telling that to your 4 yr old nephew who
likes to play those flash based games on PBS Kids. Almost all
Internet video has moved to flash as well (such as all the
Their last Linux release only exists for x86.
Two ArchLinux mailinglists are advising users about uninstalling Flash from
our systems.
Flash is hardly working on BSD. And often bug on Linux.
I spent one month, for my work, trying to correct a few of those crashes (we
provide FreeBSD servers, our
On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Programmer in Training wrote:
Quoting Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com:
Adobe supports Windows, MacOSX, Linux, and Solaris (from
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions ). If it is important to
you that Flash works well, you should either persuade Adobe to
Quoting Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com:
Please see last line of sig.
On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Programmer in Training wrote:
Quoting Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com:
Adobe supports Windows, MacOSX, Linux, and Solaris (from
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions ). If it is
On Tue 15 Jun 2010 at 15:11:47 PDT Programmer in Training wrote:
Don't install it. isn't a valid option.
Sure it is. The fact that it's an option you don't want to accept
doesn't make it invalid.
I also take issue with the well use a supported OS schtick. I will
tell Adobe to provide a
22 matches
Mail list logo
