Hi,
I want to set-up a small server from an Asus P5L-MX motherboard.
It has an onboard gigabit Ethrnet that works with the driver age.
Problem is that at boot, I experience the interface to go up and down a
couple of times, and it is usually down when Apache try to start, so
Apache would not
Olivier Nicole olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th writes:
I want to set-up a small server from an Asus P5L-MX motherboard.
It has an onboard gigabit Ethrnet that works with the driver age.
Problem is that at boot, I experience the interface to go up and down a
couple of times, and it is usually
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Have you tried using netwait?
I think that would involve putting enable_netwait in rc.conf, and
netwait_enable=YES would be it.
- M
___
Thank you, that's what I needed.
Best regards,
Olivier
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Have you tried using netwait?
I think that would involve
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Surat Sodchuen carbopol...@gmail.comwrote:
thank for your kindness
i tired that your suggestion but cannot resolve problem.
for more information ...
FreeBSD 9.1-Release on HP ProLiant DL380p Gen8 128GB of Ram
every time when booting process it seem freezing
Surat Sodchuen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Please include your question as email content, not subject.
http://serverfault.com/questions/361673/hp-nc107i-bcm5723-on-freebsd-9
Indicates
you may be able to set
hw.bge.allow_asf=0
in /boot/loader.conf. Try this, and if the problem persists, please reply
with more information (FreeBSD
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 20:44:15 -0600
From: iamatt iam...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Intel D525MW board No ethernet devices detected with 9.1
Release
Message-ID:
caeerwnu-jwnjpsopsqo7tfclqsk+2x+2dkqf_8ermaf0cnq...@mail.gmail.com
Content
Yes, yes. I have d525mv. Try Freebsd 9.1 Release amd64 (clear install).
Onbord ethernet not working in ani modes. Try -rhtssum - thtssum - momentary
dead lock. Freemsd 9.0 amd64 working exelently. (sorry for bad inglish)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com
On Jan 6, 2013 7:08 AM, zstepashka fo...@ua.fm wrote:
Yes, yes. I have d525mv. Try Freebsd 9.1 Release amd64 (clear install).
Onbord ethernet not working in ani modes. Try -rhtssum - thtssum -
momentary
dead lock. Freemsd 9.0 amd64 working exelently. (sorry for bad inglish)
Sorrry I do
Yes, i submitted PR bug report, from www.freebsd.org.
I can`t disable onboard ethernet. Computer work as router, it need 2
adapters :(
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Intel-D525MW-board-No-ethernet-devices-detected-with-9-1-Release-tp5775093p5775263.html
Hello,
I have an intel D525MW board with an ATOM processor. The system was
running 9.0 RELEASE amd64 with no problems. I did an binary upgrade
to 9.1 amd64 and now the onboard ethernet card is not detected. I
encountered a similar issue when I tried to go from 9.0 RELEASE to 9.0
STABLE a while
-0x9fff irq 17 at device 1.0 on pci128
pcm0: HDA VIA VT1708_8 PCM #0 Analog at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0
pcm1: HDA VIA VT1708_8 PCM #1 Digital at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0
but does not find the ethernet interface. I see no reference at all.
With ACPI disabled, dmesg shows it finds the ethernet
Hi, everyone:
I am trying to set up a EtherIP tunnel device to tunnel Ethernet traffic
over IPv6 using EtherIP protocol. I have Freebsd 8.3 runs on a i386
machine, and ipv6 enabled. I tried the commands below but no one works...
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel 2001:::1 2001:::10
I bought server HP ProLiant BL460c G7. I couldn't find Ethernet driver for the
FreeBSD.
Does anyone know where can I get driver for my OpenBSD(or freeBSD) server ?
Best regards
Shahin Hasanov
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Wed, 16 May 2012 15:29:05 +0400, hasanhasanli Hasan wrote:
I bought server HP ProLiant BL460c G7. I couldn't find Ethernet
driver for the FreeBSD.
Does anyone know where can I get driver for my OpenBSD(or freeBSD) server ?
You shouldn't need to get a driver because it's the
operating
On 05/16/2012 02:38 PM, Polytropon wrote:
HP ProLiant BL460c G7
Maybe this helps
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=24769
Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I am looking for a USB ethernet adapter which works with very stable
driver in FreeBSD. To effect this end, I went through section 4 man
pages, and made list of drivers for USB ethernet chips. The problem
is, many are apparently not widely available or in current production
- but I found ASIX
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Rotate 13 rabg...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a USB ethernet adapter which works with very stable
driver in FreeBSD. To effect this end, I went through section 4 man
pages, and made list of drivers for USB ethernet chips. The problem
is, many
Am 07.11.2011, 02:19 Uhr, schrieb Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
ifconfig_DEFAULT=DHCP
It's not well documented. I'd also suggest using SYNCDHCP as more
likely to work predictably on unknown equipment.
Wow. That's *a lot* easier than what I came up with.
Thanks!
Am 07.11.2011, 02:24 Uhr, schrieb Marco Steinbach
c...@executive-computing.de:
I'd be interested in testing the results (or possible steps thereto) of
your efforts in creating a customized, bootable FreeBSD USB stick image,
if that's feasible.
I am not creating an image at all.
What
possibly be there,
thus cramming rc.conf with
ifconfig_em0=DHCP
ifconfig_em1=DHCP
ifconfig_fxp0=DHCP
and so on.
Or I could grep ifconfig or dmesg output for ethernet interfaces and
dhclient these.
Both sound like a very messy solution.
So I would step beyond my current area
dhclient on any NIC which could possibly be there,
thus cramming rc.conf with
ifconfig_em0=DHCP
ifconfig_em1=DHCP
ifconfig_fxp0=DHCP
and so on.
Or I could grep ifconfig or dmesg output for ethernet interfaces and dhclient
these.
Both sound like a very messy solution.
So I
could just start dhclient on any NIC which could possibly be there,
thus cramming rc.conf with
ifconfig_em0=DHCP
ifconfig_em1=DHCP
ifconfig_fxp0=DHCP
and so on.
Or I could grep ifconfig or dmesg output for ethernet interfaces and dhclient
these.
Both sound like a very
the network:
I could just start dhclient on any NIC which could possibly be there,
thus cramming rc.conf with
ifconfig_em0=DHCP
ifconfig_em1=DHCP
ifconfig_fxp0=DHCP
and so on.
Or I could grep ifconfig or dmesg output for ethernet interfaces and
dhclient these.
Both sound
I'm trying out DesktopBSD in VirtualBox. I like it better than PC-BSD and
GhostBSD.
However, the Internet connection isn't working out-of-the-box. When I go to
the network configuration utility, select the auto DHCP, and click on Connect,
nothing happens. I have an Internet connection in my
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:14:04 -0500, Jason Hsu jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com wrote:
I'm trying out DesktopBSD in VirtualBox. I like it better
than PC-BSD and GhostBSD.
However, the Internet connection isn't working out-of-the-box.
When I go to the network configuration utility, select the
auto
Hello,
I've got two ethernet cards Intel PRO/1000 QP (82571EB) and Intel
PRO/1000 QP (82575GB) in one router/firewall. I use OpenBSD 4.8 on
this box. That works fine, but I see some input Ierr on the interfaces
(using netstat), even when the load is not very high.
$ netstat -I em2 -w2 (bandwith
On 3/3/2011 9:27 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Hello,
I've got two ethernet cards Intel PRO/1000 QP (82571EB) and Intel
PRO/1000 QP (82575GB) in one router/firewall. I use OpenBSD 4.8 on
this box. That works fine, but I see some input Ierr on the interfaces
(using netstat), even when
Patrick Lamaiziere writes:
I've got two ethernet cards Intel PRO/1000 QP (82571EB) and Intel
PRO/1000 QP (82575GB) in one router/firewall. I use OpenBSD 4.8
on this box. That works fine, but I see some input Ierr on the
interfaces (using netstat), even when the load is not very high
On 3/3/11 3:27 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Hello,
I've got two ethernet cards Intel PRO/1000 QP (82571EB) and Intel
PRO/1000 QP (82575GB) in one router/firewall. I use OpenBSD 4.8 on
this box. That works fine, but I see some input Ierr on the interfaces
(using netstat), even when the load
On 3/3/2011 9:38 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 3/3/2011 9:27 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Hello,
I've got two ethernet cards Intel PRO/1000 QP (82571EB) and Intel
PRO/1000 QP (82575GB) in one router/firewall. I use OpenBSD 4.8 on
this box. That works fine, but I see some input Ierr
Le Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:27:12 +0100,
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org a écrit :
I would like to know if under FreeBSD, you see this kind of Ierr?
Thanks to all, I think I should have a try with FreeBSD so.
Regards.
___
On 3/3/11 7:40 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:27:12 +0100,
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org a écrit :
I would like to know if under FreeBSD, you see this kind of Ierr?
Thanks to all, I think I should have a try with FreeBSD so.
Regards.
if_bridge(4) says:
The if_bridge driver currently supports only Ethernet and Ethernet-like
(e.g., 802.11) network devices, with exactly the same interface MTU size
as the bridge device.
Am I correct to assume then that I can bridge a gigabit interface and
a fast ethernet interface and that one
Hi.. I'm just study about networking using freeBSD..
I installed freeBSD in virtual machine, VMware Workstation. When I set
network configuration, in interfaces option, I can't see Realtek PCI
ethernet card. I just see Intel ethernet card and PPP. I'm using internet by
LAN in my home. DHCP also
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Luki Bangun Subekti wrote:
Hi.. I'm just study about networking using freeBSD..
I installed freeBSD in virtual machine, VMware Workstation. When I set
network configuration, in interfaces option, I can't see Realtek PCI
ethernet card. I just see Intel ethernet card and PPP
Hi,
I've checked the latest 8.1R hardware compatibility and don't see the Intel
82580 ethernet chipset being supported. This is Intel's latest ethernet
chipset, released beginning of 2010 I think. Is there support planned for this?
Thanks!
--Ed___
Eduard Rozenberg writes:
I've checked the latest 8.1R hardware compatibility and don't see
the Intel 82580 ethernet chipset being supported. This is Intel's
latest ethernet chipset, released beginning of 2010 I think. Is
there support planned for this?
The person to ask would
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Am using an ASUS MB which contains the subject driver, more specifically
rlphy.
Haven't found any support for this driver in FBSD-7.3. Has anyone else
solved this issue?
I use another NICard that is supported, but only a 10/100 vs the phy is
10/100/1000.
Google is not a help, other than it does
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:22:50AM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Am using an ASUS MB which contains the subject driver, more specifically
rlphy.
Haven't found any support for this driver in FBSD-7.3. Has anyone else
solved this issue?
Read the rl(4) manual page. For this chip you need to have
CyberLeo Kitsana cyber...@cyberleo.net wrote:
... Alas, this box lacks obvious serial ports.
If you don't mind taking it apart, there's a fair chance of finding
a 3- or 9-pin SIO header on the circuit board. It may be TTL level
rather than RS232, however.
, and it's
diminutive stature is quite cute.
The only issue I have encountered with it thus far is a seeming
propensity for it to lock up on shutdown or reboot if the Atheros AR8131
ethernet adapter is not connected to anything. It gets as far as
displaying the 'Uptime' line, then hangs; however, when
is a seeming
propensity for it to lock up on shutdown or reboot if the Atheros AR8131
ethernet adapter is not connected to anything. It gets as far as
displaying the 'Uptime' line, then hangs; however, when connected, it
will display the uptime message, then indicate that the alc0 interface
is going
issue I have encountered with it thus far is a seeming
propensity for it to lock up on shutdown or reboot if the Atheros AR8131
ethernet adapter is not connected to anything. It gets as far as
displaying the 'Uptime' line, then hangs; however, when connected, it
will display the uptime message
I just received a handful of USB Ethernet NICs whose primary chip
says SUPEREAL on it. I've installed one on a Windows machine, and
the computer identifies it as having the Supereal SR9600 chip on
it. Is there support for this chip in FreeBSD?
--Brett Glass
What's the best what to test the status of an Ethernet interface
programmatically? We've been using this code similar to this:
struct ifmediareq ifmr;
memset(ifmr, 0, sizeof(ifmr));
strcpy(ifmr.ifm_name, nfe0);
ioctl(sockfd, SIOCGIFMEDIA, (caddr_t)ifmr)
and then checking the value
On 04/01/10 14:21, Peter Steele wrote:
What's the best what to test the status of an Ethernet interface
programmatically? We've been using this code similar to this:
struct ifmediareq ifmr;
memset(ifmr, 0, sizeof(ifmr));
strcpy(ifmr.ifm_name, nfe0);
ioctl(sockfd, SIOCGIFMEDIA, (caddr_t)ifmr
' :)
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} tek4
CamTrace S.A.S
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Steve Polyack kor...@comcast.net wrote:
On 04/01/10 14:21, Peter Steele wrote:
What's the best what to test the status of an Ethernet interface
programmatically? We've been using this code similar to this:
struct
I was going to suggest that you look at the ifconfig(8) source code, but then
I did so myself - it looks like you're doing it pretty much exactly how they
are. I've never noticed ifconfig(8) returning an incorrect value, not to say
it's not possible.
Are you sure that nothing is causing
I have a Netgear GA511 cardbus gigabit ethernet adapter based on a
supported chipset (Realtek RTL8169) that is not getting detected by
FreeBSD 8 for some reason. Here is the message that appears in dmesg
whenever I insert the card:
cbb0: Warning: Bus reset timeout
The laptop I am trying to use
+re0: link state changed to DOWN
+re0: link state changed to UP
+re0: promiscuous mode enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
+re0: promiscuous mode enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
+re0: promiscuous mode enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
re0 obviously being the Realtek Ethernet driver
enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
+re0: promiscuous mode enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
re0 obviously being the Realtek Ethernet driver. The server itself never
went down during this time, but the Ethernet did. Is there any DOS type of
event that could cause this, or could the root
enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
+re0: promiscuous mode enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
+re0: promiscuous mode enabled
+re0: promiscuous mode disabled
These are from running tcpdump.
re0 obviously being the Realtek Ethernet driver. The server itself never
went down during
On 01/09/10 21:21, Tim Judd wrote:
I bought a new SiliconDust HDHomeRun device which brings two Digital
coaxial tuners to an ethernet network. From what I read and
understand about the HDHomeRun (HDHR), is that it does have an IP
address assigned to the system, but all packets of video
Hi all,
I bought a new SiliconDust HDHomeRun device which brings two Digital
coaxial tuners to an ethernet network. From what I read and
understand about the HDHomeRun (HDHR), is that it does have an IP
address assigned to the system, but all packets of video are actually
just raw Ethernet
Everyone:
I'm working on an embedded system which will be using a small Intel
Atom motherboard with a single Ethernet port. The problem is, some
configurations of the system are going to need two Ethernet ports,
and only available ports on the system are a few USB slots and a CF
Hi,
So, I'm interested in finding out if anyone knows of an Ethernet
interface which will plug into the CF socket and has drivers for
FreeBSD. Please let me know; any help would be MUCH appreciated!
Not to mentione FreeBSD drivers, but only finding an Ethernet
interface that plugs into a CF
At 05:13 PM 11/30/2009, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Not to mentione FreeBSD drivers, but only finding an Ethernet
interface that plugs into a CF sockets seems very chalenging: you
don't really send/receive the same information to memory and to
network interface; CF can address GB of data, while
I was saddened to find that my ethernet card did not work on my FreeBSD 7.2
machine. The bge driver in the kernel did not support the broadcom 5756ME.
Here is how I got it to work:
1. Set my machine up to compile the kernel (see section 8.5 of manual)
2. Edit /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h
Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was saddened to find that my ethernet card did not work on
my FreeBSD 7.2 machine. The bge driver in the kernel did not
support the broadcom 5756ME. Here is how I got it to work:
1. Set my machine up to compile the kernel (see
Myths about Power Over Ethernet
August 27, 2009
Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) technology integrates power and data across standard
Cat5/5e/6 network cabling and provides more flexibility in today’s workplace.
PoE enables power to be supplied to network devices, such as IP phones, network
cameras
Hello,
I once had a problem in linux sometimes connecting to windows file
sharing with CIFS is extremely slow. After too much searching, I
discovered the problem was a buggy kernel device driver for some lame
ethernet card I bought.
Which kernel ethernet device driver works best under
On 8/21/09, Chris Stankevitz cstankev...@toyon.com wrote:
Hello,
I once had a problem in linux sometimes connecting to windows file
sharing with CIFS is extremely slow. After too much searching, I
discovered the problem was a buggy kernel device driver for some lame
ethernet card I bought
Elliot Finley efinley.li...@gmail.com wrote:
A T1 can only run about 600 feet. Yes, that's right, 600 feet.
When people talk about T1s running long distances, the reference
to 'T1' is only the signalling at the end. In the middle, that
T1 will be carried by other methods such as SONET over
David Kelly dke...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there
that two machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of
cat5 with no special hardware?
After reading (at least most of) the discussion that has arisen
from this, I've had another
Hi,
AFAIK neither of these really needs the signal quality of Cat 5 --
they both should work just fine over Cat 3 -- but surely the higher
grade wire can't hurt (and it may increase the usable DSL distance).
I think I remember that the gauge of Ethernet cable is smaller than
the one of phone
Hi,
Am 2009-07-17 00:47:57, schrieb per...@pluto.rain.com:
Option 2: Put an ordinary DSL modem at one end and a DSLAM at the
other end. Again I'm not sure what the range is, but DSL used to
be referred to as the solution for the last mile from the telco
to the customer so it may be up to
Option 2: Put an ordinary DSL modem at one end and a DSLAM at the
other end. Again I'm not sure what the range is, but DSL used to
be referred to as the solution for the last mile from the telco
to the customer so it may be up to the job.
I could recommend this too, because a
Check www.gnswireless.com (this from a satisfied customer)
That said, I also use the method of placing mini ethernet switches or
hubs (electrically a multiport repeater and damned hard to find now)
every so often to reach distant parts of our warehouses. These are
powered, of course. POE
Just for the archives:
A T1 can only run about 600 feet. Yes, that's right, 600 feet. When people
talk about T1s running long distances, the reference to 'T1' is only the
signalling at the end. In the middle, that T1 will be carried by other
methods such as SONET over fiber for very long
David Kelly wrote:
Since when does one have CSMA/CD when configured as full duplex? All
full duplex ethernet connections are point to point, machine to
machine, or machine to switch. There is no multiple access on full
duplex. No chance of collision.
You are running Ethernet, right? CSMA
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:49:11AM -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
David Kelly wrote:
Since when does one have CSMA/CD when configured as full duplex? All
full duplex ethernet connections are point to point, machine to
machine, or machine to switch. There is no multiple access on full
Michael Powell nightre...@verizon.net writes:
You are running Ethernet, right? CSMA/CD is part of the Ethernet framing
protocol. It is present in the protocol independent of simplex/duplex, etc.
As such the timing windows contain non-infinite discreet value ranges. It is
integral
/Carrier_sense_multiple_access_with_collision_detection:
Also, in Full Duplex Ethernet, collisions are impossible since data is
transmitted and received on different wires, and each segment is
connected directly to a switch. Therefore, CSMA/CD is not used on Full
Duplex Ethernet networks.
Aha! I did
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:33:24PM -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
David Kelly wrote:
Last sentences in last paragraph before See Also at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier_sense_multiple_access_with_collision_detection:
Also, in Full Duplex Ethernet, collisions are impossible since
Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there that two
machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of cat5 with no
special hardware?
IIRC the classic Ethernet problem limiting the distance between the
farthest points on a network had to do with timing and collisions
Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there that two
machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of cat5 with no
special hardware?
IIRC the classic ethernet problem limiting the distance between the
farthest points on a network had to do with timing and collisions
David Kelly wrote:
Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there that two
machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of cat5 with no
special hardware?
IIRC the classic ethernet problem limiting the distance between the
farthest points on a network had to do
, you are talking about 1.5km or 1 mile ?
I would say, NO chance with Ethernet... it is limited to 500 meters.
100baseT uses lower power drivers than 10baseT, so perhaps 10baseT would
work better.
There are inexpensive FiberOptic Transponder (I am using a bunch of it
from Transmode for my
an inexpensive ethernet switch at each junction
to serve as a regenerative repeater?
You have to use at least 3 Repeaters which NEED electricity. Do you
know this?
Yes, of course.
5000 feet CAT5, 3 Repeater plus electric installation cost more,
then the FiberOptic Cable with two Transponder
the cost
of the cable.
Are there any particular range extenders you have used and would
recommend for making this task a sure thing on the first try?
Perhaps I should put an inexpensive ethernet switch at each junction
to serve as a regenerative repeater?
You have to use at least 3 Repeaters
Hello *,
Am 2009-07-15 17:38:33, schrieb mikel.k...@olivent.com:
David,
You can run upto 1.5 miles on a lx fiber based solution but will likely
require a skilled installer to setup that much cable for you.
Depending on your locale I am may be able to put connect you to a supplier.
David Kelly wrote:
Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there that two
machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of cat5 with no
special hardware?
IIRC the classic ethernet problem limiting the distance between the
farthest points on a network had to do
On Wed 2009-07-15 22:27:35 UTC+0200, Michelle Konzack
(bsd4miche...@tamay-dogan.net) wrote:
Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there that two
machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of cat5 with no
special hardware?
I do not know hoe much a feet is in
Hi,
A general reply to many suggestions.
So the time it takes for the smallest Ethernet frame to get from the two
farthest nodes will determine a window in which the two most distant nodes
upon attempting a transmit can tell that a collision occurred and
retransmit.
In a case of point
On Jul 15, 2009, at 9:25 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
The max distance for UTP is 328 ft. Divide the 5,000 by 328 and it
will tell
you how many bridges, hubs, or switches you will need to
regenerate the
signal. You may find devices purporting to 'range extenders', but
even these
will have
On Jul 15, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
David Kelly wrote:
Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there
that two
machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of cat5 with no
special hardware?
IIRC the classic ethernet problem limiting the distance
David,
You would need 5 boxes, the connections between each run of cable
could cause too many loss, even if the timing was not an issue.
Wire connections are not all that lossy.
You would be surprised by the impedance missmatch tests made by
cabling companies...
Meanwhile cat5 is useful
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be
displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message
correctly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be
displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message
correctly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
I have just gotten an old ethernet card, not entirely sure how old it
is but it has pulse H1012 on one of the chips and appears as ethernet
device fxp0 in freebsd 7.0.
When I plug an ethernet cable between this card and another computer
(freebsd 7.2) ifconfig says that the status has
, 2009 1:37 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: ethernet card not working
Hi,
I have just gotten an old ethernet card, not entirely sure how old it
is but it has pulse H1012 on one of the chips and appears as ethernet
device fxp0 in freebsd 7.0.
When I plug an ethernet cable between
David Collins wrote:
Hi,
I have just gotten an old ethernet card, not entirely sure how old it
is but it has pulse H1012 on one of the chips and appears as ethernet
device fxp0 in freebsd 7.0.
When I plug an ethernet cable between this card and another computer
(freebsd 7.2) ifconfig
unplug either end and plug it into my ibook (OS X) the status changes
to active and I can ping the other computer. From this I can see that
both both freebsd computers have working ethernet cards and the cable
works also, just not freebsd-freebsd.
Does anyone have any ideas why this might
On 03/06/2009, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
unplug either end and plug it into my ibook (OS X) the status changes
to active and I can ping the other computer. From this I can see that
both both freebsd computers have working ethernet cards and the cable
works also
Again, cross-over cable!
- Original Message -
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed Jun 03 17:25:17 2009
Subject: Re: ethernet card not working
On 03/06/2009, Wojciech Puchar
The cable works find and so does the network card. I have it plugged
is it crossover cable for sure?
into my ibook and am sshing across it - everything works fine and as
it should when using freebsd to osx, just can't do the same from
some cards MAY work without crossing over pairs -
1 - 100 of 687 matches
Mail list logo
