Is it possible, when booted into FreeBSD, to run Linux programs from an actual
Linux installation, instead of the Linux-emulation ports?
User would have both FreeBSD and Linux installed on hard drive, and might
possibly
mount -t ext2fs /dev/linux-partition /compat/linux
I noticed
Dear list.
I have an USB smartcard reader that emulates a serial port. It uses the
uftdi.ko kernel module and creates the following device nodes when
plugged in. System is FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64.
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 110 Jan 14 19:27 /dev/cuaU0
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0,
Morgan Wesström wrote:
Dear list.
I have an USB smartcard reader that emulates a serial port. It uses the
uftdi.ko kernel module and creates the following device nodes when
plugged in. System is FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64.
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 110 Jan 14 19:27 /dev/cuaU0
to make serial communication work through the linux
emulation layer?
/Morgan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:58:19 -0800 (PST) Super Biscuit wrote:
I'm using linux_base-f10.
How do you?
During the installation of ports. The error comes to to use at least base-f8.
Ports have been updated.
Did you pay attention at /usr/ports/UPDATING?
--
WBR, bsam
/054046.html
--- En date de : Mar 3.11.09, Super Biscuit super_bisq...@yahoo.com a écrit :
De: Super Biscuit super_bisq...@yahoo.com
Objet: linux emulation problems
À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mardi 3 Novembre 2009, 21h58
I'm using linux_base-f10. During the
installation of ports
The problem is solved. I used a recent reply to fix an error. Yes, I followed
and yes, thanks for the help from everyone.
--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
From: Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru
Subject: Re: linux emulation problems
To: Super Biscuit super_bisq...@yahoo.com
Cc
I'm using linux_base-f10. During the installation of ports. The error comes to
to use at least base-f8. Ports have been updated.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
I don't know if anyone else is trying; but, I am attempting a Linux
installation of virtualbox on FreeBSD amd64.
Here is the output first:
sh Desktop/VirtualBox-1.6.0-Linux_amd64.run
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing VirtualBox for Linux installation
VirtualBox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Desmond Chapman wrote:
I don't know if anyone else is trying; but, I am attempting a Linux
installation of virtualbox on FreeBSD amd64.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.virtualbox.devel/853
Hi,
We have recently upgraded a machine that runs a Linux app from 4.11 to
7-STABLE. Most things are just fine apart from the app can only be
started once. If stopped and then restarted, we see
semget error
Server Stopped
Googling and reading led me to ipcs and ipcrm:
(after stopping the
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:52:14 +1000
Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/03/2008, Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux
compat under freebsd. I am particularly
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
emulation allows execution of normal linux programs, not drivers
1. How do I install the drivers for all users under linux compat?
2. Is it possible for
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
emulation allows execution of normal linux programs, not drivers
Ok. So input devices won't
Da Rock wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
emulation allows execution of normal linux programs, not drivers
On 20/03/2008, Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
emulation allows execution of
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:52:14 +1000 Da Rock wrote:
Also, on the linux compat- am I correct in my observation that you have
to actually chroot to enable the running of a linux binary? Enter the
file structure of the linux compat? Or can you just run it?
Just run it.
WBR
--
bsam
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
1. How do I install the drivers for all users under linux compat?
2. Is it possible for freebsd programs to use the linux drivers?
3. Anything I should be
I think you're talking about Linux binary compatibility.
While I have heard of project(s) for device driver compatibility I do
not believe anything exists in a usable state.
-Patrick
On 19/03/2008, Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat
/md0 /mnt/FedoraISO
# cd /mnt/FedoraISO
# for rpm in *.rmp
do
rpm --ignore-os -i --root-install /compat/linux ${rpm}
done
After these commands I had my problem with ldconfig and the linux
emulation.
Now the strangest thing: my /etc/libmap.conf file disappeared.
* I didn't have to install any
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:28:54 +0200
Sereno Ternullo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Sereno Ternullo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Making a new libmap.conf for linux emulation
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:28:54 +0200
User
Hi all,
I made too many mistakes configuring my /etc/libmap.conf file and now
I'm having problems with my linux sub system.
If I have linux.ko loaded into the kernel, ldconfig fails like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc]# ldconfig
Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)
With linux.ko loaded into the
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:32 +0200
Sereno Ternullo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I made too many mistakes configuring my /etc/libmap.conf file and now
I'm having problems with my linux sub system.
why do you think you have to do that for?
If I have linux.ko loaded into the kernel,
A program I'm using, which is distributed only in binary form
wants the Mesa library. So I suppose I have to compile it but
it would have to be into a Linux format. Where is development
for Linux covered in the documentation?
___
On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Lorin Lund wrote:
A program I'm using, which is distributed only in binary form
wants the Mesa library.
Do you already have Linux emulation installed? If so, does installing the
graphics/linux_dri port solve your problem? That got Secondlife (which
uses OpenGL
Manfred Usselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
=== linux_base-rh-9 depends on executable: rpm - found
=== linux_base-rh-9 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info - found
kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 - 3
glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386
Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07
Feb 2006 10:16:49 -0500:
Manfred Usselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
=== linux_base-rh-9 depends on executable: rpm - found
=== linux_base-rh-9 depends on file: /usr/local
Hi,
I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
=== linux_base-rh-9 depends on executable: rpm - found
=== linux_base-rh-9 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info - found
kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 - 3
glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386.rpm
execution of glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7 script
On 10/5/05, K Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Antoine Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:14 AM
Subject: about linux emulation
Is it possible to chroot into a fully functional linux environment
- Original Message -
From: Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: K Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Antoine Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: about linux emulation
On 10/5/05, K Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Is it possible to chroot into a fully functional linux environment on
freebsd?
--
Antoine W. Solomon Jr.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Antoine Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:14 AM
Subject: about linux emulation
Is it possible to chroot into a fully functional linux environment on
freebsd?
--
Hi Antoine,
I don't know
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:32:04PM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
MSG In-short: what is, or where do I find info on, the current status of
linux binary compatability on FreeBSD/amd64 platform
32-bit x86 Linux binaries should run just fine on FreeBSD/AMD64 5.4 or
later. You will have to install
platform, if anyone knows the status of that fix it'd be
great to know too (of course assuming I've got the option of better linux
emulation with 5.4R).
Ideally, I'd like to be able to run the linux/amd64 binaries... But I really
don't know where FreeBSD stands at current for doing
versions, I decided to use the
Linux based versions and simply use the Linux emulation
base 7.
I was able to get Helix Universal Server (by realnetworks)
installed along with the Flash Communications Server. Both
at the time functioned properly (i believe). I then upgraded
to FreeBSD 5.3 and noticed
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:38 am, Dick Davies wrote:
* Mikko Heiskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1244 16:44]:
I've been wondering about this some time now.
The linux compatibility layer (kernel module + linux_base -port)
is told to be able to run linux binaries. The handbook even describes
for a
I've been wondering about this some time now.
The linux compatibility layer (kernel module + linux_base -port)
is told to be able to run linux binaries. The handbook even describes
for a couple of heavy-duty applications how this is done.
However, after reading that part of the handbook and
* Mikko Heiskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1244 16:44]:
I've been wondering about this some time now.
The linux compatibility layer (kernel module + linux_base -port)
is told to be able to run linux binaries. The handbook even describes
for a couple of heavy-duty applications how this is done.
I am attempting to run a commercial CAD software
suite compiled for Linux on a FreeBSD 4.10 OS. It runs
as well or perhaps better than on a Linux box until
the PID becomes large.
The MAX_PID for FreeBSD is 9 while Linux has a
limit of 0x8000.
Once the current PID gets high the interaction
In the last episode (Nov 11), Malcolm Kay said:
I am attempting to run a commercial CAD software suite compiled for
Linux on a FreeBSD 4.10 OS. It runs as well or perhaps better than on
a Linux box until the PID becomes large.
The MAX_PID for FreeBSD is 9 while Linux has a limit of
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:17 am, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 11), Malcolm Kay said:
I am attempting to run a commercial CAD software suite compiled for
Linux on a FreeBSD 4.10 OS. It runs as well or perhaps better than on
a Linux box until the PID becomes large.
The MAX_PID
hi,
i need to make setl programming language
(http://cs1.cs.nyu.edu/bacon/download-setl.html) work under freebsd5 (for
discrete math lab), no srcs available, i just found linux2.0.18 binary (from
latter link), the problem is that this is linked to libc.so.5 and it seems to
be broken
In the last episode (Nov 08), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hi,
i need to make setl programming language
(http://cs1.cs.nyu.edu/bacon/download-setl.html) work under freebsd5 (for
discrete math lab), no srcs available, i just found linux2.0.18 binary (from
latter link), the problem is that this
It looks like the linux_base-6 port installs a libc.so.5 file (into
/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libc.so.5, though). You should also be able
to just copy the required libraries off a working Linux system. Just
make sure you don't overwrite existing files with older ones.
dan,
thanks man!, that
Under Linux emulation / resolves to real root directory, not
/compat/linux directory and I am very curious why this is so.
I see that in linux_emul_convpath() there is a special check for this
case with the following comment:
/*
* We now compare the vnode of the linux_root to the one
* vnode
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Under Linux emulation / resolves to real root directory, not
/compat/linux directory and I am very curious why this is so.
I see that in linux_emul_convpath() there is a special check for this
case with the following comment:
/*
* We now compare
On Friday 22 October 2004 12:18, Konrad Heuer wrote:
Linux binaries often need to access files outside the emulation directory
tree, just think of data files in the user's homes when running
applications like acroread, linux-mozilla, staroffice etc. So you
absolutely need to break out.
Yes.
on 22.10.2004 14:18 Konrad Heuer said the following:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Linux binaries often need to access files outside the emulation directory
tree, just think of data files in the user's homes when running
applications like acroread, linux-mozilla, staroffice etc.
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 07:50:17 +, Rob DeMarco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 15:55, Paul Mather wrote:
You should be able to use portupgrade to upgrade your linux_base-6.1_6
to a more recent version. This does assume you have the ports tree
installed (and preferably up to
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 03:50, Rob DeMarco wrote:
While I have some familiarity with the ports tree, I didn't install
it this time because of limited disk space (though I suppose I could
do a partial port-tree install). Also, my P150 makes compiles long
and painful :)
To avoid all that,
Hello Questions,
I wanted to run Mozilla FireBird 6.1.6 under Linux emulation so
that I could use the Flash plugin. I installed linux_base-6.1_6
from the 4-stable packages directory and downloaded FireBird. But
FireBird required a later version of Linux emulation (7.???) that
I could only find
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:03:01 +, Rob DeMarco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to run Mozilla FireBird 6.1.6 under Linux emulation so
that I could use the Flash plugin. I installed linux_base-6.1_6
from the 4-stable packages directory and downloaded FireBird. But
FireBird required
with Flash Plugin enabled.
Complicated?
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:03:01 +, Rob DeMarco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Questions,
I wanted to run Mozilla FireBird 6.1.6 under Linux emulation so
that I could use the Flash plugin. I installed linux_base-6.1_6
from the 4-stable packages
Hi.
I have two question. I hope what someone helps me.
First:
I have NVidia fx5600 and installs drivers from
/usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver
# cat /boot/loader.conf
hw.ata.ata_dma=0
nvidia_load=YES
linux_load=YES # Linux emulation
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:08:19AM +0400, Roman Vasiliev wrote:
First run glxgears shows ~2000 fps but second ~10 fps. And whole OpenGL
application lags.
Problem solves in changing on NVidia mx 4400. All works fine.
I have the same problem with a GF4-Ti/4200: first run is fast, second
is
Lately fonts in linux-programs running under the linux-emulation on my
FreeBSD system aren't rendered as they used to. The antialiasing doesn't
seem to work anymore. I'm not sure what caused this, but it happened after
a major portupgrade of lots of ports.
Both Mathematica, Maple and Opera
Hello.
I have a perl module (Adobe's FDF toolkit) that uses two .so files as part
of it's magic. These files come precompiled for Linux. Not surprisingly, when
I try to do a perl use on the module I get an error like this:
Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/FDF.so' for module
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:27:29AM -0500, Jason Godfrey wrote:
Hello.
I have a perl module (Adobe's FDF toolkit) that uses two .so files as part
of it's magic. These files come precompiled for Linux. Not surprisingly, when
I try to do a perl use on the module I get an error like this:
I'm under the impression that linux.ko provides linux kernel emulation,
and linux binary base libraries are installed in /compat/linux/ for linux
binaries to use in linux emulation mode. when you execute a linux binary
(recognized by branding in the binary) it runs chrooted to /compat/linux/
so
Hi all,
I receive the following error when running Pervasive.SQL for linux
(www.pervasive.com) on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE with both linux_base_6.1 and
linux_base_7_1 and linux_base_7_4.
linux: 'ipc' typ=17 not implemented
snip
SQLManager is being started in console mode, intended for debugging
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:08:59PM +0200, Jaco van Tonder wrote:
linux: 'ipc' typ=17 not implemented
*** Assert in file lnasdbc.c at line 2373. ***
/snip
The program then freezes. Anyone got any ideas? I've googled for this, and
found only _1_ result, also somebody struggling with the same
On 4.8-20030810-STABLE, with
linux_base-8-8.0_1
When I run Linux Netscape 7.1, I get the
following messages on the console:
linux: 'ipc' typ=258 not implemented
Also, when I run Linux OpenOffice, I get many
instances of the following messages on the console:
linux: syscall mmap2 is
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:39:17PM -0700, Joseph Davida wrote:
Are these syscalls not implemented in Linux kernel
2.4.x?
Surely, but Linux != FreeBSD. They're not present in older Linux
kernels, so glibc will fall back to other syscalls if they are not
present, and the binary continues to
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:43:13PM +0200 or thereabouts, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On 29 Jul Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 14:03, Franz Stieber wrote:
I have a GeForce TI 4200 and TV out works great :)
[ ... ]
I'm using it under FreeBSD-4.8 with Linux emulation
Hi All,
I was just debating about trying to install UML under the linux emulation
and wondered had anyone tried it before? Does it even work or does UML
rely to much on the linux kernel functionality to work at all under
FreeBSD?
Cheers
Rus
--
http://www.fsck.me.uk - My blog
http://www.65535.net
On 12-Jan-2003 Rus Foster wrote:
Hi All,
I was just debating about trying to install UML under the linux emulation
and wondered had anyone tried it before? Does it even work or does UML
rely to much on the linux kernel functionality to work at all under
FreeBSD?
I'm not sure exactly what
Hello everybody!
I have some problems with linux support.
For example while I try to add rpm package I see next:
/hw/z/Mandrake/RPMS# rpm -i wine-20001206-ipl9mdk.i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
sed is needed by wine-20001206-ipl9mdk
awk is needed by
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you believe that the ATAPI/CAM patches at
http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/ might make cdparanoia
compatible with an ATAPI drive on FreeBSD?
Probably.
I guess that would mean the
patches would
From: Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:46:44 -0700
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick wrote:
Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
/dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
Testing
From: Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:35:03 -0700
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lowell wrote:
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nick wrote:
Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
Lowell wrote:
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you believe that the ATAPI/CAM patches at
http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/ might make cdparanoia
compatible with an ATAPI drive on FreeBSD?
Probably.
I guess that
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in the process of ripping a large CD collection. Fidelity is
paramount. By all accounts, the ripper of choice for audiophiles is
cdparanoia.
dagrab has worked fine for me for IDE drives. It's in the
ports collection. (For SCSI drives I prefer
On October 8, 2002 02:11 am, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in the process of ripping a large CD collection. Fidelity is
paramount. By all accounts, the ripper of choice for audiophiles
is cdparanoia.
dagrab has worked fine for me for IDE drives. It's
joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On October 8, 2002 02:11 am, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in the process of ripping a large CD collection. Fidelity is
paramount. By all accounts, the ripper of choice for audiophiles
is cdparanoia.
dagrab
Thus spake Lucky Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
/dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
/dev/cdrom is not a SCSI device
That
Nick wrote:
Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
/dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
/dev/cdrom is not a SCSI device
That doesn't look quite right;
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nick wrote:
Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
/dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
/dev/cdrom is not a
Lowell wrote:
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nick wrote:
Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
/dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
to root found.
-
At this point, cdparanoia dumps core.
Now I have no idea what a cooked ioctl is and Google was of no help,
but I suspect that somehow the Linux emulation layer in FreeBSD does not
provide cdparanoia with a device it knows how to talk to.
Does anybody here
Hello !
I want to use a streamer under the freebsd linux emulation. I don't know
if it is possible and if it is possible how to do it ? Where can i find
documentation or who can help me ?
kind regards
Peter Will Internet Management GmbH
-- Auf
80 matches
Mail list logo
