On Monday, 27 January 2003 at 18:55:12 -0800, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Could we now please take this off -questions? Continue on advocacy@
>> if you want.
>
> I already started and finished my thread on -chat, joining this
> thread only after
Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which secret agreements? The license is public, and it doesn't leave
> any space for secret agreements.
The secret agreements which presumably allowed UCB and BSDi to continue
using Unix code without getting sued over it. Permission which I've n
On Monday, 27 January 2003 at 11:51:44 -0800, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
>>> I'm more inclined to think that these are different parts of the same
>>> company who don't (didn't) know about the other part.
>>
>> Another strong
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
> > I'm more inclined to think that these are different parts of the same
> > company who don't (didn't) know about the other part.
>
> Another strong possibility. Happens all the time.
Not this time. The reports are quoting
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 26 January 2003 at 11:47:15 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
I don't expect anything to come of this.
It's generating lots of FUD, which is unfortunate.
That's probably their entire goal. After all, what else could
they hope to accomplish?
On Sunday, 26 January 2003 at 11:47:15 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> I don't expect anything to come of this.
>>
>> It's generating lots of FUD, which is unfortunate.
>
> That's probably their entire goal. After all, what else could
> they hope to accomplish?
I don't know. May
Greg Lehey wrote:
I don't expect anything to come of this.
It's generating lots of FUD, which is unfortunate.
That's probably their entire goal. After all, what else could
they hope to accomplish?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
On Thursday, 23 January 2003 at 19:01:30 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:45:04PM -0500, mikel king wrote:
>
>>McBride also confirmed that the company has hired high-profile
>>attorney David Boies and his legal firm to investigate whether
>>Windows, Mac OS X, Lin
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 08:34 PM, mikel king wrote:
I suppose one could speculate that FreeBSD could even benefit from
such actions. While Linux, MAC OSX, and whomever else these guy point
the finger at are battleing it out in court; FreeBSD could quietly
move ahead...
I would g
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:45:04PM -0500, mikel king wrote:
McBride also confirmed that the company has hired high-profile
attorney David Boies and his legal firm to investigate whether
Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and versions of BSD infringed on the Unix
intellect
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:45:04PM -0500, mikel king wrote:
>McBride also confirmed that the company has hired high-profile
>attorney David Boies and his legal firm to investigate whether
>Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and versions of BSD infringed on the Unix
>intellectual property it
I just read an article on eWeek about SCO's new SCOx server platform
thingie...and tucked away near the bottom of the first page is the
follow statement:
McBride also confirmed that the company has hired high-profile
attorney David Boies and his legal firm to investigate whether
Windows
12 matches
Mail list logo
