Re: Having trouble with buildworld

2003-10-05 Thread jason
they move the default some where under /usr/local/...? search for it then put it where you current one is now. it may or may not help, but doble listings for perl does not look good. also I have CPU_TYPE=athlonxp you could try the same for a speed boost on your system when you get it working.

YIM?

2003-10-05 Thread Minnesota Slinky
Hey all. I'm trying to install the new (non-blocked) version of YIM according to the instructions on the website. My problem is that I've got the newest version of GTK (2.3.4 I think) and newer versions of the four or five other dependencies. Is there a work around, or can I install old versions

Re: wav to mp3?

2003-10-05 Thread BSD baby
> I did a make search in the ports collection and didn't see what (I think) I > need, so I'll ask here. > Is there a utility (or utilities) in ports for converting .wav files to mp3? /usr/ports/audio/lame has really become the standard. SO easy to use from the command-line, just do: lame YourS

scant description for devfs - unable to create /dev/ad3* or use disklabel

2003-10-05 Thread ecsd
The transition to using devfs versus MAKEDEV is not very well documented, and I find no way to create /dev/ad3-anything although I have a /dev/ad3 and have used "disklabel -w -r ad3 auto" to initialize it. I wish there were an example section for devfs(8) that showed how to use devfs to do what MAK

Re: terminal emulation

2003-10-05 Thread Richard Coleman
He said he needs a serial console. You can't do that with telnet. "cu" and "tip" are the traditional Unix interfaces for this. But they suck. There are many better methods in the ports tree. rc Minnesota Slinky wrote: Just a question, why not just use telnet? Eric F Crist AdTech Integrated

Can not post

2003-10-05 Thread Barry Skidmore
I apologize for this post (if it gets through). I have tried several posts to freebsd-test, but they have not come through. I just wanted to know if it was a problem with that mailing list, or with all of them that I subscribed to. Barry -- +-+ | Barry Skidm

Turning off that bloody nagscreen on bittorrent!

2003-10-05 Thread Dragoncrest
Anyone know if there's a special switch or something on the Freebsd BitTorrent port or some way to go inside the python script and shut off that bloody nag stuff he's got built into his new version 3.3? It's driving me up a freaking wall. It loads, gags the client, displays the "give me mone

Re: Turning off that bloody nagscreen on bittorrent!

2003-10-05 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-10-06T02:08:50Z, Dragoncrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone know if there's a special switch or something on the Freebsd > BitTorrent port or some way to go inside the python script and shut off > that bloody nag stuff he's got built into his new version 3.3? Here's my guess: Look

Re: seperating user timezones from system timezones

2003-10-05 Thread Mailing Lists Catcher
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 14:02, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Mailing Lists Catcher wrote: > > How to I allow users access to their own timezone without affecting the > > system processes? > > > > All of my systems regardless of location have always been set to UTC so > > logs and cron are in sync across tim

Re: Pointer please

2003-10-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 06), Marcus Mller said: > I'm currently facing a non-trivial problem with the current > Objective-C runtime on FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT. The problem popped up > when trying to create a native port of OGo > (http://www.opengroupware.org) to FreeBSD. Specifically, certain > retur

malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please)

2003-10-05 Thread Robert Huff
Dan Nelson writes: > Could be one of two problems. The program either malloced memory > and tried to use it without zeroing it, or it freed some memory > and tried to keep using it. In -current, the malloc has the J > debugging flag set, which fills malloced and freed memory with > 0xd0 (s

tranparent proxying, squid, nat, ipfw

2003-10-05 Thread synrat
I'm having a hard time getting this working together. I have squid 2.5 stable working and with all the required setting for transparent proxying. The machine has the kernel with IPFW and forwarding options. NAT is on, firewall type is simple with some modifications. Internal interface address is 19

Re: malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please)

2003-10-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 05), Robert Huff said: > Dan Nelson writes: > > Could be one of two problems. The program either malloced memory > > and tried to use it without zeroing it, or it freed some memory > > and tried to keep using it. In -current, the malloc has the J > > debugging flag se

RE: terminal emulation

2003-10-05 Thread Alexey Koptsevich
Thanks everybody for suggestions! > Just a question, why not just use telnet? Because the system is not set up there yet, and I do not want to search for a monitor just for this purpose. Alex ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Re: flphoto for FreeBSD?

2003-10-05 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 02:06:18 +0200 Gabriel Striewe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > In the magazine Linux-User (http://www.linux-user.de) I came across the photo > editing programme "flphoto", written by cups-author Michael Sweets. This port > is not yet included in the ports collection.Any

Re: adding webmail

2003-10-05 Thread User Sellis
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:22:41PM -0400, T Kellers wrote: > On Sunday 05 October 2003 12:47 pm, S Ellis wrote: > > > > -I don't really grasp where the imap server comes into play > > -can I even keep the setup above and have squirrelmail? > > -can I continue to use the same 'unix' mailboxes, spoo

Re: flphoto for FreeBSD?

2003-10-05 Thread Herbert
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:06:18AM +0200, Gabriel Striewe wrote: > In the magazine Linux-User (http://www.linux-user.de) I came across > the photo editing programme "flphoto", written by cups-author Michael > Sweets. This port is not yet included in the ports collection.Anybody > knows the reason

Re: malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please)

2003-10-05 Thread James Jacobsen
It does not matter what freebsd does, C does not require that malloc initialize space according to Kernighan and Ritchie. Its a good book, I would say its worth the forty dollars. --Will On 10/05/03 20:32:00, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Oct 05), Robert Huff said: > Dan Nelson write

Re: adding webmail

2003-10-05 Thread Timothy J. Luoma
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:47:52 -0700, S Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want to broaden access to my home email by adding a webmail interface. Right now I'm running sendmail with procmail and using spamassassin; I'd like to keep this setup. Looking at the squirrelmail port has raised some questio

Re: malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please)

2003-10-05 Thread James Jacobsen
What's really bad, is that freebsd could potentally change there behavor down the line. Its probably dictated by the way kernel dezined, meaning they may do whats the cheapist. I would. If they do its go to lead to some weird behavior. :-) --James On 10/05/03 21:42:23, Robert Huff wrote

Re: malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please)

2003-10-05 Thread James Jacobsen
Man, I need to learn to spell. :) --James On 10/05/03 22:20:42, James Jacobsen wrote: What's really bad, is that freebsd could potentally change there behavor down the line. Its probably dictated by the way kernel dezined, meaning they may do whats the cheapist. I would. If they do its

Re: malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please)

2003-10-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 05), James Jacobsen said: > On 10/05/03 21:42:23, Robert Huff wrote: > >James Jacobsen writes: > >> It does not matter what freebsd does, C does not require that > >> malloc initialize space according to Kernighan and Ritchie. > > > >I knew that, and agree depending on a

Re: malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please)

2003-10-05 Thread James Jacobsen
You learn something new every day(probably not how to spell). I'm not a very experienced programmer. I actual did not know about those debugging tools. Thanks. :) --James On 10/05/03 22:31:09, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Oct 05), James Jacobsen said: > On 10/05/03 21:42:23, Robe

Re: tranparent proxying, squid, nat, ipfw

2003-10-05 Thread Mark Pearce
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:40:09 -0400 (EDT) synrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having a hard time getting this working together. > I have squid 2.5 stable working and with all the required > setting for transparent proxying. The machine has the kernel with IPFW > and forwarding options. NAT is on

4.8-RELEASE and UTF-8

2003-10-05 Thread Clemens Hermann
Hi, we have an "Umlaut" problem under FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE. for a typo3-based content management system GIFs and PNGs are generated via GDLib/Freetype. The default settings for Typo uses UTF-8. Within php pages umlauts work fine but in GDLib/Freetype generated images they do not appear. To find t

How to turn off the HDD? How to reduce the overall noise?

2003-10-05 Thread Constantine
Hello, My hard disc drive seems to be too noisy for me. I want to test, how much idle noise would the system make with the hard drive turned off. I do not want to unplug the wires, since I have had a lot of problems last time I did that. Is there any command / utility that can turn my HDD off

Re: bridging multiple interfaces

2003-10-05 Thread Mike Jackson
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > That's fine, but you must check the netmask of the interfaces and your computers > in the network, it should be 255.255.0.0. Aha, that could be the problem then. I'm using 255.255.255.0 currently. > How are you bridging the interfaces ?? i

Re: adding webmail

2003-10-05 Thread Mike Jackson
ext Timothy J. Luoma ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > To paraphrase a Mutt slogan, "All Webmail sucks" so the key is finding one > that sucks less. Hi, I'm a mutt user myself :-) And as for a webmail software that sucks the least, it's Sqwebmail. Only caveat is that your mailboxes need to be in m

Re: adding webmail

2003-10-05 Thread Luke Kearney
Hi, I have been a long time user of sqwebmail but it's handling of double byte characters sets leaves much to be desired. Otherwise it is a good package. And yes, it is fast because as Mike points out it doesn't read the entire contents of a maildir into memory before showing the mail. HTH LukeK

<    1   2