Sahil Tandon wrote:
Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone using this?
I've used it for a long time on a 6.x box and it worked fine.
Recently I had to deactivate it since it seems to lock away every IP which
is listed in the logs.
Any hint?
Give more information. Which
Hi Wilko,
Do you know who handles creative production for marketing documents at
The FreeBSD Project?
We help companies drive sales with lead-generation pieces like case
studies, brochures and white papers.
Our rates are reasonable and clients recover costs quickly with just a
couple of i
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm seeing regular kernel panics on my new box with a fresh install of
> 7.0-RELEASE. I'm trying to get some information out of kgdb by following
> the instructions in the handbook - however, I'm getting a 'cannot access
> memory
Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone using this?
> I've used it for a long time on a 6.x box and it worked fine.
> Recently I had to deactivate it since it seems to lock away every IP which
> is listed in the logs.
> Any hint?
Give more information. Which logs? Give an example.
A nice trick for easily recovering from unbootable kernels is
nextboot(8). Try man nextboot
I certainly concur with Sean on the co-ordinate a time theory,
especially if it includes them being on standby for a clean recovery,
but this nextboot(8) tactic that I never knew about before seems *ver
Camilo Reyes wrote:
I don't have much experience with this other than once I ran a server from home
and remotely ssh'ed to it to do maintenance. One of the things I learned from
that experience was that you can easily patch your services any time there is a
new threat, all you have to do is
On 05/06/2008, at 3:14 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
I have also this problem on almost all my machines .. the only
solution
I found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then performances are very
poor ..
If you find a solution please let us know :)
I tried disabling DMA 'atacontrol mode acd0 nodma
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 06:19:26PM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote:
>
> At 04:36 PM 6/5/2008, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> >
> >Anyone using this?
> >I've used it for a long time on a 6.x box and it worked fine.
> >Recently I had to deactivate it since it seems to lock away every IP which
> >is listed in t
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I don't understand what you meant by "It's also doing a lot of lseek()s
to what is likely the current position anyway (example: seek to 0x00,
read 16 bytes, seek to 0x10, etc.)." then.
I just meant that 16 was a smaller number than 4096 to use in an
example. :-)
But a
I don't have much experience with this other than once I ran a server from home
and remotely ssh'ed to it to do maintenance. One of the things I learned from
that experience was that you can easily patch your services any time there is a
new threat, all you have to do is patch your code, recompi
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Camilo Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The best way to do searches on a BSD system is to use good old
> 'locate,' or even 'find / -name .'
>
i think you can also look in /var/db/pkg or do pkg_info | grep WHATEVER
if i understood the original post correctl
The best way to do searches on a BSD system is to use good old 'locate,' or
even 'find / -name .' This will give you a result based on the ports
package which you can then add using 'pkg_add -r .'
Camilo
"Bono Vince Malum"
> --
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 200
Kirk Strauser wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
No, if it's reading in 16 byte units it will explain the terrible
performance.
No, it's actually doing 4096-byte reads. That was just an example of
what I meant.
I don't understand what you meant by "It's also doing a lot of lseek()s
to what is l
Hey,
I have pf running as the firewall on a web and IRC box. I'd like to
setup a bit of prioritization. I want ssh to be a higher priority than
any other traffic. I've read up on Class Based Queuing and Priority
Queuing. If I understand it correctly, priority queuing will transfer
ALL packets wit
Jim Stapleton writes:
> [...]
> Do you know of a wireless router that can provide individual user
> authentication, without requiring a complex setup? Some places may not
> want to pay for the internet connection, so he'll need to 'rent out'
> connection bandwidth to other vendors.
Nocatsplas
Kris Kennaway wrote:
No, if it's reading in 16 byte units it will explain the terrible
performance.
No, it's actually doing 4096-byte reads. That was just an example of
what I meant. Since I wrote that, though, I wrote a program to do
1,000,000 seeks to position 0, and it ran immeasurably
At 04:36 PM 6/5/2008, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Anyone using this?
I've used it for a long time on a 6.x box and it worked fine.
Recently I had to deactivate it since it seems to lock away every IP which
is listed in the logs.
Any hint?
bye & Thanks
av.
I believe denyhost has been dep
Hi Marc, can you please post these individually to different lists
next time rather than one massive cross-post?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I am surprised at how fast PC-BSD is picking up.
> I know that during installation, it prompts t
ok... i guess i've had it with the mfi
according to the hardware list on the freebsd site there are only 3
cards supported by the mfi driver on freebsd7 and the LSI MegaSAS 1078
ain't one of them. and lsi appears to be a remote company in singapore
which apparently doesn't like to support any
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Kirk Strauser wrote:
ktrace(1) and check for the buffer size in use. It is probably too
small.
Kris
It seems to be doing a lot of read()s with 4096-byte buffers. Is that what
you mean? It's also doing a lot of lseek()s
commenting NO_TOOLCHAIN did the trick.
Thanks,
Casey
- "Chris St Denis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Various parts of the FreeBSD base system are interdependent on each
> other. It's likely that one of the NO_* lines is breaking it.
>
> Since libgcc is what is failing I'd suspect NO_TOOLCH
Anyone using this?
I've used it for a long time on a 6.x box and it worked fine.
Recently I had to deactivate it since it seems to lock away every IP
which is listed in the logs.
Any hint?
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Stapleton wrote:
>>
>> My dad makes instruments and goes to a lot of festivals. They are
>> typically in the middle of nowhere, without internet. Many vendors
>> still bring notebooks as they provide quick & easy acc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, June 05, 2008 16:31:30 +0300 Odhiambo Washington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I am surprised at how fast PC-BSD is picking up.
> I know that during installation, it prompts the installer to enable
> the submission of stats.
On Thursday 05 June 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Kirk Strauser wrote:
> ktrace(1) and check for the buffer size in use. It is probably too
> small.
>
> Kris
It seems to be doing a lot of read()s with 4096-byte buffers. Is that what
you mean? It's also doing a lot of lseek()s to what is likely
Various parts of the FreeBSD base system are interdependent on each
other. It's likely that one of the NO_* lines is breaking it.
Since libgcc is what is failing I'd suspect NO_TOOLCHAIN
mergemaster is normally done after installworld, but the "-p" mode is
for pre-buildworld. See the man page
Yesterday, someone sent me a file with a couple URLs to frree sites
with (i think) xhtml webpages ... free examples of templates. sorry,
but ican't find the mail (erp)
please resend??
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.tho
Kirk Strauser wrote:
I'm running a command (dumprecspg from my XBaseToPg project) on a FreeBSD 7
server. I've noticed that throughput on that program is a lot lower than I
would have expected, and further investigation found it spending most of its
time in the kernel, presumably in read() [1].
In need to
Create multiple niche web sites and continually post new content to
them!
Create articles to submit to fr'ee article sites and get hundreds of
back links to your web sites!
Get into the business of writing articles for other webmasters on any
I'm running a command (dumprecspg from my XBaseToPg project) on a FreeBSD 7
server. I've noticed that throughput on that program is a lot lower than I
would have expected, and further investigation found it spending most of its
time in the kernel, presumably in read() [1].
I was testing the same
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Casey Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we no longer use "make buildworld" to upgrade from source builds?
> Everytime I've tried, I get build errors. I've gotten the impression from a
> few things I've read that freebsd-update is suppose to be used. I don
hi vince... thank you for the advice.
i did update my ports and install the 1.01.40 version...
i have the linux-base installed and the linprocfs and linsysfs mounted..
but still nothing substantial happening:
# megacli -adpCount
Controller Count: 0.
an
Hello,
anyone tried running HylaFAX in a FreeBSD jail? Does it work?
Thanks,
Nejc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi all,
I got a computer with a RTL8168/8111 PCI Express nic. It is shown in
pciconf but it is not seen by FreeBSD 7. I'm using i386 arch.
I have re and rl drivers compiled in the kernel (stock GENERIC kernel,
actually).
What do I need to make the NIC work properly?
I tried to compile the Realte
Can we no longer use "make buildworld" to upgrade from source builds? Everytime
I've tried, I get build errors. I've gotten the impression from a few things
I've read that freebsd-update is suppose to be used. I don't want a binary
install/upgrade though. I've just sync from CVS with this in the
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:15:09AM -0400, pedro alves wrote:
>
>Hello
>I am running FreeBSD 6.2-release on a Thinkpad600.
>I am trying to build a decent workstation for my work (text editing
>and minor plain web browsing).
>I do cvs updates weekly of the ports.
>However rec
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:15:44PM -0400, Schiz0 wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I recently ordered a FreeBSD server from a hosting company. This would
> be the first time I do not have physical access to a FreeBSD system.
> I'm looking for any hints/tricks/suggestions for managing and
> upgrading it safely (a
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:15:44 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> CC:
> Subject: Upgrading Kernel on a Remote Server
>
> Hey,
>
> I recently ordered a FreeBSD server from a hosting company. This would
> be the first time I do not have physical access to a Fr
Hello
I am running FreeBSD 6.2-release on a Thinkpad600.
I am trying to build a decent workstation for my work (text editing
and minor plain web browsing).
I do cvs updates weekly of the ports.
However recently I found that I can't build abiword or gnumeric or any
other gtk2 a
Hello,
I have discovered that bsnmp-ucd provides the ability to monitor FreeBSD
by gathering memory, load average, cpu usage and other system
statistics.
I wonder if anyone else have any examples of how they graph those
statistics?
I am currently using cacti and it seems difficult for me to crea
Hey,
I recently ordered a FreeBSD server from a hosting company. This would
be the first time I do not have physical access to a FreeBSD system.
I'm looking for any hints/tricks/suggestions for managing and
upgrading it safely (as in, not locking myself out or having boot
errors). The host does no
2008/6/4 Steve Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm really no security expert. I don't leave the system up 24/7, and
> I'm on a US DSL connection with a bunch of windows boxes.
>
> Seems to be a recent phenomena, I've started experiencing disk
> thrashing I can hear across the room. ps and top repor
Phusion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am running FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386 and am having problems with
> pkg_add. I can install packages as the root user without problems.
>
> - pkg_add -r packages, works when running as root
> - pkg_add -r packages, errors out when using sudo
>
> % sudo pkg_add -
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:18:26PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeffrey
> > Goldberg
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 1:34 PM
> > To: Jerry McAllister
> > Cc: FreeBSD List
> > Subject: Re:
"Steve Franks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm really no security expert. I don't leave the system up 24/7, and
> I'm on a US DSL connection with a bunch of windows boxes.
>
> Seems to be a recent phenomena, I've started experiencing disk
> thrashing I can hear across the room. ps and top repo
Simply upgrade your kernel. I believe there is an upgrade guide on the release
notes:
http://freebsd.org/releases/6.3R/announce.html
Camilo
"Bono Vince Malum"
> --
>
> Message: 23
> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:28:29 +0100
> From: Vince Hoffman
> Subject: Re: any news
On 6/5/08, Matthias Apitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't know nothing about Red Hat or Debian, but how about
>
> $ pkg_info -L stardict-2.4.8_5
>
> or even
>
> $ man pkg_info
>
> HIH
>
> matthias
Thank you Matthias
--
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 06:29:35AM -0700, Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
I use two different fortran90 compiler on a simple input file
and get executables which differ in size by almost 3 orders of
magnitude, see below. Is this something to do with the use
of shared libraries?
> % ldd *.out
> g95.out:
>libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x280c5000)
>libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280db000)
> gf42.out:
>libgfortran.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.4/libgfortran.so.2
> (0x2807e000)
>libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x28103000)
>libgcc_s.so.1 =>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 06:29:35AM -0700, Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
> >
> > I use two different fortran90 compiler on a simple input file
> > and get executables which differ in size by almost 3 orders of
> > magnitude, see below. Is this something to do with the use
> > of shared libraries?
>
> Ru
El día Thursday, June 05, 2008 a las 03:35:01PM +0200, Simon Jolle escribió:
> Hi FreeBSD users
>
> I am searching for something similar to Red Hat's "rpm -q -l package"
> and Debian's "dpkg -L package".
>
> cheers
> Simon
Don't know nothing about Red Hat or Debian, but how about
$ pkg_info -L
Hi FreeBSD users
I am searching for something similar to Red Hat's "rpm -q -l package"
and Debian's "dpkg -L package".
cheers
Simon
--
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I use two different fortran90 compiler on a simple input file
and get executables which differ in size by almost 3 orders of
magnitude, see below. Is this something to do with the use
of shared libraries?
You tell us :) What does file tell you?
Kris
% gfortran42 t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Anton Shterenlikht
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 7:21 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: size of executable - g95 vs gfortran42 - shared libs?
>
> I use two different fortran90 comp
I use two different fortran90 compiler on a simple input file
and get executables which differ in size by almost 3 orders of
magnitude, see below. Is this something to do with the use
of shared libraries?
% gfortran42 tmp.f90
% ls -al a.out
-rwxr-xr-x 1 9179 5 Jun 14:15 a.out
% g95 tmp.f90
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 at 18:46 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I just noticed today I'm starting to get messages in ../messages stating:
Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing either the
vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the vm.pmap.pv_entry_max sysctl.
I did some searchin
Hi everyone,
Through all the information I've read (and after testing for myself), it
appears as though IPv6 is still not possible inside of a jail. Is this
correct?
Is there any way that this can be accomplished?
Regards,
Steve
___
freebsd-questi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As of June 5th, 2008, the project is seeing 23 998 hosts reporting in, with a
break down as follows:
PC-BSD 14 715 hosts
FreeBSD 6 331 hosts
DesktopBSD2 662 hosts
NetBSD
Hi,
I'm seeing regular kernel panics on my new box with a fresh install of
7.0-RELEASE. I'm trying to get some information out of kgdb by following
the instructions in the handbook - however, I'm getting a 'cannot access
memory' message when I try it:
odin2008# kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore
Hi,
I'm seeing missing characters in /var/log/messages after kernel panics on a
brand new box with a fresh install of 7.0-RELEASE. Typical lines are:
May 30 0:14:53 odin2008 savecore: rebot after panic: age fault
May 3 10:14:3 odin2008 savecore: wrting core to vmcore.0
Does this imply a hardware
On Thu, June 5, 2008 00:24, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> In my personal opinion, the small gain you get is more than
> overwhelmed by the big pain you get from setting CPUTYPE.
Thanks Jonathan. I think I'll reinstall my 7.0 system from scratch and
install the apps from packages rather than build from po
61 matches
Mail list logo
