Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:29:16PM +, Dieter wrote: > > > hw.ata.wc=3D0 > > ^^^ > > "Make my hard drive go rally slow please (just in case I crash)" :) > > Slower, yes, but not *that* slow. > > Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk, multiply by two, >

Need help with IPv4/IPv6

This is a repost of an earlier message. I have some problems that seem to be related to the interoperation of ipv4 client programs and ipv6 servers or the other way round. Does anyone have some examples of how to configere FreeBSD to have a smooth interoperation of IPv4 and IPv6? What lines do I

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

> > hw.ata.wc=3D0 > ^^^ > "Make my hard drive go rally slow please (just in case I crash)" :) Slower, yes, but not *that* slow. Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk, multiply by two, so 0.064 second. Maybe the multiplier is more than 2, call it 10x, so

Re: additional processor in IBM xSeries /ii

Hi, I have an IBM xSeries 225 with two-processor motherboard, currently with only one Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. OS is 6.1p10, otherwise is this an apache22-mysql50-php5 web server. I would like to add an additional, second Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. Do I have to change anything in OS, kernel, etc, before

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:41:46PM +, Dieter wrote: > > oad > > > > > > have been trimmed from your email. > > > > >=3D20 > > > > > In telnet window 1: > > > > >=3D20 > > > > > cd /disk1/ > > > > > cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload) > > > > >=3D20 > > > > > In telnet window 2

Re: External HD create different slice on /dev which one i need to mount...?

On 11/22/06, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0800 perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mount /dev/da0s1 /ext this is the slice, dont use it > mount /dev/da0s1c /ext this is the raw partition, DONT use c - ever, unless u really (think you) know what yo

Re: IPFW & NFS

vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and > the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing > directories with the NFS server. > It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories f

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

> > > > > > time ls on a small directory on disk2 > > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > > real4m51.911s > > > > > > user0m0.000s > > > > > > sys 0m0.002s > > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > > > > > > a bit much. And that's the root di

Re: DSL (was: Advice please)

On 11/22/06, Old Ranger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The advice I'd like, is some "do's" and "don'ts" when switching from dial-up to DSL with FreeBSD. Not to sound overly arch, but a generic subject is not going to garner you nearly as much help as something specific. It would also depend on wh

Re: RAID

On 11/22/06, Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does FreeBSD support newer SATA RAID Controller? What software to make RAID 1? or someone know which SATA RAID Controller can support hardware mirror? -- *Rithy Ray, RCSA* Chief Executive Officer Web: www.rithy4u.net

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:12:06PM +, Dieter wrote: > > > > > time ls on a small directory on disk2 > > > > >=3D20 > > > > > real4m51.911s > > > > > user0m0.000s > > > > > sys 0m0.002s > > > > >=3D20 > > > > > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > > > >

Re: External HD create different slice on /dev which one i need to mount...?

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0800 perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mount /dev/da0s1 /ext this is the slice, dont use it > mount /dev/da0s1c /ext this is the raw partition, DONT use c - ever, unless u really (think you) know what you are doing > mount /dev/da0s1d /ext bing > > Always: W

Re: Mount and repair HD?

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:22:24 -0800 (PST) David Horis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > A Snap Server 1100 just died on me... (Single drive, FreeBSD-based, I > think...) > > I think it's not HD related as I can't even get into to the hardware/bios > reset mode. > > Have you folks ever hear

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway writes: > > --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:02:54AM +, Dieter wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kri

External HD create different slice on /dev which one i need to mount...?

Hi people. I have one external HD: umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 umass0:0:0:-1: Attached to scbus0 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): error 22 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable Error pass0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: Fixed Direct Acce

Problems opening, viewing, and manipulating PRs

Hello Since around last Friday the 17th, I have been having some difficulty working with FreeBSD problem reports. I'm not sure if this has something to do with the FreeBSD.org systems being moved that day or if it's just a coincidence. Anyway, I have opened two PRs, ports/105652 three days

Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:05:04PM -0600, Jamie wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: > > > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > > > seems to be refere

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:02:54AM +, Dieter wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway writes: > > > > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the di= > > sks > > > > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no > > > > one pro

RAID

Does FreeBSD support newer SATA RAID Controller? What software to make RAID 1? or someone know which SATA RAID Controller can support hardware mirror? -- *Rithy Ray, RCSA* Chief Executive Officer Web: www.rithy4u.net Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P

RE: Mount and repair HD?

Hi, Thanks for the tip. What iso should I get from the freebsd.org site? (5.5 or 6.1?) The warranty is long expired on this device... I've just popped it open... Looks like it's powered by a Pentium 166. (w/MMX! :) ) I seriously doubt it will act as a boot drive in a PC, as it seems some of t

Re: Password Security

On 11/22/06, VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Jeff... But does this encryption affects on Disk Speed or Performance for Data Access/Read/Write? On 11/22/06, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although I haven't used either, gbde and geli are possible methods. > > http://

RE: ICH7 SATA RAID (LSI MegaRAID)

> > Hello! > > I've bought a small server with Intel SE7230NH1 motherboard, > which incorporates the ICH7 SATA RAID controller. Using the > LSI BIOS utility, I created a RAID1 array of two disks and > installed FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 > (amd64) on it. > > atapci1: port > 0x30c8-0x30cf,0x30e4-0x30

ICH7 SATA RAID (LSI MegaRAID)

Hello! I've bought a small server with Intel SE7230NH1 motherboard, which incorporates the ICH7 SATA RAID controller. Using the LSI BIOS utility, I created a RAID1 array of two disks and installed FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 (amd64) on it. atapci1: port 0x30c8-0x30cf,0x30e4-0x30e7,0x30c0-0x30c7,0x30e0

Re: Gnome display configuration problem

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:51:24PM -0500, Gary Robinson wrote: > > > Frank, > > Thanks for your suggestion: > > >> Try replacing your screen section with something like this: > >> > >> Section "Screen" > >> Identifier "Screen0" > >> Device "Card0" > >> Monitor"Mo

RE: Mount and repair HD?

> > Hello, > > A Snap Server 1100 just died on me... (Single drive, > FreeBSD-based, I think...) > > I think it's not HD related as I can't even get into to the > hardware/bios reset mode. > > Have you folks ever heard of anyone opening one of these > things up and mounting the drive on a

Re: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc

VeeJay wrote: Hi Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc? *Yes*. If your disk is faster than your CPU, I/O will slowdown. I've seen an Athlon64 4200+ use up to 90% of its computing power just to transfer files from an NFS server to a local SATA

RE: additional processor in IBM xSeries

> > Hi, > > I have an IBM xSeries 225 with two-processor motherboard, > currently with only one Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. OS is 6.1p10, > otherwise is this an apache22-mysql50-php5 web server. > > I would like to add an additional, second Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. > Do I have to change anything in OS,

Mount and repair HD?

Hello, A Snap Server 1100 just died on me... (Single drive, FreeBSD-based, I think...) I think it's not HD related as I can't even get into to the hardware/bios reset mode. Have you folks ever heard of anyone opening one of these things up and mounting the drive on a regular PC? Since the dri

Re: package dependencies

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:23:03 -0800 Brian wrote: > Is there a way to tell either portupgrade or make install in a ports > folder to use a package for dependencies, even if one isn't available > for port/package I'm installing/upgrading? May be you need a command "portupgrade -RPP"? WBR -- Boris

package dependencies

Is there a way to tell either portupgrade or make install in a ports folder to use a package for dependencies, even if one isn't available for port/package I'm installing/upgrading? Brian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: Gnome display configuration problem

Frank, Thanks for your suggestion: >> Try replacing your screen section with something like this: >> >> Section "Screen" >> Identifier "Screen0" >> Device "Card0" >> Monitor"Monitor0" >> DefaultColorDepth 24 >> >> >> SubSection "Display" >>

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway writes: > > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the di= > sks > > > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no > > > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. > >=20 > > I collect

Advice please

Hello to all, I just ordered DSL from my phone service (and ISP) provider. I have a Dell dual core laptop enroute, with "extras". The advice I'd like, is some "do's" and "don'ts" when switching from dial-up to DSL with FreeBSD. What are the pitfalls? I'd like to avoid as many as possible. Regar

Re: Upgrade Question

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:05:13PM -, Graham Bentley wrote: > >You've confused STABLE with RELEASE. 6.2 has not reached RELEASE. > >6-STABLE is the latest "these changes worked fine in CURRENT (right now, > >aka 7) and have been MFCed (merged from current) so that more people can > >try t

Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4

On 11/22/06, Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the co

Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: > > > > from /usr/include/

Re: Upgrade Question

You've confused STABLE with RELEASE. 6.2 has not reached RELEASE. 6-STABLE is the latest "these changes worked fine in CURRENT (right now, aka 7) and have been MFCed (merged from current) so that more people can try them out", which right now corresponds to the version of FreeBSDthat is just

Re: firefox build error

Lowell Gilbert wrote: Laurence Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Firefox build from ports is exiting with this error: cc -o gtk2xtbin.o -c -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD6\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DBUILD_ID=00 -D_IMPL_GTKXTBIN_API -DUSE_XIM -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I

Re: Gnome display configuration problem

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 02:00:43PM -0500, Gary Robinson wrote: > > Hi, > > Yesterday I installed freebsd 6.1 on an old Dell PowerEdge 1300. It's > working fine with one exception. I installed gnome from freebsd ports, > and it's giving me a 640x480, 80 Hz screen resolution. The Screen > Resolut

Re: Opera > Cups > Print!

On Wednesday 22 November 2006 01:49, Graham Bentley wrote: > Anyone got this working? > > Firefox and other apps all printing fine :) > > Tried Opera advice and googled about > to no avail Thanks ! I'm using KDE and had to put the following in the Printer Program-tab from the Print-menu in O

Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: > > > Greetings! > > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: > > from /usr/include/mntent.h:2, > from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/li

Re: Big external drives - which filesystem?

There is a UFS2 driver for Windows, google on it and you are sure to find it. (There are also ext2/3 drivers for Windows if you prefer that one.) I use ext2 on my usb pen drive and it works great under windows. On 11/16/06, Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've just acquired a Western Di

Gnome display configuration problem

Hi, Yesterday I installed freebsd 6.1 on an old Dell PowerEdge 1300. It's working fine with one exception. I installed gnome from freebsd ports, and it's giving me a 640x480, 80 Hz screen resolution. The Screen Resolution Preferences panel gives that combination as the only option. But my moni

BTX Loader

I have tried to install Free BSD 6.1 after burning the ISO to CD. The loader loads very slowly (on character per 1 or 2 seconds) and finally hangs up after the line (root @ opu.cse.buffalo.edu ..) My computer is a Shuttle XPX SK21G with a Sempron 3100 and a SATA drive. I am about to give up af

Re: IPFW & NFS

In response to vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and > the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing > directories with the NFS server. > It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the director

check_disk_smb: another nagios problem

There is something weird about check_disk_smb from nagios-plugins-1.4.3,1 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10. From the command line (pwd is /usr/local/libexec/nagios) the switches work as expected: # ./check_disk_smb -H 194.214.13.140 -s public -u guest -p "" Domain=[MIAGE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.22]

Re: IPFW & NFS

vittorio wrote: I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing directories with the NFS server. It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the server. BUT, I'm now tr

mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4

Greetings! I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: from /usr/include/mntent.h:2, from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:97: /usr/include/mntent.h:2:20: error: #include nest

IPFW & NFS

I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing directories with the NFS server. It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the server. BUT, I'm now trying to use an IP

Re: To which port GPG belongs?

VeeJay wrote: > I have this Help Instructions from a Step-by-Step for Apache installation On a side note, you would probably want to install Apache via ports. Svein Halvor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: External USB drive kernel problems

On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:38 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (Please reply directly to me, as I am not subscribed) > > I just bought a VIA external USB enclosure with a Hitachi 200GB ATA drive > to use for disk-based backups. I put it on my test box here, which I just > upgraded to 6.2-Prereleas

Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")

On 11/22/06, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Where did you get the version 1.5.0.09? I checked out cvsweb, and there is 1.5.0.07. Doh! Sorry... totally spaced out. I forgot that last month I had updated the Makefile to try to use the new version since 1.5.0.07 can no longer be ob

Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output )

On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:12:38PM +, Dieter wrote: > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the disks > > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no > > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. > > I collected a bit of dat

Re: 'pkg_version' comparison failure

On Wednesday November 22, 2006 at 07:45:07 (AM) RW wrote: > On Wednesday 22 November 2006 11:48, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > What would cause this command: > > > > /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= > > > > to produce this error message: > > > > openoffice.org-2.0.3! Comparison faile

Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk?

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:30:58AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/22/06, Rachel Florentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >105Hi; > >Okay, I learned from sad experience and you all > >that the qmail port is junk. What about ezmlm? > >Same thing? Or good to go? > > Didn't you know that /usr

Re: Building Sendmail from ports

David Robillard wrote: [ ---8<--- Text has been removed! ---8<---] But, where will the port install my *.mc and *.cf files? This I can't seem to figure out. I would like to know before I hit 'make install' in the port dir. I would think it will install them into /usr/local/share/sendmail/cf, wo

Re: Password Security

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:41:37AM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated. > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single > user mode an

Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:07:44 -0500 Andy Harrison wrote: > I'm trying to install jdk15 because I need it to access the ilom on > some Sun x4100 boxes. Has anyone else seen or know how to handle this > error message? I tried both bash and tcsh with a clean env just to > see if that might be muckin

Re: Upgrade Question

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:34:23AM +, Robert Davison wrote: > If my cvs-upfile reads, and specfically im looking at the default release > line > > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > src-all > ports-all tag=. > doc-all tag=.

Re: I don't see anything to answer my question

On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:05:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 11/21/06, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:38:26PM -0500, rickie lyman wrote: > > > >> I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer > >that > >> has a rather

Re: firefox build error

Laurence Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Firefox build from ports is exiting with this error: > > cc -o gtk2xtbin.o -c -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD6\" > -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DBUILD_ID=00 -D_IMPL_GTKXTBIN_API > -DUSE_XIM -I../../../dist/include/xpcom > -I../../../dist/

Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")

On 11/22/06, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You didn't mention if by a chance you did follow those instructions about linprocfs... Yes, it's mounted. # grep lin /etc/fstab linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 # mount | grep lin linp

Re: Password Security

I've used geli to encrypt my swap partition following the instructions in the handbook and it went quite well. If you really need to secure the data on the machine, mark the terminal as insecure and encrypt all the disks, including swap. Keep in mind though, that no system is completely secure. I

Re: To which port GPG belongs?

On 22/11/2006 15:48, VeeJay wrote: > Thanks for your quick thoughts... > > I am still unable to verify Key > > I have got this key from Apache site > > [ key snipped ] > but how to verify because > > When I give this command > > # gpg httpd-2.0.59.tar.gz.asc > gpg: Signature made Thu Ju

Re: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc

Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc? I haven't done any testing, but would assume that it would impact it to a certain degree, because there is the additional encryption overhead. --Nick Pavlica ___ fr

Re: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc

In response to VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data > Access/Read/Write, etc? Any kind of encryption causes a performance penalty. However, if your CPU is powerful enough, it's possible (even likely) that the CPU is still able to encrypt

Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:07:44 -0500 Andy Harrison wrote: > I'm trying to install jdk15 because I need it to access the ilom on > some Sun x4100 boxes. Has anyone else seen or know how to handle this > error message? I tried both bash and tcsh with a clean env just to > see if that might be muckin

Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc

Hi Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc? -- Thanks! BR / vj ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[

linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")

I'm trying to install jdk15 because I need it to access the ilom on some Sun x4100 boxes. Has anyone else seen or know how to handle this error message? I tried both bash and tcsh with a clean env just to see if that might be mucking something up. No luck... # make -D DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES

Re: To which port GPG belongs?

I have this Help Instructions from a Step-by-Step for Apache installation lynx http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi gpg --import KEYS gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc gpg: Good signature from "Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" tar zxvf httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz this doesn't work either

problems with check_dhcp in nagios

Hello, I'm using nagios-2.4 with nagios-plugins-1.4.3,1 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10. I have a problem to make check_dhcp work. dhclient works as expected: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dhclient em0 DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPDISCOVER on

additional processor in IBM xSeries

Hi, I have an IBM xSeries 225 with two-processor motherboard, currently with only one Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. OS is 6.1p10, otherwise is this an apache22-mysql50-php5 web server. I would like to add an additional, second Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. Do I have to change anything in OS, kernel, etc, before

Re: To which port GPG belongs?

Thanks for your quick thoughts... I am still unable to verify Key I have got this key from Apache site -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUARMj7lvcTqHkQ/eB1AQKApAgAjnO4vMS0hmJc7FI/X/qT5L9ZmwZpZFLW uFFlLCOlRNluQ4e+Y+a9lIlbvkhGATWC4ukDSa4EEuVa/Bs6rgDFm0jJW8c+p

Re: Password Security

Although I haven't used either, gbde and geli are possible methods. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-question

Re: Building Sendmail from ports

[ ---8<--- Text has been removed! ---8<---] But, where will the port install my *.mc and *.cf files? This I can't seem to figure out. I would like to know before I hit 'make install' in the port dir. I would think it will install them into /usr/local/share/sendmail/cf, would that be correct? H

Re: To which port GPG belongs?

Am 22.11.06 14:53 schrieb VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi > > If I want to run commands like > > > # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc > > Which port one should install, becasue there are many... How about security/gnupg or security/gnupg-devel? I've never messed with the options on this one, but u

Re: NIC driver question

U can always add additional Intel/3COM NIC, in case the builtin card is not recognized. -- Aftab Jahan Subedar CEO/Software Engineer Subedar Technologies Ltd Soubedar Baag Bibir Bagicha #1 North Jatra Bari Dhaka 1204 Bangladesh http://www.DhakaStockExchangeGame.com Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello

Re: To which port GPG belongs?

On 22/11/2006 14:53, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > If I want to run commands like > > > # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc > > Which port one should install, becasue there are many... /usr/ports/security/gnupg Btw, there's excellent documentation at http://www.gnupg.org/ > And with which options one sh

To which port GPG belongs?

Hi If I want to run commands like # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc Which port one should install, becasue there are many... 1. /usr/ports/security/gnome-gpg 2. /usr/ports/security/gpgme03 3. /usr/ports/security/kgpg 4. /usr/ports/security/nofgpg 5. /usr/ports/security/ruby-gpgme And with which

Re: 'pkg_version' comparison failure

On Wednesday 22 November 2006 11:48, Gerard Seibert wrote: > What would cause this command: > > /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= > > to produce this error message: > > openoffice.org-2.0.3! Comparison failed > > I have updated the ports tree several times; however, the error rema

ADI AD1888 AC'97 audio CODEC on ASUS P4P800S

give me driver sound ad1888 for P4P800S plese. Sponsored Link Online degrees - find the right program to advance your career. www.nextag.com ___ freebsd-questio

Re: Upgrade Question

Gerard Seibert wrote: On Tuesday November 21, 2006 at 09:08:42 (PM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RELENG_6 for whatever 6-STABLE is (6.2 right now but will soon enough be moving on towards 6.3.). I wasn't aware that 6.2 had been released as 'STABLE' yet. Short version: No, the OP wa

Re: Upgrade Question

On Tuesday November 21, 2006 at 09:08:42 (PM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > RELENG_6 for whatever 6-STABLE is (6.2 right now but will soon > enough be moving on towards 6.3.). I wasn't aware that 6.2 had been released as 'STABLE' yet. -- Gerard Mail from '@gmail' is rejected and/or discarde

'pkg_version' comparison failure

What would cause this command: /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= to produce this error message: openoffice.org-2.0.3! Comparison failed I have updated the ports tree several times; however, the error remains. No other ports exhibits this phenomena. -- Gerard [EMAIL PROTE

> Subject: Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk?

Can you expand on this ? I have noticed that quite alot of ports are broken on 6.2 but then again I only loaded it a few days ago and havent updated the tree (thinking this is the 'latest' version - flawed?) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis