On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:21:46PM +, Dieter wrote:
hw.ata.wc=3D3D3D0
^^^
Make my hard drive go rally slow please (just in case I crash)=
:)
=3D20
Slower, yes, but not *that* slow.
=3D20
Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:47:27PM -0500, John Nielsen wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 12:42, O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello.
Xorg 7.2 is about to be released - with nice new features an, more
important, bugfixes, upgraded drivers etc.
Are there any plans of supporting this version via the
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Hello,
According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port
(3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version
win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit refuse
me to do so:
** Port
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:52:50PM -0600, john Mish III wrote:
I get this error message when I try to su to anything, either from root or
to root, and I don't know why.
$ su
su: not running setuid
Somehow your su application lost its setuid bit. Instead of blinding
chmodding it you may want
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:08:18PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On December 6, 2006 9:42:41 PM -0500 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:52:50PM -0600, john Mish III wrote:
I get this error message when I try to su to anything, either from root
or to root
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:19:09PM -0800, Rachel Florentine wrote:
75Hi;
I broke gcc. Yes, I'm pretty confident that's what I did. How do I repair it?
Or is this the wrong forum to ask?
Reinstall from backup or fresh binary media.
Kris
pgpXpuXqljxRu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:08:20PM -0800, Rachel Florentine wrote:
82- Original Message
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reinstall from backup or fresh binary media.
So go to GNU and look for a gcc tarball and have at it. But that's not the
FBSD way of doing things
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:48:06AM -0800, Cheng Jin wrote:
hi,
i have run into this strange problem of kernel crashdump not
working consistently under FreeBSd 5.4. we have bunch of development
machines with identical physical configurations, and every one of
them is setup to save the
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:02:18PM +0100, Roger Olofsson wrote:
Dear Mailing List,
Sorry for this rather lengthy post. I am not sure if this is the correct
place to ask this question. I have posted the same question to the vlc
forum with the hope that someone will help.
If this isn't
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:30:17AM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 09:27 AM 12/1/2006 +0700, you wrote:
I'm running 6.1-STABLE, and a few days ago cvsup'ed and tried portupgrade.
Portupgrade failed on some of xfce4's components. Checking xfce4-print and
xfce4-desktop's output, I have the
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:36:04PM -0800, probsd org wrote:
I know some of you have labeled me a troll. I don't think I am a troll in
pointing out to others who may be interested in FreeBSD not to look to it. I
believe just liking freebsd despite it's issues isn't advantageous to the
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 07:32:13PM +0300, John Smith wrote:
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:13:43AM +, RW wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:43, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:09:13AM +, Mark wrote:
Hello,
I'd like tp upgrade my gcc version (from 2.95.4). I have two questions
about it, though.
1) What is the best gcc version to upgrade to? I see plenty in the ports,
from the whole 3.x series to 4.3. And I wonder why they all still
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:40:23PM +, Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 24 november 2006 17:11
To: Mark
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GCC upgrade
I tested the new gcc, btw (compiled MySQL
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:25:45AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
I use cvsup to maintain a full local copy of the CVS
repo. I then use plain cvs to check out different branches
of src from it. The problem is while cvsup only takes a
minute each time I run it, cvs takes several times more.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:35:08AM +, Dieter wrote:
hw.ata.wc=3D3D0
^^^
Make my hard drive go rally slow please (just in case I crash) :)
=20
Slower, yes, but not *that* slow.
=20
Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:08:30PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I compiled the kernel with debug info, but that's totally useless, since
it won't dump anything, just hang there; I don't think even DDB would
help, since even the keyboard is not working at that time.
Come on, you didn't
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:13:32PM +0100, markoco wrote:
After downloading and burning FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE ia64 CD-s
from your ftp, I've try to install it and sysinstall don't
boot. Please help me to solve this problem. Thanks
Mac OS X 10.4.6
You seem to be confused about what kind of
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:12:38PM +, Dieter wrote:
I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a hang. Even if the disks
are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no
one process blocks, but they're all a little slower.
I collected a bit of data:
While
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote:
Greetings!
I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler
seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with:
from /usr/include/mntent.h:2,
from
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:02:54AM +, Dieter wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway writes:
I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a hang. Even if the di=
sks
are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no
one process blocks
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:05:04PM -0600, Jamie wrote:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote:
Greetings!
I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler
seems to be referencing mntent.h
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:12:06PM +, Dieter wrote:
time ls on a small directory on disk2
=3D20
real4m51.911s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.002s
=3D20
I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is
a bit much. And that's the root
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:41:46PM +, Dieter wrote:
oad
have been trimmed from your email.
=3D20
In telnet window 1:
=3D20
cd /disk1/
cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload)
=3D20
In telnet window 2:
=3D20
time ls /disk3/foo1/
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:29:16PM +, Dieter wrote:
hw.ata.wc=3D0
^^^
Make my hard drive go rally slow please (just in case I crash) :)
Slower, yes, but not *that* slow.
Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk, multiply by two,
so 0.064
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 01:04:23PM -0400, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Kris. This is a libgcj in gcc issue and have posted to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list. I see that there is a similar reference to
something similar on Darwin platform which has FreeBSD roots. It seems
that unwind symbol may be getting
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 06:04:59PM +0100, VeeJay wrote:
Hi
How to install security patches from http://www.freebsd.org/security?
The instructions are right there in the advisories.
Kris
pgpQtadqDBtwD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:58:06PM +0100, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote:
Hi,
I've recently installed 6.2-Beta3 and got KDE working with Xorg. As RC1 is
now released I want to upgrade to this version as I have been witnessing
some kernel errors and also want to 'play' with the system.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto package. Is there something
I can do to supplement/replace this need?
Why do
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:15:40PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
=20
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:43:00PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:15:40PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
=3D20
I'm running into a problem trying to install
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 07:19:16PM -0400, David Pratt wrote:
Hi. I have recently tried to compile gcc34 port with java by modifying
Makefile by adding the argument
--enable-languages=c,c++,java
This failed giving me a list of languages that excluded java. This
version of gcc is capable
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:58:01PM -0400, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Kris. I realize the java support prior to 4 requires a ton of RAM to
compile but I also know the compiler is reasonably good afterwards (from
other platforms) but have not been successful with FreeBSD at this
point.
I
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:57:01AM +0300, John Smith wrote:
On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When was this corrected? Is 6.2 going to be faster than 6.1?
As I said earlier, some of the most important changes that went into
6.0 were fixing performance problems in 5.x
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:24:47AM -0800, Joe wrote:
A while back, I read that 6.2 was going to be released today. Now I see
that 6.2 won't be released until Mid December.
Are FreeBSD releases put out whenever they're ready or is there a set
schedule that is adhered to?
I only ask
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:14:28PM -0500, Reuben A. Popp wrote:
Good afternoon everyone,
Can someone please tell me what is the maximum amount of physical ram that
the
i386 branch of fbsd can handle? We're looking at purchasing a really beefy
machine here and I would like to make sure
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:39:16AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
When I switched to 6.0, then 6.1, it was noticed by most of my clients
that my php/mysql/apache system slowed down a fair bit compared to previous
version (5.XX).
I always like to be on the bleeding edge of FreeBSD, but the
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:43:45PM -0800, Jay Chandler wrote:
Howdy.
Have a box that won't restart after I cvsup it and rebuild the OS.
When the 'reboot' command is given, the machine hangs after the
uptime announcement.
Nothing built on the box other than OpenSSH and
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote:
Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to
ensure full update-ness?
Shouldn't really matter, the relevant changes were in the kernel.
Kris
pgptUG0zqiPwb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 02:53:05PM -0800, Joe wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:24:47AM -0800, Joe wrote:
A while back, I read that 6.2 was going to be released today. Now I see
that 6.2 won't be released until Mid December.
Are FreeBSD releases put out whenever
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
this is nothing professional, just my personal experience.
same machine, two sata, one is amd64, the other i386.
while doing portupgrade due to gtk upgrade on amd64, it reboot a few times,
never
finished the job, and i can't say
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:27:47AM +0300, John Smith wrote:
On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote:
Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to
ensure full update-ness?
Shouldn't really matter
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:00:54AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm playing with DTC right now, within a Jail ... and one of the steps to
set
it up is to run mknod to create devices for a chroot environment, which, of
course, fail in a jail
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:37:31AM +0100, Armin Arh wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Opera-9.02 from ports, and it crashes...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opera
Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 87 in file
/usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0)
Abort trap (core
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:40:43AM -0600, Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 02:36, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Jonathan - what is your swap use? Cause you also experience this kind of
problem...
Thanks!
i have all my apps open that i typeically run, and i
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:36:25AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The fact that swap is in use, together with your description,
indicates that your system is overloaded; those transient loads are
causing it to periodically demand more
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:11:31AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
good morning.
I'd like to ask which list should i use to
discuss my stability issues on a 6.1-RELEASE-p10.
it should be a productive system, but sometimes
randomly locks
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 11:15:54AM -0800, Chris wrote:
If your system is hanging then you need to configure additional
debugging to figure out the cause. Read the chapter on kernel
debugging the developers handbook; without this information no
developer can help you.
Kris
P.S. In my
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Chris wrote:
I've posted several questions (under two other ids though the name
Chris)
since March trying to put up a Tyan quad dual s4882. I've run it on 6.0
STABLE as of about March, 6.1 RELEASE in several flavors from May
through September and
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:18:59AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Dear Kris and others,
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, you'll need to do some more diagnosis along the lines of my previous
email then.
Here's my typical load:
last pid: 96934; load averages: 0.03, 0.06
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:12:06AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I am running FBSD 6-1 stable with custom kernel. Occasionally I experience
short freezes - that is the machine stops to respond for a few seconds and
then happily starts to work again.
My general question is what
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:56:53PM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Is your system swapping? Monitor with top, swapinfo, etc.
I will take a more careful look in the course of next few days. The
problem is that I access this box only via
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 11:29:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
How do you know the entire system is freezing instead of just the tty?
:) If you have e.g. heavy disk write activity then the syncer will
grab Giant while flushing
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:13:50AM +0700, Ferry Limanto wrote:
Dear,
I'm Ferry from ISP in Idonesia. I want to ask something. I want to start
my squid, version 3 (squid -z), but the error message is: /usr/libexec:
ld-elf.so.1 : library libcrypt.so.2 not found. But in my library here
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:12:23PM -0500, George Donnelly wrote:
Hi
I maintain my own package repository, served over ftp and I am finding
that often times a package will not fully get installed on a remote
host.
For example, if i run pkg_add -r python24 and i know i have just built
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:57:54PM -0500, George Donnelly wrote:
hi, thanks
i'm building them with make package-recursive
yes they actually contain all the files bc they always install right
at least the first time.
That's quite bizarre, I've never encountered it. If you can make a
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:02:14PM -, chris scott wrote:
well theseare the only additional lines ive added to my kernel
I pretty sure i added crypto support after the problems started
i have disabled geli support for encrytped swap partitions as i thought
that may bethe cause
#
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:35:25PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
I have a new box that I just setup w/ 2 GB of RAM, and installed FreeBSD 6.1
stable (snapshot), with the standard kernel and when I look at the specs, it
only shows 1GB of ram. Is there some sort of kernel option that needs to be
set
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:56:35PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
The BIOS sees it OK, but just not the OS.
I guess you'll need to post a verbose boot log to stable@
Kris
P.S. Don't top-post :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:42:05PM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:11:17PM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03AM -0500, Timothy
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:11:17PM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03AM -0500, Timothy Parker wrote:
Hello
I am currebtly using the 2.12 package port for Gnome. (My processor is
in
bad shape and can't
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03AM -0500, Timothy Parker wrote:
Hello
I am currebtly using the 2.12 package port for Gnome. (My processor is in
bad shape and can't handle most source builds without shutting down.)
What are the plans for making 2.14 and 2.16 available as binary packages?
This is a FAQ; you have something linked to two thread libraries.
Kris
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:18:57PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
Out of no where I started to get :
Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 87 in file
/usr/src/lib
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:33:09PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
Thanks... Any idea where to look for the answer? I did find
references, but to UPDATING that didn't exist. Wondered how all
of a sudden items I haven't recompiled in a while started having
it.
You had old
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 08:34:52PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:33:09PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
=20
Thanks... Any idea where to look for the answer? I did find
references, but to UPDATING that didn't exist. Wondered how all=20
of a
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:07:54PM -0700, Rik Davis wrote:
Guys,
I'm a die hard freebsd user, but I am finding myself becomeing quite
frustrated with why you completely pulled the 5.4 ports collection
off of your ftp sites.
Because 5.4 was released nearly 18 months ago and disk space is
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:31:20PM -0400, Michael Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/06, Pavel Porubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please add Gnome 2.16 and Xorg 7.x to the next FreeBSD 6.2. After about
a month there will be Gnome 2.18 and you want to to add to FreeBSD 6.2
just Gnome 2.14. Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:06:01AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:31:20PM -0400, Michael Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/06, Pavel Porubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please add Gnome 2.16 and Xorg 7.x to the next FreeBSD
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:31:47PM -0400, Rob wrote:
I don't plan on allowing anyone to connect to my machine or use it as
a NTPD server. I see that OpenNTPD (OpenBSD's version) by default
doesn't listen on any IP/port and seems a little more secure. Is this
a good one to use over the
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:14:56PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:31:47PM -0400, Rob wrote:
I don't plan on allowing anyone to connect to my machine or use it as
a NTPD server. I see that OpenNTPD (OpenBSD's version) by default
doesn't listen
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:01:19PM +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote:
$ sudo make install clean
=== samba-3.0.23c,1 broken kernel API until now (7-CURRENT).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/samba3]$ uname -a
FreeBSD vim3.saarinen.org
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:21:51PM -0700, Brian wrote:
How good is the SMP support now for AMD X2 chips?
Fine.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 03:04:44PM -0700, Brian wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:21:51PM -0700, Brian wrote:
How good is the SMP support now for AMD X2 chips?
Fine.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:08:27AM -0700, perikillo wrote:
change the scheduler to the old SCHED_4BSD and maxuser from 10 to 32
like chuck told me.
These are probably what fixed it.
I guess you've learned a Lesson: when you choose to use code marked as
experimental, a) don't be surprised when
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 01:06:48PM -0700, Ted Johnson wrote:
Hi;
The latest and greatest Python is version 2.5; however, I seem to only be
able to build version 2.4.3 from the port. I ran my standard battery of
clean-up and get ready commands:
portupgrade -a
portsclean -C
portsclean -D
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Not claiming to know much about anything, but can't seem to get this
to compile. The only things that stand out are the preprocessor
error (which I don't know enough about to even begin to troubleshoot)
and the tiffio.h no
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:30:45AM +0200, Pascal Bleyler wrote:
HI,
I've founded this atm:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=langportname=ruby1
8
what are my options? The PC has only 80M RAM ... :(
Wait it out, add more RAM, or use a tool that requires less memory.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Jason Artz wrote:
Is there a way to do a binary install instead of
downloading all the new sources and compiling them as
an upgrade?
Sort of. You can do it by hand if you're careful (the install files
-- base.aa, etc -- are just .tar.bz2 files cut up
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:49:59PM -0700, backyard wrote:
I thought if you went to the options in sysinstall and
go to the part that says Release Name and it likely is
going to say 5.3-RELEASE change that to 6.1-RELEASE
and then do an ftp install. You should get the newer
version of the
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:59:45PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I was trying to build a kernel with statical device hints by
uncommenting the following line in my kernel configuration file:
# To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints
hints VT.hints
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:12:55PM -0500, Jeff Cross wrote:
Jeff Cross wrote:
I have noticed the following messages when booting up my laptop
recently. Can anyone explain this to me, if it is good or bad (it looks
bad), and how I can correct it?
Sep 19 08:57:54 xtop savecore: reboot
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:21:08PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote:
I recall that FreeBSD 6.1 had some NFS lockd issues that were a
show stopper at one time for me however I'm having trouble finding
information on the current state of NFS. Anyone have a pointer to
information?
rpc.lockd
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:42:44PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:21:08PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote:
I recall that FreeBSD 6.1 had some NFS lockd issues that were a
show stopper at one time for me however I'm
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:57:32PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:42:44PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:21:08PM -0400, Michael Conlen
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:43:16PM +0200, Robert Joosten wrote:
Hi,
rpc.lockd remains unreliable; avoid using it if practical.
Hmmm, is there a way to run pxe-boxes without rpc.lockd and then still
able to run adduser and so on ?
Use the nolockd option to mount_nfs, that's what I meant
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:11:52PM -0700, backyard wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble building tcl84. These issues did
not seem to exist until I updated the ports tree and
world the other day
Heres the basic stuff:
FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #6 Sun Sept 17 22:03:38
is what uname -a spits out
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:29:52PM -0700, backyard wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:11:52PM -0700, backyard
wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble building tcl84. These issues
did
not seem to exist until I updated the ports tree
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:12:22PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 19:45, Andrew Gould wrote:
pkg_info provides a nice listing of package names that
include version numbers. I'd like to have a list of
the names without the version numbers so that I can
write a script to
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:52:41PM -0400, Adam Martin wrote:
On 2006 Sep 20 , at 08:28, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi List,
recently (last few days) a lot of spam has begun to arrive on this
list
could anyone concerned ([EMAIL PROTECTED], ...) check/upgrade the
filters?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:42:41AM +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
No critical pending issues, no show stoppers left, no required or
desired features. Only some stress tests problems.
So, does this mean that the page has not been updated? Usually I would
expect
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Hi:
I was just looking over the release schedule for the 6.2 release, a few
weeks ago, there was no detailed plan, now it's there including the
todo-list,
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/todo.html
No critical
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:54:27AM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
I was just looking over the release schedule for the 6.2
release, a few weeks ago, there was no detailed plan, now
it's there including the todo-list,
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/todo.html
No critical
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:12:03PM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
Where would one find the list of problems already fixed -- hence
not being tracked -- so as to know whether a given 6.1 problem
needs to be pointed out?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?query
It looks
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:54:50PM -0500, Jeff Cross wrote:
I'm not trying to kick any dead horses here but there are times when I
try to run some applications that I get some messages like the following:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.5 not found, required by...
I normally
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:29:05PM +1000, Iain Dooley wrote:
i'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. i have recently set up some jails and
everything seems to be running fine.
however when i use:
/etc/rc.d/jail stop
and then type:
jls
i still see jails as running, with JID's assigned.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:58:46PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
ke han wrote:
I am using
portsnap fetch
portsnap update
to sync my ports tree on FreeBSd 6.1...it seems it maintains an index
when I run update.
Yes.
I am used to using:
portsversion and portsupdate to upgrade
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:22:53PM -0400, Bob wrote:
Or am I doing something dumb?
portaudit reported:
Affected package: mailman-with-htdig-2.1.8_3
Type of problem: mailman -- Multiple Vulnerabilities.
Reference:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:27:11AM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
# ll /dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
# file -s /dev/ad0s7
/dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
# grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s7 /linux
701 - 800 of 3577 matches
Mail list logo
